mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2025-08-03 18:38:50 +00:00
Removed unneeded hint=None/obj=None in system check messages.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Graham
parent
36f1f5cfb0
commit
004ba0f99e
30 changed files with 287 additions and 495 deletions
|
|
@ -122,9 +122,8 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("Field defines a relation with model 'Rel1', "
|
||||
"which is either not installed, or is abstract."),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
"Field defines a relation with model 'Rel1', "
|
||||
"which is either not installed, or is abstract.",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E300',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -154,9 +153,8 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check(from_model=Model)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("Field defines a relation with model 'Rel2', "
|
||||
"which is either not installed, or is abstract."),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
"Field defines a relation with model 'Rel2', "
|
||||
"which is either not installed, or is abstract.",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E300',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -191,7 +189,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
DjangoWarning(
|
||||
'null has no effect on ManyToManyField.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.W340',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -199,7 +196,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected.append(
|
||||
DjangoWarning(
|
||||
'ManyToManyField does not support validators.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.W341',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,8 +209,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
class Group(models.Model):
|
||||
field = models.ManyToManyField('Person',
|
||||
through="AmbiguousRelationship", related_name='tertiary')
|
||||
field = models.ManyToManyField('Person', through="AmbiguousRelationship", related_name='tertiary')
|
||||
|
||||
class AmbiguousRelationship(models.Model):
|
||||
# Too much foreign keys to Person.
|
||||
|
|
@ -226,14 +221,15 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.field', but it has more than one "
|
||||
"foreign key to 'Person', which is ambiguous. You must specify "
|
||||
"which foreign key Django should use via the through_fields "
|
||||
"keyword argument."),
|
||||
hint=('If you want to create a recursive relationship, use '
|
||||
'ForeignKey("self", symmetrical=False, '
|
||||
'through="AmbiguousRelationship").'),
|
||||
"The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.field', but it has more than one "
|
||||
"foreign key to 'Person', which is ambiguous. You must specify "
|
||||
"which foreign key Django should use via the through_fields "
|
||||
"keyword argument.",
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
'If you want to create a recursive relationship, use '
|
||||
'ForeignKey("self", symmetrical=False, through="AmbiguousRelationship").'
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E335',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -248,8 +244,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
class Group(models.Model):
|
||||
members = models.ManyToManyField('Person',
|
||||
through="InvalidRelationship")
|
||||
members = models.ManyToManyField('Person', through="InvalidRelationship")
|
||||
|
||||
class InvalidRelationship(models.Model):
|
||||
person = models.ForeignKey(Person, models.CASCADE)
|
||||
|
|
@ -260,10 +255,9 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not "
|
||||
"have a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'."),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
"The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not "
|
||||
"have a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'.",
|
||||
obj=InvalidRelationship,
|
||||
id='fields.E336',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -275,8 +269,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
class Group(models.Model):
|
||||
members = models.ManyToManyField('Person',
|
||||
through="InvalidRelationship")
|
||||
members = models.ManyToManyField('Person', through="InvalidRelationship")
|
||||
|
||||
class InvalidRelationship(models.Model):
|
||||
group = models.ForeignKey(Group, models.CASCADE)
|
||||
|
|
@ -286,10 +279,9 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not have "
|
||||
"a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'."),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
"The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not have "
|
||||
"a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'.",
|
||||
obj=InvalidRelationship,
|
||||
id='fields.E336',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -301,16 +293,14 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
class Group(models.Model):
|
||||
members = models.ManyToManyField('Person',
|
||||
through="MissingM2MModel")
|
||||
members = models.ManyToManyField('Person', through="MissingM2MModel")
|
||||
|
||||
field = Group._meta.get_field('members')
|
||||
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("Field specifies a many-to-many relation through model "
|
||||
"'MissingM2MModel', which has not been installed."),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
"Field specifies a many-to-many relation through model "
|
||||
"'MissingM2MModel', which has not been installed.",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E331',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -350,7 +340,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E332',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -359,8 +348,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
def test_too_many_foreign_keys_in_self_referential_model(self):
|
||||
class Person(models.Model):
|
||||
friends = models.ManyToManyField('self',
|
||||
through="InvalidRelationship", symmetrical=False)
|
||||
friends = models.ManyToManyField('self', through="InvalidRelationship", symmetrical=False)
|
||||
|
||||
class InvalidRelationship(models.Model):
|
||||
first = models.ForeignKey(Person, models.CASCADE, related_name="rel_from_set_2")
|
||||
|
|
@ -371,11 +359,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check(from_model=Person)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Person.friends', but it has more than two "
|
||||
"foreign keys to 'Person', which is ambiguous. You must specify "
|
||||
"which two foreign keys Django should use via the through_fields "
|
||||
"keyword argument."),
|
||||
"The model is used as an intermediate model by "
|
||||
"'invalid_models_tests.Person.friends', but it has more than two "
|
||||
"foreign keys to 'Person', which is ambiguous. You must specify "
|
||||
"which two foreign keys Django should use via the through_fields "
|
||||
"keyword argument.",
|
||||
hint='Use through_fields to specify which two foreign keys Django should use.',
|
||||
obj=InvalidRelationship,
|
||||
id='fields.E333',
|
||||
|
|
@ -386,8 +374,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
def test_symmetric_self_reference_with_intermediate_table(self):
|
||||
class Person(models.Model):
|
||||
# Explicit symmetrical=True.
|
||||
friends = models.ManyToManyField('self',
|
||||
through="Relationship", symmetrical=True)
|
||||
friends = models.ManyToManyField('self', through="Relationship", symmetrical=True)
|
||||
|
||||
class Relationship(models.Model):
|
||||
first = models.ForeignKey(Person, models.CASCADE, related_name="rel_from_set")
|
||||
|
|
@ -398,7 +385,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E332',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -412,10 +398,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
"""
|
||||
class Person(models.Model):
|
||||
# Explicit symmetrical=True.
|
||||
friends = models.ManyToManyField('self',
|
||||
friends = models.ManyToManyField(
|
||||
'self',
|
||||
symmetrical=True,
|
||||
through="Relationship",
|
||||
through_fields=('first', 'second'))
|
||||
through_fields=('first', 'second'),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
class Relationship(models.Model):
|
||||
first = models.ForeignKey(Person, models.CASCADE, related_name="rel_from_set")
|
||||
|
|
@ -427,7 +415,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E332',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -492,7 +479,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'ManyToManyFields cannot be unique.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E330',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -511,7 +497,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"'Target.bad' must set unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.",
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E311',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -530,7 +515,6 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"'Target.bad' must set unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.",
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E311',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -547,10 +531,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
person_country_id = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
person_city_id = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
person = models.ForeignObject(Person,
|
||||
person = models.ForeignObject(
|
||||
Person,
|
||||
on_delete=models.CASCADE,
|
||||
from_fields=['person_country_id', 'person_city_id'],
|
||||
to_fields=['country_id', 'city_id'])
|
||||
to_fields=['country_id', 'city_id'],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
field = MMembership._meta.get_field('person')
|
||||
errors = field.check()
|
||||
|
|
@ -630,17 +616,21 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
swappable = 'TEST_SWAPPABLE_MODEL'
|
||||
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
explicit_fk = models.ForeignKey(SwappableModel,
|
||||
explicit_fk = models.ForeignKey(
|
||||
SwappableModel,
|
||||
models.CASCADE,
|
||||
related_name='explicit_fk')
|
||||
implicit_fk = models.ForeignKey('invalid_models_tests.SwappableModel',
|
||||
related_name='explicit_fk',
|
||||
)
|
||||
implicit_fk = models.ForeignKey(
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.SwappableModel',
|
||||
models.CASCADE,
|
||||
related_name='implicit_fk')
|
||||
explicit_m2m = models.ManyToManyField(SwappableModel,
|
||||
related_name='explicit_m2m')
|
||||
related_name='implicit_fk',
|
||||
)
|
||||
explicit_m2m = models.ManyToManyField(SwappableModel, related_name='explicit_m2m')
|
||||
implicit_m2m = models.ManyToManyField(
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.SwappableModel',
|
||||
related_name='implicit_m2m')
|
||||
related_name='implicit_m2m',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
explicit_fk = Model._meta.get_field('explicit_fk')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(explicit_fk.check(), [])
|
||||
|
|
@ -664,17 +654,21 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
swappable = 'TEST_SWAPPED_MODEL'
|
||||
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
explicit_fk = models.ForeignKey(SwappedModel,
|
||||
explicit_fk = models.ForeignKey(
|
||||
SwappedModel,
|
||||
models.CASCADE,
|
||||
related_name='explicit_fk')
|
||||
implicit_fk = models.ForeignKey('invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel',
|
||||
related_name='explicit_fk',
|
||||
)
|
||||
implicit_fk = models.ForeignKey(
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel',
|
||||
models.CASCADE,
|
||||
related_name='implicit_fk')
|
||||
explicit_m2m = models.ManyToManyField(SwappedModel,
|
||||
related_name='explicit_m2m')
|
||||
related_name='implicit_fk',
|
||||
)
|
||||
explicit_m2m = models.ManyToManyField(SwappedModel, related_name='explicit_m2m')
|
||||
implicit_m2m = models.ManyToManyField(
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel',
|
||||
related_name='implicit_m2m')
|
||||
related_name='implicit_m2m',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
fields = [
|
||||
Model._meta.get_field('explicit_fk'),
|
||||
|
|
@ -838,15 +832,19 @@ class AccessorClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m'.",
|
||||
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.foreign' or 'Model.m2m'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.foreign' or 'Model.m2m'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'),
|
||||
id='fields.E304',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign'.",
|
||||
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.m2m' or 'Model.foreign'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.m2m' or 'Model.foreign'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'),
|
||||
id='fields.E304',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -873,9 +871,10 @@ class AccessorClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.children' clashes with field name 'Child.m2m_clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Child.m2m_clash', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.children'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Child.m2m_clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.children'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('children'),
|
||||
id='fields.E302',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -930,9 +929,10 @@ class ReverseQueryNameClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.model'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Target.model', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Target.model', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -987,17 +987,19 @@ class ExplicitRelatedNameClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
|
||||
id='fields.E302',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1085,8 +1087,10 @@ class ExplicitRelatedQueryNameClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1106,15 +1110,19 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.first_m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.second_m2m'.",
|
||||
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.first_m2m' or 'Model.second_m2m'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.first_m2m' or 'Model.second_m2m'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('first_m2m'),
|
||||
id='fields.E304',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.second_m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.first_m2m'.",
|
||||
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.second_m2m' or 'Model.first_m2m'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for 'Model.second_m2m' or 'Model.first_m2m'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('second_m2m'),
|
||||
id='fields.E304',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1129,9 +1137,10 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.model_set' clashes with field name 'Model.model_set'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.model_set'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.model_set'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model_set'),
|
||||
id='fields.E302',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1146,8 +1155,10 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.model' clashes with field name 'Model.model'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.model'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.model'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1157,22 +1168,25 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
def test_clash_under_explicit_related_name(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
clash = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
m2m = models.ManyToManyField("self",
|
||||
symmetrical=False, related_name='clash')
|
||||
m2m = models.ManyToManyField("self", symmetrical=False, related_name='clash')
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'),
|
||||
id='fields.E302',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1181,10 +1195,8 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
def test_valid_model(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
first = models.ManyToManyField("self",
|
||||
symmetrical=False, related_name='first_accessor')
|
||||
second = models.ManyToManyField("self",
|
||||
symmetrical=False, related_name='second_accessor')
|
||||
first = models.ManyToManyField("self", symmetrical=False, related_name='first_accessor')
|
||||
second = models.ManyToManyField("self", symmetrical=False, related_name='second_accessor')
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, [])
|
||||
|
|
@ -1201,9 +1213,11 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.model_set' clashes with field name 'Model.model_set'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.model_set'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.model_set'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model_set'),
|
||||
id='fields.E302',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1218,9 +1232,10 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.model' clashes with field name 'Model.model'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.model'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.model'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1236,17 +1251,19 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.foreign'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.foreign'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'),
|
||||
id='fields.E302',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
|
||||
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change "
|
||||
"a related_name argument to the definition "
|
||||
"for field 'Model.foreign'."),
|
||||
hint=(
|
||||
"Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
|
||||
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.foreign'."
|
||||
),
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'),
|
||||
id='fields.E303',
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1402,15 +1419,17 @@ class M2mThroughFieldsTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
errors = field.check(from_model=Event)
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("'Invitation.invitee' is not a foreign key to 'Event'."),
|
||||
"'Invitation.invitee' is not a foreign key to 'Event'.",
|
||||
hint="Did you mean one of the following foreign keys to 'Event': event?",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E339'),
|
||||
id='fields.E339',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
("'Invitation.event' is not a foreign key to 'Fan'."),
|
||||
"'Invitation.event' is not a foreign key to 'Fan'.",
|
||||
hint="Did you mean one of the following foreign keys to 'Fan': invitee, inviter?",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E339'),
|
||||
id='fields.E339',
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected, errors)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1441,12 +1460,14 @@ class M2mThroughFieldsTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
"The intermediary model 'invalid_models_tests.Invitation' has no field 'invalid_field_1'.",
|
||||
hint="Did you mean one of the following foreign keys to 'Event': event?",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E338'),
|
||||
id='fields.E338',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
"The intermediary model 'invalid_models_tests.Invitation' has no field 'invalid_field_2'.",
|
||||
hint="Did you mean one of the following foreign keys to 'Fan': invitee, inviter?",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E338'),
|
||||
id='fields.E338',
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected, errors)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1473,8 +1494,7 @@ class M2mThroughFieldsTests(SimpleTestCase):
|
|||
"Field specifies 'through_fields' but does not provide the names "
|
||||
"of the two link fields that should be used for the relation "
|
||||
"through model 'invalid_models_tests.Invitation'.",
|
||||
hint=("Make sure you specify 'through_fields' as "
|
||||
"through_fields=('field1', 'field2')"),
|
||||
hint="Make sure you specify 'through_fields' as through_fields=('field1', 'field2')",
|
||||
obj=field,
|
||||
id='fields.E337')]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected, errors)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue