## Summary
Implement support for RDJson output for `ruff check`, as requested in
#8655.
## Test Plan
Tested using a snapshot test. Same approach as for e.g. the JSON output
formatter.
## Additional info
I tried to keep the implementation close to the JSON implementation.
I had to deviate a bit to make the `suggestions` key work: If there are
no suggestions, then setting `suggestions` to `null` is invalid
according to the JSONSchema. Therefore, I opted for a slightly more
complex implementation, that skips the `suggestions` key entirely if
there are no fixes available for the given diagnostic. Maybe it would
have been easier to set `"suggestions": []`, but I ended up doing it
this way.
I didn't consider notebooks, as I _think_ that RDJson doesn't work with
notebooks. This should be confirmed, and if so, there should be some
form of warning or error emitted when trying to output diagnostics for a
notebook.
I also didn't consider `ruff format`, as this comment:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8655#issuecomment-1811446160
suggests that that wouldn't be compatible.
I'm new to Rust, any feedback is appreciated. 🙂 I
implemented this in order to have a productive rainy saturday afternoon,
I'm not knowledgeable about RDJson beyond the sources linked in the
issue.
## Summary
I've added support for configuring the `ruff check` output file via the
environment variable `RUFF_OUTPUT_FILE` akin to #1731.
This is super useful when, e.g., generating a [GitLab code quality
report](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/testing/code_quality.html#implement-a-custom-tool)
while running Ruff as a pre-commit hook. Usually, `ruff check` should
print its human-readable output to `stdout`, but when run through
`pre-commit` _in a GitLab CI job_ it should write its output in `gitlab`
format to a file. So, to override these two settings only during CI,
environment variables come handy, and `RUFF_OUTPUT_FORMAT` already
exists but `RUFF_OUTPUT_FILE` has been missing.
A (simplified) GitLab CI job config for this scenario might look like
this:
```yaml
pre-commit:
stage: test
image: python
variables:
RUFF_OUTPUT_FILE: gl-code-quality-report.json
RUFF_OUTPUT_FORMAT: gitlab
before_script:
- pip install pre-commit
script:
- pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure
artifacts:
reports:
codequality: gl-code-quality-report.json
```
## Test Plan
I tested it manually.
Fixes#5499
## Summary
Add support for `FORCE_COLOR` env var, as specified at
https://force-color.org/
## Test Plan
I wrote an integration test for this, and then realized that can't work,
since we use a dev-dependency on `colored` with the `no-color` feature
to avoid ANSI color codes in test snapshots.
So this is just tested manually.
`cargo run --features test-rules -- check --no-cache --isolated -
--select RUF901 --diff < /dev/null` shows a colored diff.
`cargo run --features test-rules -- check --no-cache --isolated -
--select RUF901 --diff < /dev/null | less` does not have color, since we
pipe it to `less`.
`FORCE_COLOR=1 cargo run --features test-rules -- check --no-cache
--isolated - --select RUF901 --diff < /dev/null | less` does have color
(after this diff), even though we pipe it to `less`.
Section about comparing Ruff to PyLint now is more precise about the
following two points:
- Ruff do count branches different and there for earlier give
too-many-branches warning.
- Activating all Pylint rules in Ruff also activates pylint rules that
are not active by default in Pylint itself because they are implemented
via pylint plugins.
## Summary
Since #10217 the [formatter
docs](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/) contained
```
ruff format # Format all files in the current directory.
ruff format path/to/code/ # Lint all files in `path/to/code` (and any subdirectories).
ruff format path/to/file.py # Format a single file.
```
I believe the `Lint` here is a copy-paste typo from the [linter
docs](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/linter/).
## Test Plan
N/A
## Summary
The purpose of this change is mainly to address one of the issues
outlined in #10427. Namely, some lists in the docs were not rendering
properly when preceded by a text block without a newline character. This
PR adds `mdformat` as a final step to the rule documentation script, so
that any missing newlines will be added.
NB: The default behavior of `mdformat` is to escape markdown special
characters found in text such as `<`. This resulted in some misformatted
docs. To address this I implemented an ad-hoc mdformat plugin to
override the behavior. This may be considered a bit 'hacky', but I think
it's a good solution. Nevertheless, if someone has a better idea, let me
know.
## Test Plan
This change is hard to test systematically, however, I tried my best to
look at the before and after diffs to ensure no unwanted changes were
made to the docs.
## Summary
#10151 documented the deviations between Ruff and Black with the new
2024 style guide in the `ruff-python-formatter/README.md`. However,
that's not the documentation shown
on the website when navigating to [intentional
deviations](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/).
This PR streamlines the `ruff-python-formatter/README.md` and links to
the documentation on the website instead of repeating the same content.
The PR also makes the 2024 style guide deviations available on the
website documentation.
## Test Plan
I built the documentation locally and verified that the 2024 style guide
known deviations are now shown on the website.
## Summary
This PR modifies the documentation to use `ruff check` instead of `ruff
check .`, and `ruff format` instead of `ruff format .`, as discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10168#discussion_r1509976904)
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR introduces the `ruff_server` crate and a new `ruff server`
command. `ruff_server` is a re-implementation of
[`ruff-lsp`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp), written entirely in
Rust. It brings significant performance improvements, much tighter
integration with Ruff, a foundation for supporting entirely new language
server features, and more!
This PR is an early version of `ruff_lsp` that we're calling the
**pre-release** version. Anyone is more than welcome to use it and
submit bug reports for any issues they encounter - we'll have some
documentation on how to set it up with a few common editors, and we'll
also provide a pre-release VSCode extension for those interested.
This pre-release version supports:
- **Diagnostics for `.py` files**
- **Quick fixes**
- **Full-file formatting**
- **Range formatting**
- **Multiple workspace folders**
- **Automatic linter/formatter configuration** - taken from any
`pyproject.toml` files in the workspace.
Many thanks to @MichaReiser for his [proof-of-concept
work](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7262), which was important
groundwork for making this PR possible.
## Architectural Decisions
I've made an executive choice to go with `lsp-server` as a base
framework for the LSP, in favor of `tower-lsp`. There were several
reasons for this:
1. I would like to avoid `async` in our implementation. LSPs are mostly
computationally bound rather than I/O bound, and `async` adds a lot of
complexity to the API, while also making harder to reason about
execution order. This leads into the second reason, which is...
2. Any handlers that mutate state should be blocking and run in the
event loop, and the state should be lock-free. This is the approach that
`rust-analyzer` uses (also with the `lsp-server`/`lsp-types` crates as a
framework), and it gives us assurances about data mutation and execution
order. `tower-lsp` doesn't support this, which has caused some
[issues](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284) around data
races and out-of-order handler execution.
3. In general, I think it makes sense to have tight control over
scheduling and the specifics of our implementation, in exchange for a
slightly higher up-front cost of writing it ourselves. We'll be able to
fine-tune it to our needs and support future LSP features without
depending on an upstream maintainer.
## Test Plan
The pre-release of `ruff_server` will have snapshot tests for common
document editing scenarios. An expanded test suite is on the roadmap for
future version of `ruff_server`.
## Summary
This PR was prompted by the discussion in #10153.
It adds CLI tab examples next to the `pyproject.toml` and `ruff.toml`
examples. It should be helpful for users wanting to try out the preview
mode without modifying or creating a `.toml` file.
It also adds a paragraph to try to make the effect of the preview mode
less confusing.
