mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2025-07-24 05:36:15 +00:00
Fixed #18637 - Updated some documentation for aspects of models that are ModelForm specific, not admin specific.
Thanks Ben Sturmfels for the patch.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3fd89d9903
commit
13d47c3f33
2 changed files with 58 additions and 60 deletions
|
@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ determine a few things:
|
|||
|
||||
* The database column type (e.g. ``INTEGER``, ``VARCHAR``).
|
||||
|
||||
* The :doc:`widget </ref/forms/widgets>` to use in Django's admin interface,
|
||||
if you care to use it (e.g. ``<input type="text">``, ``<select>``).
|
||||
* The default :doc:`widget </ref/forms/widgets>` to use when rendering a form
|
||||
field (e.g. ``<input type="text">``, ``<select>``).
|
||||
|
||||
* The minimal validation requirements, used in Django's admin and in
|
||||
automatically-generated forms.
|
||||
|
@ -143,13 +143,13 @@ ones:
|
|||
Note that this is different than :attr:`~Field.null`.
|
||||
:attr:`~Field.null` is purely database-related, whereas
|
||||
:attr:`~Field.blank` is validation-related. If a field has
|
||||
:attr:`blank=True <Field.blank>`, validation on Django's admin site will
|
||||
:attr:`blank=True <Field.blank>`, form validation will
|
||||
allow entry of an empty value. If a field has :attr:`blank=False
|
||||
<Field.blank>`, the field will be required.
|
||||
|
||||
:attr:`~Field.choices`
|
||||
An iterable (e.g., a list or tuple) of 2-tuples to use as choices for
|
||||
this field. If this is given, Django's admin will use a select box
|
||||
this field. If this is given, the default form widget will be a select box
|
||||
instead of the standard text field and will limit choices to the choices
|
||||
given.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ ones:
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
The first element in each tuple is the value that will be stored in the
|
||||
database, the second element will be displayed by the admin interface,
|
||||
database, the second element will be displayed by the default form widget
|
||||
or in a ModelChoiceField. Given an instance of a model object, the
|
||||
display value for a choices field can be accessed using the
|
||||
``get_FOO_display`` method. For example::
|
||||
|
@ -195,9 +195,8 @@ ones:
|
|||
created.
|
||||
|
||||
:attr:`~Field.help_text`
|
||||
Extra "help" text to be displayed under the field on the object's admin
|
||||
form. It's useful for documentation even if your object doesn't have an
|
||||
admin form.
|
||||
Extra "help" text to be displayed with the form widget. It's useful for
|
||||
documentation even if your field isn't used on a form.
|
||||
|
||||
:attr:`~Field.primary_key`
|
||||
If ``True``, this field is the primary key for the model.
|
||||
|
@ -360,13 +359,12 @@ It doesn't matter which model has the
|
|||
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`, but you should only put it in one
|
||||
of the models -- not both.
|
||||
|
||||
Generally, :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` instances should go in the
|
||||
object that's going to be edited in the admin interface, if you're using
|
||||
Django's admin. In the above example, ``toppings`` is in ``Pizza`` (rather than
|
||||
``Topping`` having a ``pizzas`` :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` )
|
||||
because it's more natural to think about a pizza having toppings than a
|
||||
topping being on multiple pizzas. The way it's set up above, the ``Pizza`` admin
|
||||
form would let users select the toppings.
|
||||
Generally, :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` instances should go in
|
||||
the object that's going to be edited on a form. In the above example,
|
||||
``toppings`` is in ``Pizza`` (rather than ``Topping`` having a ``pizzas``
|
||||
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` ) because it's more natural to think
|
||||
about a pizza having toppings than a topping being on multiple pizzas. The way
|
||||
it's set up above, the ``Pizza`` form would let users select the toppings.
|
||||
|
||||
.. seealso::
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue