Fixed #10913 -- Documented how related_name affects QuerySet filtering

Thanks neithere for the suggestion.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Graham 2013-10-02 12:12:53 -04:00
parent e1b7723817
commit 75bb6ba966
2 changed files with 13 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -1124,8 +1124,9 @@ Example::
>>> b.entry_set.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
>>> b.entry_set.count()
You can override the ``FOO_set`` name by setting the ``related_name``
parameter in the ``ForeignKey()`` definition. For example, if the ``Entry``
You can override the ``FOO_set`` name by setting the
:attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name` parameter in the
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` definition. For example, if the ``Entry``
model was altered to ``blog = ForeignKey(Blog, related_name='entries')``, the
above example code would look like this::
@ -1224,10 +1225,11 @@ An example makes this easier to understand::
a.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects for this Author.
Like :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`,
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` can specify ``related_name``. In the
above example, if the :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` in ``Entry``
had specified ``related_name='entries'``, then each ``Author`` instance would
have an ``entries`` attribute instead of ``entry_set``.
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` can specify
:attr:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField.related_name`. In the above example,
if the :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` in ``Entry`` had specified
``related_name='entries'``, then each ``Author`` instance would have an
``entries`` attribute instead of ``entry_set``.
One-to-one relationships
------------------------