## Summary
This PR adds the command to run ruff using [pkgx](https://pkgx.sh).
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
It's just showing that ruff is supported in one more package manager.
## Test Plan
You can run `pkgx ruff` if you have pkgx installed or run `sh <(curl
https://pkgx.sh) +github.com/charliermarsh/ruff sh
`
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7347Closes#3970 via use of `include`
We could update examples in our documentation, but I worry since we do
not have versioned documentation users on older versions would be
confused. Instead, I'll open an issue to track updating use of `ruff
check .` in the documentation sometime in the future.
This dockerfile creates a minimal docker container that runs ruff
```console
$ docker run -v .:/io --rm ruff check --select G004 .
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:51:26: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:55:22: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:84:13: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:177:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:200:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:354:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:477:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
Found 7 errors.
```
```console
$ docker image ls ruff
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
ruff latest 505876b0f817 2 minutes ago 16.2MB
```
Test repo: https://github.com/konstin/release-testing2
Successful build:
1865915510
The package:
https://github.com/konstin/release-testing2/pkgs/container/release-testing2
After merging this, i have to manually push the first image and connect
it the repo in the github UI or the action will fail due to lack of
permissions
Open questions:
* Test arm version: Anyone working on an aarch64 linux machine? I don't
see this failing or a high-priority deployment (the vast majority of
linux users is on x86), but it would be nice to have it tested one.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This adds redirects from, e.g., `https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/F401`
to `https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/unused-import`, which are
generated automatically when creating the documentation. Though we want
to move towards human-readable names eventually, I think this is a nice
and user-friendly change (and doesn't require any fancy infrastructure,
since the redirects are handled via a plugin and added client-side).
Closes#4710.
## Summary
The ruff configuration section is called "format", rather than
"preview". Using the configuration as it was written in the docs gives
an error:
```
$ ruff format --check .
ruff failed
Cause: TOML parse error at line 143, column 1
|
143 | [tool.ruff.preview]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
invalid type: map, expected a boolean
```
## Test Plan
Tested running `ruff format` with the following in my `pyproject.toml`:
```toml
[tool.ruff.format]
preview = true
```
and it worked properly (using preview rules for formatting).
This ensures the python label is used for all python code blocks for
consistency.
## Test Plan
Visual inspection of all changes via git client ensuring no other
changes were made in error.
I got some feedback on Mastodon that it wasn't clear how to use the
linter and formatter together in pre-commit (mostly in the pre-commit
repo's documentation, which is even less clear, but the two should be
consistent).
## Summary
Being able to set `--no-cache` without touching the command line makes
comparing formatter speed with e.g. Hyperfine a lot easier; Black allows
one to set `BLACK_CACHE_DIR=/dev/null`, but setting
`RUFF_CACHE_DIR=/dev/null` has Ruff choke:
```
error: Failed to initialize cache at /dev/null: Not a directory (os error 20)
error: Failed to initialize cache at /dev/null: Not a directory (os error 20)
warning: Failed to open cache file '/dev/null/0.1.4/18160934645386409287': Not a directory (os error 20)
```
Alternately, we could make a `/dev/null` (or `nul` on Windows) cache
directory imply `--no-cache`?
## Test Plan
None yet.
This PR updates the editor integration section of the documentation for
Neovim.
* Removes the now archived `null-ls` plugin
* Add `nvim-lint` (for linters) and `conform.nvim` (for formatter)
plugins
Screenshot ref: b7032228-57b1-4141-ae17-e186c4428b61
## Summary
Similarly to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8302, the
configuration documentation mentions `extend-exclude` for tool specific
configuration, although neither `format` nor `lint` supports it, since
they only support `exclude`.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
**Summary** Prepare for the black preview style becoming the black
stable style at the end of the year.
This adds a new test file to compare stable and preview on some relevant
preview options in black, and makes `format_dev` understand the black
preview flag. I've added poetry as a project that uses preview.
I've implemented one specific deviation (collapsing of stub
implementation in non-stub files) which showed up in poetry for testing.
This also improves poetry compatibility from 0.99891 to 0.99919.
Fixes#7440
New compatibility stats:
| project | similarity index | total files | changed files |
|----------------|------------------:|------------------:|------------------:|
| cpython | 0.75803 | 1799 | 1647 |
| django | 0.99983 | 2772 | 35 |
| home-assistant | 0.99953 | 10596 | 189 |
| poetry | 0.99919 | 317 | 12 |
| transformers | 0.99963 | 2657 | 332 |
| twine | 1.00000 | 33 | 0 |
| typeshed | 0.99978 | 3669 | 20 |
| warehouse | 0.99969 | 654 | 15 |
| zulip | 0.99970 | 1459 | 22 |
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
closes#8217
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
The previous configuration for `ruff` contained an unrecognized field
`magic-trailing-comma` set to "respect". As of version 0.1.2 of `ruff`,
this field was not recognized and resulted in a TOML parse error when
running the `ruff format .` command. This change removes the
`magic-trailing-comma` field and adds the recognized
`skip-magic-trailing-comma` field set to `false`.
## Test Plan
Tested locally with `ruff` 0.1.2.
Per some previous discussion, the policy is not clear about what happens
if the behavior is similar but the _scope_ in which a rule is applied
changes.
