Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Micha Reiser
9ae698fe30
Switch to Rust 2024 edition (#18129) 2025-05-16 13:25:28 +02:00
Micha Reiser
32b57b2ee4
Enable nursery rules: 'redundant_clone', 'debug_assert_with_mut_call', and 'unused_peekable' (#13920) 2024-10-25 09:46:30 +02:00
Dhruv Manilawala
040a591cad
Avoid indexing the workspace for single-file mode (#13770)
## Summary

This PR updates the language server to avoid indexing the workspace for
single-file mode.

**What's a single-file mode?**

When a user opens the file directly in an editor, and not the folder
that represents the workspace, the editor usually can't determine the
workspace root. This means that during initializing the server, the
`workspaceFolders` field will be empty / nil.

Now, in this case, the server defaults to using the current working
directory which is a reasonable default assuming that the directory
would point to the one where this open file is present. This would allow
the server to index the directory itself for any config file, if
present.

It turns out that in VS Code the current working directory in the above
scenario is the system root directory `/` and so the server will try to
index the entire root directory which would take a lot of time. This is
the issue as described in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/627. To reproduce, refer
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/627#issuecomment-2401440767.

This PR updates the indexer to avoid traversing the workspace to read
any config file that might be present. The first commit
(8dd2a31eef)
refactors the initialization and introduces two structs `Workspaces` and
`Workspace`. The latter struct includes a field to determine whether
it's the default workspace. The second commit
(61fc39bdb6)
utilizes this field to avoid traversing.

Closes: #11366

## Editor behavior

This is to document the behavior as seen in different editors. The test
scenario used has the following directory tree structure:
```
.
├── nested
│   ├── nested.py
│   └── pyproject.toml
└── test.py
```

where, the contents of the files are:

**test.py**
```py
import os
```

**nested/nested.py**
```py
import os
import math
```

**nested/pyproject.toml**
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint]
select = ["I"]
```

Steps:
1. Open `test.py` directly in the editor
2. Validate that it raises the `F401` violation
3. Open `nested/nested.py` in the same editor instance
4. This file would raise only `I001` if the `nested/pyproject.toml` was
indexed

### VS Code

When (1) is done from above, the current working directory is `/` which
means the server will try to index the entire system to build up the
settings index. This will include the `nested/pyproject.toml` file as
well. This leads to bad user experience because the user would need to
wait for minutes for the server to finish indexing.

This PR avoids that by not traversing the workspace directory in
single-file mode. But, in VS Code, this means that per (4), the file
wouldn't raise `I001` but only raise two `F401` violations because the
`nested/pyproject.toml` was never resolved.

One solution here would be to fix this in the extension itself where we
would detect this scenario and pass in the workspace directory that is
the one containing this open file in (1) above.

### Neovim

**tl;dr** it works as expected because the client considers the presence
of certain files (depending on the server) as the root of the workspace.
For Ruff, they are `pyproject.toml`, `ruff.toml`, and `.ruff.toml`. This
means that the client notifies us as the user moves between single-file
mode and workspace mode.

https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13770#issuecomment-2416608055

### Helix

Same as Neovim, additional context in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13770#issuecomment-2417362097

### Sublime Text

**tl;dr** It works similar to VS Code except that the current working
directory of the current process is different and thus the config file
is never read. So, the behavior remains unchanged with this PR.

https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13770#issuecomment-2417362097

### Zed

Zed seems to be starting a separate language server instance for each
file when the editor is running in a single-file mode even though all
files have been opened in a single editor instance.

(Separated the logs into sections separated by a single blank line
indicating 3 different server instances that the editor started for 3
files.)

```
   0.000053375s  INFO main ruff_server::server: No workspace settings found for file:///Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp, using default settings
   0.009448792s  INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp
   0.009906334s DEBUG ruff:main ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/test.py
   0.011775917s  INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered

   0.000060583s  INFO main ruff_server::server: No workspace settings found for file:///Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested, using default settings
   0.010387125s  INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested
   0.011061875s DEBUG ruff:main ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested/nested.py
   0.011545208s  INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered

   0.000059125s  INFO main ruff_server::server: No workspace settings found for file:///Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested, using default settings
   0.010857583s  INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested
   0.011428958s DEBUG ruff:main ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested/other.py
   0.011893792s  INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
```

## Test Plan

When using the `ruff` server from this PR, we see that the server starts
quickly as seen in the logs. Next, when I switch to the release binary,
it starts indexing the root directory.

For more details, refer to the "Editor Behavior" section above.
2024-10-18 10:51:43 +05:30
Jane Lewis
ad4a88657b
Remove usage of std::path::absolute from snapshot test (#11973) 2024-06-21 20:21:12 +01:00
Jane Lewis
3ab7a8da73
Add Jupyter Notebook document change snapshot test (#11944)
## Summary

Closes #11914.

This PR introduces a snapshot test that replays the LSP requests made
during a document formatting request, and confirms that the notebook
document is updated in the expected way.
2024-06-21 05:29:27 +00:00