Use Annotation::tags instead of hardcoded rule matching in ruff server (#20565)

Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
This commit is contained in:
Dan Parizher 2025-09-26 03:06:26 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent 02ebb2ee61
commit 0bae7e613d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
7 changed files with 75 additions and 13 deletions

View file

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ use itertools::Itertools;
use log::debug;
use rustc_hash::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
use ruff_db::diagnostic::{Annotation, Diagnostic, IntoDiagnosticMessage, Span};
use ruff_db::diagnostic::{Annotation, Diagnostic, DiagnosticTag, IntoDiagnosticMessage, Span};
use ruff_diagnostics::{Applicability, Fix, IsolationLevel};
use ruff_notebook::{CellOffsets, NotebookIndex};
use ruff_python_ast::helpers::{collect_import_from_member, is_docstring_stmt, to_module_path};
@ -3326,6 +3326,56 @@ impl DiagnosticGuard<'_, '_> {
pub(crate) fn defuse(mut self) {
self.diagnostic = None;
}
/// Set the message on the primary annotation for this diagnostic.
///
/// If a message already exists on the primary annotation, then this
/// overwrites the existing message.
///
/// This message is associated with the primary annotation created
/// for every `Diagnostic` that uses the `DiagnosticGuard` API.
/// Specifically, the annotation is derived from the `TextRange` given to
/// the `LintContext::report_diagnostic` API.
///
/// Callers can add additional primary or secondary annotations via the
/// `DerefMut` trait implementation to a `Diagnostic`.
pub(crate) fn set_primary_message(&mut self, message: impl IntoDiagnosticMessage) {
// N.B. It is normally bad juju to define `self` methods
// on types that implement `Deref`. Instead, it's idiomatic
// to do `fn foo(this: &mut LintDiagnosticGuard)`, which in
// turn forces callers to use
// `LintDiagnosticGuard(&mut guard, message)`. But this is
// supremely annoying for what is expected to be a common
// case.
//
// Moreover, most of the downside that comes from these sorts
// of methods is a semver hazard. Because the deref target type
// could also define a method by the same name, and that leads
// to confusion. But we own all the code involved here and
// there is no semver boundary. So... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ---AG
// OK because we know the diagnostic was constructed with a single
// primary annotation that will always come before any other annotation
// in the diagnostic. (This relies on the `Diagnostic` API not exposing
// any methods for removing annotations or re-ordering them, which is
// true as of 2025-04-11.)
let ann = self.primary_annotation_mut().unwrap();
ann.set_message(message);
}
/// Adds a tag on the primary annotation for this diagnostic.
///
/// This tag is associated with the primary annotation created
/// for every `Diagnostic` that uses the `DiagnosticGuard` API.
/// Specifically, the annotation is derived from the `TextRange` given to
/// the `LintContext::report_diagnostic` API.
///
/// Callers can add additional primary or secondary annotations via the
/// `DerefMut` trait implementation to a `Diagnostic`.
pub(crate) fn add_primary_tag(&mut self, tag: DiagnosticTag) {
let ann = self.primary_annotation_mut().unwrap();
ann.push_tag(tag);
}
}
impl DiagnosticGuard<'_, '_> {

View file

@ -197,9 +197,7 @@ pub(crate) fn redefined_while_unused(checker: &Checker, scope_id: ScopeId, scope
shadowed,
);
if let Some(ann) = diagnostic.primary_annotation_mut() {
ann.set_message(format_args!("`{name}` redefined here"));
}
diagnostic.set_primary_message(format_args!("`{name}` redefined here"));
if let Some(range) = binding.parent_range(checker.semantic()) {
diagnostic.set_parent(range.start());

View file

@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ pub(crate) fn unused_import(checker: &Checker, scope: &Scope) {
diagnostic.set_fix(fix.clone());
}
}
diagnostic.add_primary_tag(ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Unnecessary);
}
}
@ -455,6 +457,8 @@ pub(crate) fn unused_import(checker: &Checker, scope: &Scope) {
if let Some(range) = binding.parent_range {
diagnostic.set_parent(range.start());
}
diagnostic.add_primary_tag(ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Unnecessary);
}
}

View file

@ -272,4 +272,6 @@ pub(crate) fn unused_variable(checker: &Checker, name: &str, binding: &Binding)
if let Some(fix) = remove_unused_variable(binding, checker) {
diagnostic.set_fix(fix);
}
// Add Unnecessary tag for unused variables
diagnostic.add_primary_tag(ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Unnecessary);
}

View file

@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ pub(crate) fn deprecated_import(checker: &Checker, import_from_stmt: &StmtImport
},
import_from_stmt.range(),
);
diagnostic.add_primary_tag(ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Deprecated);
if let Some(content) = fix {
diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::safe_edit(Edit::range_replacement(
content,

View file

@ -100,4 +100,6 @@ pub(crate) fn unused_unpacked_variable(checker: &Checker, name: &str, binding: &
if let Some(fix) = remove_unused_variable(binding, checker) {
diagnostic.set_fix(fix);
}
// Add Unnecessary tag for unused unpacked variables
diagnostic.add_primary_tag(ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Unnecessary);
}

View file

@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ fn to_lsp_diagnostic(
let code = code.to_string();
(
Some(severity(&code)),
tags(&code),
tags(diagnostic),
Some(lsp_types::NumberOrString::String(code)),
)
} else {
@ -338,12 +338,17 @@ fn severity(code: &str) -> lsp_types::DiagnosticSeverity {
}
}
fn tags(code: &str) -> Option<Vec<lsp_types::DiagnosticTag>> {
match code {
// F401: <module> imported but unused
// F841: local variable <name> is assigned to but never used
// RUF059: Unused unpacked variable
"F401" | "F841" | "RUF059" => Some(vec![lsp_types::DiagnosticTag::UNNECESSARY]),
_ => None,
fn tags(diagnostic: &Diagnostic) -> Option<Vec<lsp_types::DiagnosticTag>> {
diagnostic.primary_tags().map(|tags| {
tags.iter()
.map(|tag| match tag {
ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Unnecessary => {
lsp_types::DiagnosticTag::UNNECESSARY
}
ruff_db::diagnostic::DiagnosticTag::Deprecated => {
lsp_types::DiagnosticTag::DEPRECATED
}
})
.collect()
})
}