The `run_once()` name is just a historical accident. Furthermore, it now
started to appear elsewhere as well, so let's just call it IO::step() as we
should have from the beginning.
- transaction which was started with max_frame = 0 and max_frame_read_lock_index = 0
can write to the WAL and in this case it needs to read data back from WAL
- without cache spilling its hard to reproduce this issue for the turso-db now,
but I stumbled into this issue with sync-engine which do weird stuff with the WAL
which "simulates" cache spilling behaviour to some extent
This is just the bare minimum that I needed to convince myself that this
approach will work. The only views that we support are slices of the
main table: no aggregations, no joins, no projections.
drop view is implemented.
view population is implemented.
deletes, inserts and updates are implemented.
much like indexes before, a flag must be passed to enable views.
`BTreeTable::to_sql` makes us incompatible with SQLite by losing e.g. the original whitespace provided during the CREATE TABLE command.
For now let's fix our tests by regex-replacing every CREATE TABLE in
the entire repo to have exactly 1 space after the table name in the
CREATE TABLE statement.
We store `last_checksum` to do cumulative checksumming. After reading
wal for recovery, we didn't set last checksum properly in case there
were no frames so this cause us to not initialize last_checksum
properly.
`db_size` is `>0` in case of last frame written of a transaction. This
is necessary as we need to know -- while recovering wal contents -- that
we have read a transaction fully instead of treating every frame as its
own transaction.
Closes#1866
Makes it easier to test the feature:
```
$ cargo run -- --experimental-indexes
Limbo v0.0.22
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database
limbo> CREATE TABLE t(x);
limbo> CREATE INDEX t_idx ON t(x);
limbo> DROP INDEX t_idx;
```
Previously we implemented update as a simple `Delete` + `Insert`
procedure which seemed okay for the moment but it wasn't. `Delete` can
trigger balance and a post balance `seek` which will leave cursor
pointing to an invalid page which `Insert` will try to insert to.
We solve this by removing `Delete` from the execution plan and rely on
`Insert` to properly overwrite the cell where the rowid is the same as
the one we are inserting.
