It would be good to include the word "divergent" in the log when a
change is divergent, since users are often unsure what's happening when
they see a divergent change, and giving them a term to search for would
be helpful. However, I don't think it looks good to put this label next
to the change ID itself if both are the same color, since it ends up
being hard to distinguish from the change offset at a glance. Also,
putting the label next to the change ID also messes up the alignment of
fields in the log. Therefore, I think it looks better to put the
"divergent" label at the end of the line.
Since divergence and hidden commits are similar, it makes sense for both
labels to be in the same place, so I also moved the hidden label to the
end for consistency.
One downside is that the labels are less obviously connected with the
change ID itself due to them being farther apart. I think this could be
fine, since they are still visually connected by being the same color.
Although we don't have "jj git tag set"/"delete" commands, this fixes weird undo
behavior #6325. The discussion in #6325 is derailed, but there would be another
issue for the "abandon unreachable" behavior.
Fixes#6325
New users (especially ones unfamiliar with CLI programs) intuitively
expect `jj undo` to work the same way the "undo" functionality of
typical GUI applications do. That means, running `jj undo` multiple
times should restore progressively older states of the repository
one-by-one.
Related feature request "jj undo ergonomics":
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/3700
This paves the way for the semantics of `jj undo` and `jj op revert` to
evolve independently. `jj op revert` is going to stay the low-level
command to apply the inverse of any operation. The new name is
consistent with `jj revert`, which applies the inverse of a commit.
`jj undo` on the other hand is planned to become a higher-level command,
which is more similar to, say, Ctrl+Z in typical GUI applications.
Running `jj undo` repeatedly will revert progressively older operations,
allowing the user to walk backwards in time. At the same time, `jj undo`
will lose the abilitly to revert arbitrary operations, to keep its
semantics simple and intuitive.
Related feature request "jj undo ergonomics":
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/3700
There are two major goals:
1. garbage-collect predecessor commits referenced by immutable commits.
2. show operations alongside predecessors in "jj evolog".
The predecessors field will be removed from the Commit object. Maybe we can
also remove (writer side of) the extras table from GitBackend.
"jj evolog" will traverse the operation history to build an evolution
graph. This will be slower than the current implementation, but it seems
tolerable for mid-size repository stored in a local disk.
(when the page cache is warm)
% time jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph | wc -c
50459
jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph 0.12s user 0.31s system 103% cpu 0.418 total
Suppose we're interested in recent modifications, the traversal can often be
terminate early. I also have an idea for indexing originating operations.
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/6405
For old operations which didn't record predecessors, "jj evolog" will fall back
to commit.predecessor_ids(). That's why commit_predecessors is Option<_>.
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
This removes the special case for RefName::LocalBranch(_), which can be
processed as a remote bookmark.
"jj git import" now prints local bookmarks and tags with @git suffix. I think
this is more correct since these refs are imported from the backing Git
repository.
These helpers are going to be needed to port the git2 code in the lib
tests to gitoxide. Since the cli tests already depend on testutils, this
helps with avoiding duplicating the code
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
Added colons to make it seem less like an English sentence, see
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/4602#discussion_r1791295776
I believe printing both the start and end times is excessive for a
summary. For now, I have it print just the start time for consistency.
I intend to change it to print the ending time later.
I was a bit torn on whether to use `format_timestamp(self.time().start())`
or `self.time().start().ago()`. The latter looks better, but is less
configurable and worse for dates long ago. In the future, we could add a
`format_op_summary_timestamp` function and/or a template function that
uses `.ago()` for recent dates and absolute dates for old dates.
This removes an invalid View state from the root operation.
Note that the root index will have to be reindexed in order to resolve "root()"
in the root operation. I don't think this would practically matter, so this
patch doesn't bump the index version to invalidate the existing indexes.
See also 48a9f9ef56 "repo: use Transaction for creating repo-init operation."
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
It's common to create empty working-copy commits while using jj, and
currently the author timestamp for a commit is only set when it is first
created. If you create an empty commit, then don't work on a repo for a
few days, and then start working on a new feature without abandoning the
working-copy commit, the author timestamp will remain as the time the
commit was created rather than being updated to the time that work began
or finished.
This commit changes the behavior so that discardable commits (empty
commits with no description) by the current user have their author
timestamps reset when they are rewritten, meaning that the author
timestamp will become finalized whenever a commit is given a description
or becomes non-empty.
It's inconsistent that some warnings have headings and some don't, and it seems
the choice is arbitrary. Let's unify the style. There are two exceptions:
1. continued line following labeled message,
2. "unrecognized response" followed by prompt.
As discussed in #2900, the milliseconds are rarely useful, and it can
be confusing with different timezones because it makes harder to
compare timestamps.
I added an environment variable to control the timestamp in a
cross-platform way. I didn't document because it exists only for tests
(like `JJ_RANDOMNESS_SEED`).
Closes#2900
this greatly speeds up the time to run all tests, at the cost of slightly larger recompile times for individual tests.
this unfortunately adds the requirement that all tests are listed in `runner.rs` for the crate.
to avoid forgetting, i've added a new test that ensures the directory is in sync with the file.
## benchmarks
before this change, recompiling all tests took 32-50 seconds and running a single test took 3.5 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 3.543 s ± 0.168 s [User: 2.597 s, System: 1.262 s]
Range (min … max): 3.400 s … 3.847 s 10 runs
```
after this change, recompiling all tests take 4 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs ; cargo t --test runner --no-run'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.055 s ± 0.123 s [User: 3.591 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.804 s … 4.159 s 10 runs
```
and running a single test takes about the same:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test runner -- test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.129 s ± 0.120 s [User: 3.636 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.933 s … 4.346 s 10 runs
```
about 1.4 seconds of that is the time for the runner, of which .4 is the time for the linker. so
there may be room for further improving the times.
The error output gets more verbose because all gix error sources are printed.
Maybe we'll need a better formatting, but changing to multi-line output doesn't
look nice either.
