[refurb] Implement write-whole-file (FURB103) (#10802)

## Summary

Implement `write-whole-file` (`FURB103`), part of #1348. This is largely
a copy and paste of `read-whole-file` #7682.

## Test Plan

Text fixture added.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>

crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/refurb/FURB103.py

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+def foo():
+    ...
+
+
+def bar(x):
+    ...
+
+
+# Errors.
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", "w") as f:
+    f.write("test")
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", "wb") as f:
+    f.write(foobar)
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", mode="wb") as f:
+    f.write(b"abc")
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", "w", encoding="utf8") as f:
+    f.write(foobar)
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", "w", errors="ignore") as f:
+    f.write(foobar)
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", mode="w") as f:
+    f.write(foobar)
+
+# FURB103
+with open(foo(), "wb") as f:
+    # The body of `with` is non-trivial, but the recommendation holds.
+    bar("pre")
+    f.write(bar())
+    bar("post")
+    print("Done")
+
+# FURB103
+with open("a.txt", "w") as a, open("b.txt", "wb") as b:
+    a.write(x)
+    b.write(y)
+
+# FURB103
+with foo() as a, open("file.txt", "w") as b, foo() as c:
+    # We have other things in here, multiple with items, but the user
+    # writes a single time to file and that bit they can replace.
+    bar(a)
+    b.write(bar(bar(a + x)))
+    bar(c)
+
+
+# FURB103
+with open("file.txt", "w", newline="\r\n") as f:
+    f.write(foobar)
+
+
+# Non-errors.
+
+with open("file.txt", errors="ignore", mode="wb") as f:
+    # Path.write_bytes() does not support errors
+    f.write(foobar)
+
+f2 = open("file2.txt", "w")
+with open("file.txt", "w") as f:
+    f2.write(x)
+
+# mode is dynamic
+with open("file.txt", foo()) as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# keyword mode is incorrect
+with open("file.txt", mode="a+") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# enables line buffering, not supported in write_text()
+with open("file.txt", buffering=1) as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# dont mistake "newline" for "mode"
+with open("file.txt", newline="wb") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# I guess we can possibly also report this case, but the question
+# is why the user would put "w+" here in the first place.
+with open("file.txt", "w+") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# Even though we write the whole file, we do other things.
+with open("file.txt", "w") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+    f.seek(0)
+    x += f.read(100)
+
+# This shouldn't error, since it could contain unsupported arguments, like `buffering`.
+with open(*filename, mode="w") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# This shouldn't error, since it could contain unsupported arguments, like `buffering`.
+with open(**kwargs) as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# This shouldn't error, since it could contain unsupported arguments, like `buffering`.
+with open("file.txt", **kwargs) as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# This shouldn't error, since it could contain unsupported arguments, like `buffering`.
+with open("file.txt", mode="w", **kwargs) as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# This could error (but doesn't), since it can't contain unsupported arguments, like
+# `buffering`.
+with open(*filename, mode="w") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# This could error (but doesn't), since it can't contain unsupported arguments, like
+# `buffering`.
+with open(*filename, file="file.txt", mode="w") as f:
+    f.write(x)
+
+# Loops imply multiple writes
+with open("file.txt", "w") as f:
+    while x < 0:
+        f.write(foobar)
+
+with open("file.txt", "w") as f:
+    for line in text:
+        f.write(line)

crates/ruff_linter/src/checkers/ast/analyze/statement.rs

@@ -1225,6 +1225,9 @@ pub(crate) fn statement(stmt: &Stmt, checker: &mut Checker) {
             if checker.enabled(Rule::ReadWholeFile) {
                 refurb::rules::read_whole_file(checker, with_stmt);
             }
+            if checker.enabled(Rule::WriteWholeFile) {
+                refurb::rules::write_whole_file(checker, with_stmt);
+            }
             if checker.enabled(Rule::UselessWithLock) {
                 pylint::rules::useless_with_lock(checker, with_stmt);
             }

crates/ruff_linter/src/codes.rs

@@ -1037,6 +1037,7 @@ pub fn code_to_rule(linter: Linter, code: &str) -> Option<(RuleGroup, Rule)> {
 
         // refurb
         (Refurb, "101") => (RuleGroup::Preview, rules::refurb::rules::ReadWholeFile),
+        (Refurb, "103") => (RuleGroup::Preview, rules::refurb::rules::WriteWholeFile),
         (Refurb, "105") => (RuleGroup::Preview, rules::refurb::rules::PrintEmptyString),
         (Refurb, "110") => (RuleGroup::Preview, rules::refurb::rules::IfExpInsteadOfOrOperator),
         #[allow(deprecated)]

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/helpers.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-use ruff_python_ast as ast;
+use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Expr};
 use ruff_python_codegen::Generator;
-use ruff_text_size::TextRange;
+use ruff_python_semantic::{BindingId, ResolvedReference, SemanticModel};
+use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextRange};
 
 /// Format a code snippet to call `name.method()`.
 pub(super) fn generate_method_call(name: &str, method: &str, generator: Generator) -> String {
@@ -61,3 +62,217 @@ pub(super) fn generate_none_identity_comparison(
     };
     generator.expr(&compare.into())
 }
+
+// Helpers for read-whole-file and write-whole-file
+#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone)]
+pub(super) enum OpenMode {
+    /// "r"
+    ReadText,
+    /// "rb"
+    ReadBytes,
+    /// "w"
+    WriteText,
+    /// "wb"
+    WriteBytes,
+}
+
+impl OpenMode {
+    pub(super) fn pathlib_method(self) -> String {
+        match self {
+            OpenMode::ReadText => "read_text".to_string(),
+            OpenMode::ReadBytes => "read_bytes".to_string(),
+            OpenMode::WriteText => "write_text".to_string(),
+            OpenMode::WriteBytes => "write_bytes".to_string(),
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/// A grab bag struct that joins together every piece of information we need to track
+/// about a file open operation.
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub(super) struct FileOpen<'a> {
+    /// With item where the open happens, we use it for the reporting range.
+    pub(super) item: &'a ast::WithItem,
+    /// Filename expression used as the first argument in `open`, we use it in the diagnostic message.
+    pub(super) filename: &'a Expr,
+    /// The file open mode.
+    pub(super) mode: OpenMode,
+    /// The file open keywords.
+    pub(super) keywords: Vec<&'a ast::Keyword>,
+    /// We only check `open` operations whose file handles are used exactly once.
+    pub(super) reference: &'a ResolvedReference,
+}
+
+impl<'a> FileOpen<'a> {
+    /// Determine whether an expression is a reference to the file handle, by comparing
+    /// their ranges. If two expressions have the same range, they must be the same expression.
+    pub(super) fn is_ref(&self, expr: &Expr) -> bool {
+        expr.range() == self.reference.range()
+    }
+}
+
+/// Find and return all `open` operations in the given `with` statement.
+pub(super) fn find_file_opens<'a>(
+    with: &'a ast::StmtWith,
+    semantic: &'a SemanticModel<'a>,
+    read_mode: bool,
+) -> Vec<FileOpen<'a>> {
+    with.items
+        .iter()
+        .filter_map(|item| find_file_open(item, with, semantic, read_mode))
+        .collect()
+}
+
+/// Find `open` operation in the given `with` item.
+fn find_file_open<'a>(
+    item: &'a ast::WithItem,
+    with: &'a ast::StmtWith,
+    semantic: &'a SemanticModel<'a>,
+    read_mode: bool,
+) -> Option<FileOpen<'a>> {
+    // We want to match `open(...) as var`.
+    let ast::ExprCall {
+        func,
+        arguments: ast::Arguments { args, keywords, .. },
+        ..
+    } = item.context_expr.as_call_expr()?;
+
+    if func.as_name_expr()?.id != "open" {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    let var = item.optional_vars.as_deref()?.as_name_expr()?;
+
+    // Ignore calls with `*args` and `**kwargs`. In the exact case of `open(*filename, mode="w")`,
+    // it could be a match; but in all other cases, the call _could_ contain unsupported keyword
+    // arguments, like `buffering`.
+    if args.iter().any(Expr::is_starred_expr)
+        || keywords.iter().any(|keyword| keyword.arg.is_none())
+    {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    // Match positional arguments, get filename and mode.
+    let (filename, pos_mode) = match_open_args(args)?;
+
+    // Match keyword arguments, get keyword arguments to forward and possibly mode.
+    let (keywords, kw_mode) = match_open_keywords(keywords, read_mode)?;
+
+    let mode = kw_mode.unwrap_or(pos_mode);
+
+    match mode {
+        OpenMode::ReadText | OpenMode::ReadBytes => {
+            if !read_mode {
+                return None;
+            }
+        }
+        OpenMode::WriteText | OpenMode::WriteBytes => {
+            if read_mode {
+                return None;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    // Path.read_bytes and Path.write_bytes do not support any kwargs.
+    if matches!(mode, OpenMode::ReadBytes | OpenMode::WriteBytes) && !keywords.is_empty() {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    // Now we need to find what is this variable bound to...
+    let scope = semantic.current_scope();
+    let bindings: Vec<BindingId> = scope.get_all(var.id.as_str()).collect();
+
+    let binding = bindings
+        .iter()
+        .map(|x| semantic.binding(*x))
+        // We might have many bindings with the same name, but we only care
+        // for the one we are looking at right now.
+        .find(|binding| binding.range() == var.range())?;
+
+    // Since many references can share the same binding, we can limit our attention span
+    // exclusively to the body of the current `with` statement.
+    let references: Vec<&ResolvedReference> = binding
+        .references
+        .iter()
+        .map(|id| semantic.reference(*id))
+        .filter(|reference| with.range().contains_range(reference.range()))
+        .collect();
+
+    // And even with all these restrictions, if the file handle gets used not exactly once,
+    // it doesn't fit the bill.
+    let [reference] = references.as_slice() else {
+        return None;
+    };
+
+    Some(FileOpen {
+        item,
+        filename,
+        mode,
+        keywords,
+        reference,
+    })
+}
+
+/// Match positional arguments. Return expression for the file name and open mode.
+fn match_open_args(args: &[Expr]) -> Option<(&Expr, OpenMode)> {
+    match args {
+        [filename] => Some((filename, OpenMode::ReadText)),
+        [filename, mode_literal] => match_open_mode(mode_literal).map(|mode| (filename, mode)),
+        // The third positional argument is `buffering` and the pathlib methods don't support it.
+        _ => None,
+    }
+}
+
+/// Match keyword arguments. Return keyword arguments to forward and mode.
+fn match_open_keywords(
+    keywords: &[ast::Keyword],
+    read_mode: bool,
+) -> Option<(Vec<&ast::Keyword>, Option<OpenMode>)> {
+    let mut result: Vec<&ast::Keyword> = vec![];
+    let mut mode: Option<OpenMode> = None;
+
+    for keyword in keywords {
+        match keyword.arg.as_ref()?.as_str() {
+            "encoding" | "errors" => result.push(keyword),
+            // newline is only valid for write_text
+            "newline" => {
+                if read_mode {
+                    return None;
+                }
+                result.push(keyword);
+            }
+
+            // This might look bizarre, - why do we re-wrap this optional?
+            //
+            // The answer is quite simple, in the result of the current function
+            // mode being `None` is a possible and correct option meaning that there
+            // was NO "mode" keyword argument.
+            //
+            // The result of `match_open_mode` on the other hand is None
+            // in the cases when the mode is not compatible with `write_text`/`write_bytes`.
+            //
+            // So, here we return None from this whole function if the mode
+            // is incompatible.
+            "mode" => mode = Some(match_open_mode(&keyword.value)?),
+
+            // All other keywords cannot be directly forwarded.
+            _ => return None,
+        };
+    }
+    Some((result, mode))
+}
+
+/// Match open mode to see if it is supported.
+fn match_open_mode(mode: &Expr) -> Option<OpenMode> {
+    let ast::ExprStringLiteral { value, .. } = mode.as_string_literal_expr()?;
+    if value.is_implicit_concatenated() {
+        return None;
+    }
+    match value.to_str() {
+        "r" => Some(OpenMode::ReadText),
+        "rb" => Some(OpenMode::ReadBytes),
+        "w" => Some(OpenMode::WriteText),
+        "wb" => Some(OpenMode::WriteBytes),
+        _ => None,
+    }
+}

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/mod.rs

@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ mod tests {
     #[test_case(Rule::MetaClassABCMeta, Path::new("FURB180.py"))]
     #[test_case(Rule::HashlibDigestHex, Path::new("FURB181.py"))]
     #[test_case(Rule::ListReverseCopy, Path::new("FURB187.py"))]
+    #[test_case(Rule::WriteWholeFile, Path::new("FURB103.py"))]
     fn rules(rule_code: Rule, path: &Path) -> Result<()> {
         let snapshot = format!("{}_{}", rule_code.noqa_code(), path.to_string_lossy());
         let diagnostics = test_path(

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/rules/mod.rs

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ pub(crate) use type_none_comparison::*;
 pub(crate) use unnecessary_enumerate::*;
 pub(crate) use unnecessary_from_float::*;
 pub(crate) use verbose_decimal_constructor::*;
+pub(crate) use write_whole_file::*;
 
 mod bit_count;
 mod check_and_remove_from_set;
@@ -53,3 +54,4 @@ mod type_none_comparison;
 mod unnecessary_enumerate;
 mod unnecessary_from_float;
 mod verbose_decimal_constructor;
+mod write_whole_file;

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/rules/read_whole_file.rs

@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ use ruff_macros::{derive_message_formats, violation};
 use ruff_python_ast::visitor::{self, Visitor};
 use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Expr};
 use ruff_python_codegen::Generator;
-use ruff_python_semantic::{BindingId, ResolvedReference, SemanticModel};
 use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextRange};
 
 use crate::checkers::ast::Checker;
 use crate::fix::snippet::SourceCodeSnippet;
 
+use super::super::helpers::{find_file_opens, FileOpen};
+
 /// ## What it does
 /// Checks for uses of `open` and `read` that can be replaced by `pathlib`
 /// methods, like `Path.read_text` and `Path.read_bytes`.
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ pub(crate) fn read_whole_file(checker: &mut Checker, with: &ast::StmtWith) {
     }
 
     // First we go through all the items in the statement and find all `open` operations.
-    let candidates = find_file_opens(with, checker.semantic());
+    let candidates = find_file_opens(with, checker.semantic(), true);
     if candidates.is_empty() {
         return;
     }
@@ -85,180 +86,6 @@ pub(crate) fn read_whole_file(checker: &mut Checker, with: &ast::StmtWith) {
     checker.diagnostics.extend(diagnostics);
 }
 
-#[derive(Debug)]
-enum ReadMode {
-    /// "r"  -> `read_text`
-    Text,
-    /// "rb" -> `read_bytes`
-    Bytes,
-}
-
-/// A grab bag struct that joins together every piece of information we need to track
-/// about a file open operation.
-#[derive(Debug)]
-struct FileOpen<'a> {
-    /// With item where the open happens, we use it for the reporting range.
-    item: &'a ast::WithItem,
-    /// Filename expression used as the first argument in `open`, we use it in the diagnostic message.
-    filename: &'a Expr,
-    /// The type of read to choose `read_text` or `read_bytes`.
-    mode: ReadMode,
-    /// Keywords that can be used in the new read call.
-    keywords: Vec<&'a ast::Keyword>,
-    /// We only check `open` operations whose file handles are used exactly once.
-    reference: &'a ResolvedReference,
-}
-
-impl<'a> FileOpen<'a> {
-    /// Determine whether an expression is a reference to the file handle, by comparing
-    /// their ranges. If two expressions have the same range, they must be the same expression.
-    fn is_ref(&self, expr: &Expr) -> bool {
-        expr.range() == self.reference.range()
-    }
-}
-
-/// Find and return all `open` operations in the given `with` statement.
-fn find_file_opens<'a>(
-    with: &'a ast::StmtWith,
-    semantic: &'a SemanticModel<'a>,
-) -> Vec<FileOpen<'a>> {
-    with.items
-        .iter()
-        .filter_map(|item| find_file_open(item, with, semantic))
-        .collect()
-}
-
-/// Find `open` operation in the given `with` item.
-fn find_file_open<'a>(
-    item: &'a ast::WithItem,
-    with: &'a ast::StmtWith,
-    semantic: &'a SemanticModel<'a>,
-) -> Option<FileOpen<'a>> {
-    // We want to match `open(...) as var`.
-    let ast::ExprCall {
-        func,
-        arguments: ast::Arguments { args, keywords, .. },
-        ..
-    } = item.context_expr.as_call_expr()?;
-
-    if func.as_name_expr()?.id != "open" {
-        return None;
-    }
-
-    let var = item.optional_vars.as_deref()?.as_name_expr()?;
-
-    // Ignore calls with `*args` and `**kwargs`. In the exact case of `open(*filename, mode="r")`,
-    // it could be a match; but in all other cases, the call _could_ contain unsupported keyword
-    // arguments, like `buffering`.
-    if args.iter().any(Expr::is_starred_expr)
-        || keywords.iter().any(|keyword| keyword.arg.is_none())
-    {
-        return None;
-    }
-
-    // Match positional arguments, get filename and read mode.
-    let (filename, pos_mode) = match_open_args(args)?;
-
-    // Match keyword arguments, get keyword arguments to forward and possibly read mode.
-    let (keywords, kw_mode) = match_open_keywords(keywords)?;
-
-    // `pos_mode` could've been assigned default value corresponding to "r", while
-    // keyword mode should override that.
-    let mode = kw_mode.unwrap_or(pos_mode);
-
-    if matches!(mode, ReadMode::Bytes) && !keywords.is_empty() {
-        return None;
-    }
-
-    // Now we need to find what is this variable bound to...
-    let scope = semantic.current_scope();
-    let bindings: Vec<BindingId> = scope.get_all(var.id.as_str()).collect();
-
-    let binding = bindings
-        .iter()
-        .map(|x| semantic.binding(*x))
-        // We might have many bindings with the same name, but we only care
-        // for the one we are looking at right now.
-        .find(|binding| binding.range() == var.range())?;
-
-    // Since many references can share the same binding, we can limit our attention span
-    // exclusively to the body of the current `with` statement.
-    let references: Vec<&ResolvedReference> = binding
-        .references
-        .iter()
-        .map(|id| semantic.reference(*id))
-        .filter(|reference| with.range().contains_range(reference.range()))
-        .collect();
-
-    // And even with all these restrictions, if the file handle gets used not exactly once,
-    // it doesn't fit the bill.
-    let [reference] = references.as_slice() else {
-        return None;
-    };
-
-    Some(FileOpen {
-        item,
-        filename,
-        mode,
-        keywords,
-        reference,
-    })
-}
-
-/// Match positional arguments. Return expression for the file name and read mode.
-fn match_open_args(args: &[Expr]) -> Option<(&Expr, ReadMode)> {
-    match args {
-        [filename] => Some((filename, ReadMode::Text)),
-        [filename, mode_literal] => match_open_mode(mode_literal).map(|mode| (filename, mode)),
-        // The third positional argument is `buffering` and `read_text` doesn't support it.
-        _ => None,
-    }
-}
-
-/// Match keyword arguments. Return keyword arguments to forward and read mode.
-fn match_open_keywords(
-    keywords: &[ast::Keyword],
-) -> Option<(Vec<&ast::Keyword>, Option<ReadMode>)> {
-    let mut result: Vec<&ast::Keyword> = vec![];
-    let mut mode: Option<ReadMode> = None;
-
-    for keyword in keywords {
-        match keyword.arg.as_ref()?.as_str() {
-            "encoding" | "errors" => result.push(keyword),
-
-            // This might look bizarre, - why do we re-wrap this optional?
-            //
-            // The answer is quite simple, in the result of the current function
-            // mode being `None` is a possible and correct option meaning that there
-            // was NO "mode" keyword argument.
-            //
-            // The result of `match_open_mode` on the other hand is None
-            // in the cases when the mode is not compatible with `read_text`/`read_bytes`.
-            //
-            // So, here we return None from this whole function if the mode
-            // is incompatible.
-            "mode" => mode = Some(match_open_mode(&keyword.value)?),
-
-            // All other keywords cannot be directly forwarded.
-            _ => return None,
-        };
-    }
-    Some((result, mode))
-}
-
-/// Match open mode to see if it is supported.
-fn match_open_mode(mode: &Expr) -> Option<ReadMode> {
-    let ast::ExprStringLiteral { value, .. } = mode.as_string_literal_expr()?;
-    if value.is_implicit_concatenated() {
-        return None;
-    }
-    match value.to_str() {
-        "r" => Some(ReadMode::Text),
-        "rb" => Some(ReadMode::Bytes),
-        _ => None,
-    }
-}
-
 /// AST visitor that matches `open` operations with the corresponding `read` calls.
 #[derive(Debug)]
 struct ReadMatcher<'a> {
@@ -309,17 +136,12 @@ fn match_read_call(expr: &Expr) -> Option<&Expr> {
         return None;
     }
 
-    Some(attr.value.as_ref())
+    Some(&*attr.value)
 }
 
-/// Construct the replacement suggestion call.
 fn make_suggestion(open: &FileOpen<'_>, generator: Generator) -> SourceCodeSnippet {
-    let method_name = match open.mode {
-        ReadMode::Text => "read_text",
-        ReadMode::Bytes => "read_bytes",
-    };
     let name = ast::ExprName {
-        id: method_name.to_string(),
+        id: open.mode.pathlib_method(),
         ctx: ast::ExprContext::Load,
         range: TextRange::default(),
     };

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/rules/write_whole_file.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+use ruff_diagnostics::{Diagnostic, Violation};
+use ruff_macros::{derive_message_formats, violation};
+use ruff_python_ast::relocate::relocate_expr;
+use ruff_python_ast::visitor::{self, Visitor};
+use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Expr, Stmt};
+use ruff_python_codegen::Generator;
+use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextRange};
+
+use crate::checkers::ast::Checker;
+use crate::fix::snippet::SourceCodeSnippet;
+
+use super::super::helpers::{find_file_opens, FileOpen};
+
+/// ## What it does
+/// Checks for uses of `open` and `write` that can be replaced by `pathlib`
+/// methods, like `Path.write_text` and `Path.write_bytes`.
+///
+/// ## Why is this bad?
+/// When writing a single string to a file, it's simpler and more concise
+/// to use `pathlib` methods like `Path.write_text` and `Path.write_bytes`
+/// instead of `open` and `write` calls via `with` statements.
+///
+/// ## Example
+/// ```python
+/// with open(filename, "w") as f:
+///     f.write(contents)
+/// ```
+///
+/// Use instead:
+/// ```python
+/// from pathlib import Path
+///
+/// Path(filename).write_text(contents)
+/// ```
+///
+/// ## References
+/// - [Python documentation: `Path.write_bytes`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/pathlib.html#pathlib.Path.write_bytes)
+/// - [Python documentation: `Path.write_text`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/pathlib.html#pathlib.Path.write_text)
+#[violation]
+pub struct WriteWholeFile {
+    filename: SourceCodeSnippet,
+    suggestion: SourceCodeSnippet,
+}
+
+impl Violation for WriteWholeFile {
+    #[derive_message_formats]
+    fn message(&self) -> String {
+        let filename = self.filename.truncated_display();
+        let suggestion = self.suggestion.truncated_display();
+        format!("`open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path({filename}).{suggestion}`")
+    }
+}
+
+/// FURB103
+pub(crate) fn write_whole_file(checker: &mut Checker, with: &ast::StmtWith) {
+    // `async` check here is more of a precaution.
+    if with.is_async || !checker.semantic().is_builtin("open") {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    // First we go through all the items in the statement and find all `open` operations.
+    let candidates = find_file_opens(with, checker.semantic(), false);
+    if candidates.is_empty() {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    // Then we need to match each `open` operation with exactly one `write` call.
+    let (matches, contents) = {
+        let mut matcher = WriteMatcher::new(candidates);
+        visitor::walk_body(&mut matcher, &with.body);
+        matcher.finish()
+    };
+
+    // All the matched operations should be reported.
+    let diagnostics: Vec<Diagnostic> = matches
+        .iter()
+        .zip(contents)
+        .map(|(open, content)| {
+            Diagnostic::new(
+                WriteWholeFile {
+                    filename: SourceCodeSnippet::from_str(&checker.generator().expr(open.filename)),
+                    suggestion: make_suggestion(open, content, checker.generator()),
+                },
+                open.item.range(),
+            )
+        })
+        .collect();
+    checker.diagnostics.extend(diagnostics);
+}
+
+/// AST visitor that matches `open` operations with the corresponding `write` calls.
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct WriteMatcher<'a> {
+    candidates: Vec<FileOpen<'a>>,
+    matches: Vec<FileOpen<'a>>,
+    contents: Vec<&'a Expr>,
+    loop_counter: u32,
+}
+
+impl<'a> WriteMatcher<'a> {
+    fn new(candidates: Vec<FileOpen<'a>>) -> Self {
+        Self {
+            candidates,
+            matches: vec![],
+            contents: vec![],
+            loop_counter: 0,
+        }
+    }
+
+    fn finish(self) -> (Vec<FileOpen<'a>>, Vec<&'a Expr>) {
+        (self.matches, self.contents)
+    }
+}
+
+impl<'a> Visitor<'a> for WriteMatcher<'a> {
+    fn visit_stmt(&mut self, stmt: &'a Stmt) {
+        if matches!(stmt, ast::Stmt::While(_) | ast::Stmt::For(_)) {
+            self.loop_counter += 1;
+            visitor::walk_stmt(self, stmt);
+            self.loop_counter -= 1;
+        } else {
+            visitor::walk_stmt(self, stmt);
+        }
+    }
+
+    fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &'a Expr) {
+        if let Some((write_to, content)) = match_write_call(expr) {
+            if let Some(open) = self
+                .candidates
+                .iter()
+                .position(|open| open.is_ref(write_to))
+            {
+                if self.loop_counter == 0 {
+                    self.matches.push(self.candidates.remove(open));
+                    self.contents.push(content);
+                } else {
+                    self.candidates.remove(open);
+                }
+            }
+            return;
+        }
+        visitor::walk_expr(self, expr);
+    }
+}
+
+/// Match `x.write(foo)` expression and return expression `x` and `foo` on success.
+fn match_write_call(expr: &Expr) -> Option<(&Expr, &Expr)> {
+    let call = expr.as_call_expr()?;
+    let attr = call.func.as_attribute_expr()?;
+    let method_name = &attr.attr;
+
+    if method_name != "write"
+        || !attr.value.is_name_expr()
+        || call.arguments.args.len() != 1
+        || !call.arguments.keywords.is_empty()
+    {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    // `write` only takes in a single positional argument.
+    Some((&*attr.value, call.arguments.args.first()?))
+}
+
+fn make_suggestion(open: &FileOpen<'_>, arg: &Expr, generator: Generator) -> SourceCodeSnippet {
+    let name = ast::ExprName {
+        id: open.mode.pathlib_method(),
+        ctx: ast::ExprContext::Load,
+        range: TextRange::default(),
+    };
+    let mut arg = arg.clone();
+    relocate_expr(&mut arg, TextRange::default());
+    let call = ast::ExprCall {
+        func: Box::new(name.into()),
+        arguments: ast::Arguments {
+            args: Box::new([arg]),
+            keywords: open.keywords.iter().copied().cloned().collect(),
+            range: TextRange::default(),
+        },
+        range: TextRange::default(),
+    };
+    SourceCodeSnippet::from_str(&generator.expr(&call.into()))
+}

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/snapshots/ruff_linter__rules__refurb__tests__FURB103_FURB103.py.snap

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+---
+source: crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/refurb/mod.rs
+---
+FURB103.py:12:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_text("test")`
+   |
+11 | # FURB103
+12 | with open("file.txt", "w") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+13 |     f.write("test")
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:16:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_bytes(foobar)`
+   |
+15 | # FURB103
+16 | with open("file.txt", "wb") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+17 |     f.write(foobar)
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:20:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_bytes(b"abc")`
+   |
+19 | # FURB103
+20 | with open("file.txt", mode="wb") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+21 |     f.write(b"abc")
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:24:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_text(foobar, encoding="utf8")`
+   |
+23 | # FURB103
+24 | with open("file.txt", "w", encoding="utf8") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+25 |     f.write(foobar)
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:28:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_text(foobar, errors="ignore")`
+   |
+27 | # FURB103
+28 | with open("file.txt", "w", errors="ignore") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+29 |     f.write(foobar)
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:32:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_text(foobar)`
+   |
+31 | # FURB103
+32 | with open("file.txt", mode="w") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+33 |     f.write(foobar)
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:36:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path(foo()).write_bytes(bar())`
+   |
+35 | # FURB103
+36 | with open(foo(), "wb") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+37 |     # The body of `with` is non-trivial, but the recommendation holds.
+38 |     bar("pre")
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:44:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("a.txt").write_text(x)`
+   |
+43 | # FURB103
+44 | with open("a.txt", "w") as a, open("b.txt", "wb") as b:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+45 |     a.write(x)
+46 |     b.write(y)
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:44:31: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("b.txt").write_bytes(y)`
+   |
+43 | # FURB103
+44 | with open("a.txt", "w") as a, open("b.txt", "wb") as b:
+   |                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+45 |     a.write(x)
+46 |     b.write(y)
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:49:18: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_text(bar(bar(a + x)))`
+   |
+48 | # FURB103
+49 | with foo() as a, open("file.txt", "w") as b, foo() as c:
+   |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+50 |     # We have other things in here, multiple with items, but the user
+51 |     # writes a single time to file and that bit they can replace.
+   |
+
+FURB103.py:58:6: FURB103 `open` and `write` should be replaced by `Path("file.txt").write_text(foobar, newline="\r\n")`
+   |
+57 | # FURB103
+58 | with open("file.txt", "w", newline="\r\n") as f:
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FURB103
+59 |     f.write(foobar)
+   |

ruff.schema.json

@@ -3041,6 +3041,7 @@
         "FURB1",
         "FURB10",
         "FURB101",
+        "FURB103",
         "FURB105",
         "FURB11",
         "FURB110",

scripts/add_rule.py

@@ -27,9 +27,7 @@ def main(*, name: str, prefix: str, code: str, linter: str) -> None:
         / "crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures"
         / dir_name(linter)
         / f"{filestem}.py"
-    ).open(
-        "a",
-    ):
+    ).open("a"):
         pass
 
     plugin_module = ROOT_DIR / "crates/ruff_linter/src/rules" / dir_name(linter)
@@ -141,7 +139,7 @@ pub(crate) fn {rule_name_snake}(checker: &mut Checker) {{}}
         variant = pascal_case(linter)
         rule = f"""rules::{linter.split(" ")[0]}::rules::{name}"""
         lines.append(
-            " " * 8 + f"""({variant}, "{code}") => (RuleGroup::Stable, {rule}),\n""",
+            " " * 8 + f"""({variant}, "{code}") => (RuleGroup::Preview, {rule}),\n""",
         )
         lines.sort()
         text += "".join(lines)