## Summary
Remove a hack in control flow modeling that was treating `return`
statements at the end of function bodies in a special way (basically
considering the state *just before* the `return` statement as the
end-of-scope state). This is not needed anymore now that #18750 has been
merged.
In order to make this work, we now use *all reachable bindings* for
purposes of finding implicit instance attribute assignments as well as
for deferred lookups of symbols. Both would otherwise be affected by
this change:
```py
def C:
def f(self):
self.x = 1 # a reachable binding that is not visible at the end of the scope
return
```
```py
def f():
class X: ... # a reachable binding that is not visible at the end of the scope
x: "X" = X() # deferred use of `X`
return
```
Implicit instance attributes also required another change. We previously
kept track of possibly-unbound instance attributes in some cases, but we
now give up on that completely and always consider *implicit* instance
attributes to be bound if we see a reachable binding in a reachable
method. The previous behavior was somewhat inconsistent anyway because
we also do not consider attributes possibly-unbound in other scenarios:
we do not (and can not) keep track of whether or not methods are called
that define these attributes.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/711
## Ecosystem analysis
I think this looks very positive!
* We see an unsurprising drop in `possibly-unbound-attribute`
diagnostics (599), mostly for classes that define attributes in `try …
except` blocks, `for` loops, or `if … else: raise …` constructs. There
might obviously also be true positives that got removed, but the vast
majority should be false positives.
* There is also a drop in `possibly-unresolved-reference` /
`unresolved-reference` diagnostics (279+13) from the change to deferred
lookups.
* Some `invalid-type-form` false positives got resolved (13), because we
can now properly look up the names in the annotations.
* There are some new *true* positives in `attrs`, since we understand
the `Attribute` annotation that was previously inferred as `Unknown`
because of a re-assignment after the class definition.
## Test Plan
The existing attributes.md test suite has sufficient coverage here.
## Summary
Temporarily modify `UseDefMapBuilder::reachability` for star imports in
order for new definitions to pick up the right reachability. This was
already working for `UseDefMapBuilder::place_states`, but not for
`UseDefMapBuilder::reachable_definitions`.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/728
## Test Plan
Regression test
## Summary
Evaluate `TYPE_CHECKING` to `ALWAYS_TRUE` and `not TYPE_CHECKING` to
`ALWAYS_FALSE` during semantic index building. This is a follow-up to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18998 and is in principle just a
performance optimization. We see some (favorable) ecosystem changes
because we can eliminate definitely-unreachable branches early now and
retain narrowing constraints without solving
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/690 first.
Gates all uses of `get-size2` behind the feature `get-size` in the crate
`ruff_python_ast`. Also requires that `ruff_text_size` is pulled in with
the feature `get-size` enabled if we enable the same-named feature for
`ruff_python_ast`.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Make `UP045` ignore `Optional[NamedTuple]` as `NamedTuple` is a function
(not a proper type). Rewriting it to `NamedTuple | None` breaks at
runtime. While type checkers currently accept `NamedTuple` as a type,
they arguably shouldn't. Therefore, we outright ignore it and don't
touch or lint on it.
For a more detailed discussion, see the linked issue.
## Test Plan
Added examples to the existing tests.
## Related Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18619
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Part of #18972
This PR makes [call-date-today
(DTZ011)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/call-date-today/#call-date-today-dtz011)'s
example error out-of-the-box
[Old example](https://play.ruff.rs/b42d6aef-7777-4b3b-9f96-19132000b765)
```py
import datetime
datetime.datetime.today()
```
[New example](https://play.ruff.rs/8577c3c1-cfa8-425b-b1e1-4c53b2a48375)
```py
import datetime
datetime.date.today()
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
N/A, no functionality/tests affected
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Part of #18972
This PR makes [no-explicit-stacklevel
(B028)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/no-explicit-stacklevel/#no-explicit-stacklevel-b028)'s
example error out-of-the-box
[Old example](https://play.ruff.rs/1ee80aec-2d6e-4a3f-8e98-da82b6a9f544)
```py
warnings.warn("This is a warning")
```
[New example](https://play.ruff.rs/343593aa-38a0-4d76-a32b-5abd0a4306cc)
```py
import warnings
warnings.warn("This is a warning")
```
Imports were also added to the "use instead" section
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
N/A, no functionality/tests affected
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Part of #18972
This PR makes [batched-without-explicit-strict
(B911)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/batched-without-explicit-strict/#batched-without-explicit-strict-b911)'s
example error out-of-the-box
[Old example](https://play.ruff.rs/a897d96b-0749-4291-8a62-dfd4caf290a0)
```py
itertools.batched(iterable, n)
```
[New example](https://play.ruff.rs/1c1e0ab7-014c-4dc2-abed-c2cb6cd01f70)
```py
import itertools
itertools.batched(iterable, n)
```
Imports were also added to the "use instead" sections
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
N/A, no functionality/tests affected
## Summary
This just replaces one temporary solution to recursive protocols (the
`SelfReference` mechanism) with another one (track seen types when
recursively descending in `normalize` and replace recursive references
with `Any`). But this temporary solution can handle mutually-recursive
types, not just self-referential ones, and it's sufficient for the
primer ecosystem and some other projects we are testing on to no longer
stack overflow.
The follow-up here will be to properly handle these self-references
instead of replacing them with `Any`.
We will also eventually need cycle detection on more recursive-descent
type transformations and tests.
## Test Plan
Existing tests (including recursive-protocol tests) and primer.
Added mdtest for mutually-recursive protocols that stack-overflowed
before this PR.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR fixes rule C420's fix. The fix replaces `{...}` with
`dict....(...)`. Therefore, if there is any identifier or such right
before the fix, the fix will fuse that previous token with `dict...`.
The example in the issue is
```python
0 or{x: None for x in "x"}
# gets "fixed" to
0 ordict.fromkeys(iterable)
```
## Related Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18599
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fixes#18908
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Part of #18972
This PR makes [airflow3-moved-to-provider
(AIR302)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/airflow3-moved-to-provider/#airflow3-moved-to-provider-air302)'s
example error out-of-the-box
[Old example](https://play.ruff.rs/1026c008-57bc-4330-93b9-141444f2a611)
```py
from airflow.auth.managers.fab.fab_auth_manage import FabAuthManager
```
[New example](https://play.ruff.rs/b690e809-a81d-4265-9fde-1494caa0b7fd)
```py
from airflow.auth.managers.fab.fab_auth_manager import FabAuthManager
fab_auth_manager_app = FabAuthManager().get_fastapi_app()
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
N/A, no functionality/tests affected
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Mark `UP008`'s fix safe if it won't delete comments.
## Relevant Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18533
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Part of #18972
This PR makes [flask-debug-true
(S201)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/flask-debug-true/#flask-debug-true-s201)'s
example error out-of-the-box
[Old example](https://play.ruff.rs/d5e1a013-1107-4223-9094-0e8393ad3c64)
```py
import flask
app = Flask()
app.run(debug=True)
```
[New example](https://play.ruff.rs/c4aebd2c-0448-4471-8bad-3e38ace68367)
```py
from flask import Flask
app = Flask()
app.run(debug=True)
```
Imports were also added to the `Use instead:` section to make it valid
code out-of-the-box.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
N/A, no functionality/tests affected
## Summary
Simplifies literal `True` and `False` conditions to `ALWAYS_TRUE` /
`ALWAYS_FALSE` during semantic index building. This allows us to eagerly
evaluate more constraints, which should help with performance (looks
like there is a tiny 1% improvement in instrumented benchmarks), but
also allows us to eliminate definitely-unreachable branches in
control-flow merging. This can lead to better type inference in some
cases because it allows us to retain narrowing constraints without
solving https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/690 first:
```py
def _(c: int | None):
if c is None:
assert False
reveal_type(c) # int, previously: int | None
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/713
## Test Plan
* Regression test for https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/713
* Made sure that all ecosystem diffs trace back to removed false
positives
## Summary
This PR adds diagnostic for invalid binary operators in type
expressions. It should close https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/706
if merged.
Please feel free to suggest better wordings for the diagnostic message.
## Test Plan
I modified `mdtest/annotations/invalid.md` and added a test for each
binary operator, and fixed tests that was broken by the new diagnostic.
## Summary
Print the [new salsa memory usage
dumps](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18928) in mypy primer CI
runs to help us catch memory regressions. The numbers are rounded to the
nearest power of 1.1 (about a 5% threshold between buckets) to avoid overly sensitive diffs.
This PR extracts a lot of the complex logic in the `match_parameters`
and `check_types` methods of our call binding machinery into separate
helper types. This is setup for #18996, which will update this logic to
handle variadic arguments. To do so, it is helpful to have the
per-argument logic extracted into a method that we can call repeatedly
for each _element_ of a variadic argument.
This should be a pure refactoring, with no behavioral changes.
This PR updates our unpacking assignment logic to use the new tuple
machinery. As a result, we can now unpack variable-length tuples
correctly.
As part of this, the `TupleSpec` classes have been renamed to `Tuple`,
and can now contain any element (Rust) type, not just `Type<'db>`. The
unpacker uses a tuple of `UnionBuilder`s to maintain the types that will
be assigned to each target, as we iterate through potentially many union
elements on the rhs. We also add a new consuming iterator for tuples,
and update the `all_elements` methods to wrap the result in an enum
(similar to `itertools::Position`) letting you know which part of the
tuple each element appears in. I also added a new
`UnionBuilder::try_build`, which lets you specify a different fallback
type if the union contains no elements.
## Summary
Ensure that we correctly infer calls such as `tuple((1, 2))`,
`tuple(range(42))`, etc. Ensure that we emit errors on invalid calls
such as `tuple[int, str]()`.
## Test Plan
Mdtests
## Summary
Under preview 🧪 I've expanded rule `PYI016` to also flag type
union duplicates containing `None` and `Optional`.
## Test Plan
Examples/tests have been added. I've made sure that the existing
examples did not change unless preview is enabled.
## Relevant Issues
* https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18508 (discussing
introducing/extending a rule to flag `Optional[None]`)
* https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18546 (where I discussed this
addition with @AlexWaygood)
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
## Summary
I think this should be the last step before combining `OldDiagnostic`
and `ruff_db::Diagnostic`. We can't store a `NoqaCode` on
`ruff_db::Diagnostic`, so I converted the `noqa_code` field to an
`Option<String>` and then propagated this change to all of the callers.
I tried to use `&str` everywhere it was possible, so I think the
remaining `to_string` calls are necessary. I spent some time trying to
convert _everything_ to `&str` but ran into lifetime issues, especially
in the `FixTable`. Maybe we can take another look at that if it causes a
performance regression, but hopefully these paths aren't too hot. We
also avoid some `to_string` calls, so it might even out a bit too.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Most of the work here was doing some light refactoring to facilitate
sensible testing. That is, we don't want to list every builtin included
in most tests, so we add some structure to the completion type returned.
Tests can now filter based on whether a completion is a builtin or not.
Otherwise, builtins are found using the existing infrastructure for
`object.attr` completions (where we hard-code the module name
`builtins`).
I did consider changing the sort order based on whether a completion
suggestion was a builtin or not. In particular, it seemed like it might
be a good idea to sort builtins after other scope based completions,
but before the dunder and sunder attributes. Namely, it seems likely
that there is an inverse correlation between the size of a scope and
the likelihood of an item in that scope being used at any given point.
So it *might* be a good idea to prioritize the likelier candidates in
the completions returned.
Additionally, the number of items introduced by adding builtins is quite
large. So I wondered whether mixing them in with everything else would
become too noisy.
However, it's not totally clear to me that this is the right thing to
do. Right now, I feel like there is a very obvious lexicographic
ordering that makes "finding" the right suggestion to activate
potentially easier than if the ranking mechanism is less clear.
(Technically, the dunder and sunder attributes are not sorted
lexicographically, but I'd put forward that most folks don't have an
intuitive understanding of where `_` ranks lexicographically with
respect to "regular" letters. Moreover, since dunder and sunder
attributes are all grouped together, I think the ordering here ends up
being very obvious after even a quick glance.)
