## Summary
Decrease the maximum number of literals in a union before we collapse to
the supertype. The better fix for this will be
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/957, but it is very tempting to
solve this for now by simply decreasing the limit by one, to get below
the salsa limit of 200.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/660
## Test Plan
Added a regression test that would previously lead to a "too many cycle
iterations" panic.
## Summary
With this PR, we stop performing boundness analysis for implicit
instance attributes:
```py
class C:
def __init__(self):
if False:
self.x = 1
C().x # would previously show an error, with this PR we pretend the attribute exists
```
This PR is potentially just a temporary measure until we find a better
fix. But I have already invested a lot of time trying to find the root
cause of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/758 (and [this
example](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/758#issuecomment-3206108262),
which I'm not entirely sure is related) and I still don't understand
what is going on. This PR fixes the performance problems in both of
these problems (in a rather crude way).
The impact of the proposed change on the ecosystem is small, and the
three new diagnostics are arguably true positives (previously hidden
because we considered the code unreachable, based on e.g. `assert`ions
that depended on implicit instance attributes). So this seems like a
reasonable fix for now.
Note that we still support cases like these:
```py
class D:
if False: # or any other expression that statically evaluates to `False`
x: int = 1
D().x # still an error
class E:
if False: # or any other expression that statically evaluates to `False`
def f(self):
self.x = 1
E().x # still an error
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/758
## Test Plan
Updated tests, benchmark results
## Summary
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/692
If the expression (or any child expressions) is not definitely bound the
reachability constraint evaluation is determined as ambiguous.
This fixes the infinite cycles panic in the following code:
```py
from typing import Literal
class Toggle:
def __init__(self: "Toggle"):
if not self.x:
self.x: Literal[True] = True
```
Credit of this solution is for David.
## Test Plan
- Added a test case with too many cycle iterations panic.
- Previous tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
Part of #994. This adds a new field to the Specialization struct to
record when we're dealing with the top or bottom materialization of an
invariant generic. It also implements subtyping and assignability for
these objects.
Next planned steps after this is done are to implement other operations
on top/bottom materializations; probably attribute access is an
important one.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
There are some situations that we have a confusing diagnostics due to
identical class names.
## Class with same name from different modules
```python
import pandas
import polars
df: pandas.DataFrame = polars.DataFrame()
```
This yields the following error:
**Actual:**
error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `DataFrame` is not
assignable to `DataFrame`"
**Expected**:
error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `polars.DataFrame` is not
assignable to `pandas.DataFrame`"
## Nested classes
```python
from enum import Enum
class A:
class B(Enum):
ACTIVE = "active"
INACTIVE = "inactive"
class C:
class B(Enum):
ACTIVE = "active"
INACTIVE = "inactive"
```
**Actual**:
error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[B.ACTIVE]` is not
assignable to `B`"
**Expected**:
error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type
`Literal[my_module.C.B.ACTIVE]` is not assignable to `my_module.A.B`"
## Solution
In this MR we added an heuristics to detect when to use a fully
qualified name:
- There is an invalid assignment and;
- They are two different classes and;
- They have the same name
The fully qualified name always includes:
- module name
- nested classes name
- actual class name
There was no `QualifiedDisplay` so I had to implement it from scratch.
I'm very new to the codebase, so I might have done things inefficiently,
so I appreciate feedback.
Should we pre-compute the fully qualified name or do it on demand?
## Not implemented
### Function-local classes
Should we approach this in a different PR?
**Example**:
```python
# t.py
from __future__ import annotations
def function() -> A:
class A:
pass
return A()
class A:
pass
a: A = function()
```
#### mypy
```console
t.py:8: error: Incompatible return value type (got "t.A@5", expected "t.A") [return-value]
```
From my testing the 5 in `A@5` comes from the like number.
#### ty
```console
error[invalid-return-type]: Return type does not match returned value
--> t.py:4:19
|
4 | def function() -> A:
| - Expected `A` because of return type
5 | class A:
6 | pass
7 |
8 | return A()
| ^^^ expected `A`, found `A`
|
info: rule `invalid-return-type` is enabled by default
```
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/848
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Properly preserve type qualifiers when accessing attributes on unions
and intersections. This is a prerequisite for
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19579.
Also fix a completely wrong implementation of
`map_with_boundness_and_qualifiers`. It now closely follows
`map_with_boundness` (just above).
## Test Plan
I thought about it, but didn't find any easy way to test this. This only
affected `Type::member`. Things like validation of attribute writes
(where type qualifiers like `ClassVar` and `Final` are important) were
already handling things correctly.
## Summary
Add a subtly different test case for recursive PEP 695 type aliases,
which does require that we relax our union simplification, so we don't
eagerly unpack aliases from user-provided union annotations.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest.
## Summary
This has been here for awhile (since our initial PEP 695 type alias
support) but isn't really correct. The right-hand-side of a PEP 695 type
alias is a distinct scope, and we don't mark it as an "eager" nested
scope, so it automatically gets "deferred" resolution of names from
outer scopes (just like a nested function). Thus it's
redundant/unnecessary for us to use `DeferredExpressionState::Deferred`
for resolving that RHS expression -- that's for deferring resolution of
individual names within a scope. Using it here causes us to wrongly
ignore applicable outer-scope narrowing.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest that failed before this PR (the second snippet -- the first
snippet always passed.)
## Summary
Implement validation for `TypedDict` constructor calls and dictionary
literal assignments, including support for `total=False` and proper
field management.
Also add support for `Required` and `NotRequired` type qualifiers in
`TypedDict` classes, along with proper inheritance behavior and the
`total=` parameter.
Support both constructor calls and dict literal syntax
part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/154
### Basic Required Field Validation
```py
class Person(TypedDict):
name: str
age: int | None
# Error: Missing required field 'name' in TypedDict `Person` constructor
incomplete = Person(age=25)
# Error: Invalid argument to key "name" with declared type `str` on TypedDict `Person`
wrong_type = Person(name=123, age=25)
# Error: Invalid key access on TypedDict `Person`: Unknown key "extra"
extra_field = Person(name="Bob", age=25, extra=True)
```
<img width="773" height="191" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 17 59 22"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/79076d98-e85f-4495-93d6-a731aa72a5c9"
/>
### Support for `total=False`
```py
class OptionalPerson(TypedDict, total=False):
name: str
age: int | None
# All valid - all fields are optional with total=False
charlie = OptionalPerson()
david = OptionalPerson(name="David")
emily = OptionalPerson(age=30)
frank = OptionalPerson(name="Frank", age=25)
# But type validation and extra fields still apply
invalid_type = OptionalPerson(name=123) # Error: Invalid argument type
invalid_extra = OptionalPerson(extra=True) # Error: Invalid key access
```
### Dictionary Literal Validation
```py
# Type checking works for both constructors and dict literals
person: Person = {"name": "Alice", "age": 30}
reveal_type(person["name"]) # revealed: str
reveal_type(person["age"]) # revealed: int | None
# Error: Invalid key access on TypedDict `Person`: Unknown key "non_existing"
reveal_type(person["non_existing"]) # revealed: Unknown
```
### `Required`, `NotRequired`, `total`
```python
from typing import TypedDict
from typing_extensions import Required, NotRequired
class PartialUser(TypedDict, total=False):
name: Required[str] # Required despite total=False
age: int # Optional due to total=False
email: NotRequired[str] # Explicitly optional (redundant)
class User(TypedDict):
name: Required[str] # Explicitly required (redundant)
age: int # Required due to total=True
bio: NotRequired[str] # Optional despite total=True
# Valid constructions
partial = PartialUser(name="Alice") # name required, age optional
full = User(name="Bob", age=25) # name and age required, bio optional
# Inheritance maintains original field requirements
class Employee(PartialUser):
department: str # Required (new field)
# name: still Required (inherited)
# age: still optional (inherited)
emp = Employee(name="Charlie", department="Engineering") # ✅
Employee(department="Engineering") # ❌
e: Employee = {"age": 1} # ❌
```
<img width="898" height="683" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 22 02 57"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c1b18cd-cb2e-493a-a948-51589d121738"
/>
## Implementation
The implementation reuses existing validation logic done in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19782
### ℹ️ Why I did NOT synthesize an `__init__` for `TypedDict`:
`TypedDict` inherits `dict.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)` that accepts
all arguments.
The type resolution system finds this inherited signature **before**
looking for synthesized members.
So `own_synthesized_member()` is never called because a signature
already exists.
To force synthesis, you'd have to override Python’s inheritance
mechanism, which would break compatibility with the existing ecosystem.
This is why I went with ad-hoc validation. IMO it's the only viable
approach that respects Python’s
inheritance semantics while providing the required validation.
### Refacto of `Field`
**Before:**
```rust
struct Field<'db> {
declared_ty: Type<'db>,
default_ty: Option<Type<'db>>, // NamedTuple and dataclass only
init_only: bool, // dataclass only
init: bool, // dataclass only
is_required: Option<bool>, // TypedDict only
}
```
**After:**
```rust
struct Field<'db> {
declared_ty: Type<'db>,
kind: FieldKind<'db>,
}
enum FieldKind<'db> {
NamedTuple { default_ty: Option<Type<'db>> },
Dataclass { default_ty: Option<Type<'db>>, init_only: bool, init: bool },
TypedDict { is_required: bool },
}
```
## Test Plan
Updated Markdown tests
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
This PR limits the argument type expansion size for an overload call
evaluation to 512.
The limit chosen is arbitrary but I've taken the 256 limit from Pyright
into account and bumped it x2 to start with.
Initially, I actually started out by trying to refactor the entire
argument type expansion to be lazy. Currently, expanding a single
argument at any position eagerly creates the combination (argument
lists) and returns that (`Vec<CallArguments>`) but I thought we could
make it lazier by converting the return type of `expand` from
`Iterator<Item = Vec<CallArguments>>` to `Iterator<Item = Iterator<Item
= CallArguments>>` but that's proving to be difficult to implement
mainly because we **need** to maintain the previous expansion to
generate the next expansion which is the main reason to use
`std::iter::successors` in the first place.
Another approach would be to eagerly expand all the argument types and
then use the `combinations` from `itertools` to generate the
combinations but we would need to find the "boundary" between arguments
lists produced from expanding argument at position 1 and position 2
because that's important for the algorithm.
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/868
## Test Plan
Add test case to demonstrate the limit along with the diagnostic
snapshot stating that the limit has been reached.
Part of astral-sh/ty#994
## Summary
Add new special forms to `ty_extensions`, `Top[T]` and `Bottom[T]`.
Remove `ty_extensions.top_materialization` and
`ty_extensions.bottom_materialization`.
## Test Plan
Converted the existing `materialization.md` mdtest to the new syntax.
Added some tests for invalid use of the new special form.
## Summary
Previously we held off from doing this because we weren't sure that it
was worth the added complexity cost. But our code has changed in the
months since we made that initial decision, and I think the structure of
the code is such that it no longer really leads to much added complexity
to add precise inference when unpacking a string literal or a bytes
literal.
The improved inference we gain from this has real benefits to users (see
the mypy_primer report), and this PR doesn't appear to have a
performance impact.
## Test plan
mdtests
"Why would you do this? This looks like you just replaced `bool` with an
overly complex trait"
Yes that's correct!
This should be a no-op refactoring. It replaces all of the logic in our
assignability, subtyping, equivalence, and disjointness methods to work
over an arbitrary `Constraints` trait instead of only working on `bool`.
The methods that `Constraints` provides looks very much like what we get
from `bool`. But soon we will add a new impl of this trait, and some new
methods, that let us express "fuzzy" constraints that aren't always true
or false. (In particular, a constraint will express the upper and lower
bounds of the allowed specializations of a typevar.)
Even once we have that, most of the operations that we perform on
constraint sets will be the usual boolean operations, just on sets.
(`false` becomes empty/never; `true` becomes universe/always; `or`
becomes union; `and` becomes intersection; `not` becomes negation.) So
it's helpful to have this separate PR to refactor how we invoke those
operations without introducing the new functionality yet.
Note that we also have translations of `Option::is_some_and` and
`is_none_or`, and of `Iterator::any` and `all`, and that the `and`,
`or`, `when_any`, and `when_all` methods are meant to short-circuit,
just like the corresponding boolean operations. For constraint sets,
that depends on being able to implement the `is_always` and `is_never`
trait methods.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Part of: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/868
This PR adds a heuristic to avoid argument type expansion if it's going
to eventually lead to no matching overload.
This is done by checking whether the non-expandable argument types are
assignable to the corresponding annotated parameter type. If one of them
is not assignable to all of the remaining overloads, then argument type
expansion isn't going to help.
## Test Plan
Add mdtest that would otherwise take a long time because of the number
of arguments that it would need to expand (30).
This commit corrects the type checker's behavior when handling
`dataclass_transform` decorators that don't explicitly specify
`field_specifiers`. According to [PEP 681 (Data Class
Transforms)](https://peps.python.org/pep-0681/#dataclass-transform-parameters),
when `field_specifiers` is not provided, it defaults to an empty tuple,
meaning no field specifiers are supported and
`dataclasses.field`/`dataclasses.Field` calls should be ignored.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/980
## Summary
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/669
(This turned out to be simpler that I thought :))
## Test Plan
Update existing test cases.
### Ecosystem report
Most of them are basically because ty has now started inferring more
precise types for the return type to an overloaded call and a lot of the
types are defined using type aliases, here's some examples:
<details><summary>Details</summary>
<p>
> attrs (https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs)
> + tests/test_make.py:146:14: error[unresolved-attribute] Type
`Literal[42]` has no attribute `default`
> - Found 555 diagnostics
> + Found 556 diagnostics
This is accurate now that we infer the type as `Literal[42]` instead of
`Unknown` (Pyright infers it as `int`)
> optuna (https://github.com/optuna/optuna)
> + optuna/_gp/search_space.py:181:53: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to function `_round_one_normalized_param` is incorrect:
Expected `tuple[int | float, int | float]`, found `tuple[Unknown |
ndarray[Unknown, <class 'float'>], Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class
'float'>]]`
> + optuna/_gp/search_space.py:181:83: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to function `_round_one_normalized_param` is incorrect:
Expected `int | float`, found `Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class
'float'>]`
> + tests/gp_tests/test_search_space.py:109:13:
error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function
`_unnormalize_one_param` is incorrect: Expected `tuple[int | float, int
| float]`, found `Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class 'float'>]`
> + tests/gp_tests/test_search_space.py:110:13:
error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function
`_unnormalize_one_param` is incorrect: Expected `int | float`, found
`Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class 'float'>]`
> - Found 559 diagnostics
> + Found 563 diagnostics
Same as above where ty is now inferring a more precise type like
`Unknown | ndarray[tuple[int, int], <class 'float'>]` instead of just
`Unknown` as before
> jinja (https://github.com/pallets/jinja)
> + src/jinja2/bccache.py:298:39: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument
to bound method `write_bytecode` is incorrect: Expected `IO[bytes]`,
found `_TemporaryFileWrapper[str]`
> - Found 186 diagnostics
> + Found 187 diagnostics
This requires support for type aliases to match the correct overload.
> hydra-zen (https://github.com/mit-ll-responsible-ai/hydra-zen)
> + src/hydra_zen/wrapper/_implementations.py:945:16:
error[invalid-return-type] Return type does not match returned value:
expected `DataClass_ | type[@Todo(type[T] for protocols)] | ListConfig |
DictConfig`, found `@Todo(unsupported type[X] special form) | (((...) ->
Any) & dict[Unknown, Unknown]) | (DataClass_ & dict[Unknown, Unknown]) |
dict[Any, Any] | (ListConfig & dict[Unknown, Unknown]) | (DictConfig &
dict[Unknown, Unknown]) | (((...) -> Any) & list[Unknown]) | (DataClass_
& list[Unknown]) | list[Any] | (ListConfig & list[Unknown]) |
(DictConfig & list[Unknown])`
> + tests/annotations/behaviors.py:60:28: error[call-non-callable]
Object of type `Path` is not callable
> + tests/annotations/behaviors.py:64:21: error[call-non-callable]
Object of type `Path` is not callable
> + tests/annotations/declarations.py:167:17: error[call-non-callable]
Object of type `Path` is not callable
> + tests/annotations/declarations.py:524:17:
error[unresolved-attribute] Type `<class 'int'>` has no attribute
`_target_`
> - Found 561 diagnostics
> + Found 566 diagnostics
Same as above, this requires support for type aliases to match the
correct overload.
> paasta (https://github.com/yelp/paasta)
> + paasta_tools/utils.py:4188:19: warning[redundant-cast] Value is
already of type `list[str]`
> - Found 888 diagnostics
> + Found 889 diagnostics
This is correct.
> colour (https://github.com/colour-science/colour)
> + colour/plotting/diagrams.py:448:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/diagrams.py:462:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/models.py:419:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:230:9: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:474:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:495:17: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:513:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `text` is incorrect: Expected `int | float`,
found `ndarray[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`), dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:514:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `text` is incorrect: Expected `int | float`,
found `ndarray[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`), dtype[Unknown]]`
> - Found 480 diagnostics
> + Found 488 diagnostics
Most of them are correct except for the last two diagnostics which I'm
not sure
what's happening, it's trying to index into an `np.ndarray` type (which
is
inferred correctly) but I think it might be picking up an incorrect
overload
for the `__getitem__` method.
Scipy's diagnostics also requires support for type alises to pick the
correct overload.
</p>
</details>
In implementing partial stubs I had observed that this continue in the
namespace package code seemed erroneous since the same continue for
partial stubs didn't work. Unfortunately I wasn't confident enough to
push on that hunch. Fortunately I remembered that hunch to make this an
easy fix.
The issue with the continue is that it bails out of the current
search-path without testing any .py files. This breaks when for example
`google` and `google-stubs`/`types-google` are both in the same
site-packages dir -- failing to find a module in `types-google` has us
completely skip over `google`!
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/520
fix https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1047
## Summary
This PR fixes how `KW_ONLY` is applied in dataclasses. Previously, the
sentinel leaked into subclasses and incorrectly marked their fields as
keyword-only; now it only affects fields declared in the same class.
```py
from dataclasses import dataclass, KW_ONLY
@dataclass
class D:
x: int
_: KW_ONLY
y: str
@dataclass
class E(D):
z: bytes
# This should work: x=1 (positional), z=b"foo" (positional), y="foo" (keyword-only)
E(1, b"foo", y="foo")
reveal_type(E.__init__) # revealed: (self: E, x: int, z: bytes, *, y: str) -> None
```
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
mdtests
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1046
We special-case iteration of certain types because they may have a more
detailed tuple-spec. Now that type aliases are a distinct type variant,
we need to handle them as well.
I don't love that `Type::TypeAlias` means we have to remember to add a
case for it basically anywhere we are special-casing a certain kind of
type, but at the moment I don't have a better plan. It's another
argument for avoiding fallback cases in `Type` matches, which we usually
prefer; I've updated this match statement to be comprehensive.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest.
`Type::TypeVar` now distinguishes whether the typevar in question is
inferable or not.
A typevar is _not inferable_ inside the body of the generic class or
function that binds it:
```py
def f[T](t: T) -> T:
return t
```
The infered type of `t` in the function body is `TypeVar(T,
NotInferable)`. This represents how e.g. assignability checks need to be
valid for all possible specializations of the typevar. Most of the
existing assignability/etc logic only applies to non-inferable typevars.
Outside of the function body, the typevar is _inferable_:
```py
f(4)
```
Here, the parameter type of `f` is `TypeVar(T, Inferable)`. This
represents how e.g. assignability doesn't need to hold for _all_
specializations; instead, we need to find the constraints under which
this specific assignability check holds.
This is in support of starting to perform specialization inference _as
part of_ performing the assignability check at the call site.
In the [[POPL2015][]] paper, this concept is called _monomorphic_ /
_polymorphic_, but I thought _non-inferable_ / _inferable_ would be
clearer for us.
Depends on #19784
[POPL2015]: https://doi.org/10.1145/2676726.2676991
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This PR adds a new lint, `invalid-await`, for all sorts of reasons why
an object may not be `await`able, as discussed in astral-sh/ty#919.
Precisely, `__await__` is guarded against being missing, possibly
unbound, or improperly defined (expects additional arguments or doesn't
return an iterator).
Of course, diagnostics need to be fine-tuned. If `__await__` cannot be
called with no extra arguments, it indicates an error (or a quirk?) in
the method signature, not at the call site. Without any doubt, such an
object is not `Awaitable`, but I feel like talking about arguments for
an *implicit* call is a bit leaky.
I didn't reference any actual diagnostic messages in the lint
definition, because I want to hear feedback first.
Also, there's no mention of the actual required method signature for
`__await__` anywhere in the docs. The only reference I had is the
`typing` stub. I basically ended up linking `[Awaitable]` to ["must
implement
`__await__`"](https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html#collections.abc.Awaitable),
which is insufficient on its own.
## Test Plan
The following code was tested:
```python
import asyncio
import typing
class Awaitable:
def __await__(self) -> typing.Generator[typing.Any, None, int]:
yield None
return 5
class NoDunderMethod:
pass
class InvalidAwaitArgs:
def __await__(self, value: int) -> int:
return value
class InvalidAwaitReturn:
def __await__(self) -> int:
return 5
class InvalidAwaitReturnImplicit:
def __await__(self):
pass
async def main() -> None:
result = await Awaitable() # valid
result = await NoDunderMethod() # `__await__` is missing
result = await InvalidAwaitReturn() # `__await__` returns `int`, which is not a valid iterator
result = await InvalidAwaitArgs() # `__await__` expects additional arguments and cannot be called implicitly
result = await InvalidAwaitReturnImplicit() # `__await__` returns `Unknown`, which is not a valid iterator
asyncio.run(main())
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
