## Summary
just a minor nit followup to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18010 -- put all the
non-`Visitor` methods of `SemanticIndexBuilder` in the same impl block
rather than having multiple impl blocks
## Test Plan
`cargo build`
Summary
--
I noticed these `cfg` directives while working on diagnostics. I think
it makes more sense to apply an `insta` filter in the test instead. I
copied this filter from a CLI test for the same rule.
Test Plan
--
Existing tests, especially Windows CI on this PR
## Summary
With this PR we now detect that x is always defined in `use`:
```py
if flag and (x := number):
use(x)
```
When outside if, it's still detected as possibly not defined
```py
flag and (x := number)
# error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
use(x)
```
In order to achieve that, I had to find a way to get access to the
flow-snapshots of the boolean expression when analyzing the flow of the
if statement. I did it by special casing the visitor of boolean
expression to return flow control information, exporting two snapshots -
`maybe_short_circuit` and `no_short_circuit`. When indexing
boolean expression itself we must assume all possible flows, but when
it's inside if statement, we can be smarter than that.
## Test Plan
Fixed existing and added new mdtests.
I went through some of mypy primer results and they look fine
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Add various attributes to `NamedTuple` classes/instances that are
available at runtime.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/417
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
The PR add the `fix safety` section for rule `SIM210` (#15584 )
It is a little cheating, as the Fix safety section is copy/pasted by
#18086 as the problem is the same.
### Unsafe Fix Example
```python
class Foo():
def __eq__(self, other):
return 0
def foo():
return True if Foo() == 0 else False
def foo_fix():
return Foo() == 0
print(foo()) # False
print(foo_fix()) # 0
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes#18107
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Snapshot tests
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
`ProviderReplacement::Name` was designed back when we only wanted to do
linting. Now we also want to fix the user code. It would be easier for
us to replace them with better AutoImport struct.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
The test fixture has been updated as some cases can now be fixed
## Summary
The PR adds an explicit check for `"__builtins__"` during name lookup,
similar to how `"__file__"` is implemented. The inferred type is
`Any`.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/393
## Test Plan
Added a markdown test for `__builtins__`.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
This makes an easy tweak to allow our diagnostics for unmatched
overloads to apply to method calls. Previously, they only worked for
function calls.
There is at least one other case worth addressing too, namely, class
literals. e.g., `type()`. We had a diagnostic snapshot test case to
track it.
Closesastral-sh/ty#274
## Summary
Model that `type[C]` is always assignable to `type`, even if `C` is not
fully static.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/312
## Test Plan
* New Markdown tests
* Property tests
## Summary
This PR deletes the `DiagnosticKind` type by inlining its three fields
(`name`, `body`, and `suggestion`) into three other diagnostic types:
`Diagnostic`, `DiagnosticMessage`, and `CacheMessage`.
Instead of deferring to an internal `DiagnosticKind`, both `Diagnostic`
and `DiagnosticMessage` now have their own macro-generated `AsRule`
implementations.
This should make both https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18051 and
another follow-up PR changing the type of `name` on `CacheMessage`
easier since its type will be able to change separately from
`Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticMessage`.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
## Summary
Resolves [#290](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/290).
All arguments, synthesized or not, are now accounted for in
`too-many-positional-arguments`'s error message.
For example, consider this example:
```python
class C:
def foo(self): ...
C().foo(1) # !!!
```
Previously, ty would say:
> Too many positional arguments to bound method foo: expected 0, got 1
After this change, it will say:
> Too many positional arguments to bound method foo: expected 1, got 2
This is what Python itself does too:
```text
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<python-input-0>", line 3, in <module>
C().foo()
~~~~~~~^^
TypeError: C.foo() takes 0 positional arguments but 1 was given
```
## Test Plan
Markdown tests.
## Summary
Nvim 0.11+ uses the builtin `vim.lsp.enable` and `vim.lsp.config` to
enable and configure LSP clients. This adds the new non legacy way of
configuring Nvim with `nvim-lspconfig` according to the upstream
documentation.
Update documentation for Nvim LSP configuration according to
`nvim-lspconfig` and Nvim 0.11+
## Test Plan
Tested locally on macOS with Nvim 0.11.1 and `nvim-lspconfig`
master/[ac1dfbe](ac1dfbe3b6).
The PR add the `fix safety` section for rule `SIM103` (#15584 )
### Unsafe Fix Example
```python
class Foo:
def __eq__(self, other):
return 1
def foo():
if Foo() == 1:
return True
return False
def foo_fix():
return Foo() == 1
print(foo()) # True
print(foo_fix()) # 1
```
### Note
I updated the code snippet example, because I thought it was cool to
have a correct example, i.e., that I can paste inside the playground and
it works :-)
Fixes#18069
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR addresses a bug in the `flake8-simplify` rule `SIM905`
(split-static-string) where `str.split(maxsplit=0)` and
`str.rsplit(maxsplit=0)` produced incorrect results for empty strings or
strings starting/ending with whitespace. The fix ensures that the
linting rule's suggested replacements now align with Python's native
behavior for these specific `maxsplit=0` scenarios.
## Test Plan
1. Added new test cases to the existing
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_simplify/SIM905.py`
fixture to cover the scenarios described in issue #18069.
2. Ran `cargo test -p ruff_linter`.
3. Verified and accepted the updated snapshots for `SIM905.py` using
`cargo insta review`. The new snapshots confirm the corrected behavior
for `maxsplit=0`.
## Summary
This PR does the following:
1. Remove the symlinks from the `fuzz/` directory
2. Update `init-fuzzer.sh` script to create those symlinks
3. Update `fuzz/.gitignore` to ignore those corpus directories
## Test Plan
Initialize the fuzzer:
```sh
./fuzz/init-fuzzer.sh
```
And, run a fuzz target:
```sh
cargo +nightly fuzz run ruff_parse_simple -- -timeout=1 -only_ascii=1
```
The diagnostic now includes a pointer to the implementation definition
along with each possible overload.
This doesn't include information about *why* each overload failed. But
given the emphasis on concise output (since there can be *many*
unmatched overloads), it's not totally clear how to include that
additional information.
Fixes#274
These are, after all, specific to function types. The methods on `Type`
are more like conveniences that return something when the type *happens*
to be a function. But defining them on `FunctionType` itself makes it
easy to call them when you have a `FunctionType` instead of a `Type`.
I found the previous code somewhat harder to read. Namely, a `for`
loop was being used to encode "execute zero or one times, but not
more." Which is sometimes okay, but it seemed clearer to me to use
more explicit case analysis here.
This should have no behavioral changes.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Similiar to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17941.
`Replacement::Name` was designed for linting only. Now, we also want to
fix the user code. It would be easier to replace it with a better
AutoImport struct whenever possible.
On the other hand, `AIR301` and `AIR311` contain attribute changes that
can still use a struct like `Replacement::Name`. To reduce the
confusion, I also updated it as `Replacement::AttrName`
Some of the original `Replacement::Name` has been replaced as
`Replacement::Message` as they're not directly mapping and the message
has now been moved to `help`
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
The test fixtures have been updated
The PR add the `fix safety` section for rule `RUF007` (#15584 )
It seems that the fix was always marked as unsafe #14401
## Unsafety example
This first example is a little extreme. In fact, the class `Foo`
overrides the `__getitem__` method but in a very special, way. The
difference lies in the fact that `zip(letters, letters[1:])` call the
slice `letters[1:]` which is behaving weird in this case, while
`itertools.pairwise(letters)` call just `__getitem__(0), __getitem__(1),
...` and so on.
Note that the diagnostic is emitted: [playground](https://play.ruff.rs)
I don't know if we want to mention this problem, as there is a subtile
bug in the python implementation of `Foo` which make the rule unsafe.
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
import itertools
@dataclass
class Foo:
letters: str
def __getitem__(self, index):
return self.letters[index] + "_foo"
letters = Foo("ABCD")
zip_ = zip(letters, letters[1:])
for a, b in zip_:
print(a, b) # A_foo B, B_foo C, C_foo D, D_foo _
pair = itertools.pairwise(letters)
for a, b in pair:
print(a, b) # A_foo B_foo, B_foo C_foo, C_foo D_foo
```
This other example is much probable.
here, `itertools.pairwise` was shadowed by a costume function
[(playground)](https://play.ruff.rs)
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from itertools import pairwise
def pairwise(a):
return []
letters = "ABCD"
zip_ = zip(letters, letters[1:])
print([(a, b) for a, b in zip_]) # [('A', 'B'), ('B', 'C'), ('C', 'D')]
pair = pairwise(letters)
print(pair) # []
```
