It would be good to include the word "divergent" in the log when a
change is divergent, since users are often unsure what's happening when
they see a divergent change, and giving them a term to search for would
be helpful. However, I don't think it looks good to put this label next
to the change ID itself if both are the same color, since it ends up
being hard to distinguish from the change offset at a glance. Also,
putting the label next to the change ID also messes up the alignment of
fields in the log. Therefore, I think it looks better to put the
"divergent" label at the end of the line.
Since divergence and hidden commits are similar, it makes sense for both
labels to be in the same place, so I also moved the hidden label to the
end for consistency.
One downside is that the labels are less obviously connected with the
change ID itself due to them being farther apart. I think this could be
fine, since they are still visually connected by being the same color.
Conflict labels will generally start with lowercase change IDs, so
making all of the text lowercase makes it more consistent. I also
removed the "contents of" text, since conflict labels will already be
long enough, and this text doesn't add anything. Similarly, I removed
the "(conflict 1 of 1)" note from the Git conflict markers since Git
doesn't include this information, and including it would result in extra
long lines once we add conflict labels.
Running "cargo insta test --workspace", results in numerous warnings:
Snapshot test passes but the existing value is in a legacy format.
Please run `cargo insta test --force-update-snapshots` to update to
a newer format.
This commit is the result of running the suggested command.
As a follow-up to #8115, this moves all references in the codebase to use the new website.
I didn't update the older CHANGELOG entries because I figured they're intended
to be immutable.
Deprecation warnings will be emitted for default "substring:" patterns. This
change will suppress them. Since "glob:" will be the new default, I made these
tests use "glob:" when both "exact:" and "glob:" work.
Tests for the revset filter functions aren't updated.
This patch doesn't add builtin_evolog_redacted template because I'm not sure if
we want to collect evolution log for debugging purpose. The redacted template
can be added later if needed.
In parts of the description that are not about `-d` specifically, we
should not say "onto the destination". The message we print at the end
also says "onto destination". This updates both places to use "to"
instead of "onto".
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
The choice of the upper limit is arbitrary. We use 5 in "multiple revisions"
error, but I feel 5 would be too small for "jj absorb", where the stack of
mutable commits may be ~10, but wouldn't likely be ~100s.
There have been a number of users confused about why
their commits are immutable, or what to do about it, ex.
[https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5659].
Separately, I feel that the cli is too quick to suggest
`--ignore-immutable`, without context of the consequences. A new user
could see that the command is failing, see a helpful hint to make it not
fail, apply it and move on. This has wildly different consequences, from
`jj squash --into someone_elses_branch@origin` rewriting a single commit,
to `jj edit 'root()+'` rewriting your entire history.
This commit changes the immutable hint by doing the following:
* Adds a short description of what immutable commits are used for, and a
link to the relevant docs, to the hint message.
* Shows the number of immutable commits that would be rewritten if
the operation had succeeded.
* Removes the suggestion to use `--ignore-immutable`.
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
I don't think we need --keep-emptied flag. IIRC, "jj squash" has that flag in
order not to squash commit description to the destination commits. Since
"jj absorb" never moves commit description, the source commit is preserved in
that situation.
Closes#5141
Both Mercurial and Git (xdiff) have a special case for empty hunks.
https://repo.mercurial-scm.org/hg/rev/2b1ec74c961f
I also changed the internal line numbers to start from 0 so we wouldn't have
to think about whether "N - 1" would underflow.
Fixes#5049
The destination commits are selected based on annotation, which I think is
basically the same as "hg absorb" (except for handling of consecutive hunks.)
However, we don't compute a full interleaved delta right now, and the hunks are
merged in the same way as "jj squash". This means absorbed hunks might produce
conflicts if no context lines exist. Still I think this is more intuitive than
selecting destination commits based on patch commutativity.
I've left inline comments to the tests where behavior is different from "hg
absorb", but these aren't exhaustively checked.
Closes#170
