It would be good to include the word "divergent" in the log when a
change is divergent, since users are often unsure what's happening when
they see a divergent change, and giving them a term to search for would
be helpful. However, I don't think it looks good to put this label next
to the change ID itself if both are the same color, since it ends up
being hard to distinguish from the change offset at a glance. Also,
putting the label next to the change ID also messes up the alignment of
fields in the log. Therefore, I think it looks better to put the
"divergent" label at the end of the line.
Since divergence and hidden commits are similar, it makes sense for both
labels to be in the same place, so I also moved the hidden label to the
end for consistency.
One downside is that the labels are less obviously connected with the
change ID itself due to them being farther apart. I think this could be
fine, since they are still visually connected by being the same color.
Running "cargo insta test --workspace", results in numerous warnings:
Snapshot test passes but the existing value is in a legacy format.
Please run `cargo insta test --force-update-snapshots` to update to
a newer format.
This commit is the result of running the suggested command.
Deprecation warnings will be emitted for default "substring:" patterns. This
change will suppress them. Since "glob:" will be the new default, I made these
tests use "glob:" when both "exact:" and "glob:" work.
Tests for the revset filter functions aren't updated.
I'm going to fix parsing of CLI string patterns to use revset parser, and it
would be annoying if inner quotes were required in addition to shell quotes:
$ jj bookmark list 'glob:"push-*"'
There's also a plan to enable glob matching globally. This will mean that we'll
have to use either `subject(*foo*)` or `subject(substring:foo)` for substring
search.
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/6971#issuecomment-3067038313
As we have discussed many times on Discord and GitHub, `--destination`
is not a great name because `--insert-before` and `--insert-after` are
also destinations. The most popular alternative seems to be
`--onto`. We already use that term in descriptions in several places,
such as in the help text for `rebase -d` where we say "The revision(s)
to rebase onto". This patch therefore renames the `--destination` flag
to `--onto`.
The short name naturally becomes `-o`. That is perhaps a little
unfortunate because it's a common short name for `--output <file>`
arguments, but we don't use that anywhere so it seems fine.
Perhaps we should also rename `--source` (used by `rebase` and `fix`)
to something else. Perhaps the most obvious name is `--descendants`,
but the short form would be `-d`, which is of course already taken by
`--destination` in the case of `rebase`. Either way, I'm leaving that
rename for later. It would be good to do it before next release if we
are going to do it, though.
Closes#7941
The operation timestamp is often very close to the committer timestamp, so I
don't think it's useful in evolog. I also removed "root()" as it wouldn't be
useful either, and the root operation should have no evolved commits.
I had a report from a user at Google who was confused about a config
deprecation message because they had forgotten that they set a
repo-level config. This patch includes the source level in the warning
message. Hopefully that's sufficient. We could of course print the
path too, but that would make the message much longer so we would have
to split it up on two lines and I'm not sure it's worth it.
This is the last part of the series 02722eae54 "view: port bookmark/tag name
types to RefName/RemoteName." Templater doesn't use these name types internally
because we wouldn't gain much type safety in template language.
The return type of .remote() is changed to Option<RefSymbol>. An empty symbol is
rendered with quotes, so it would be weird if local_bookmark.remote() returned
an empty RefSymbol.
the feature reused as much as possible of the `jj rebase` code, with
minimum modifications, in order to avoid reimplementing or complexifying
the rebase code.
It leads to some cases where some commits may be rewritten twice.
For example:
❯ jj -s
@ ylrkuwto (empty) (no description set)
○ qsorlqym file4
│ A file4
○ mmkvzzpw file3
│ A file3
○ uttlrpzl file1&2
│ A file1
│ A file2
◆ zzzzzzzz root()
❯ jj split -r u -A m -m file1 file1
Rebased 3 descendant commits
First part: ulpvupsv aaf064bc file1
Second part: uttlrpzl 0d4358c2 file1&2
Working copy (@) now at: ylrkuwto 60d905c5 (empty) (no description set)
Parent commit (@-) : qsorlqym 8cfbe2d8 file4
❯ jj -s
@ ylrkuwto (empty) (no description set)
○ qsorlqym file4
│ A file4
○ ulpvupsv file1
│ A file1
○ mmkvzzpw file3
│ A file3
○ uttlrpzl file1&2
│ A file2
◆ zzzzzzzz root()
There is an intermediate state created as
@ ylrkuwto (empty) (no description set)
○ qsorlqym file4
│ A file4
○ mmkvzzpw file3
│ A file3
○ uttlrpzl file1&2
│ A file2
○ ulpvupsv file1
│ A file1
◆ zzzzzzzz root()
where the commits in `uttlrpzl::` have been rewritten, then `ulpvupsv`
is moved, effectively rewriting the commits in `ulpvupsv::`.
The number of user visible rewritten commits is accurately reported.
`jj split --parallel` is still done as a special case: implementing
it with the rebase code would put the first commits on the right
branch.
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
to set the message on the first commit, where the selected
changes are going. The commit with the remaining changes
keeps the original description.
With this option it becomes possible to use split in a fully
non-interactive way, in combination with the filset feature.
It also makes jj split more consistent with other commands
like squash, commit or new.
Since we now have the template alias, it's easy to migrate the config value
programatically. However, there are a couple of minor behavior changes:
a. default description won't be used if user customized the
draft_commit_description template.
b. default description won't be inserted if trailer is added
For (a), I assumed user would inline the default description in the draft
template if they customized the template. (b) should be okay because the
trailers template is a new feature.
Since 7618b52b "cli: consider 'JJ:' lines as comments also when not followed by
space", lines starting with "JJ:" (without space) are also ignored. We can
simply add "JJ:" prefix to empty intro/instruction lines.
Closes#5484
This helps detect whether the last line is "JJ:" instruction or not. It seems
also nice that I don't have to insert newline to reflow the edited paragraph.
This is to ensure two things:
1. That the evolog isn't missing the history from the target commit.
2. That the evolog doesn't include extra "temporary" commits due to
the way `jj split` is implemented.
The impetus for this is the discussion in https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/5926.
The changes added here detect the extra temporary commit added to the evolog
when `split --parallel` is run using the implementation in #5926.
It wasn't immediately obvious to me what was happening here, but once I
understood it it seemed pretty simple. Perhaps it's worth a comment to explain
it to the next reader.
The consensus about this change, if one ever existed, seems to have dissolved
into two cohorts, one which is happy with the change, and one which thinks we
should move both the bookmark and change id to the child commit instead of
leaving them on the parent.
We may decide to add flags to allow users to choose between the two behaviors,
but there are also other concerns such as where @ should go (parent or child).
Until we agree on a path forward it seems reasonable to delay the breaking
change by disabling it via the config option we added. I don't think it's
necessary to fully revert the code and new tests since we aren't announcing the
option.
#3419
This should help prevent misuse of "jj bookmark set" with e.g. remote bookmark
name. A remote-looking bookmark can be created by quoting the name if needed.
This patch doesn't change the parsing of name patterns. For patterns, I think
it's better to add support for compound expressions (e.g. `glob:foo* & ~bar`)
rather than adding revset::parse_string_pattern(text) -> StringPattern.
Closes#5705
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
After even more discussion on Discord, we decided to use the new bookmark
behavior immediately and only print a warning during `jj split` if the user has
opted out of the new behavior using the `split.legacy-bookmark-behavior` config
setting.
The reasoning is that if the behavior change breaks someone's workflow or is
very disruptive, they are likely to check the changelog and learn about the
config option. For users that are not adversely impacted, printing a warning
that can only be silenced by changing their config is also disruptive.
#3419
It only occurred to me after I rebuilt jj and actually had to run the command
that we should probably recommend a change to the user config instead of the
repo config.
#3419
Currently, `jj split` moves bookmarks from the target revision to the second
revision created by the split. Since the first revision inherits the change id
of the target revision, moving the bookmarks to the first revision is less
surprising (i.e. the bookmarks stay with the change id). This no-implicit-move
behavior also aligns with how `jj abandon` drops bookmarks instead of moving
them to the parent revision.
Two releases from now, `jj split` will no longer move bookmarks to the second
revision created by the split. Instead, local bookmarks associated with the
target revision will move to the first revision created by the split (which
inherits the target revision's change id). You can opt out of this change by
setting `split.legacy-bookmark-behavior = true`, but this will likely be
removed in a future release. You can also try the new behavior now by setting
`split.legacy-bookmark-behavior = false`.
Users who have not opted into the new behavior via the config setting will see
a warning when they run `jj split` informing them about the change. The default
behavior be changed in the future.
The `jj split` tests for bookmarks are updated to run in all three configurations:
- Config setting enabled
- Config setting disabled
- Config setting unset
#3419
We are planning to add a config option that controls how bookmarks and change
ids move during `jj split` based on feedback in https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/5618.
I think the tests will be more readable after the config option is added if we
move the bookmark testing to its own test.
#3419
With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
