mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-26 01:38:30 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	 484527f780
			
		
	
	
		484527f780
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			jon.i.austin@gmail.com. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@5458 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
		
			
				
	
	
		
			1814 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			62 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			1814 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			62 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ======================
 | |
| Database API reference
 | |
| ======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you've created your `data models`_, Django automatically gives you a
 | |
| database-abstraction API that lets you create, retrieve, update and delete
 | |
| objects. This document explains that API.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _`data models`: ../model-api/
 | |
| 
 | |
| Throughout this reference, we'll refer to the following models, which comprise
 | |
| a weblog application::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Blog(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(maxlength=100)
 | |
|         tagline = models.TextField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __str__(self):
 | |
|             return self.name
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Author(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(maxlength=50)
 | |
|         email = models.URLField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __str__(self):
 | |
|             return self.name
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Entry(models.Model):
 | |
|         blog = models.ForeignKey(Blog)
 | |
|         headline = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
 | |
|         body_text = models.TextField()
 | |
|         pub_date = models.DateTimeField()
 | |
|         authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __str__(self):
 | |
|             return self.headline
 | |
| 
 | |
| Creating objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To represent database-table data in Python objects, Django uses an intuitive
 | |
| system: A model class represents a database table, and an instance of that
 | |
| class represents a particular record in the database table.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create an object, instantiate it using keyword arguments to the model class,
 | |
| then call ``save()`` to save it to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You import the model class from wherever it lives on the Python path, as you
 | |
| may expect. (We point this out here because previous Django versions required
 | |
| funky model importing.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Assuming models live in a file ``mysite/blog/models.py``, here's an example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from mysite.blog.models import Blog
 | |
|     b = Blog(name='Beatles Blog', tagline='All the latest Beatles news.')
 | |
|     b.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This performs an ``INSERT`` SQL statement behind the scenes. Django doesn't hit
 | |
| the database until you explicitly call ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``save()`` method has no return value.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create an object and save it all in one step see the `create`__ method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| __ `create(**kwargs)`_
 | |
| 
 | |
| Auto-incrementing primary keys
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has an ``AutoField`` -- an auto-incrementing primary key -- then
 | |
| that auto-incremented value will be calculated and saved as an attribute on
 | |
| your object the first time you call ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b2 = Blog(name='Cheddar Talk', tagline='Thoughts on cheese.')
 | |
|     b2.id     # Returns None, because b doesn't have an ID yet.
 | |
|     b2.save()
 | |
|     b2.id     # Returns the ID of your new object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There's no way to tell what the value of an ID will be before you call
 | |
| ``save()``, because that value is calculated by your database, not by Django.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (For convenience, each model has an ``AutoField`` named ``id`` by default
 | |
| unless you explicitly specify ``primary_key=True`` on a field. See the
 | |
| `AutoField documentation`_.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _AutoField documentation: ../model-api/#autofield
 | |
| 
 | |
| Explicitly specifying auto-primary-key values
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has an ``AutoField`` but you want to define a new object's ID
 | |
| explicitly when saving, just define it explicitly before saving, rather than
 | |
| relying on the auto-assignment of the ID.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b3 = Blog(id=3, name='Cheddar Talk', tagline='Thoughts on cheese.')
 | |
|     b3.id     # Returns 3.
 | |
|     b3.save()
 | |
|     b3.id     # Returns 3.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you assign auto-primary-key values manually, make sure not to use an
 | |
| already-existing primary-key value! If you create a new object with an explicit
 | |
| primary-key value that already exists in the database, Django will assume
 | |
| you're changing the existing record rather than creating a new one.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Given the above ``'Cheddar Talk'`` blog example, this example would override
 | |
| the previous record in the database::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b4 = Blog(id=3, name='Not Cheddar', tagline='Anything but cheese.')
 | |
|     b4.save()  # Overrides the previous blog with ID=3!
 | |
| 
 | |
| See `How Django knows to UPDATE vs. INSERT`_, below, for the reason this
 | |
| happens.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Explicitly specifying auto-primary-key values is mostly useful for bulk-saving
 | |
| objects, when you're confident you won't have primary-key collision.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Saving changes to objects
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To save changes to an object that's already in the database, use ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Given a ``Blog`` instance ``b5`` that has already been saved to the database,
 | |
| this example changes its name and updates its record in the database::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b5.name = 'New name'
 | |
|     b5.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This performs an ``UPDATE`` SQL statement behind the scenes. Django doesn't hit
 | |
| the database until you explicitly call ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``save()`` method has no return value.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating ``ForeignKey`` fields works exactly the same way; simply assign an
 | |
| object of the right type to the field in question::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     joe = Author.objects.create(name="Joe")
 | |
|     entry.author = joe
 | |
|     entry.save()
 | |
|     
 | |
| Django will complain if you try to assign an object of the wrong type.
 | |
| 
 | |
| How Django knows to UPDATE vs. INSERT
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You may have noticed Django database objects use the same ``save()`` method
 | |
| for creating and changing objects. Django abstracts the need to use ``INSERT``
 | |
| or ``UPDATE`` SQL statements. Specifically, when you call ``save()``, Django
 | |
| follows this algorithm:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * If the object's primary key attribute is set to a value that evaluates to
 | |
|       ``True`` (i.e., a value other than ``None`` or the empty string), Django
 | |
|       executes a ``SELECT`` query to determine whether a record with the given
 | |
|       primary key already exists.
 | |
|     * If the record with the given primary key does already exist, Django
 | |
|       executes an ``UPDATE`` query.
 | |
|     * If the object's primary key attribute is *not* set, or if it's set but a
 | |
|       record doesn't exist, Django executes an ``INSERT``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The one gotcha here is that you should be careful not to specify a primary-key
 | |
| value explicitly when saving new objects, if you cannot guarantee the
 | |
| primary-key value is unused. For more on this nuance, see
 | |
| "Explicitly specifying auto-primary-key values" above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving objects
 | |
| ==================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To retrieve objects from your database, you construct a ``QuerySet`` via a
 | |
| ``Manager`` on your model class.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A ``QuerySet`` represents a collection of objects from your database. It can
 | |
| have zero, one or many *filters* -- criteria that narrow down the collection
 | |
| based on given parameters. In SQL terms, a ``QuerySet`` equates to a ``SELECT``
 | |
| statement, and a filter is a limiting clause such as ``WHERE`` or ``LIMIT``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You get a ``QuerySet`` by using your model's ``Manager``. Each model has at
 | |
| least one ``Manager``, and it's called ``objects`` by default. Access it
 | |
| directly via the model class, like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects  # <django.db.models.manager.Manager object at ...>
 | |
|     b = Blog(name='Foo', tagline='Bar')
 | |
|     b.objects     # AttributeError: "Manager isn't accessible via Blog instances."
 | |
| 
 | |
| (``Managers`` are accessible only via model classes, rather than from model
 | |
| instances, to enforce a separation between "table-level" operations and
 | |
| "record-level" operations.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``Manager`` is the main source of ``QuerySets`` for a model. It acts as a
 | |
| "root" ``QuerySet`` that describes all objects in the model's database table.
 | |
| For example, ``Blog.objects`` is the initial ``QuerySet`` that contains all
 | |
| ``Blog`` objects in the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving all objects
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The simplest way to retrieve objects from a table is to get all of them.
 | |
| To do this, use the ``all()`` method on a ``Manager``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     all_entries = Entry.objects.all()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``all()`` method returns a ``QuerySet`` of all the objects in the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (If ``Entry.objects`` is a ``QuerySet``, why can't we just do ``Entry.objects``?
 | |
| That's because ``Entry.objects``, the root ``QuerySet``, is a special case
 | |
| that cannot be evaluated. The ``all()`` method returns a ``QuerySet`` that
 | |
| *can* be evaluated.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Filtering objects
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The root ``QuerySet`` provided by the ``Manager`` describes all objects in the
 | |
| database table. Usually, though, you'll need to select only a subset of the
 | |
| complete set of objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create such a subset, you refine the initial ``QuerySet``, adding filter
 | |
| conditions. The two most common ways to refine a ``QuerySet`` are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``filter(**kwargs)``
 | |
|     Returns a new ``QuerySet`` containing objects that match the given lookup
 | |
|     parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``exclude(**kwargs)``
 | |
|     Returns a new ``QuerySet`` containing objects that do *not* match the given
 | |
|     lookup parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The lookup parameters (``**kwargs`` in the above function definitions) should
 | |
| be in the format described in `Field lookups`_ below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, to get a ``QuerySet`` of blog entries from the year 2006, use
 | |
| ``filter()`` like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2006)
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Note we don't have to add an ``all()`` -- ``Entry.objects.all().filter(...)``.
 | |
| That would still work, but you only need ``all()`` when you want all objects
 | |
| from the root ``QuerySet``.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Chaining filters
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The result of refining a ``QuerySet`` is itself a ``QuerySet``, so it's
 | |
| possible to chain refinements together. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(
 | |
|         headline__startswith='What').exclude(
 | |
|             pub_date__gte=datetime.now()).filter(
 | |
|                 pub_date__gte=datetime(2005, 1, 1))
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...takes the initial ``QuerySet`` of all entries in the database, adds a
 | |
| filter, then an exclusion, then another filter. The final result is a
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` containing all entries with a headline that starts with "What",
 | |
| that were published between January 1, 2005, and the current day.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Filtered QuerySets are unique
 | |
| -----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each time you refine a ``QuerySet``, you get a brand-new ``QuerySet`` that is
 | |
| in no way bound to the previous ``QuerySet``. Each refinement creates a
 | |
| separate and distinct ``QuerySet`` that can be stored, used and reused.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     q1 = Entry.objects.filter(headline__startswith="What")
 | |
|     q2 = q1.exclude(pub_date__gte=datetime.now())
 | |
|     q3 = q1.filter(pub_date__gte=datetime.now())
 | |
| 
 | |
| These three ``QuerySets`` are separate. The first is a base ``QuerySet``
 | |
| containing all entries that contain a headline starting with "What". The second
 | |
| is a subset of the first, with an additional criteria that excludes records
 | |
| whose ``pub_date`` is greater than now. The third is a subset of the first,
 | |
| with an additional criteria that selects only the records whose ``pub_date`` is
 | |
| greater than now. The initial ``QuerySet`` (``q1``) is unaffected by the
 | |
| refinement process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| QuerySets are lazy
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``QuerySets`` are lazy -- the act of creating a ``QuerySet`` doesn't involve
 | |
| any database activity. You can stack filters together all day long, and Django
 | |
| won't actually run the query until the ``QuerySet`` is *evaluated*.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When QuerySets are evaluated
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can evaluate a ``QuerySet`` in the following ways:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * **Iteration.** A ``QuerySet`` is iterable, and it executes its database
 | |
|       query the first time you iterate over it. For example, this will print
 | |
|       the headline of all entries in the database::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           for e in Entry.objects.all():
 | |
|               print e.headline
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * **Slicing.** As explained in `Limiting QuerySets`_ below, a ``QuerySet``
 | |
|       can be sliced, using Python's array-slicing syntax. Usually slicing a
 | |
|       ``QuerySet`` returns another (unevaluated )``QuerySet``, but Django will
 | |
|       execute the database query if you use the "step" parameter of slice
 | |
|       syntax.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * **repr().** A ``QuerySet`` is evaluated when you call ``repr()`` on it.
 | |
|       This is for convenience in the Python interactive interpreter, so you can
 | |
|       immediately see your results when using the API interactively.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * **len().** A ``QuerySet`` is evaluated when you call ``len()`` on it.
 | |
|       This, as you might expect, returns the length of the result list.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Note: *Don't* use ``len()`` on ``QuerySet``\s if all you want to do is
 | |
|       determine the number of records in the set. It's much more efficient to
 | |
|       handle a count at the database level, using SQL's ``SELECT COUNT(*)``,
 | |
|       and Django provides a ``count()`` method for precisely this reason. See
 | |
|       ``count()`` below.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * **list().** Force evaluation of a ``QuerySet`` by calling ``list()`` on
 | |
|       it. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           entry_list = list(Entry.objects.all())
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Be warned, though, that this could have a large memory overhead, because
 | |
|       Django will load each element of the list into memory. In contrast,
 | |
|       iterating over a ``QuerySet`` will take advantage of your database to
 | |
|       load data and instantiate objects only as you need them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Limiting QuerySets
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Use Python's array-slicing syntax to limit your ``QuerySet`` to a certain
 | |
| number of results. This is the equivalent of SQL's ``LIMIT`` and ``OFFSET``
 | |
| clauses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this returns the first 5 objects (``LIMIT 5``)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.all()[:5]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This returns the fifth through tenth objects (``OFFSET 5 LIMIT 5``)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.all()[5:10]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Generally, slicing a ``QuerySet`` returns a new ``QuerySet`` -- it doesn't
 | |
| evaluate the query. An exception is if you use the "step" parameter of Python
 | |
| slice syntax. For example, this would actually execute the query in order to
 | |
| return a list of every *second* object of the first 10::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.all()[:10:2]
 | |
| 
 | |
| To retrieve a *single* object rather than a list
 | |
| (e.g. ``SELECT foo FROM bar LIMIT 1``), use a simple index instead of a
 | |
| slice. For example, this returns the first ``Entry`` in the database, after
 | |
| ordering entries alphabetically by headline::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.order_by('headline')[0]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is roughly equivalent to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.order_by('headline')[0:1].get()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note, however, that the first of these will raise ``IndexError`` while the
 | |
| second will raise ``DoesNotExist`` if no objects match the given criteria.
 | |
| 
 | |
| QuerySet methods that return new QuerySets
 | |
| ------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django provides a range of ``QuerySet`` refinement methods that modify either
 | |
| the types of results returned by the ``QuerySet`` or the way its SQL query is
 | |
| executed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``filter(**kwargs)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a new ``QuerySet`` containing objects that match the given lookup
 | |
| parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The lookup parameters (``**kwargs``) should be in the format described in
 | |
| `Field lookups`_ below. Multiple parameters are joined via ``AND`` in the
 | |
| underlying SQL statement.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``exclude(**kwargs)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a new ``QuerySet`` containing objects that do *not* match the given
 | |
| lookup parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The lookup parameters (``**kwargs``) should be in the format described in
 | |
| `Field lookups`_ below. Multiple parameters are joined via ``AND`` in the
 | |
| underlying SQL statement, and the whole thing is enclosed in a ``NOT()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example excludes all entries whose ``pub_date`` is later than 2005-1-3
 | |
| AND whose ``headline`` is "Hello"::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.exclude(pub_date__gt=datetime.date(2005, 1, 3), headline='Hello')
 | |
| 
 | |
| In SQL terms, that evaluates to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ...
 | |
|     WHERE NOT (pub_date > '2005-1-3' AND headline = 'Hello')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example excludes all entries whose ``pub_date`` is later than 2005-1-3
 | |
| AND whose headline is NOT "Hello"::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.exclude(pub_date__gt=datetime.date(2005, 1, 3)).exclude(headline='Hello')
 | |
| 
 | |
| In SQL terms, that evaluates to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ...
 | |
|     WHERE NOT pub_date > '2005-1-3'
 | |
|     AND NOT headline = 'Hello'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note the second example is more restrictive.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``order_by(*fields)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| By default, results returned by a ``QuerySet`` are ordered by the ordering
 | |
| tuple given by the ``ordering`` option in the model's ``Meta``. You can
 | |
| override this on a per-``QuerySet`` basis by using the ``order_by`` method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2005).order_by('-pub_date', 'headline')
 | |
| 
 | |
| The result above will be ordered by ``pub_date`` descending, then by
 | |
| ``headline`` ascending. The negative sign in front of ``"-pub_date"`` indicates
 | |
| *descending* order. Ascending order is implied. To order randomly, use ``"?"``,
 | |
| like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.order_by('?')
 | |
| 
 | |
| To order by a field in a different table, add the other table's name and a dot,
 | |
| like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.order_by('blogs_blog.name', 'headline')
 | |
| 
 | |
| There's no way to specify whether ordering should be case sensitive. With
 | |
| respect to case-sensitivity, Django will order results however your database
 | |
| backend normally orders them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``distinct()``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a new ``QuerySet`` that uses ``SELECT DISTINCT`` in its SQL query. This
 | |
| eliminates duplicate rows from the query results.
 | |
| 
 | |
| By default, a ``QuerySet`` will not eliminate duplicate rows. In practice, this
 | |
| is rarely a problem, because simple queries such as ``Blog.objects.all()``
 | |
| don't introduce the possibility of duplicate result rows.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, if your query spans multiple tables, it's possible to get duplicate
 | |
| results when a ``QuerySet`` is evaluated. That's when you'd use ``distinct()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``values(*fields)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a ``ValuesQuerySet`` -- a ``QuerySet`` that evaluates to a list of
 | |
| dictionaries instead of model-instance objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each of those dictionaries represents an object, with the keys corresponding to
 | |
| the attribute names of model objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example compares the dictionaries of ``values()`` with the normal model
 | |
| objects::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # This list contains a Blog object.
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(name__startswith='Beatles')
 | |
|     [Beatles Blog]
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # This list contains a dictionary.
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(name__startswith='Beatles').values()
 | |
|     [{'id': 1, 'name': 'Beatles Blog', 'tagline': 'All the latest Beatles news.'}]
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``values()`` takes optional positional arguments, ``*fields``, which specify
 | |
| field names to which the ``SELECT`` should be limited. If you specify the
 | |
| fields, each dictionary will contain only the field keys/values for the fields
 | |
| you specify. If you don't specify the fields, each dictionary will contain a
 | |
| key and value for every field in the database table.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.values()
 | |
|     [{'id': 1, 'name': 'Beatles Blog', 'tagline': 'All the latest Beatles news.'}],
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.values('id', 'name')
 | |
|     [{'id': 1, 'name': 'Beatles Blog'}]
 | |
| 
 | |
| A ``ValuesQuerySet`` is useful when you know you're only going to need values
 | |
| from a small number of the available fields and you won't need the
 | |
| functionality of a model instance object. It's more efficient to select only
 | |
| the fields you need to use.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, note a ``ValuesQuerySet`` is a subclass of ``QuerySet``, so it has all
 | |
| methods of ``QuerySet``. You can call ``filter()`` on it, or ``order_by()``, or
 | |
| whatever. Yes, that means these two calls are identical::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.values().order_by('id')
 | |
|     Blog.objects.order_by('id').values()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The people who made Django prefer to put all the SQL-affecting methods first,
 | |
| followed (optionally) by any output-affecting methods (such as ``values()``),
 | |
| but it doesn't really matter. This is your chance to really flaunt your
 | |
| individualism.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``dates(field, kind, order='ASC')``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a ``DateQuerySet`` -- a ``QuerySet`` that evaluates to a list of
 | |
| ``datetime.datetime`` objects representing all available dates of a particular
 | |
| kind within the contents of the ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``field`` should be the name of a ``DateField`` or ``DateTimeField`` of your
 | |
| model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``kind`` should be either ``"year"``, ``"month"`` or ``"day"``. Each
 | |
| ``datetime.datetime`` object in the result list is "truncated" to the given
 | |
| ``type``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ``"year"`` returns a list of all distinct year values for the field.
 | |
|     * ``"month"`` returns a list of all distinct year/month values for the field.
 | |
|     * ``"day"`` returns a list of all distinct year/month/day values for the field.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``order``, which defaults to ``'ASC'``, should be either ``'ASC'`` or
 | |
| ``'DESC'``. This specifies how to order the results.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Examples::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.dates('pub_date', 'year')
 | |
|     [datetime.datetime(2005, 1, 1)]
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.dates('pub_date', 'month')
 | |
|     [datetime.datetime(2005, 2, 1), datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 1)]
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.dates('pub_date', 'day')
 | |
|     [datetime.datetime(2005, 2, 20), datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20)]
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.dates('pub_date', 'day', order='DESC')
 | |
|     [datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20), datetime.datetime(2005, 2, 20)]
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(headline__contains='Lennon').dates('pub_date', 'day')
 | |
|     [datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20)]
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``none()``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| **New in Django development version**
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns an ``EmptyQuerySet`` -- a ``QuerySet`` that always evaluates to
 | |
| an empty list. This can be used in cases where you know that you should
 | |
| return an empty result set and your caller is expecting a ``QuerySet``
 | |
| object (instead of returning an empty list, for example.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Examples::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.none()
 | |
|     []
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``select_related()``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a ``QuerySet`` that will automatically "follow" foreign-key
 | |
| relationships, selecting that additional related-object data when it executes
 | |
| its query. This is a performance booster which results in (sometimes much)
 | |
| larger queries but means later use of foreign-key relationships won't require
 | |
| database queries.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following examples illustrate the difference between plain lookups and
 | |
| ``select_related()`` lookups. Here's standard lookup::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Hits the database.
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=5)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Hits the database again to get the related Blog object.
 | |
|     b = e.blog
 | |
| 
 | |
| And here's ``select_related`` lookup::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Hits the database.
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.select_related().get(id=5)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Doesn't hit the database, because e.blog has been prepopulated
 | |
|     # in the previous query.
 | |
|     b = e.blog
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``select_related()`` follows foreign keys as far as possible. If you have the
 | |
| following models::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class City(models.Model):
 | |
|         # ...
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Person(models.Model):
 | |
|         # ...
 | |
|         hometown = models.ForeignKey(City)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Book(models.Model):
 | |
|         # ...
 | |
|         author = models.ForeignKey(Person)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...then a call to ``Book.objects.select_related().get(id=4)`` will cache the
 | |
| related ``Person`` *and* the related ``City``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Book.objects.select_related().get(id=4)
 | |
|     p = b.author         # Doesn't hit the database.
 | |
|     c = p.hometown       # Doesn't hit the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     sv = Book.objects.get(id=4) # No select_related() in this example.
 | |
|     p = b.author         # Hits the database.
 | |
|     c = p.hometown       # Hits the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that ``select_related()`` does not follow foreign keys that have
 | |
| ``null=True``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Usually, using ``select_related()`` can vastly improve performance because your
 | |
| app can avoid many database calls. However, in situations with deeply nested
 | |
| sets of relationships ``select_related()`` can sometimes end up following "too
 | |
| many" relations, and can generate queries so large that they end up being slow.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In these situations, you can use the ``depth`` argument to ``select_related()``
 | |
| to control how many "levels" of relations ``select_related()`` will actually
 | |
| follow::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Book.objects.select_related(depth=1).get(id=4)
 | |
|     p = b.author         # Doesn't hit the database.
 | |
|     c = p.hometown       # Requires a database call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``depth`` argument is new in the Django development version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``extra(select=None, where=None, params=None, tables=None)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes, the Django query syntax by itself can't easily express a complex
 | |
| ``WHERE`` clause. For these edge cases, Django provides the ``extra()``
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` modifier -- a hook for injecting specific clauses into the SQL
 | |
| generated by a ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| By definition, these extra lookups may not be portable to different database
 | |
| engines (because you're explicitly writing SQL code) and violate the DRY
 | |
| principle, so you should avoid them if possible.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Specify one or more of ``params``, ``select``, ``where`` or ``tables``. None
 | |
| of the arguments is required, but you should use at least one of them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``select``
 | |
|     The ``select`` argument lets you put extra fields in the ``SELECT`` clause.
 | |
|     It should be a dictionary mapping attribute names to SQL clauses to use to
 | |
|     calculate that attribute.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Entry.objects.extra(select={'is_recent': "pub_date > '2006-01-01'"})
 | |
| 
 | |
|     As a result, each ``Entry`` object will have an extra attribute,
 | |
|     ``is_recent``, a boolean representing whether the entry's ``pub_date`` is
 | |
|     greater than Jan. 1, 2006.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Django inserts the given SQL snippet directly into the ``SELECT``
 | |
|     statement, so the resulting SQL of the above example would be::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         SELECT blog_entry.*, (pub_date > '2006-01-01')
 | |
|         FROM blog_entry;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The next example is more advanced; it does a subquery to give each
 | |
|     resulting ``Blog`` object an ``entry_count`` attribute, an integer count
 | |
|     of associated ``Entry`` objects::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Blog.objects.extra(
 | |
|             select={
 | |
|                 'entry_count': 'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM blog_entry WHERE blog_entry.blog_id = blog_blog.id'
 | |
|             },
 | |
|         )
 | |
| 
 | |
|     (In this particular case, we're exploiting the fact that the query will
 | |
|     already contain the ``blog_blog`` table in its ``FROM`` clause.)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The resulting SQL of the above example would be::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         SELECT blog_blog.*, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM blog_entry WHERE blog_entry.blog_id = blog_blog.id)
 | |
|         FROM blog_blog;
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Note that the parenthesis required by most database engines around
 | |
|     subqueries are not required in Django's ``select`` clauses. Also note that
 | |
|     some database backends, such as some MySQL versions, don't support
 | |
|     subqueries.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``where`` / ``tables``
 | |
|     You can define explicit SQL ``WHERE`` clauses -- perhaps to perform
 | |
|     non-explicit joins -- by using ``where``. You can manually add tables to
 | |
|     the SQL ``FROM`` clause by using ``tables``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``where`` and ``tables`` both take a list of strings. All ``where``
 | |
|     parameters are "AND"ed to any other search criteria.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Entry.objects.extra(where=['id IN (3, 4, 5, 20)'])
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ...translates (roughly) into the following SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         SELECT * FROM blog_entry WHERE id IN (3, 4, 5, 20);
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``params``
 | |
|     The ``select`` and ``where`` parameters described above may use standard
 | |
|     Python database string placeholders -- ``'%s'`` to indicate parameters the
 | |
|     database engine should automatically quote. The ``params`` argument is a
 | |
|     list of any extra parameters to be substituted.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Entry.objects.extra(where=['headline=%s'], params=['Lennon'])
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Always use ``params`` instead of embedding values directly into ``select``
 | |
|     or ``where`` because ``params`` will ensure values are quoted correctly
 | |
|     according to your particular backend. (For example, quotes will be escaped
 | |
|     correctly.)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Bad::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Entry.objects.extra(where=["headline='Lennon'"])
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Good::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Entry.objects.extra(where=['headline=%s'], params=['Lennon'])
 | |
| 
 | |
| QuerySet methods that do not return QuerySets
 | |
| ---------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following ``QuerySet`` methods evaluate the ``QuerySet`` and return
 | |
| something *other than* a ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These methods do not use a cache (see `Caching and QuerySets`_ below). Rather,
 | |
| they query the database each time they're called.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``get(**kwargs)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns the object matching the given lookup parameters, which should be in
 | |
| the format described in `Field lookups`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``get()`` raises ``AssertionError`` if more than one object was found.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``get()`` raises a ``DoesNotExist`` exception if an object wasn't found for the
 | |
| given parameters. The ``DoesNotExist`` exception is an attribute of the model
 | |
| class. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.get(id='foo') # raises Entry.DoesNotExist
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``DoesNotExist`` exception inherits from
 | |
| ``django.core.exceptions.ObjectDoesNotExist``, so you can target multiple
 | |
| ``DoesNotExist`` exceptions. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.core.exceptions import ObjectDoesNotExist
 | |
|     try:
 | |
|         e = Entry.objects.get(id=3)
 | |
|         b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     except ObjectDoesNotExist:
 | |
|         print "Either the entry or blog doesn't exist."
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``create(**kwargs)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| A convenience method for creating an object and saving it all in one step.  Thus::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     p = Person.objects.create(first_name="Bruce", last_name="Springsteen")
 | |
| 
 | |
| and::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     p = Person(first_name="Bruce", last_name="Springsteen")
 | |
|     p.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| are equivalent.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``get_or_create(**kwargs)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| A convenience method for looking up an object with the given kwargs, creating
 | |
| one if necessary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns a tuple of ``(object, created)``, where ``object`` is the retrieved or
 | |
| created object and ``created`` is a boolean specifying whether a new object was
 | |
| created.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is meant as a shortcut to boilerplatish code and is mostly useful for
 | |
| data-import scripts. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     try:
 | |
|         obj = Person.objects.get(first_name='John', last_name='Lennon')
 | |
|     except Person.DoesNotExist:
 | |
|         obj = Person(first_name='John', last_name='Lennon', birthday=date(1940, 10, 9))
 | |
|         obj.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This pattern gets quite unwieldy as the number of fields in a model goes up.
 | |
| The above example can be rewritten using ``get_or_create()`` like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     obj, created = Person.objects.get_or_create(first_name='John', last_name='Lennon',
 | |
|                       defaults={'birthday': date(1940, 10, 9)})
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any keyword arguments passed to ``get_or_create()`` -- *except* an optional one
 | |
| called ``defaults`` -- will be used in a ``get()`` call. If an object is found,
 | |
| ``get_or_create()`` returns a tuple of that object and ``False``. If an object
 | |
| is *not* found, ``get_or_create()`` will instantiate and save a new object,
 | |
| returning a tuple of the new object and ``True``. The new object will be
 | |
| created according to this algorithm::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     defaults = kwargs.pop('defaults', {})
 | |
|     params = dict([(k, v) for k, v in kwargs.items() if '__' not in k])
 | |
|     params.update(defaults)
 | |
|     obj = self.model(**params)
 | |
|     obj.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| In English, that means start with any non-``'defaults'`` keyword argument that
 | |
| doesn't contain a double underscore (which would indicate a non-exact lookup).
 | |
| Then add the contents of ``defaults``, overriding any keys if necessary, and
 | |
| use the result as the keyword arguments to the model class.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you have a field named ``defaults`` and want to use it as an exact lookup in
 | |
| ``get_or_create()``, just use ``'defaults__exact'``, like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Foo.objects.get_or_create(defaults__exact='bar', defaults={'defaults': 'baz'})
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, a word on using ``get_or_create()`` in Django views. As mentioned
 | |
| earlier, ``get_or_create()`` is mostly useful in scripts that need to parse
 | |
| data and create new records if existing ones aren't available. But if you need
 | |
| to use ``get_or_create()`` in a view, please make sure to use it only in
 | |
| ``POST`` requests unless you have a good reason not to. ``GET`` requests
 | |
| shouldn't have any effect on data; use ``POST`` whenever a request to a page
 | |
| has a side effect on your data. For more, see `Safe methods`_ in the HTTP spec.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _Safe methods: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.1.1
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``count()``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns an integer representing the number of objects in the database matching
 | |
| the ``QuerySet``. ``count()`` never raises exceptions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Returns the total number of entries in the database.
 | |
|     Entry.objects.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Returns the number of entries whose headline contains 'Lennon'
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(headline__contains='Lennon').count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``count()`` performs a ``SELECT COUNT(*)`` behind the scenes, so you should
 | |
| always use ``count()`` rather than loading all of the record into Python
 | |
| objects and calling ``len()`` on the result.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Depending on which database you're using (e.g. PostgreSQL vs. MySQL),
 | |
| ``count()`` may return a long integer instead of a normal Python integer. This
 | |
| is an underlying implementation quirk that shouldn't pose any real-world
 | |
| problems.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``in_bulk(id_list)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Takes a list of primary-key values and returns a dictionary mapping each
 | |
| primary-key value to an instance of the object with the given ID.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.in_bulk([1])
 | |
|     {1: Beatles Blog}
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.in_bulk([1, 2])
 | |
|     {1: Beatles Blog, 2: Cheddar Talk}
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.in_bulk([])
 | |
|     {}
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you pass ``in_bulk()`` an empty list, you'll get an empty dictionary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``latest(field_name=None)``
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Returns the latest object in the table, by date, using the ``field_name``
 | |
| provided as the date field.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example returns the latest ``Entry`` in the table, according to the
 | |
| ``pub_date`` field::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.latest('pub_date')
 | |
| 
 | |
| If your model's ``Meta`` specifies ``get_latest_by``, you can leave off the
 | |
| ``field_name`` argument to ``latest()``. Django will use the field specified in
 | |
| ``get_latest_by`` by default.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Like ``get()``, ``latest()`` raises ``DoesNotExist`` if an object doesn't
 | |
| exist with the given parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note ``latest()`` exists purely for convenience and readability.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Field lookups
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Field lookups are how you specify the meat of an SQL ``WHERE`` clause. They're
 | |
| specified as keyword arguments to the ``QuerySet`` methods ``filter()``,
 | |
| ``exclude()`` and ``get()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Basic lookups keyword arguments take the form ``field__lookuptype=value``.
 | |
| (That's a double-underscore). For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__lte='2006-01-01')
 | |
| 
 | |
| translates (roughly) into the following SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT * FROM blog_entry WHERE pub_date <= '2006-01-01';
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: How this is possible
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Python has the ability to define functions that accept arbitrary name-value
 | |
|    arguments whose names and values are evaluated at runtime. For more
 | |
|    information, see `Keyword Arguments`_ in the official Python tutorial.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. _`Keyword Arguments`: http://docs.python.org/tut/node6.html#SECTION006720000000000000000
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you pass an invalid keyword argument, a lookup function will raise
 | |
| ``TypeError``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The database API supports the following lookup types:
 | |
| 
 | |
| exact
 | |
| ~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Exact match. If the value provided for comparison is ``None``, it will
 | |
| be interpreted as an SQL ``NULL`` (See isnull_ for more details).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Examples::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.get(id__exact=14)
 | |
|     Entry.objects.get(id__exact=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalents::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE id = 14;
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE id = NULL;
 | |
| 
 | |
| iexact
 | |
| ~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-insensitive exact match.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.get(name__iexact='beatles blog')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE name ILIKE 'beatles blog';
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note this will match ``'Beatles Blog'``, ``'beatles blog'``,
 | |
| ``'BeAtLes BLoG'``, etc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| contains
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-sensitive containment test.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.get(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%Lennon%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note this will match the headline ``'Today Lennon honored'`` but not
 | |
| ``'today lennon honored'``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQLite doesn't support case-sensitive ``LIKE`` statements; ``contains`` acts
 | |
| like ``icontains`` for SQLite.
 | |
| 
 | |
| icontains
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-insensitive containment test.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.get(headline__icontains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline ILIKE '%Lennon%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| gt
 | |
| ~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Greater than.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(id__gt=4)
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE id > 4;
 | |
| 
 | |
| gte
 | |
| ~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Greater than or equal to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| lt
 | |
| ~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Less than.
 | |
| 
 | |
| lte
 | |
| ~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Less than or equal to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| in
 | |
| ~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a given list.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(id__in=[1, 3, 4])
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE id IN (1, 3, 4);
 | |
| 
 | |
| startswith
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-sensitive starts-with.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(headline__startswith='Will')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE 'Will%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQLite doesn't support case-sensitive ``LIKE`` statements; ``startswith`` acts
 | |
| like ``istartswith`` for SQLite.
 | |
| 
 | |
| istartswith
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-insensitive starts-with.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(headline__istartswith='will')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline ILIKE 'Will%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| endswith
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-sensitive ends-with.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(headline__endswith='cats')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%cats';
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQLite doesn't support case-sensitive ``LIKE`` statements; ``endswith`` acts
 | |
| like ``iendswith`` for SQLite.
 | |
| 
 | |
| iendswith
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Case-insensitive ends-with.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(headline__iendswith='will')
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline ILIKE '%will'
 | |
| 
 | |
| range
 | |
| ~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Range test (inclusive).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     start_date = datetime.date(2005, 1, 1)
 | |
|     end_date = datetime.date(2005, 3, 31)
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__range=(start_date, end_date))
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE pub_date BETWEEN '2005-01-01' and '2005-03-31';
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can use ``range`` anywhere you can use ``BETWEEN`` in SQL -- for dates,
 | |
| numbers and even characters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| year
 | |
| ~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| For date/datetime fields, exact year match. Takes a four-digit year.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2005)
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE EXTRACT('year' FROM pub_date) = '2005';
 | |
| 
 | |
| (The exact SQL syntax varies for each database engine.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| month
 | |
| ~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| For date/datetime fields, exact month match. Takes an integer 1 (January)
 | |
| through 12 (December).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__month=12)
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE EXTRACT('month' FROM pub_date) = '12';
 | |
| 
 | |
| (The exact SQL syntax varies for each database engine.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| day
 | |
| ~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| For date/datetime fields, exact day match.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__day=3)
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE EXTRACT('day' FROM pub_date) = '3';
 | |
| 
 | |
| (The exact SQL syntax varies for each database engine.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note this will match any record with a pub_date on the third day of the month,
 | |
| such as January 3, July 3, etc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| isnull
 | |
| ~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Takes either ``True`` or ``False``, which correspond to SQL queries of
 | |
| ``IS NULL`` and ``IS NOT NULL``, respectively.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__isnull=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQL equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE pub_date IS NULL;
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: ``__isnull=True`` vs ``__exact=None``
 | |
| 
 | |
|     There is an important difference between ``__isnull=True`` and
 | |
|     ``__exact=None``. ``__exact=None`` will *always* return an empty result
 | |
|     set, because SQL requires that no value is equal to ``NULL``.
 | |
|     ``__isnull`` determines if the field is currently holding the value
 | |
|     of ``NULL`` without performing a comparison.
 | |
| 
 | |
| search
 | |
| ~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| A boolean full-text search, taking advantage of full-text indexing. This is
 | |
| like ``contains`` but is significantly faster due to full-text indexing.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note this is only available in MySQL and requires direct manipulation of the
 | |
| database to add the full-text index.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Default lookups are exact
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you don't provide a lookup type -- that is, if your keyword argument doesn't
 | |
| contain a double underscore -- the lookup type is assumed to be ``exact``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, the following two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.get(id__exact=14) # Explicit form
 | |
|     Blog.objects.get(id=14) # __exact is implied
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is for convenience, because ``exact`` lookups are the common case.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The pk lookup shortcut
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For convenience, Django provides a ``pk`` lookup type, which stands for
 | |
| "primary_key".
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the example ``Blog`` model, the primary key is the ``id`` field, so these
 | |
| three statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.get(id__exact=14) # Explicit form
 | |
|     Blog.objects.get(id=14) # __exact is implied
 | |
|     Blog.objects.get(pk=14) # pk implies id__exact
 | |
| 
 | |
| The use of ``pk`` isn't limited to ``__exact`` queries -- any query term
 | |
| can be combined with ``pk`` to perform a query on the primary key of a model::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get blogs entries  with id 1, 4 and 7
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(pk__in=[1,4,7])
 | |
|     # Get all blog entries with id > 14
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(pk__gt=14)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``pk`` lookups also work across joins. For example, these three statements are
 | |
| equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog__id__exact=3) # Explicit form
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog__id=3) # __exact is implied
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog__pk=3) # __pk implies __id__exact
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lookups that span relationships
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django offers a powerful and intuitive way to "follow" relationships in
 | |
| lookups, taking care of the SQL ``JOIN``\s for you automatically, behind the
 | |
| scenes. To span a relationship, just use the field name of related fields
 | |
| across models, separated by double underscores, until you get to the field you
 | |
| want.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example retrieves all ``Entry`` objects with a ``Blog`` whose ``name``
 | |
| is ``'Beatles Blog'``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog__name__exact='Beatles Blog')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This spanning can be as deep as you'd like.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It works backwards, too. To refer to a "reverse" relationship, just use the
 | |
| lowercase name of the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example retrieves all ``Blog`` objects which have at least one ``Entry``
 | |
| whose ``headline`` contains ``'Lennon'``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Escaping percent signs and underscores in LIKE statements
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The field lookups that equate to ``LIKE`` SQL statements (``iexact``,
 | |
| ``contains``, ``icontains``, ``startswith``, ``istartswith``, ``endswith``
 | |
| and ``iendswith``) will automatically escape the two special characters used in
 | |
| ``LIKE`` statements -- the percent sign and the underscore. (In a ``LIKE``
 | |
| statement, the percent sign signifies a multiple-character wildcard and the
 | |
| underscore signifies a single-character wildcard.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This means things should work intuitively, so the abstraction doesn't leak.
 | |
| For example, to retrieve all the entries that contain a percent sign, just use
 | |
| the percent sign as any other character::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(headline__contains='%')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django takes care of the quoting for you; the resulting SQL will look something
 | |
| like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%\%%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| Same goes for underscores. Both percentage signs and underscores are handled
 | |
| for you transparently.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Caching and QuerySets
 | |
| ---------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each ``QuerySet`` contains a cache, to minimize database access. It's important
 | |
| to understand how it works, in order to write the most efficient code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a newly created ``QuerySet``, the cache is empty. The first time a
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` is evaluated -- and, hence, a database query happens -- Django
 | |
| saves the query results in the ``QuerySet``'s cache and returns the results
 | |
| that have been explicitly requested (e.g., the next element, if the
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` is being iterated over). Subsequent evaluations of the
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` reuse the cached results.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keep this caching behavior in mind, because it may bite you if you don't use
 | |
| your ``QuerySet``\s correctly. For example, the following will create two
 | |
| ``QuerySet``\s, evaluate them, and throw them away::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     print [e.headline for e in Entry.objects.all()]
 | |
|     print [e.pub_date for e in Entry.objects.all()]
 | |
| 
 | |
| That means the same database query will be executed twice, effectively doubling
 | |
| your database load. Also, there's a possibility the two lists may not include
 | |
| the same database records, because an ``Entry`` may have been added or deleted
 | |
| in the split second between the two requests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To avoid this problem, simply save the ``QuerySet`` and reuse it::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     queryset = Poll.objects.all()
 | |
|     print [p.headline for p in queryset] # Evaluate the query set.
 | |
|     print [p.pub_date for p in queryset] # Re-use the cache from the evaluation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Comparing objects
 | |
| =================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To compare two model instances, just use the standard Python comparison operator,
 | |
| the double equals sign: ``==``. Behind the scenes, that compares the primary
 | |
| key values of two models.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using the ``Entry`` example above, the following two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     some_entry == other_entry
 | |
|     some_entry.id == other_entry.id
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model's primary key isn't called ``id``, no problem. Comparisons will
 | |
| always use the primary key, whatever it's called. For example, if a model's
 | |
| primary key field is called ``name``, these two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     some_obj == other_obj
 | |
|     some_obj.name == other_obj.name
 | |
| 
 | |
| Complex lookups with Q objects
 | |
| ==============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keyword argument queries -- in ``filter()``, etc. -- are "AND"ed together. If
 | |
| you need to execute more complex queries (for example, queries with ``OR``
 | |
| statements), you can use ``Q`` objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A ``Q`` object (``django.db.models.Q``) is an object used to encapsulate a
 | |
| collection of keyword arguments. These keyword arguments are specified as in
 | |
| "Field lookups" above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this ``Q`` object encapsulates a single ``LIKE`` query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='What')
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``Q`` objects can be combined using the ``&`` and ``|`` operators. When an
 | |
| operator is used on two ``Q`` objects, it yields a new ``Q`` object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this statement yields a single ``Q`` object that represents the
 | |
| "OR" of two ``"question__startswith"`` queries::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='Who') | Q(question__startswith='What')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is equivalent to the following SQL ``WHERE`` clause::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%'
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining ``Q`` objects
 | |
| with the ``&`` and ``|`` operators. You can also use parenthetical grouping.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each lookup function that takes keyword-arguments (e.g. ``filter()``,
 | |
| ``exclude()``, ``get()``) can also be passed one or more ``Q`` objects as
 | |
| positional (not-named) arguments. If you provide multiple ``Q`` object
 | |
| arguments to a lookup function, the arguments will be "AND"ed together. For
 | |
| example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         Q(question__startswith='Who'),
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6))
 | |
|     )
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... roughly translates into the SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT * from polls WHERE question LIKE 'Who%'
 | |
|         AND (pub_date = '2005-05-02' OR pub_date = '2005-05-06')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lookup functions can mix the use of ``Q`` objects and keyword arguments. All
 | |
| arguments provided to a lookup function (be they keyword arguments or ``Q``
 | |
| objects) are "AND"ed together. However, if a ``Q`` object is provided, it must
 | |
| precede the definition of any keyword arguments. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6)),
 | |
|         question__startswith='Who')
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... would be a valid query, equivalent to the previous example; but::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # INVALID QUERY
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         question__startswith='Who',
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6)))
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... would not be valid.
 | |
| 
 | |
| See the `OR lookups examples page`_ for more examples.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _OR lookups examples page: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/or_lookups/
 | |
| 
 | |
| Related objects
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you define a relationship in a model (i.e., a ``ForeignKey``,
 | |
| ``OneToOneField``, or ``ManyToManyField``), instances of that model will have
 | |
| a convenient API to access the related object(s).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using the models at the top of this page, for example, an ``Entry`` object ``e``
 | |
| can get its associated ``Blog`` object by accessing the ``blog`` attribute:
 | |
| ``e.blog``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Behind the scenes, this functionality is implemented by Python descriptors_.
 | |
| This shouldn't really matter to you, but we point it out here for the curious.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django also creates API accessors for the "other" side of the relationship --
 | |
| the link from the related model to the model that defines the relationship.
 | |
| For example, a ``Blog`` object ``b`` has access to a list of all related
 | |
| ``Entry`` objects via the ``entry_set`` attribute: ``b.entry_set.all()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All examples in this section use the sample ``Blog``, ``Author`` and ``Entry``
 | |
| models defined at the top of this page.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _descriptors: http://users.rcn.com/python/download/Descriptor.htm
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-many relationships
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forward
 | |
| ~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has a ``ForeignKey``, instances of that model will have access to
 | |
| the related (foreign) object via a simple attribute of the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     e.blog # Returns the related Blog object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can get and set via a foreign-key attribute. As you may expect, changes to
 | |
| the foreign key aren't saved to the database until you call ``save()``.
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     e.blog = some_blog
 | |
|     e.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a ``ForeignKey`` field has ``null=True`` set (i.e., it allows ``NULL``
 | |
| values), you can assign ``None`` to it. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     e.blog = None
 | |
|     e.save() # "UPDATE blog_entry SET blog_id = NULL ...;"
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forward access to one-to-many relationships is cached the first time the
 | |
| related object is accessed. Subsequent accesses to the foreign key on the same
 | |
| object instance are cached. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     print e.blog  # Hits the database to retrieve the associated Blog.
 | |
|     print e.blog  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that the ``select_related()`` ``QuerySet`` method recursively prepopulates
 | |
| the cache of all one-to-many relationships ahead of time. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.select_related().get(id=2)
 | |
|     print e.blog  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
|     print e.blog  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``select_related()`` is documented in the "QuerySet methods that return new
 | |
| QuerySets" section above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Backward
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has a ``ForeignKey``, instances of the foreign-key model will have
 | |
| access to a ``Manager`` that returns all instances of the first model. By
 | |
| default, this ``Manager`` is named ``FOO_set``, where ``FOO`` is the source
 | |
| model name, lowercased. This ``Manager`` returns ``QuerySets``, which can be
 | |
| filtered and manipulated as described in the "Retrieving objects" section
 | |
| above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     b.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects related to Blog.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # b.entry_set is a Manager that returns QuerySets.
 | |
|     b.entry_set.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
|     b.entry_set.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can override the ``FOO_set`` name by setting the ``related_name``
 | |
| parameter in the ``ForeignKey()`` definition. For example, if the ``Entry``
 | |
| model was altered to ``blog = ForeignKey(Blog, related_name='entries')``, the
 | |
| above example code would look like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     b.entries.all() # Returns all Entry objects related to Blog.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # b.entries is a Manager that returns QuerySets.
 | |
|     b.entries.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
|     b.entries.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You cannot access a reverse ``ForeignKey`` ``Manager`` from the class; it must
 | |
| be accessed from an instance. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.entry_set # Raises AttributeError: "Manager must be accessed via instance".
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition to the ``QuerySet`` methods defined in "Retrieving objects" above,
 | |
| the ``ForeignKey`` ``Manager`` has these additional methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ``add(obj1, obj2, ...)``: Adds the specified model objects to the related
 | |
|       object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|           e = Entry.objects.get(id=234)
 | |
|           b.entry_set.add(e) # Associates Entry e with Blog b.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ``create(**kwargs)``: Creates a new object, saves it and puts it in the
 | |
|       related object set. Returns the newly created object.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|           e = b.entry_set.create(headline='Hello', body_text='Hi', pub_date=datetime.date(2005, 1, 1))
 | |
|           # No need to call e.save() at this point -- it's already been saved.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       This is equivalent to (but much simpler than)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|           e = Entry(blog=b, headline='Hello', body_text='Hi', pub_date=datetime.date(2005, 1, 1))
 | |
|           e.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Note that there's no need to specify the keyword argument of the model
 | |
|       that defines the relationship. In the above example, we don't pass the
 | |
|       parameter ``blog`` to ``create()``. Django figures out that the new
 | |
|       ``Entry`` object's ``blog`` field should be set to ``b``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ``remove(obj1, obj2, ...)``: Removes the specified model objects from the
 | |
|       related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|           e = Entry.objects.get(id=234)
 | |
|           b.entry_set.remove(e) # Disassociates Entry e from Blog b.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       In order to prevent database inconsistency, this method only exists on
 | |
|       ``ForeignKey`` objects where ``null=True``. If the related field can't be
 | |
|       set to ``None`` (``NULL``), then an object can't be removed from a
 | |
|       relation without being added to another. In the above example, removing
 | |
|       ``e`` from ``b.entry_set()`` is equivalent to doing ``e.blog = None``,
 | |
|       and because the ``blog`` ``ForeignKey`` doesn't have ``null=True``, this
 | |
|       is invalid.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ``clear()``: Removes all objects from the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|           b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|           b.entry_set.clear()
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Note this doesn't delete the related objects -- it just disassociates
 | |
|       them.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Just like ``remove()``, ``clear()`` is only available on ``ForeignKey``s
 | |
|       where ``null=True``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To assign the members of a related set in one fell swoop, just assign to it
 | |
| from any iterable object. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     b.entry_set = [e1, e2]
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the ``clear()`` method is available, any pre-existing objects will be
 | |
| removed from the ``entry_set`` before all objects in the iterable (in this
 | |
| case, a list) are added to the set. If the ``clear()`` method is *not*
 | |
| available, all objects in the iterable will be added without removing any
 | |
| existing elements.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each "reverse" operation described in this section has an immediate effect on
 | |
| the database. Every addition, creation and deletion is immediately and
 | |
| automatically saved to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many-to-many relationships
 | |
| --------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both ends of a many-to-many relationship get automatic API access to the other
 | |
| end. The API works just as a "backward" one-to-many relationship. See Backward_
 | |
| above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The only difference is in the attribute naming: The model that defines the
 | |
| ``ManyToManyField`` uses the attribute name of that field itself, whereas the
 | |
| "reverse" model uses the lowercased model name of the original model, plus
 | |
| ``'_set'`` (just like reverse one-to-many relationships).
 | |
| 
 | |
| An example makes this easier to understand::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=3)
 | |
|     e.authors.all() # Returns all Author objects for this Entry.
 | |
|     e.authors.count()
 | |
|     e.authors.filter(name__contains='John')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     a = Author.objects.get(id=5)
 | |
|     a.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects for this Author.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Like ``ForeignKey``, ``ManyToManyField`` can specify ``related_name``. In the
 | |
| above example, if the ``ManyToManyField`` in ``Entry`` had specified
 | |
| ``related_name='entries'``, then each ``Author`` instance would have an
 | |
| ``entries`` attribute instead of ``entry_set``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-one relationships
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The semantics of one-to-one relationships will be changing soon, so we don't
 | |
| recommend you use them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| How are the backward relationships possible?
 | |
| --------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other object-relational mappers require you to define relationships on both
 | |
| sides. The Django developers believe this is a violation of the DRY (Don't
 | |
| Repeat Yourself) principle, so Django only requires you to define the
 | |
| relationship on one end.
 | |
| 
 | |
| But how is this possible, given that a model class doesn't know which other
 | |
| model classes are related to it until those other model classes are loaded?
 | |
| 
 | |
| The answer lies in the ``INSTALLED_APPS`` setting. The first time any model is
 | |
| loaded, Django iterates over every model in ``INSTALLED_APPS`` and creates the
 | |
| backward relationships in memory as needed. Essentially, one of the functions
 | |
| of ``INSTALLED_APPS`` is to tell Django the entire model domain.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Queries over related objects
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Queries involving related objects follow the same rules as queries involving
 | |
| normal value fields. When specifying the the value for a query to match, you
 | |
| may use either an object instance itself, or the primary key value for the
 | |
| object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, if you have a Blog object ``b`` with ``id=5``, the following
 | |
| three queries would be identical::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=b) # Query using object instance
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=b.id) # Query using id from instance
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=5) # Query using id directly
 | |
| 
 | |
| Deleting objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The delete method, conveniently, is named ``delete()``. This method immediately
 | |
| deletes the object and has no return value. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e.delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also delete objects in bulk. Every ``QuerySet`` has a ``delete()``
 | |
| method, which deletes all members of that ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this deletes all ``Entry`` objects with a ``pub_date`` year of
 | |
| 2005::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2005).delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| When Django deletes an object, it emulates the behavior of the SQL
 | |
| constraint ``ON DELETE CASCADE`` -- in other words, any objects which
 | |
| had foreign keys pointing at the object to be deleted will be deleted
 | |
| along with it. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
|     # This will delete the Blog and all of its Entry objects.
 | |
|     b.delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that ``delete()`` is the only ``QuerySet`` method that is not exposed on a
 | |
| ``Manager`` itself. This is a safety mechanism to prevent you from accidentally
 | |
| requesting ``Entry.objects.delete()``, and deleting *all* the entries. If you
 | |
| *do* want to delete all the objects, then you have to explicitly request a
 | |
| complete query set::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.all().delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Extra instance methods
 | |
| ======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition to ``save()``, ``delete()``, a model object might get any or all
 | |
| of the following methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_FOO_display()
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every field that has ``choices`` set, the object will have a
 | |
| ``get_FOO_display()`` method, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This
 | |
| method returns the "human-readable" value of the field. For example, in the
 | |
| following model::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     GENDER_CHOICES = (
 | |
|         ('M', 'Male'),
 | |
|         ('F', 'Female'),
 | |
|     )
 | |
|     class Person(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(maxlength=20)
 | |
|         gender = models.CharField(maxlength=1, choices=GENDER_CHOICES)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...each ``Person`` instance will have a ``get_gender_display()`` method. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> p = Person(name='John', gender='M')
 | |
|     >>> p.save()
 | |
|     >>> p.gender
 | |
|     'M'
 | |
|     >>> p.get_gender_display()
 | |
|     'Male'
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_next_by_FOO(\**kwargs) and get_previous_by_FOO(\**kwargs)
 | |
| -------------------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``DateField`` and ``DateTimeField`` that does not have ``null=True``,
 | |
| the object will have ``get_next_by_FOO()`` and ``get_previous_by_FOO()``
 | |
| methods, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the next and
 | |
| previous object with respect to the date field, raising the appropriate
 | |
| ``DoesNotExist`` exception when appropriate.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both methods accept optional keyword arguments, which should be in the format
 | |
| described in `Field lookups`_ above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that in the case of identical date values, these methods will use the ID
 | |
| as a fallback check. This guarantees that no records are skipped or duplicated.
 | |
| For a full example, see the `lookup API sample model`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _lookup API sample model: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/lookup/
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_FOO_filename()
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``get_FOO_filename()`` method,
 | |
| where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the full filesystem path
 | |
| to the file, according to your ``MEDIA_ROOT`` setting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that ``ImageField`` is technically a subclass of ``FileField``, so every
 | |
| model with an ``ImageField`` will also get this method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_FOO_url()
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``get_FOO_url()`` method,
 | |
| where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the full URL to the file,
 | |
| according to your ``MEDIA_URL`` setting. If the value is blank, this method
 | |
| returns an empty string.
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_FOO_size()
 | |
| --------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``get_FOO_size()`` method,
 | |
| where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the size of the file, in
 | |
| bytes. (Behind the scenes, it uses ``os.path.getsize``.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| save_FOO_file(filename, raw_contents)
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``save_FOO_file()`` method,
 | |
| where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This saves the given file to the
 | |
| filesystem, using the given filename. If a file with the given filename already
 | |
| exists, Django adds an underscore to the end of the filename (but before the
 | |
| extension) until the filename is available.
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_FOO_height() and get_FOO_width()
 | |
| ------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``ImageField``, the object will have ``get_FOO_height()`` and
 | |
| ``get_FOO_width()`` methods, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This
 | |
| returns the height (or width) of the image, as an integer, in pixels.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Shortcuts
 | |
| =========
 | |
| 
 | |
| As you develop views, you will discover a number of common idioms in the
 | |
| way you use the database API. Django encodes some of these idioms as
 | |
| shortcuts that can be used to simplify the process of writing views. These
 | |
| functions are in the ``django.shortcuts`` module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_object_or_404()
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| One common idiom to use ``get()`` and raise ``Http404`` if the
 | |
| object doesn't exist. This idiom is captured by ``get_object_or_404()``.
 | |
| This function takes a Django model as its first argument and an
 | |
| arbitrary number of keyword arguments, which it passes to the manager's
 | |
| ``get()`` function. It raises ``Http404`` if the object doesn't
 | |
| exist. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get the Entry with a primary key of 3
 | |
|     e = get_object_or_404(Entry, pk=3)
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you provide a model to this shortcut function, the default manager
 | |
| is used to execute the underlying ``get()`` query. If you don't want to
 | |
| use the default manager, or if you want to search a list of related objects,
 | |
| you can provide ``get_object_or_404()`` with a manager object instead.
 | |
| For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get the author of blog instance `e` with a name of 'Fred'
 | |
|     a = get_object_or_404(e.authors, name='Fred')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Use a custom manager 'recent_entries' in the search for an
 | |
|     # entry with a primary key of 3
 | |
|     e = get_object_or_404(Entry.recent_entries, pk=3)
 | |
| 
 | |
| get_list_or_404()
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``get_list_or_404`` behaves the same way as ``get_object_or_404()``
 | |
| -- except that it uses ``filter()`` instead of ``get()``. It raises
 | |
| ``Http404`` if the list is empty.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Falling back to raw SQL
 | |
| =======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you find yourself needing to write an SQL query that is too complex for
 | |
| Django's database-mapper to handle, you can fall back into raw-SQL statement
 | |
| mode.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The preferred way to do this is by giving your model custom methods or custom
 | |
| manager methods that execute queries. Although there's nothing in Django that
 | |
| *requires* database queries to live in the model layer, this approach keeps all
 | |
| your data-access logic in one place, which is smart from an code-organization
 | |
| standpoint. For instructions, see `Executing custom SQL`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, it's important to note that the Django database layer is merely an
 | |
| interface to your database. You can access your database via other tools,
 | |
| programming languages or database frameworks; there's nothing Django-specific
 | |
| about your database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _Executing custom SQL: ../model-api/#executing-custom-sql
 |