Git-tracking tags will be stored there. I don't have a concrete plan for proper
remote tags support, but I think tags fetched/pushed internally can be recorded
as remote tags.
I think this makes more sense because WorkspaceId is currently a human-readable
name. In error/status messages, workspace names are now printed in revset
syntax.
New WorkspaceId types do not implement Default. It would be weird if string-like
type had non-empty Default::default(). The DEFAULT constant is provided instead.
I tried to minimize this patch, but it seemed rather complicated than porting
most callers all at once. Remote management functions in git.rs are unchanged.
They'll be ported separately.
With this change, many non-template bookmark/remote name outputs should be
rendered in revset syntax.
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
We had both `repo()` and `mut_repo()` on `Transaction` and I think it
was easy to get confused and think that the former returned a
`&ReadonlyRepo` but both of them actually return a reference to
`MutableRepo` (the latter obviously returns a mutable reference). I
hope that renaming to the more idiomatic `repo_mut()` will help
clarify.
We could instead have renamed them to `mut_repo()` and
`mut_repo_mut()` but that seemed unnecessarily long. It would better
match the `mut_repo` variables we typically use, though.
"Concurrent" operations are not necessarily actually concurrent, so
"divergent" seems like a better name. And "reconcile" seems like a
better term for merging them, though we also sometimes use "merge".
Forgetting a workspace removes its working-copy commit, so it makes
sense for it to be abandoned if it is discardable just like editing a
new commit will cause the old commit to be abandoned if it is
discardable.
We've had the public_heads for as long as we've had the View object,
IIRC (I didn't check), but we still don't use it for anything. I don't
have any concrete plans for using it either. Maybe our config for
immutable commits is good enough, or maybe we'll want something more
generic (like Mercurial's phases). For now, I think we should simplify
by removing it the storage for public heads.
It seems better to have the caller pass the transaction description
when we finish the transaction than when we start it. That way we have
all the information we want to include more readily available.
The state field isn't saved yet. git import/export code paths are migrated,
but new tracking state is always calculated based on git.auto-local-branch
setting. So the tracking state is effectively a global flag.
As we don't know whether the existing remote branches have been merged in to
local branches, we assume that remote branches are "tracking" so long as the
local counterparts exist. This means existing locally-deleted branch won't
be pushed without re-tracking it. I think it's rare to leave locally-deleted
branches for long. For "git.auto-local-branch = false" setup, users might have
to untrack branches if they've manually "merged" remote branches and want to
continue that workflow. I considered using git.auto-local-branch setting in the
migration path, but I don't think that would give a better result. The setting
may be toggled after the branches got merged, and I'm planning to change it
default off for better Git interop.
Implementation-wise, the state enum can be a simple bool. It's enum just
because I originally considered to pack "forgotten" concept into it. I have
no idea which will be better for future extension.
Since set_remote_branch_target() is called while merging refs, its tracking
state shouldn't be reinitialized. The other callers are migrated to new setter
to keep the story simple.
This isn't important, but I'm going to change remote_targets to store RemoteRef
instead of RefTarget, so I went ahead and change the other field types as well.
There's a subtle behavior change. Unlike the original remove_remote_branch(),
remote_views entry is not discarded when the branches map becomes empty. The
reasoning here is that the remote view can be added/removed when the remote
is added/removed respectively, though that's not implemented yet. Since the
serialized data cannot represent an empty remote, such view may generate
non-unique content hash.
I don't think there's any reason to use the local backend in tests
instead of using the stricter test backend.
I think we should generally use the test backend in tests and only use
the local backend or git backend when there's a particular reason to
do so (such as in `test_bad_locking` where the on-disk directory
structure matters). But this patch only deals with the simpler cases
where we were only testing with the local backend.
It makes the call sites clearer if we pass the `TestRepoBackend` enum
instead of the boolean `use_git` value. It's also more extensible (I
plan to add another backend for tests).
This is breaking change. Old jj binary will panic if it sees a view saved by
new jj. Alternatively, we can store both new and legacy data for backward
compatibility.
Alternatively, we can wrap BTreeMap<String, Option<RefTarget>> to flatten
Option<&Option<..>> internally, but doing that would be tedious. It would
also be unclear if map.remove(name) should construct an absent RefTarget if
the ref doesn't exist.
The next commit will change these maps to store Option<RefTarget> entries, but
None entries will still be omitted from the serialized data. Since ContentHash
should describe the serialized data, relying on the generic ContentHash would
cause future hash conflict where absent RefTarget entries will be preserved.
For example, ([remove], [None, add]) will be serialized as ([remove], [add]),
and deserialized to ([remove], [add, None]). If we add support for lossless
serialization, hash(([remove], [None, add])) should differ from the lossy one.
We saw a failure in `test_merge_views_git_heads()` in the GitHub CI,
but I wasn't able to reproduce it locally. Using the
`commit_transactions()` helper in the test should fix it.
It's named after Conflict::from_legacy_form(). If RefTarget is migrated to
new Conflict type, from_legacy_form([], [add]) will create a normal target,
and from_legacy_form([], []) will be equivalent to the current None target.
That's why this function isn't named as RefTarget::conflict().
If RefTarget is migrated to new Conflict type, this function will create
RefTarget(Conflict::resolved(Some(id))).
We still need some .unwrap() to insert Option<RefTarget> into map, but maps
will be changed to store new RefTarget type, and their mutation API will
guarantee that Conflict::resolved(None) is eliminated.
