Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
0eeb02c0c1
[syntax-errors] Detect single starred expression assignment x = *y (#17624)
## Summary

Part of #17412

Starred expressions cannot be used as values in assignment expressions.
Add a new semantic syntax error to catch such instances.
Note that we already have
`ParseErrorType::InvalidStarredExpressionUsage` to catch some starred
expression errors during parsing, but that does not cover top level
assignment expressions.

## Test Plan

- Added new inline tests for the new rule
- Found some examples marked as "valid" in existing tests (`_ = *data`),
which are not really valid (per this new rule) and updated them
- There was an existing inline test - `assign_stmt_invalid_value_expr`
which had instances of `*` expression which would be deemed invalid by
this new rule. Converted these to tuples, so that they do not trigger
this new rule.
2025-04-30 15:04:00 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
d45593288f
[syntax-errors] Starred expressions in return, yield, and for (#17134)
Summary
--

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16520 by flagging single,
starred expressions in `return`, `yield`, and
`for` statements.

I thought `yield from` would also be included here, but that error is
emitted by
the CPython parser:

```pycon
>>> ast.parse("def f(): yield from *x")
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<python-input-214>", line 1, in <module>
    ast.parse("def f(): yield from *x")
    ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/ast.py", line 54, in parse
    return compile(source, filename, mode, flags,
                   _feature_version=feature_version, optimize=optimize)
  File "<unknown>", line 1
    def f(): yield from *x
                        ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```

And we also already catch it in our parser.

Test Plan
--

New inline tests and updates to existing tests.
2025-04-02 08:38:25 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
ab1011ce70
[syntax-errors] Single starred assignment target (#17024)
Some checks are pending
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
[Knot Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
Summary
--

Detects starred assignment targets outside of tuples and lists like `*a
= (1,)`.

This PR only considers assignment statements. I also checked annotated
assigment statements, but these give a separate error that we already
catch, so I think they're okay not to consider:

```pycon
>>> *a: list[int] = []
  File "<python-input-72>", line 1
    *a: list[int] = []
      ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```

Fixes #13759

Test Plan
--

New inline tests, plus a new `SemanticSyntaxError` for an existing
parser test. I also removed a now-invalid case from an otherwise-valid
test fixture.

The new semantic error leads to two errors for the case below:

```python
*foo() = 42
```

but this matches [pyright] too.

[pyright]: https://pyright-play.net/?code=FQMw9mAUCUAEC8sAsAmAUEA
2025-03-29 12:35:47 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
5697d21fca
[syntax-errors] Irrefutable case pattern before final case (#16905)
Summary
--

Detects irrefutable `match` cases before the final case using a modified
version
of the existing `Pattern::is_irrefutable` method from the AST crate. The
modified method helps to retrieve a more precise diagnostic range to
match what
Python 3.13 shows in the REPL.

Test Plan
--

New inline tests, as well as some updates to existing tests that had
irrefutable
patterns before the last block.
2025-03-26 12:27:16 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
2baaedda6c
[syntax-errors] Start detecting compile-time syntax errors (#16106)
## Summary

This PR implements the "greeter" approach for checking the AST for
syntax errors emitted by the CPython compiler. It introduces two main
infrastructural changes to support all of the compile-time errors:
1. Adds a new `semantic_errors` module to the parser crate with public
`SemanticSyntaxChecker` and `SemanticSyntaxError` types
2. Embeds a `SemanticSyntaxChecker` in the `ruff_linter::Checker` for
checking these errors in ruff

As a proof of concept, it also implements detection of two syntax
errors:
1. A reimplementation of
[`late-future-import`](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/late-future-import/)
(`F404`)
2. Detection of rebound comprehension iteration variables
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14395)

## Test plan
Existing F404 tests, new inline tests in the `ruff_python_parser` crate,
and a linter CLI test showing an example of the `Message` output.

I also tested in VS Code, where `preview = false` and turning off syntax
errors both disable the new errors:


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cf453d95-04f7-484b-8440-cb812f29d45e)

And on the playground, where `preview = false` also disables the errors:


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a97570c4-1efa-439f-9d99-a54487dd6064)


Fixes #14395

---------

Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-03-21 14:45:25 -04:00
Jelle Zijlstra
cd3e319538
Add support for PEP 696 syntax (#11120) 2024-04-26 09:47:29 +02:00
Dhruv Manilawala
13ffb5bc19
Replace LALRPOP parser with hand-written parser (#10036)
(Supersedes #9152, authored by @LaBatata101)

## Summary

This PR replaces the current parser generated from LALRPOP to a
hand-written recursive descent parser.

It also updates the grammar for [PEP
646](https://peps.python.org/pep-0646/) so that the parser outputs the
correct AST. For example, in `data[*x]`, the index expression is now a
tuple with a single starred expression instead of just a starred
expression.

Beyond the performance improvements, the parser is also error resilient
and can provide better error messages. The behavior as seen by any
downstream tools isn't changed. That is, the linter and formatter can
still assume that the parser will _stop_ at the first syntax error. This
will be updated in the following months.

For more details about the change here, refer to the PR corresponding to
the individual commits and the release blog post.

## Test Plan

Write _lots_ and _lots_ of tests for both valid and invalid syntax and
verify the output.

## Acknowledgements

- @MichaReiser for reviewing 100+ parser PRs and continuously providing
guidance throughout the project
- @LaBatata101 for initiating the transition to a hand-written parser in
#9152
- @addisoncrump for implementing the fuzzer which helped
[catch](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10903)
[a](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10910)
[lot](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10966)
[of](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10896)
[bugs](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10877)

---------

Co-authored-by: Victor Hugo Gomes <labatata101@linuxmail.org>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2024-04-18 17:57:39 +05:30