When creating a dict with string keys, some prefer to call dict instead of writing a dict literal.
For example: `dict(a=1, b=2, c=3)` instead of `{"a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3}`.
This extends the autofix for TID252 to work with for relative imports without `module` (i.e. `from .. import`). Tested with `matplotlib` and `bokeh`.
(Previously it would panic on unwrap of the module)
Note that pandas has [replaced](6057d7a93e) `absolufy-imports` with `ruff` now!
# Summary
This allows users to do things like:
```py
# ruff: noqa: F401
```
...to ignore all `F401` directives in a file. It's equivalent to `per-file-ignores`, but allows users to specify the behavior inline.
Note that Flake8 does _not_ support this, so we _don't_ respect `# flake8: noqa: F401`. (Flake8 treats that as equivalent to `# flake8: noqa`, so ignores _all_ errors in the file. I think all of [these usages](https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=%22%23+flake8%3A+noqa%3A+%22) are probably mistakes!)
A couple notes on the details:
- If a user has `# ruff: noqa: F401` in the file, but also `# noqa: F401` on a line that would legitimately trigger an `F401` violation, we _do_ mark that as "unused" for `RUF100` purposes. This may be the wrong choice. The `noqa` is legitimately unused, but it's also not "wrong". It's just redundant.
- If a user has `# ruff: noqa: F401`, and runs `--add-noqa`, we _won't_ add `# noqa: F401` to any lines (which seems like the obvious right choice to me).
Closes#1054 (which has some extra pieces that I'll carve out into a separate issue).
Closes#2446.
- Implement N999 (following flake8-module-naming) in pep8_naming
- Refactor pep8_naming: split rules.rs into file per rule
- Documentation for majority of the violations
Closes https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/issues/2734
This rule guards against `asyncio.create_task` usages of the form:
```py
asyncio.create_task(coordinator.ws_connect()) # Error
```
...which can lead to unexpected bugs due to the lack of a strong reference to the created task. See Will McGugan's blog post for reference: https://textual.textualize.io/blog/2023/02/11/the-heisenbug-lurking-in-your-async-code/.
Note that we can't detect issues like:
```py
def f():
# Stored as `task`, but never used...
task = asyncio.create_task(coordinator.ws_connect())
```
So that would be a false negative. But this catches the common case of failing to assign the task in any way.
Closes#2809.
