mirror of
				https://github.com/python/cpython.git
				synced 2025-10-29 17:38:56 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			644 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			28 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			644 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			28 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. highlightlang:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-intro:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ************
 | |
| Introduction
 | |
| ************
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Application Programmer's Interface to Python gives C and C++ programmers
 | |
| access to the Python interpreter at a variety of levels.  The API is equally
 | |
| usable from C++, but for brevity it is generally referred to as the Python/C
 | |
| API.  There are two fundamentally different reasons for using the Python/C API.
 | |
| The first reason is to write *extension modules* for specific purposes; these
 | |
| are C modules that extend the Python interpreter.  This is probably the most
 | |
| common use.  The second reason is to use Python as a component in a larger
 | |
| application; this technique is generally referred to as :dfn:`embedding` Python
 | |
| in an application.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Writing an extension module is a relatively well-understood process,  where a
 | |
| "cookbook" approach works well.  There are several tools  that automate the
 | |
| process to some extent.  While people have embedded  Python in other
 | |
| applications since its early existence, the process of  embedding Python is less
 | |
| straightforward than writing an extension.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many API functions are useful independent of whether you're embedding  or
 | |
| extending Python; moreover, most applications that embed Python  will need to
 | |
| provide a custom extension as well, so it's probably a  good idea to become
 | |
| familiar with writing an extension before  attempting to embed Python in a real
 | |
| application.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-includes:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Include Files
 | |
| =============
 | |
| 
 | |
| All function, type and macro definitions needed to use the Python/C API are
 | |
| included in your code by the following line::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    #include "Python.h"
 | |
| 
 | |
| This implies inclusion of the following standard headers: ``<stdio.h>``,
 | |
| ``<string.h>``, ``<errno.h>``, ``<limits.h>``, ``<assert.h>`` and ``<stdlib.h>``
 | |
| (if available).
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Since Python may define some pre-processor definitions which affect the standard
 | |
|    headers on some systems, you *must* include :file:`Python.h` before any standard
 | |
|    headers are included.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All user visible names defined by Python.h (except those defined by the included
 | |
| standard headers) have one of the prefixes ``Py`` or ``_Py``.  Names beginning
 | |
| with ``_Py`` are for internal use by the Python implementation and should not be
 | |
| used by extension writers. Structure member names do not have a reserved prefix.
 | |
| 
 | |
| **Important:** user code should never define names that begin with ``Py`` or
 | |
| ``_Py``.  This confuses the reader, and jeopardizes the portability of the user
 | |
| code to future Python versions, which may define additional names beginning with
 | |
| one of these prefixes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The header files are typically installed with Python.  On Unix, these  are
 | |
| located in the directories :file:`{prefix}/include/pythonversion/` and
 | |
| :file:`{exec_prefix}/include/pythonversion/`, where :envvar:`prefix` and
 | |
| :envvar:`exec_prefix` are defined by the corresponding parameters to Python's
 | |
| :program:`configure` script and *version* is ``sys.version[:3]``.  On Windows,
 | |
| the headers are installed in :file:`{prefix}/include`, where :envvar:`prefix` is
 | |
| the installation directory specified to the installer.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To include the headers, place both directories (if different) on your compiler's
 | |
| search path for includes.  Do *not* place the parent directories on the search
 | |
| path and then use ``#include <pythonX.Y/Python.h>``; this will break on
 | |
| multi-platform builds since the platform independent headers under
 | |
| :envvar:`prefix` include the platform specific headers from
 | |
| :envvar:`exec_prefix`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| C++ users should note that though the API is defined entirely using C, the
 | |
| header files do properly declare the entry points to be ``extern "C"``, so there
 | |
| is no need to do anything special to use the API from C++.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-objects:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Objects, Types and Reference Counts
 | |
| ===================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: object: type
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most Python/C API functions have one or more arguments as well as a return value
 | |
| of type :c:type:`PyObject\*`.  This type is a pointer to an opaque data type
 | |
| representing an arbitrary Python object.  Since all Python object types are
 | |
| treated the same way by the Python language in most situations (e.g.,
 | |
| assignments, scope rules, and argument passing), it is only fitting that they
 | |
| should be represented by a single C type.  Almost all Python objects live on the
 | |
| heap: you never declare an automatic or static variable of type
 | |
| :c:type:`PyObject`, only pointer variables of type :c:type:`PyObject\*` can  be
 | |
| declared.  The sole exception are the type objects; since these must never be
 | |
| deallocated, they are typically static :c:type:`PyTypeObject` objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All Python objects (even Python integers) have a :dfn:`type` and a
 | |
| :dfn:`reference count`.  An object's type determines what kind of object it is
 | |
| (e.g., an integer, a list, or a user-defined function; there are many more as
 | |
| explained in :ref:`types`).  For each of the well-known types there is a macro
 | |
| to check whether an object is of that type; for instance, ``PyList_Check(a)`` is
 | |
| true if (and only if) the object pointed to by *a* is a Python list.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-refcounts:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Reference Counts
 | |
| ----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The reference count is important because today's computers have a  finite (and
 | |
| often severely limited) memory size; it counts how many  different places there
 | |
| are that have a reference to an object.  Such a  place could be another object,
 | |
| or a global (or static) C variable, or  a local variable in some C function.
 | |
| When an object's reference count  becomes zero, the object is deallocated.  If
 | |
| it contains references to  other objects, their reference count is decremented.
 | |
| Those other  objects may be deallocated in turn, if this decrement makes their
 | |
| reference count become zero, and so on.  (There's an obvious problem  with
 | |
| objects that reference each other here; for now, the solution is  "don't do
 | |
| that.")
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: Py_INCREF()
 | |
|    single: Py_DECREF()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Reference counts are always manipulated explicitly.  The normal way is  to use
 | |
| the macro :c:func:`Py_INCREF` to increment an object's reference count by one,
 | |
| and :c:func:`Py_DECREF` to decrement it by   one.  The :c:func:`Py_DECREF` macro
 | |
| is considerably more complex than the incref one, since it must check whether
 | |
| the reference count becomes zero and then cause the object's deallocator to be
 | |
| called. The deallocator is a function pointer contained in the object's type
 | |
| structure.  The type-specific deallocator takes care of decrementing the
 | |
| reference counts for other objects contained in the object if this is a compound
 | |
| object type, such as a list, as well as performing any additional finalization
 | |
| that's needed.  There's no chance that the reference count can overflow; at
 | |
| least as many bits are used to hold the reference count as there are distinct
 | |
| memory locations in virtual memory (assuming ``sizeof(Py_ssize_t) >= sizeof(void*)``).
 | |
| Thus, the reference count increment is a simple operation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is not necessary to increment an object's reference count for every  local
 | |
| variable that contains a pointer to an object.  In theory, the  object's
 | |
| reference count goes up by one when the variable is made to  point to it and it
 | |
| goes down by one when the variable goes out of  scope.  However, these two
 | |
| cancel each other out, so at the end the  reference count hasn't changed.  The
 | |
| only real reason to use the  reference count is to prevent the object from being
 | |
| deallocated as  long as our variable is pointing to it.  If we know that there
 | |
| is at  least one other reference to the object that lives at least as long as
 | |
| our variable, there is no need to increment the reference count  temporarily.
 | |
| An important situation where this arises is in objects  that are passed as
 | |
| arguments to C functions in an extension module  that are called from Python;
 | |
| the call mechanism guarantees to hold a  reference to every argument for the
 | |
| duration of the call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, a common pitfall is to extract an object from a list and hold on to it
 | |
| for a while without incrementing its reference count. Some other operation might
 | |
| conceivably remove the object from the list, decrementing its reference count
 | |
| and possible deallocating it. The real danger is that innocent-looking
 | |
| operations may invoke arbitrary Python code which could do this; there is a code
 | |
| path which allows control to flow back to the user from a :c:func:`Py_DECREF`, so
 | |
| almost any operation is potentially dangerous.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A safe approach is to always use the generic operations (functions  whose name
 | |
| begins with ``PyObject_``, ``PyNumber_``, ``PySequence_`` or ``PyMapping_``).
 | |
| These operations always increment the reference count of the object they return.
 | |
| This leaves the caller with the responsibility to call :c:func:`Py_DECREF` when
 | |
| they are done with the result; this soon becomes second nature.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-refcountdetails:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Reference Count Details
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| The reference count behavior of functions in the Python/C API is best  explained
 | |
| in terms of *ownership of references*.  Ownership pertains to references, never
 | |
| to objects (objects are not owned: they are always shared).  "Owning a
 | |
| reference" means being responsible for calling Py_DECREF on it when the
 | |
| reference is no longer needed.  Ownership can also be transferred, meaning that
 | |
| the code that receives ownership of the reference then becomes responsible for
 | |
| eventually decref'ing it by calling :c:func:`Py_DECREF` or :c:func:`Py_XDECREF`
 | |
| when it's no longer needed---or passing on this responsibility (usually to its
 | |
| caller). When a function passes ownership of a reference on to its caller, the
 | |
| caller is said to receive a *new* reference.  When no ownership is transferred,
 | |
| the caller is said to *borrow* the reference. Nothing needs to be done for a
 | |
| borrowed reference.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Conversely, when a calling function passes in a reference to an  object, there
 | |
| are two possibilities: the function *steals* a  reference to the object, or it
 | |
| does not.  *Stealing a reference* means that when you pass a reference to a
 | |
| function, that function assumes that it now owns that reference, and you are not
 | |
| responsible for it any longer.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: PyList_SetItem()
 | |
|    single: PyTuple_SetItem()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Few functions steal references; the two notable exceptions are
 | |
| :c:func:`PyList_SetItem` and :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem`, which  steal a reference
 | |
| to the item (but not to the tuple or list into which the item is put!).  These
 | |
| functions were designed to steal a reference because of a common idiom for
 | |
| populating a tuple or list with newly created objects; for example, the code to
 | |
| create the tuple ``(1, 2, "three")`` could look like this (forgetting about
 | |
| error handling for the moment; a better way to code this is shown below)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    PyObject *t;
 | |
| 
 | |
|    t = PyTuple_New(3);
 | |
|    PyTuple_SetItem(t, 0, PyLong_FromLong(1L));
 | |
|    PyTuple_SetItem(t, 1, PyLong_FromLong(2L));
 | |
|    PyTuple_SetItem(t, 2, PyUnicode_FromString("three"));
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here, :c:func:`PyLong_FromLong` returns a new reference which is immediately
 | |
| stolen by :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem`.  When you want to keep using an object
 | |
| although the reference to it will be stolen, use :c:func:`Py_INCREF` to grab
 | |
| another reference before calling the reference-stealing function.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Incidentally, :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem` is the *only* way to set tuple items;
 | |
| :c:func:`PySequence_SetItem` and :c:func:`PyObject_SetItem` refuse to do this
 | |
| since tuples are an immutable data type.  You should only use
 | |
| :c:func:`PyTuple_SetItem` for tuples that you are creating yourself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Equivalent code for populating a list can be written using :c:func:`PyList_New`
 | |
| and :c:func:`PyList_SetItem`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, in practice, you will rarely use these ways of creating and populating
 | |
| a tuple or list.  There's a generic function, :c:func:`Py_BuildValue`, that can
 | |
| create most common objects from C values, directed by a :dfn:`format string`.
 | |
| For example, the above two blocks of code could be replaced by the following
 | |
| (which also takes care of the error checking)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    PyObject *tuple, *list;
 | |
| 
 | |
|    tuple = Py_BuildValue("(iis)", 1, 2, "three");
 | |
|    list = Py_BuildValue("[iis]", 1, 2, "three");
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is much more common to use :c:func:`PyObject_SetItem` and friends with items
 | |
| whose references you are only borrowing, like arguments that were passed in to
 | |
| the function you are writing.  In that case, their behaviour regarding reference
 | |
| counts is much saner, since you don't have to increment a reference count so you
 | |
| can give a reference away ("have it be stolen").  For example, this function
 | |
| sets all items of a list (actually, any mutable sequence) to a given item::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    int
 | |
|    set_all(PyObject *target, PyObject *item)
 | |
|    {
 | |
|        Py_ssize_t i, n;
 | |
| 
 | |
|        n = PyObject_Length(target);
 | |
|        if (n < 0)
 | |
|            return -1;
 | |
|        for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
 | |
|            PyObject *index = PyLong_FromSsize_t(i);
 | |
|            if (!index)
 | |
|                return -1;
 | |
|            if (PyObject_SetItem(target, index, item) < 0) {
 | |
|                Py_DECREF(index);
 | |
|                return -1;
 | |
|            }
 | |
|            Py_DECREF(index);
 | |
|        }
 | |
|        return 0;
 | |
|    }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: set_all()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The situation is slightly different for function return values.   While passing
 | |
| a reference to most functions does not change your  ownership responsibilities
 | |
| for that reference, many functions that  return a reference to an object give
 | |
| you ownership of the reference. The reason is simple: in many cases, the
 | |
| returned object is created  on the fly, and the reference you get is the only
 | |
| reference to the  object.  Therefore, the generic functions that return object
 | |
| references, like :c:func:`PyObject_GetItem` and  :c:func:`PySequence_GetItem`,
 | |
| always return a new reference (the caller becomes the owner of the reference).
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is important to realize that whether you own a reference returned  by a
 | |
| function depends on which function you call only --- *the plumage* (the type of
 | |
| the object passed as an argument to the function) *doesn't enter into it!*
 | |
| Thus, if you  extract an item from a list using :c:func:`PyList_GetItem`, you
 | |
| don't own the reference --- but if you obtain the same item from the same list
 | |
| using :c:func:`PySequence_GetItem` (which happens to take exactly the same
 | |
| arguments), you do own a reference to the returned object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: PyList_GetItem()
 | |
|    single: PySequence_GetItem()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here is an example of how you could write a function that computes the sum of
 | |
| the items in a list of integers; once using  :c:func:`PyList_GetItem`, and once
 | |
| using :c:func:`PySequence_GetItem`. ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    long
 | |
|    sum_list(PyObject *list)
 | |
|    {
 | |
|        Py_ssize_t i, n;
 | |
|        long total = 0, value;
 | |
|        PyObject *item;
 | |
| 
 | |
|        n = PyList_Size(list);
 | |
|        if (n < 0)
 | |
|            return -1; /* Not a list */
 | |
|        for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
 | |
|            item = PyList_GetItem(list, i); /* Can't fail */
 | |
|            if (!PyLong_Check(item)) continue; /* Skip non-integers */
 | |
|            value = PyLong_AsLong(item);
 | |
|            if (value == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
 | |
|                /* Integer too big to fit in a C long, bail out */
 | |
|                return -1;
 | |
|            total += value;
 | |
|        }
 | |
|        return total;
 | |
|    }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: sum_list()
 | |
| 
 | |
| ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    long
 | |
|    sum_sequence(PyObject *sequence)
 | |
|    {
 | |
|        Py_ssize_t i, n;
 | |
|        long total = 0, value;
 | |
|        PyObject *item;
 | |
|        n = PySequence_Length(sequence);
 | |
|        if (n < 0)
 | |
|            return -1; /* Has no length */
 | |
|        for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
 | |
|            item = PySequence_GetItem(sequence, i);
 | |
|            if (item == NULL)
 | |
|                return -1; /* Not a sequence, or other failure */
 | |
|            if (PyLong_Check(item)) {
 | |
|                value = PyLong_AsLong(item);
 | |
|                Py_DECREF(item);
 | |
|                if (value == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
 | |
|                    /* Integer too big to fit in a C long, bail out */
 | |
|                    return -1;
 | |
|                total += value;
 | |
|            }
 | |
|            else {
 | |
|                Py_DECREF(item); /* Discard reference ownership */
 | |
|            }
 | |
|        }
 | |
|        return total;
 | |
|    }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: sum_sequence()
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-types:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Types
 | |
| -----
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are few other data types that play a significant role in  the Python/C
 | |
| API; most are simple C types such as :c:type:`int`,  :c:type:`long`,
 | |
| :c:type:`double` and :c:type:`char\*`.  A few structure types  are used to
 | |
| describe static tables used to list the functions exported  by a module or the
 | |
| data attributes of a new object type, and another is used to describe the value
 | |
| of a complex number.  These will  be discussed together with the functions that
 | |
| use them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-exceptions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Exceptions
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Python programmer only needs to deal with exceptions if specific  error
 | |
| handling is required; unhandled exceptions are automatically  propagated to the
 | |
| caller, then to the caller's caller, and so on, until they reach the top-level
 | |
| interpreter, where they are reported to the  user accompanied by a stack
 | |
| traceback.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: PyErr_Occurred()
 | |
| 
 | |
| For C programmers, however, error checking always has to be explicit.  All
 | |
| functions in the Python/C API can raise exceptions, unless an explicit claim is
 | |
| made otherwise in a function's documentation.  In general, when a function
 | |
| encounters an error, it sets an exception, discards any object references that
 | |
| it owns, and returns an error indicator.  If not documented otherwise, this
 | |
| indicator is either *NULL* or ``-1``, depending on the function's return type.
 | |
| A few functions return a Boolean true/false result, with false indicating an
 | |
| error.  Very few functions return no explicit error indicator or have an
 | |
| ambiguous return value, and require explicit testing for errors with
 | |
| :c:func:`PyErr_Occurred`.  These exceptions are always explicitly documented.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: PyErr_SetString()
 | |
|    single: PyErr_Clear()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Exception state is maintained in per-thread storage (this is  equivalent to
 | |
| using global storage in an unthreaded application).  A  thread can be in one of
 | |
| two states: an exception has occurred, or not. The function
 | |
| :c:func:`PyErr_Occurred` can be used to check for this: it returns a borrowed
 | |
| reference to the exception type object when an exception has occurred, and
 | |
| *NULL* otherwise.  There are a number of functions to set the exception state:
 | |
| :c:func:`PyErr_SetString` is the most common (though not the most general)
 | |
| function to set the exception state, and :c:func:`PyErr_Clear` clears the
 | |
| exception state.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The full exception state consists of three objects (all of which can  be
 | |
| *NULL*): the exception type, the corresponding exception  value, and the
 | |
| traceback.  These have the same meanings as the Python result of
 | |
| ``sys.exc_info()``; however, they are not the same: the Python objects represent
 | |
| the last exception being handled by a Python  :keyword:`try` ...
 | |
| :keyword:`except` statement, while the C level exception state only exists while
 | |
| an exception is being passed on between C functions until it reaches the Python
 | |
| bytecode interpreter's  main loop, which takes care of transferring it to
 | |
| ``sys.exc_info()`` and friends.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: exc_info() (in module sys)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that starting with Python 1.5, the preferred, thread-safe way to access the
 | |
| exception state from Python code is to call the function :func:`sys.exc_info`,
 | |
| which returns the per-thread exception state for Python code.  Also, the
 | |
| semantics of both ways to access the exception state have changed so that a
 | |
| function which catches an exception will save and restore its thread's exception
 | |
| state so as to preserve the exception state of its caller.  This prevents common
 | |
| bugs in exception handling code caused by an innocent-looking function
 | |
| overwriting the exception being handled; it also reduces the often unwanted
 | |
| lifetime extension for objects that are referenced by the stack frames in the
 | |
| traceback.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As a general principle, a function that calls another function to  perform some
 | |
| task should check whether the called function raised an  exception, and if so,
 | |
| pass the exception state on to its caller.  It  should discard any object
 | |
| references that it owns, and return an  error indicator, but it should *not* set
 | |
| another exception --- that would overwrite the exception that was just raised,
 | |
| and lose important information about the exact cause of the error.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: sum_sequence()
 | |
| 
 | |
| A simple example of detecting exceptions and passing them on is shown in the
 | |
| :c:func:`sum_sequence` example above.  It so happens that this example doesn't
 | |
| need to clean up any owned references when it detects an error.  The following
 | |
| example function shows some error cleanup.  First, to remind you why you like
 | |
| Python, we show the equivalent Python code::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def incr_item(dict, key):
 | |
|        try:
 | |
|            item = dict[key]
 | |
|        except KeyError:
 | |
|            item = 0
 | |
|        dict[key] = item + 1
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: incr_item()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here is the corresponding C code, in all its glory::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    int
 | |
|    incr_item(PyObject *dict, PyObject *key)
 | |
|    {
 | |
|        /* Objects all initialized to NULL for Py_XDECREF */
 | |
|        PyObject *item = NULL, *const_one = NULL, *incremented_item = NULL;
 | |
|        int rv = -1; /* Return value initialized to -1 (failure) */
 | |
| 
 | |
|        item = PyObject_GetItem(dict, key);
 | |
|        if (item == NULL) {
 | |
|            /* Handle KeyError only: */
 | |
|            if (!PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_KeyError))
 | |
|                goto error;
 | |
| 
 | |
|            /* Clear the error and use zero: */
 | |
|            PyErr_Clear();
 | |
|            item = PyLong_FromLong(0L);
 | |
|            if (item == NULL)
 | |
|                goto error;
 | |
|        }
 | |
|        const_one = PyLong_FromLong(1L);
 | |
|        if (const_one == NULL)
 | |
|            goto error;
 | |
| 
 | |
|        incremented_item = PyNumber_Add(item, const_one);
 | |
|        if (incremented_item == NULL)
 | |
|            goto error;
 | |
| 
 | |
|        if (PyObject_SetItem(dict, key, incremented_item) < 0)
 | |
|            goto error;
 | |
|        rv = 0; /* Success */
 | |
|        /* Continue with cleanup code */
 | |
| 
 | |
|     error:
 | |
|        /* Cleanup code, shared by success and failure path */
 | |
| 
 | |
|        /* Use Py_XDECREF() to ignore NULL references */
 | |
|        Py_XDECREF(item);
 | |
|        Py_XDECREF(const_one);
 | |
|        Py_XDECREF(incremented_item);
 | |
| 
 | |
|        return rv; /* -1 for error, 0 for success */
 | |
|    }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: incr_item()
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: PyErr_ExceptionMatches()
 | |
|    single: PyErr_Clear()
 | |
|    single: Py_XDECREF()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example represents an endorsed use of the ``goto`` statement  in C!
 | |
| It illustrates the use of :c:func:`PyErr_ExceptionMatches` and
 | |
| :c:func:`PyErr_Clear` to handle specific exceptions, and the use of
 | |
| :c:func:`Py_XDECREF` to dispose of owned references that may be *NULL* (note the
 | |
| ``'X'`` in the name; :c:func:`Py_DECREF` would crash when confronted with a
 | |
| *NULL* reference).  It is important that the variables used to hold owned
 | |
| references are initialized to *NULL* for this to work; likewise, the proposed
 | |
| return value is initialized to ``-1`` (failure) and only set to success after
 | |
| the final call made is successful.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-embedding:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Embedding Python
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The one important task that only embedders (as opposed to extension writers) of
 | |
| the Python interpreter have to worry about is the initialization, and possibly
 | |
| the finalization, of the Python interpreter.  Most functionality of the
 | |
| interpreter can only be used after the interpreter has been initialized.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: Py_Initialize()
 | |
|    module: builtins
 | |
|    module: __main__
 | |
|    module: sys
 | |
|    triple: module; search; path
 | |
|    single: path (in module sys)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The basic initialization function is :c:func:`Py_Initialize`. This initializes
 | |
| the table of loaded modules, and creates the fundamental modules
 | |
| :mod:`builtins`, :mod:`__main__`, and :mod:`sys`.  It also
 | |
| initializes the module search path (``sys.path``).
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: PySys_SetArgvEx()
 | |
| 
 | |
| :c:func:`Py_Initialize` does not set the "script argument list"  (``sys.argv``).
 | |
| If this variable is needed by Python code that will be executed later, it must
 | |
| be set explicitly with a call to  ``PySys_SetArgvEx(argc, argv, updatepath)``
 | |
| after the call to :c:func:`Py_Initialize`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| On most systems (in particular, on Unix and Windows, although the details are
 | |
| slightly different), :c:func:`Py_Initialize` calculates the module search path
 | |
| based upon its best guess for the location of the standard Python interpreter
 | |
| executable, assuming that the Python library is found in a fixed location
 | |
| relative to the Python interpreter executable.  In particular, it looks for a
 | |
| directory named :file:`lib/python{X.Y}` relative to the parent directory
 | |
| where the executable named :file:`python` is found on the shell command search
 | |
| path (the environment variable :envvar:`PATH`).
 | |
| 
 | |
| For instance, if the Python executable is found in
 | |
| :file:`/usr/local/bin/python`, it will assume that the libraries are in
 | |
| :file:`/usr/local/lib/python{X.Y}`.  (In fact, this particular path is also
 | |
| the "fallback" location, used when no executable file named :file:`python` is
 | |
| found along :envvar:`PATH`.)  The user can override this behavior by setting the
 | |
| environment variable :envvar:`PYTHONHOME`, or insert additional directories in
 | |
| front of the standard path by setting :envvar:`PYTHONPATH`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: Py_SetProgramName()
 | |
|    single: Py_GetPath()
 | |
|    single: Py_GetPrefix()
 | |
|    single: Py_GetExecPrefix()
 | |
|    single: Py_GetProgramFullPath()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The embedding application can steer the search by calling
 | |
| ``Py_SetProgramName(file)`` *before* calling  :c:func:`Py_Initialize`.  Note that
 | |
| :envvar:`PYTHONHOME` still overrides this and :envvar:`PYTHONPATH` is still
 | |
| inserted in front of the standard path.  An application that requires total
 | |
| control has to provide its own implementation of :c:func:`Py_GetPath`,
 | |
| :c:func:`Py_GetPrefix`, :c:func:`Py_GetExecPrefix`, and
 | |
| :c:func:`Py_GetProgramFullPath` (all defined in :file:`Modules/getpath.c`).
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index:: single: Py_IsInitialized()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes, it is desirable to "uninitialize" Python.  For instance,  the
 | |
| application may want to start over (make another call to
 | |
| :c:func:`Py_Initialize`) or the application is simply done with its  use of
 | |
| Python and wants to free memory allocated by Python.  This can be accomplished
 | |
| by calling :c:func:`Py_Finalize`.  The function :c:func:`Py_IsInitialized` returns
 | |
| true if Python is currently in the initialized state.  More information about
 | |
| these functions is given in a later chapter. Notice that :c:func:`Py_Finalize`
 | |
| does *not* free all memory allocated by the Python interpreter, e.g. memory
 | |
| allocated by extension modules currently cannot be released.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _api-debugging:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Debugging Builds
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Python can be built with several macros to enable extra checks of the
 | |
| interpreter and extension modules.  These checks tend to add a large amount of
 | |
| overhead to the runtime so they are not enabled by default.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A full list of the various types of debugging builds is in the file
 | |
| :file:`Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt` in the Python source distribution. Builds are
 | |
| available that support tracing of reference counts, debugging the memory
 | |
| allocator, or low-level profiling of the main interpreter loop.  Only the most
 | |
| frequently-used builds will be described in the remainder of this section.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Compiling the interpreter with the :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG` macro defined produces
 | |
| what is generally meant by "a debug build" of Python. :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG` is
 | |
| enabled in the Unix build by adding ``--with-pydebug`` to the
 | |
| :file:`./configure` command.  It is also implied by the presence of the
 | |
| not-Python-specific :c:macro:`_DEBUG` macro.  When :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG` is enabled
 | |
| in the Unix build, compiler optimization is disabled.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition to the reference count debugging described below, the following
 | |
| extra checks are performed:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Extra checks are added to the object allocator.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Extra checks are added to the parser and compiler.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Downcasts from wide types to narrow types are checked for loss of information.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * A number of assertions are added to the dictionary and set implementations.
 | |
|   In addition, the set object acquires a :meth:`test_c_api` method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Sanity checks of the input arguments are added to frame creation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The storage for ints is initialized with a known invalid pattern to catch
 | |
|   reference to uninitialized digits.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Low-level tracing and extra exception checking are added to the runtime
 | |
|   virtual machine.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Extra checks are added to the memory arena implementation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Extra debugging is added to the thread module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There may be additional checks not mentioned here.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Defining :c:macro:`Py_TRACE_REFS` enables reference tracing.  When defined, a
 | |
| circular doubly linked list of active objects is maintained by adding two extra
 | |
| fields to every :c:type:`PyObject`.  Total allocations are tracked as well.  Upon
 | |
| exit, all existing references are printed.  (In interactive mode this happens
 | |
| after every statement run by the interpreter.)  Implied by :c:macro:`Py_DEBUG`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please refer to :file:`Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt` in the Python source distribution
 | |
| for more detailed information.
 | |
| 
 | 
