This commit is contained in:
Amethyst Reese 2025-12-23 09:56:56 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 72ce6a696c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
4 changed files with 860 additions and 421 deletions

View file

@ -332,6 +332,25 @@ mod tests {
Ok(())
}
#[test]
fn range_suppressions_full() -> Result<()> {
let diagnostics = test_path(
Path::new("ruff/suppressions.py"),
&settings::LinterSettings::for_rules(vec![
Rule::UnusedVariable,
Rule::AmbiguousVariableName,
Rule::UnusedNOQA,
Rule::InvalidRuleCode,
Rule::InvalidSuppressionComment,
Rule::UnmatchedSuppressionComment,
])
.with_external_rules(&["TK421"])
.with_preview_mode(),
)?;
assert_diagnostics!(diagnostics);
Ok(())
}
#[test]
fn ruf100_0() -> Result<()> {
let diagnostics = test_path(

View file

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ source: crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/mod.rs
--- Summary ---
Removed: 15
Added: 23
Added: 20
--- Removed ---
E741 Ambiguous variable name: `I`
@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (non-enabled: `E501`)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
47 | I = 1
48 | # ruff: enable[E501]
| --------------------
|
help: Remove unused suppression
43 | def f():
@ -308,26 +309,10 @@ help: Remove unused suppression
45 | # logged to user
- # ruff: disable[E501]
46 | I = 1
47 | # ruff: enable[E501]
48 |
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (non-enabled: `E501`)
--> suppressions.py:48:5
|
46 | # ruff: disable[E501]
47 | I = 1
48 | # ruff: enable[E501]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: Remove unused suppression
45 | # logged to user
46 | # ruff: disable[E501]
47 | I = 1
- # ruff: enable[E501]
47 |
48 |
49 |
50 | def f():
49 | def f():
RUF100 [*] Unused `noqa` directive (unused: `E741`, `F841`)
@ -563,6 +548,9 @@ RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: YF829
| ^^^^^
94 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
| -----
|
help: Remove the rule code
90 |
@ -572,6 +560,10 @@ help: Remove the rule code
93 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
94 | value = 0
95 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
- # ruff: enable[YF829]
96 |
97 |
98 | def f():
RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: RQW320
@ -583,6 +575,8 @@ RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: RQW320
| ^^^^^^
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
| ------
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
|
help: Remove the rule code
91 | def f():
@ -590,23 +584,6 @@ help: Remove the rule code
93 | # ruff: disable[YF829]
- # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
94 + # ruff: disable[F841]
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: RQW320
--> suppressions.py:96:26
|
94 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
| ^^^^^^
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
|
help: Remove the rule code
93 | # ruff: disable[YF829]
94 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
95 | value = 0
- # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
96 + # ruff: enable[F841]
@ -615,24 +592,6 @@ help: Remove the rule code
99 |
RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: YF829
--> suppressions.py:97:20
|
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
| ^^^^^
|
help: Remove the rule code
94 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
- # ruff: enable[YF829]
97 |
98 |
99 | def f():
RUF103 [*] Invalid suppression comment: missing suppression codes like `[E501, ...]`
--> suppressions.py:109:5
|

View file

@ -0,0 +1,460 @@
---
source: crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/mod.rs
---
RUF104 Suppression comment without matching `#ruff:enable` comment
--> suppressions.py:11:5
|
9 | # These should both be ignored by the implicit range suppression.
10 | # Should also generate an "unmatched suppression" warning.
11 | # ruff:disable[E741,F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
12 | I = 1
|
E741 Ambiguous variable name: `I`
--> suppressions.py:18:5
|
16 | # Neither warning is ignored, and an "unmatched suppression"
17 | # should be generated.
18 | I = 1
| ^
19 | # ruff: enable[E741, F841]
|
F841 [*] Local variable `I` is assigned to but never used
--> suppressions.py:18:5
|
16 | # Neither warning is ignored, and an "unmatched suppression"
17 | # should be generated.
18 | I = 1
| ^
19 | # ruff: enable[E741, F841]
|
help: Remove assignment to unused variable `I`
15 | def f():
16 | # Neither warning is ignored, and an "unmatched suppression"
17 | # should be generated.
- I = 1
18 + pass
19 | # ruff: enable[E741, F841]
20 |
21 |
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior
RUF103 [*] Invalid suppression comment: no matching 'disable' comment
--> suppressions.py:19:5
|
17 | # should be generated.
18 | I = 1
19 | # ruff: enable[E741, F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: Remove suppression comment
16 | # Neither warning is ignored, and an "unmatched suppression"
17 | # should be generated.
18 | I = 1
- # ruff: enable[E741, F841]
19 |
20 |
21 | def f():
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior
F841 [*] Local variable `I` is assigned to but never used
--> suppressions.py:26:5
|
24 | # the other logged to the user.
25 | # ruff: disable[E741]
26 | I = 1
| ^
27 | # ruff: enable[E741]
|
help: Remove assignment to unused variable `I`
23 | # One should be ignored by the range suppression, and
24 | # the other logged to the user.
25 | # ruff: disable[E741]
- I = 1
26 + pass
27 | # ruff: enable[E741]
28 |
29 |
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior
F841 [*] Local variable `l` is assigned to but never used
--> suppressions.py:35:5
|
33 | # middle line should be completely silenced.
34 | # ruff: disable[E741]
35 | l = 0
| ^
36 | # ruff: disable[F841]
37 | O = 1
|
help: Remove assignment to unused variable `l`
32 | # lines should each log a different warning, while the
33 | # middle line should be completely silenced.
34 | # ruff: disable[E741]
- l = 0
35 | # ruff: disable[F841]
36 | O = 1
37 | # ruff: enable[E741]
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior
E741 Ambiguous variable name: `I`
--> suppressions.py:39:5
|
37 | O = 1
38 | # ruff: enable[E741]
39 | I = 2
| ^
40 | # ruff: enable[F841]
|
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (non-enabled: `E501`)
--> suppressions.py:46:5
|
44 | # Neither of these are ignored and warnings are
45 | # logged to user
46 | # ruff: disable[E501]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
47 | I = 1
48 | # ruff: enable[E501]
| --------------------
|
help: Remove unused suppression
43 | def f():
44 | # Neither of these are ignored and warnings are
45 | # logged to user
- # ruff: disable[E501]
46 | I = 1
- # ruff: enable[E501]
47 |
48 |
49 | def f():
E741 Ambiguous variable name: `I`
--> suppressions.py:47:5
|
45 | # logged to user
46 | # ruff: disable[E501]
47 | I = 1
| ^
48 | # ruff: enable[E501]
|
F841 [*] Local variable `I` is assigned to but never used
--> suppressions.py:47:5
|
45 | # logged to user
46 | # ruff: disable[E501]
47 | I = 1
| ^
48 | # ruff: enable[E501]
|
help: Remove assignment to unused variable `I`
44 | # Neither of these are ignored and warnings are
45 | # logged to user
46 | # ruff: disable[E501]
- I = 1
47 + pass
48 | # ruff: enable[E501]
49 |
50 |
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior
RUF100 [*] Unused `noqa` directive (unused: `E741`, `F841`)
--> suppressions.py:55:12
|
53 | # and an unusued noqa diagnostic should be logged.
54 | # ruff:disable[E741,F841]
55 | I = 1 # noqa: E741,F841
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
56 | # ruff:enable[E741,F841]
|
help: Remove unused `noqa` directive
52 | # These should both be ignored by the range suppression,
53 | # and an unusued noqa diagnostic should be logged.
54 | # ruff:disable[E741,F841]
- I = 1 # noqa: E741,F841
55 + I = 1
56 | # ruff:enable[E741,F841]
57 |
58 |
RUF104 Suppression comment without matching `#ruff:enable` comment
--> suppressions.py:61:5
|
59 | def f():
60 | # TODO: Duplicate codes should be counted as duplicate, not unused
61 | # ruff: disable[F841, F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
62 | foo = 0
|
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (unused: `F841`)
--> suppressions.py:61:21
|
59 | def f():
60 | # TODO: Duplicate codes should be counted as duplicate, not unused
61 | # ruff: disable[F841, F841]
| ^^^^
62 | foo = 0
|
help: Remove unused suppression
58 |
59 | def f():
60 | # TODO: Duplicate codes should be counted as duplicate, not unused
- # ruff: disable[F841, F841]
61 + # ruff: disable[F841]
62 | foo = 0
63 |
64 |
RUF104 Suppression comment without matching `#ruff:enable` comment
--> suppressions.py:68:5
|
66 | # Overlapping range suppressions, one should be marked as used,
67 | # and the other should trigger an unused suppression diagnostic
68 | # ruff: disable[F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
69 | # ruff: disable[F841]
70 | foo = 0
|
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (unused: `F841`)
--> suppressions.py:69:5
|
67 | # and the other should trigger an unused suppression diagnostic
68 | # ruff: disable[F841]
69 | # ruff: disable[F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
70 | foo = 0
|
help: Remove unused suppression
66 | # Overlapping range suppressions, one should be marked as used,
67 | # and the other should trigger an unused suppression diagnostic
68 | # ruff: disable[F841]
- # ruff: disable[F841]
69 | foo = 0
70 |
71 |
RUF104 Suppression comment without matching `#ruff:enable` comment
--> suppressions.py:75:5
|
73 | def f():
74 | # Multiple codes but only one is used
75 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
76 | foo = 0
|
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (unused: `E741`)
--> suppressions.py:75:21
|
73 | def f():
74 | # Multiple codes but only one is used
75 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^
76 | foo = 0
|
help: Remove unused suppression
72 |
73 | def f():
74 | # Multiple codes but only one is used
- # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
75 + # ruff: disable[F401, F841]
76 | foo = 0
77 |
78 |
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (non-enabled: `F401`)
--> suppressions.py:75:27
|
73 | def f():
74 | # Multiple codes but only one is used
75 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^
76 | foo = 0
|
help: Remove unused suppression
72 |
73 | def f():
74 | # Multiple codes but only one is used
- # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
75 + # ruff: disable[E741, F841]
76 | foo = 0
77 |
78 |
RUF104 Suppression comment without matching `#ruff:enable` comment
--> suppressions.py:81:5
|
79 | def f():
80 | # Multiple codes but only two are used
81 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
82 | I = 0
|
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (non-enabled: `F401`)
--> suppressions.py:81:27
|
79 | def f():
80 | # Multiple codes but only two are used
81 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^
82 | I = 0
|
help: Remove unused suppression
78 |
79 | def f():
80 | # Multiple codes but only two are used
- # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
81 + # ruff: disable[E741, F841]
82 | I = 0
83 |
84 |
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (unused: `E741`)
--> suppressions.py:87:21
|
85 | def f():
86 | # Multiple codes but none are used
87 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^
88 | print("hello")
|
help: Remove unused suppression
84 |
85 | def f():
86 | # Multiple codes but none are used
- # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
87 + # ruff: disable[F401, F841]
88 | print("hello")
89 |
90 |
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (non-enabled: `F401`)
--> suppressions.py:87:27
|
85 | def f():
86 | # Multiple codes but none are used
87 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^
88 | print("hello")
|
help: Remove unused suppression
84 |
85 | def f():
86 | # Multiple codes but none are used
- # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
87 + # ruff: disable[E741, F841]
88 | print("hello")
89 |
90 |
RUF100 [*] Unused suppression (unused: `F841`)
--> suppressions.py:87:33
|
85 | def f():
86 | # Multiple codes but none are used
87 | # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
| ^^^^
88 | print("hello")
|
help: Remove unused suppression
84 |
85 | def f():
86 | # Multiple codes but none are used
- # ruff: disable[E741, F401, F841]
87 + # ruff: disable[E741, F401]
88 | print("hello")
89 |
90 |
RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: YF829
--> suppressions.py:93:21
|
91 | def f():
92 | # Unknown rule codes
93 | # ruff: disable[YF829]
| ^^^^^
94 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
| -----
|
help: Remove the rule code
90 |
91 | def f():
92 | # Unknown rule codes
- # ruff: disable[YF829]
93 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
94 | value = 0
95 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
- # ruff: enable[YF829]
96 |
97 |
98 | def f():
RUF102 [*] Invalid rule code in suppression: RQW320
--> suppressions.py:94:27
|
92 | # Unknown rule codes
93 | # ruff: disable[YF829]
94 | # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
| ^^^^^^
95 | value = 0
96 | # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
| ------
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
|
help: Remove the rule code
91 | def f():
92 | # Unknown rule codes
93 | # ruff: disable[YF829]
- # ruff: disable[F841, RQW320]
94 + # ruff: disable[F841]
95 | value = 0
- # ruff: enable[F841, RQW320]
96 + # ruff: enable[F841]
97 | # ruff: enable[YF829]
98 |
99 |
RUF103 [*] Invalid suppression comment: missing suppression codes like `[E501, ...]`
--> suppressions.py:109:5
|
107 | def f():
108 | # Empty or missing rule codes
109 | # ruff: disable
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
110 | # ruff: disable[]
111 | print("hello")
|
help: Remove suppression comment
106 |
107 | def f():
108 | # Empty or missing rule codes
- # ruff: disable
109 | # ruff: disable[]
110 | print("hello")
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior
RUF103 [*] Invalid suppression comment: missing suppression codes like `[E501, ...]`
--> suppressions.py:110:5
|
108 | # Empty or missing rule codes
109 | # ruff: disable
110 | # ruff: disable[]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
111 | print("hello")
|
help: Remove suppression comment
107 | def f():
108 | # Empty or missing rule codes
109 | # ruff: disable
- # ruff: disable[]
110 | print("hello")
note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior

View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
use compact_str::CompactString;
use core::fmt;
use ruff_db::diagnostic::Diagnostic;
use ruff_diagnostics::{Edit, Fix};
use ruff_diagnostics::{Applicability, Edit, Fix};
use ruff_python_ast::token::{TokenKind, Tokens};
use ruff_python_ast::whitespace::indentation;
use rustc_hash::FxHashSet;
@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ use ruff_python_trivia::Cursor;
use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextLen, TextRange, TextSize, TextSlice};
use smallvec::{SmallVec, smallvec};
use crate::Locator;
use crate::checkers::ast::LintContext;
use crate::codes::Rule;
use crate::fix::edits::delete_comment;
@ -24,6 +23,7 @@ use crate::rules::ruff::rules::{
UnmatchedSuppressionComment, UnusedCodes, UnusedNOQA, UnusedNOQAKind, code_is_valid,
};
use crate::settings::LinterSettings;
use crate::{Locator, Violation};
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
enum SuppressionAction {
@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ pub(crate) struct Suppression {
/// Range for which the suppression applies
range: TextRange,
/// Any comments associated with the suppression
comments: SmallVec<[SuppressionComment; 2]>,
/// Whether this suppression actually suppressed a diagnostic
used: Cell<bool>,
disable_comment: Option<SuppressionComment>,
enable_comment: Option<SuppressionComment>,
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
@ -171,23 +171,17 @@ impl Suppressions {
if !code_is_valid(&suppression.code, &context.settings().external) {
// InvalidRuleCode
if context.is_rule_enabled(Rule::InvalidRuleCode) {
for comment in &suppression.comments {
let (range, edit) = Suppressions::delete_code_or_comment(
locator,
suppression,
comment,
true,
);
context
.report_diagnostic(
InvalidRuleCode {
rule_code: suppression.code.to_string(),
kind: InvalidRuleCodeKind::Suppression,
},
range,
)
.set_fix(Fix::safe_edit(edit));
}
Suppressions::report_suppression(
context,
locator,
suppression,
true,
Applicability::Safe,
InvalidRuleCode {
rule_code: suppression.code.to_string(),
kind: InvalidRuleCodeKind::Suppression,
},
);
}
} else if !suppression.used.get() {
// UnusedNOQA
@ -197,40 +191,35 @@ impl Suppressions {
) else {
continue; // "external" lint code, don't treat it as unused
};
for comment in &suppression.comments {
let (range, edit) = Suppressions::delete_code_or_comment(
locator,
suppression,
comment,
false,
);
let codes = if context.is_rule_enabled(rule) {
UnusedCodes {
unmatched: vec![suppression.code.to_string()],
..Default::default()
}
} else {
UnusedCodes {
disabled: vec![suppression.code.to_string()],
..Default::default()
}
};
let codes = if context.is_rule_enabled(rule) {
UnusedCodes {
unmatched: vec![suppression.code.to_string()],
..Default::default()
}
} else {
UnusedCodes {
disabled: vec![suppression.code.to_string()],
..Default::default()
}
};
context
.report_diagnostic(
UnusedNOQA {
codes: Some(codes),
kind: UnusedNOQAKind::Suppression,
},
range,
)
.set_fix(Fix::safe_edit(edit));
}
Suppressions::report_suppression(
context,
locator,
suppression,
false,
Applicability::Safe,
UnusedNOQA {
codes: Some(codes),
kind: UnusedNOQAKind::Suppression,
},
);
}
} else if suppression.comments.len() == 1 {
} else if suppression.disable_comment.is_some() && suppression.enable_comment.is_none()
{
// UnmatchedSuppressionComment
let range = suppression.comments[0].range;
let range = suppression.disable_comment.as_ref().unwrap().range;
if unmatched_ranges.insert(range) {
context.report_diagnostic_if_enabled(UnmatchedSuppressionComment {}, range);
}
@ -267,6 +256,37 @@ impl Suppressions {
}
}
fn report_suppression<T: Violation>(
context: &LintContext,
locator: &Locator,
suppression: &Suppression,
highlight_only_code: bool,
applicability: Applicability,
kind: T,
) {
if suppression.disable_comment.is_some() {
let (range, edit) = Suppressions::delete_code_or_comment(
locator,
suppression,
suppression.disable_comment.as_ref().unwrap(),
highlight_only_code,
);
let mut diagnostic = context.report_diagnostic(kind, range);
if suppression.enable_comment.is_some() {
let (range2, edit2) = Suppressions::delete_code_or_comment(
locator,
suppression,
suppression.enable_comment.as_ref().unwrap(),
highlight_only_code,
);
diagnostic.secondary_annotation("", range2);
diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::applicable_edits(edit, vec![edit2], applicability));
} else {
diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::applicable_edit(edit, applicability));
}
}
}
fn delete_code_or_comment(
locator: &Locator<'_>,
suppression: &Suppression,
@ -424,7 +444,8 @@ impl<'a> SuppressionsBuilder<'a> {
self.valid.push(Suppression {
code: code.into(),
range: combined_range,
comments: smallvec![comment.comment.clone(), other.comment.clone()],
disable_comment: Some(comment.comment.clone()),
enable_comment: Some(other.comment.clone()),
used: false.into(),
});
}
@ -441,7 +462,8 @@ impl<'a> SuppressionsBuilder<'a> {
self.valid.push(Suppression {
code: code.into(),
range: implicit_range,
comments: smallvec![comment.comment.clone()],
disable_comment: Some(comment.comment.clone()),
enable_comment: None,
used: false.into(),
});
}
@ -705,24 +727,22 @@ print('hello')
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo]\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[foo]",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
},
],
invalid: [],
@ -751,30 +771,28 @@ def foo():
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[bar]\n print('hello')\n\n",
code: "bar",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo]\nprint('hello')\n\ndef foo():\n # ruff: disable[bar]\n print('hello')\n\n",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
],
invalid: [],
@ -803,46 +821,42 @@ class Foo:
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[bar]\n print('hello')\n # ruff: enable[bar]",
code: "bar",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo]\n def bar(self):\n # ruff: disable[bar]\n print('hello')\n # ruff: enable[bar]\n # ruff: enable[foo]",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
},
],
invalid: [],
@ -872,46 +886,42 @@ def foo():
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo]\n print('hello')\n # ruff: disable[bar]\n print('hello')\n # ruff: enable[foo]",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[bar]\n print('hello')\n # ruff: enable[foo]\n print('hello')\n # ruff: enable[bar]",
code: "bar",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
},
],
invalid: [],
@ -936,50 +946,46 @@ print('hello')
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[foo, bar]",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo, bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo, bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[foo, bar]",
code: "bar",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo, bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo, bar]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
},
],
invalid: [],
@ -1005,16 +1011,15 @@ print('world')
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo]\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[bar]\nprint('world')\n",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
],
invalid: [
@ -1051,32 +1056,30 @@ print('hello')
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[bar, foo]\n",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[bar, foo]\n",
code: "bar",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo, bar]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
"bar",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
],
invalid: [
@ -1116,38 +1119,35 @@ print('hello')
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo] first\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: disable[foo] second\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[foo]",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo] first",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "first",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo] first",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "first",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[foo]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "",
},
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[foo] second\nprint('hello')\n# ruff: enable[foo]\n",
code: "foo",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo] second",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "second",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[foo] second",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"foo",
],
reason: "second",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
],
invalid: [],
@ -1189,100 +1189,92 @@ def bar():
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[delta] unmatched\n pass\n # ruff: enable[beta,gamma]\n# ruff: enable[alpha]\n\n# ruff: disable # parse error!\n",
code: "delta",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[delta] unmatched",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"delta",
],
reason: "unmatched",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[delta] unmatched",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"delta",
],
reason: "unmatched",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[beta,gamma]\n if True:\n # ruff: disable[delta] unmatched\n pass\n # ruff: enable[beta,gamma]",
code: "beta",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[beta,gamma]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[beta,gamma]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[beta,gamma]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[beta,gamma]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[beta,gamma]\n if True:\n # ruff: disable[delta] unmatched\n pass\n # ruff: enable[beta,gamma]",
code: "gamma",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[beta,gamma]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[beta,gamma]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[beta,gamma]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[beta,gamma]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"beta",
"gamma",
],
reason: "",
},
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[zeta] unmatched\n pass\n# ruff: enable[zeta] underindented\n pass\n",
code: "zeta",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[zeta] unmatched",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"zeta",
],
reason: "unmatched",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[zeta] unmatched",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"zeta",
],
reason: "unmatched",
},
enable_comment: None,
},
Suppression {
covered_source: "# ruff: disable[alpha]\ndef foo():\n # ruff: disable[beta,gamma]\n if True:\n # ruff: disable[delta] unmatched\n pass\n # ruff: enable[beta,gamma]\n# ruff: enable[alpha]",
code: "alpha",
comments: [
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[alpha]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"alpha",
],
reason: "",
},
SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[alpha]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"alpha",
],
reason: "",
},
],
disable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: disable[alpha]",
action: Disable,
codes: [
"alpha",
],
reason: "",
},
enable_comment: SuppressionComment {
text: "# ruff: enable[alpha]",
action: Enable,
codes: [
"alpha",
],
reason: "",
},
},
],
invalid: [
@ -1559,7 +1551,10 @@ def bar():
TextRange::new(offset, TextSize::try_from(source.len()).unwrap()),
);
match parser.parse_comment() {
Ok(comment) => Ok(DebugSuppressionComment { source, comment }),
Ok(comment) => Ok(DebugSuppressionComment {
source,
comment: Some(comment),
}),
Err(error) => Err(error),
}
}
@ -1639,16 +1634,18 @@ def bar():
.field("covered_source", &&self.source[self.suppression.range])
.field("code", &self.suppression.code)
.field(
"comments",
&self
.suppression
.comments
.iter()
.map(|comment| DebugSuppressionComment {
source: self.source,
comment: comment.clone(),
})
.collect_vec(),
"disable_comment",
&DebugSuppressionComment {
source: self.source,
comment: self.suppression.disable_comment.clone(),
},
)
.field(
"enable_comment",
&DebugSuppressionComment {
source: self.source,
comment: self.suppression.enable_comment.clone(),
},
)
.finish()
}
@ -1667,7 +1664,7 @@ def bar():
"comment",
&DebugSuppressionComment {
source: self.source,
comment: self.invalid.comment.clone(),
comment: Some(self.invalid.comment.clone()),
},
)
.finish()
@ -1690,23 +1687,27 @@ def bar():
struct DebugSuppressionComment<'a> {
source: &'a str,
comment: SuppressionComment,
comment: Option<SuppressionComment>,
}
impl fmt::Debug for DebugSuppressionComment<'_> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
f.debug_struct("SuppressionComment")
.field("text", &&self.source[self.comment.range])
.field("action", &self.comment.action)
.field(
"codes",
&DebugCodes {
source: self.source,
codes: &self.comment.codes,
},
)
.field("reason", &&self.source[self.comment.reason])
.finish()
match &self.comment {
Some(comment) => f
.debug_struct("SuppressionComment")
.field("text", &&self.source[comment.range])
.field("action", &comment.action)
.field(
"codes",
&DebugCodes {
source: self.source,
codes: &comment.codes,
},
)
.field("reason", &&self.source[comment.reason])
.finish(),
None => f.debug_tuple("None").finish(),
}
}
}