Jussi Saurio ad8c9a4c15 Merge 'Fix WAL frame checksum mismatch' from Diego Reis ... Closes #1622 I did an A/B test between SQLite and Limbo and they can restart the db from each other, indicating that there isn't something very wrong with our file format. Turns out it was with our reset logic without truncating the file. I assumed it's safe to don't reset if we're in `PASSIVE` mode, given the [docs](https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/wal_checkpoint_v2.html) and [source code](2bd9f69d40 f447e7b5c098/src/wal.c#L2193). It also does some small clean ups and fixes. Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com> Closes #1647		2025-06-04 09:14:45 +03:00
..
btree.rs	do not move_to if we are already inserting in correct place	2025-06-02 02:55:32 -03:00
buffer_pool.rs	core: Move buffer_pool.rs to storage module	2024-08-01 11:53:14 +03:00
database.rs	core/io: Switch to Arc<Completion>	2025-05-27 11:28:49 +03:00
mod.rs	Minor improvements and cleanups in btree	2025-03-01 15:48:42 -05:00
page_cache.rs	remove dumb comment from pagecachekey	2025-05-29 14:12:16 +02:00
pager.rs	remove frame_id from PageCacheKey	2025-05-29 14:12:16 +02:00
sqlite3_ondisk.rs	core: Tagging some comments as TODO	2025-06-03 15:09:16 -03:00
wal.rs	core: Tagging some comments as TODO	2025-06-03 15:09:16 -03:00