mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-09-30 05:44:56 +00:00
[ty] Require that we can find a root when listing sub-modules
This is similar to a change made in the "list top-level modules" implementation that had been masked by poor Salsa failure modes. Basically, if we can't find a root here, it *must* be a bug. And if we just silently skip over it, we risk voiding Salsa's purity contract, leading to more difficult to debug panics. This did cause one test to fail, but only because the test wasn't properly setting up roots.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b913ce652
commit
9cea752934
4 changed files with 23 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -161,9 +161,11 @@ fn all_submodule_names_for_package(db: &dyn Db, file: File) -> Option<Vec<Name>>
|
|||
// tree. When the revision gets bumped, the cache
|
||||
// that Salsa creates does for this routine will be
|
||||
// invalidated.
|
||||
if let Some(root) = db.files().root(db, parent_directory) {
|
||||
let _ = root.revision(db);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let root = db
|
||||
.files()
|
||||
.root(db, parent_directory)
|
||||
.expect("System search path should have a registered root");
|
||||
let _ = root.revision(db);
|
||||
|
||||
db.system()
|
||||
.read_directory(parent_directory)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue