As we have discussed many times on Discord and GitHub, `--destination`
is not a great name because `--insert-before` and `--insert-after` are
also destinations. The most popular alternative seems to be
`--onto`. We already use that term in descriptions in several places,
such as in the help text for `rebase -d` where we say "The revision(s)
to rebase onto". This patch therefore renames the `--destination` flag
to `--onto`.
The short name naturally becomes `-o`. That is perhaps a little
unfortunate because it's a common short name for `--output <file>`
arguments, but we don't use that anywhere so it seems fine.
Perhaps we should also rename `--source` (used by `rebase` and `fix`)
to something else. Perhaps the most obvious name is `--descendants`,
but the short form would be `-d`, which is of course already taken by
`--destination` in the case of `rebase`. Either way, I'm leaving that
rename for later. It would be good to do it before next release if we
are going to do it, though.
Closes#7941
New users (especially ones unfamiliar with CLI programs) intuitively
expect `jj undo` to work the same way the "undo" functionality of
typical GUI applications do. That means, running `jj undo` multiple
times should restore progressively older states of the repository
one-by-one.
Related feature request "jj undo ergonomics":
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/3700
There are two major goals:
1. garbage-collect predecessor commits referenced by immutable commits.
2. show operations alongside predecessors in "jj evolog".
The predecessors field will be removed from the Commit object. Maybe we can
also remove (writer side of) the extras table from GitBackend.
"jj evolog" will traverse the operation history to build an evolution
graph. This will be slower than the current implementation, but it seems
tolerable for mid-size repository stored in a local disk.
(when the page cache is warm)
% time jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph | wc -c
50459
jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph 0.12s user 0.31s system 103% cpu 0.418 total
Suppose we're interested in recent modifications, the traversal can often be
terminate early. I also have an idea for indexing originating operations.
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/6405
For old operations which didn't record predecessors, "jj evolog" will fall back
to commit.predecessor_ids(). That's why commit_predecessors is Option<_>.
In parts of the description that are not about `-d` specifically, we
should not say "onto the destination". The message we print at the end
also says "onto destination". This updates both places to use "to"
instead of "onto".
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
This allows the customization of the duplicated commit descriptions.
An ideal use case for this is emulating `git cherry-pick -x`, as
illustrated in the tests.
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
I believe this was an oversight. "jj duplicate" should duplicate commits (=
patches), not trees.
This patch adds a separate test file because test_rewrite.rs is pretty big, and
we'll probably want to migrate CLI tests to jj-lib.
The working-copy revision is usually the latest commit, but it's not always
true. This patch ensures that the wc branch is emitted first so the graph node
order is less dependent on rewrites.
This commit extracts out the common code printing out the
`MoveCommitsStats` information into a shared function. The printed
output was also inconsistent between `-r` and `-s`/`-b` code paths, so I
standardized it to say "Rebased ? commits onto destination" for both
cases.
Added colons to make it seem less like an English sentence, see
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/4602#discussion_r1791295776
I believe printing both the start and end times is excessive for a
summary. For now, I have it print just the start time for consistency.
I intend to change it to print the ending time later.
I was a bit torn on whether to use `format_timestamp(self.time().start())`
or `self.time().start().ago()`. The latter looks better, but is less
configurable and worse for dates long ago. In the future, we could add a
`format_op_summary_timestamp` function and/or a template function that
uses `.ago()` for recent dates and absolute dates for old dates.
This removes an invalid View state from the root operation.
Note that the root index will have to be reindexed in order to resolve "root()"
in the root operation. I don't think this would practically matter, so this
patch doesn't bump the index version to invalidate the existing indexes.
See also 48a9f9ef56 "repo: use Transaction for creating repo-init operation."
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
There's a subtle behavior change that an empty revset is no longer rejected
individually, but I think that's good for "jj duplicate".
cmd_duplicate() was the last caller of index.topo_order().
this greatly speeds up the time to run all tests, at the cost of slightly larger recompile times for individual tests.
this unfortunately adds the requirement that all tests are listed in `runner.rs` for the crate.
to avoid forgetting, i've added a new test that ensures the directory is in sync with the file.
## benchmarks
before this change, recompiling all tests took 32-50 seconds and running a single test took 3.5 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 3.543 s ± 0.168 s [User: 2.597 s, System: 1.262 s]
Range (min … max): 3.400 s … 3.847 s 10 runs
```
after this change, recompiling all tests take 4 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs ; cargo t --test runner --no-run'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.055 s ± 0.123 s [User: 3.591 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.804 s … 4.159 s 10 runs
```
and running a single test takes about the same:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test runner -- test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.129 s ± 0.120 s [User: 3.636 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.933 s … 4.346 s 10 runs
```
about 1.4 seconds of that is the time for the runner, of which .4 is the time for the linker. so
there may be room for further improving the times.
Once we add support for immutable commits, `jj duplicate` should be
allowed to create duplicate of them. The reason it can't duplicate the
root commit is that it would mean there would be multiple root
commits, which would break the invariant that the single root commit
is the only root commit (and the backends refuse to write a commit
without parents). So let's have `jj duplicate` check specifically that
the user doesn't try to duplicate the root commit instead.
They are shown next to the change and commit id, since they are other names the
commit can be referred by.
The description is separated from the branches by a ` | ` when there are
branches, so that one can tell the branches from the description without color.
The result looks like this: 
