From 715609663a223343c216165e81b58daff099524c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Nielsen <4120606+ericbn@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:15:12 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update PEP reference in future_rewritable_type_annotation.rs
 (#11985)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

Documentation mentions:

> PEP 563 enabled the use of a number of convenient type annotations,
such as `list[str]` instead of `List[str]`

but it meant [PEP 585](https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/) instead.

[PEP 563](https://peps.python.org/pep-0563/) is the one defining `from
__future__ import annotations`.

## Test Plan

No automated test required, just verify that
https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/ is the correct reference.
---
 .../rules/future_rewritable_type_annotation.rs                  | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_future_annotations/rules/future_rewritable_type_annotation.rs b/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_future_annotations/rules/future_rewritable_type_annotation.rs
index 38ed7d44a3..6c8aa08177 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_future_annotations/rules/future_rewritable_type_annotation.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_future_annotations/rules/future_rewritable_type_annotation.rs
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ use crate::checkers::ast::Checker;
 /// PEP 563.
 ///
 /// ## Why is this bad?
-/// PEP 563 enabled the use of a number of convenient type annotations, such as
+/// PEP 585 enabled the use of a number of convenient type annotations, such as
 /// `list[str]` instead of `List[str]`. However, these annotations are only
 /// available on Python 3.9 and higher, _unless_ the `from __future__ import annotations`
 /// import is present.