[ty] Delay computation of 'unbound' visibility for implicit instance attributes (#18669)

## Summary

Consider the following example, which leads to a excessively large
runtime on `main`. The reason for this is the following. When inferring
types for `self.a`, we look up the `a` attribute on `C`. While looking
for implicit instance attributes, we go through every method and check
for `self.a = …` assignments. There are no such assignments here, but we
always have an implicit `self.a = <unbound>` binding at the beginning
over every method. This binding accumulates a complex visibility
constraint in `C.f`, due to the `isinstance` checks. While evaluating
that constraint, we need to infer the type of `self.b`. There's no
binding for `self.b` either, but there's also an implicit `self.b =
<unbound>` binding with the same complex visibility constraint
(involving `self.b` recursively). This leads to a combinatorial
explosion:

```py
class C:
    def f(self: "C"):
        if isinstance(self.a, str):
            return

        if isinstance(self.b, str):
            return
        if isinstance(self.b, str):
            return
        if isinstance(self.b, str):
            return
        # repeat 20 times
```
(note that the `self` parameter here is annotated explicitly because we
currently still infer `Unknown` for `self` otherwise)

The fix proposed here is rather simple: when there are no `self.name =
…` attribute assignments in a given method, we skip evaluating the
visibility constraint of the implicit `self.name = <unbound>` binding.
This should also generally help with performance, because that's a very
common case.

This is *not* a fix for cases where there *are* actual bindings in the
method. When we add `self.a = 1; self.b = 1` to that example above, we
still see that combinatorial explosion of runtime. I still think it's
worth to make this optimization, as it fixes the problems with `pandas`
and `sqlalchemy` reported by users. I will open a ticket to track that
separately.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/627
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/641

## Test Plan

* Made sure that `ty` finishes quickly on the MREs in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/627
* Made sure that `ty` finishes quickly on `pandas`
* Made sure that `ty` finishes quickly on `sqlalchemy`

crates/ty_python_semantic/src/semantic_index/definition.rs

@@ -109,10 +109,6 @@ impl<'db> DefinitionState<'db> {
             || matches!(self, DefinitionState::Defined(def) if f(def))
     }
 
-    pub(crate) fn is_undefined(self) -> bool {
-        matches!(self, DefinitionState::Undefined)
-    }
-
     #[allow(unused)]
     pub(crate) fn definition(self) -> Option<Definition<'db>> {
         match self {

crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/class.rs

@@ -1640,19 +1640,21 @@ impl<'db> ClassLiteral<'db> {
                 continue;
             }
 
-            let mut attribute_assignments = attribute_assignments.peekable();
-            let unbound_visibility = attribute_assignments
-                .peek()
-                .map(|attribute_assignment| {
-                    if attribute_assignment.binding.is_undefined() {
-                        method_map.is_binding_visible(db, attribute_assignment)
-                    } else {
-                        Truthiness::AlwaysFalse
-                    }
-                })
-                .unwrap_or(Truthiness::AlwaysFalse);
+            // Storage for the implicit `DefinitionState::Undefined` binding. If present, it
+            // will be the first binding in the `attribute_assignments` iterator.
+            let mut unbound_binding = None;
 
             for attribute_assignment in attribute_assignments {
+                if let DefinitionState::Undefined = attribute_assignment.binding {
+                    // Store the implicit unbound binding here so that we can delay the
+                    // computation of `unbound_visibility` to the point when we actually
+                    // need it. This is an optimization for the common case where the
+                    // `unbound` binding is the only binding of the `name` attribute,
+                    // i.e. if there is no `self.name = …` assignment in this method.
+                    unbound_binding = Some(attribute_assignment);
+                    continue;
+                }
+
                 let DefinitionState::Defined(binding) = attribute_assignment.binding else {
                     continue;
                 };
@@ -1676,6 +1678,11 @@ impl<'db> ClassLiteral<'db> {
                 // There is at least one attribute assignment that may be visible,
                 // so if `unbound_visibility` is always false then this attribute is considered bound.
                 // TODO: this is incomplete logic since the attributes bound after termination are considered visible.
+                let unbound_visibility = unbound_binding
+                    .as_ref()
+                    .map(|binding| method_map.is_binding_visible(db, binding))
+                    .unwrap_or(Truthiness::AlwaysFalse);
+
                 if unbound_visibility
                     .negate()
                     .and(is_method_visible)