Use parenthesized_with_dangling_comments in arguments formatter (#6376)

## Summary

Fixes an instability whereby this:

```python
def get_recent_deployments(threshold_days: int) -> Set[str]:
    # Returns a list of deployments not older than threshold days
    # including `/root/zulip` directory if it exists.
    recent = set()
    threshold_date = datetime.datetime.now() - datetime.timedelta(  # noqa: DTZ005
        days=threshold_days
    )
```

Was being formatted as:

```python
def get_recent_deployments(threshold_days: int) -> Set[str]:
    # Returns a list of deployments not older than threshold days
    # including `/root/zulip` directory if it exists.
    recent = set()
    threshold_date = (
        datetime.datetime.now()
        - datetime.timedelta(days=threshold_days)  # noqa: DTZ005
    )
```

Which was in turn being formatted as:

```python
def get_recent_deployments(threshold_days: int) -> Set[str]:
    # Returns a list of deployments not older than threshold days
    # including `/root/zulip` directory if it exists.
    recent = set()
    threshold_date = (
        datetime.datetime.now() - datetime.timedelta(days=threshold_days)  # noqa: DTZ005
    )
```

The second-to-third formattings still differs from Black because we
aren't taking the line suffix into account when splitting
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6377), but the first
formatting is correct and should be unchanged (i.e., the first-to-second
formattings is incorrect, and fixed here).

## Test Plan

`cargo run --bin ruff_dev -- format-dev --stability-check ../zulip`

crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/call.py

@@ -111,3 +111,7 @@ f (
     1
     # abc
 )
+
+threshold_date = datetime.datetime.now() - datetime.timedelta(  # comment
+    days=threshold_days_threshold_days
+)

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/arguments.rs

@@ -5,9 +5,8 @@ use ruff_python_trivia::{SimpleTokenKind, SimpleTokenizer};
 use ruff_text_size::{TextRange, TextSize};
 
 use crate::builders::empty_parenthesized_with_dangling_comments;
-use crate::comments::trailing_comments;
 use crate::expression::expr_generator_exp::GeneratorExpParentheses;
-use crate::expression::parentheses::{parenthesized, Parentheses};
+use crate::expression::parentheses::{parenthesized_with_dangling_comments, Parentheses};
 use crate::prelude::*;
 use crate::FormatNodeRule;
 
@@ -35,18 +34,6 @@ impl FormatNodeRule<Arguments> for FormatArguments {
             );
         }
 
-        // If the arguments are non-empty, then a dangling comment indicates a comment on the
-        // same line as the opening parenthesis, e.g.:
-        // ```python
-        // f(  # This call has a dangling comment.
-        //     a,
-        //     b,
-        //     c,
-        // )
-        let comments = f.context().comments().clone();
-        let dangling_comments = comments.dangling_comments(item.as_any_node_ref());
-        write!(f, [trailing_comments(dangling_comments)])?;
-
         let all_arguments = format_with(|f: &mut PyFormatter| {
             let source = f.context().source();
             let mut joiner = f.join_comma_separated(item.end());
@@ -84,6 +71,17 @@ impl FormatNodeRule<Arguments> for FormatArguments {
             joiner.finish()
         });
 
+        // If the arguments are non-empty, then a dangling comment indicates a comment on the
+        // same line as the opening parenthesis, e.g.:
+        // ```python
+        // f(  # This call has a dangling comment.
+        //     a,
+        //     b,
+        //     c,
+        // )
+        let comments = f.context().comments().clone();
+        let dangling_comments = comments.dangling_comments(item.as_any_node_ref());
+
         write!(
             f,
             [
@@ -103,7 +101,12 @@ impl FormatNodeRule<Arguments> for FormatArguments {
                 // )
                 // ```
                 // TODO(konstin): Doesn't work see wrongly formatted test
-                parenthesized("(", &group(&all_arguments), ")")
+                parenthesized_with_dangling_comments(
+                    "(",
+                    dangling_comments,
+                    &group(&all_arguments),
+                    ")"
+                )
             ]
         )
     }

crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__call.py.snap

@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ f (
     1
     # abc
 )
+
+threshold_date = datetime.datetime.now() - datetime.timedelta(  # comment
+    days=threshold_days_threshold_days
+)
 ```
 
 ## Output
@@ -230,6 +234,10 @@ f(
     1
     # abc
 )
+
+threshold_date = datetime.datetime.now() - datetime.timedelta(  # comment
+    days=threshold_days_threshold_days
+)
 ```