Summary
--
This was suggested on Discord, I hope this is roughly what we had in
mind. I took the message from the ty README, but I'm more than happy to
update it. Otherwise I just tried to mimic the appearance of the `ruff
analyze graph` warning (although I'm realizing now the whole text is
bold for ruff).
Test Plan
--
New warnings in the CLI tests. I thought this might be undesirable but
it looks like uv did the same thing
(https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6166).
## Summary
Adds a simple progress bar for the `ty check` CLI command. The style is
taken from uv, and like uv the bar is always shown - for smaller
projects it is fast enough that it isn't noticeable. We could
alternatively hide it completely based on some heuristic for the number
of files, or only show it after some amount of time.
I also disabled it when `--watch` is passed, cancelling inflight checks
was leading to zombie progress bars. I think we can fix this by using
[`MultiProgress`](https://docs.rs/indicatif/latest/indicatif/struct.MultiProgress.html)
and managing all the bars globally, but I left that out for now.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/98.
We just set the ID on the `Message` and it just does what we want in
this case. I think I didn't do this originally because I was trying to
preserve the existing rendering? I'm not sure. I might have just missed
this method.
In a subsequent commit, we're going to start using `annotate-snippets`'s
functionality for diagnostic IDs in the rendering. As part of doing
that, I wanted to remove this special casing of an empty message. I did
that independently to see what, if anything, would change. (The changes
look fine to me. They'll be tweaked again in the next commit along with
a bunch of others.)
## Summary
This PR is a first step toward integration of the new `Diagnostic` type
into ruff. There are two main changes:
- A new `UnifiedFile` enum wrapping `File` for red-knot and a
`SourceFile` for ruff
- ruff's `Message::SyntaxError` variant is now a `Diagnostic` instead of
a `SyntaxErrorMessage`
The second of these changes was mostly just a proof of concept for the
first, and it went pretty smoothly. Converting `DiagnosticMessage`s will
be most of the work in replacing `Message` entirely.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, which show no changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Resolves#15502.
`ty generate-shell-completion` now works in a similar manner to `ruff
generate-shell-completion`.
## Test Plan
Manually:
<details>
```shell
$ cargo run --package ty generate-shell-completion nushell
module completions {
# An extremely fast Python type checker.
export extern ty [
--help(-h) # Print help
--version(-V) # Print version
]
# ...
}
export use completions *
```
</details>
e.g.,
```
❯ uv run -q -- ty -V
ty 0.0.0-alpha.4 (08881edba 2025-05-05)
❯ uv run -q -- ty --version
ty 0.0.0-alpha.4 (08881edba 2025-05-05)
```
Previously, this just displayed `ty 0.0.0` because it didn't use our
custom version implementation. We no longer have a short version —
matching the interface in uv. We could add a variant for it, if it seems
important to people. However, I think we found it more confusing than
not over there and didn't get any complaints about the change.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/54
Extends https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17866, using
`dist-workspace.toml` as a source of truth for versions to enable
version retrieval in distributions that are not Git repositories (i.e.,
Python source distributions and source tarballs consumed by Linux
distros).
I retain the Git tag lookup from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17866 as a fallback — it seems
harmless, but we could drop it to simplify things here.
I confirmed this works from the repository as well as Python source and
binary distributions:
```
❯ uv run --refresh-package ty --reinstall-package ty -q -- ty version
ty 0.0.1-alpha.1+5 (2eadc9e61 2025-05-05)
❯ uv build
...
❯ uvx --from ty@dist/ty-0.0.0a1.tar.gz --no-cache -q -- ty version
ty 0.0.1-alpha.1
❯ uvx --from ty@dist/ty-0.0.0a1-py3-none-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl -q -- ty version
ty 0.0.1-alpha.1
```
Requires https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/pull/36
cc @Gankra and @MichaReiser for review.
Currently, `ty version` pulls its information from the Ruff repository —
but we want this to pull from the repository in the directory _above_
when Ruff is a submodule.
I tested this in the `ty` repository after tagging an arbitrary commit:
```
❯ uv run --refresh-package ty --reinstall-package ty ty version
Built ty @ file:///Users/zb/workspace/ty
Uninstalled 1 package in 2ms
Installed 1 package in 1ms
ty 0.0.0+3 (34253b1d4 2025-05-05)
```
We also use the last Git tag as the source of truth for the version,
instead of the crate version. However, we'll need a way to set the
version for releases still, as the tag is published _after_ the build.
We can either tag early (without pushing the tag to the remote), or add
another environment variable. (**Note, this approach is changed in a
follow-up. See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17868**)
From this repository, the version will be `unknown`:
```
❯ cargo run -q --bin ty -- version
ty unknown
```
We could add special handling like... `ty unknown (ruff@...)` but I see
that as a secondary goal.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/5
The reviewer situation in this repository is unhinged, cc @Gankra and
@MichaReiser for review.
## Summary
closes#17472
This is obviously just a band-aid solution to this problem (in that you
can always make your [pathological
inputs](28994edd82/sympy/polys/numberfields/resolvent_lookup.py)
bigger and it will still crash), but I think this is not an unreasonable
change — even if we add more sophisticated solutions later. I tried
using `stacker` as suggested by @MichaReiser, and it works. But it's
unclear where exactly would be the right place to put it, and even for
the `sympy` problem, we would need to add it both in the semantic index
builder AST traversal and in type inference. Increasing the default
stack size for worker threads, as proposed here, doesn't solve the
underlying problem (that there is a hard limit), but it is more
universal in the sense that it is not specific to large binary-operator
expression chains.
To determine a reasonable stack size, I created files that look like
*right associative*:
```py
from typing import reveal_type
total = (1 + (1 + (1 + (1 + (… + 1)))))
reveal_type(total)
```
*left associative*
```py
from typing import reveal_type
total = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + … + 1
reveal_type(total)
```
with a variable amount of operands (`N`). I then chose the stack size
large enough to still be able to handle cases that existing type
checkers can not:
```
right
N = 20: mypy takes ~ 1min
N = 350: pyright crashes with a stack overflow (mypy fails with "too many nested parentheses")
N = 800: ty(main) infers Literal[800] instantly
N = 1000: ty(main) crashes with "thread '<unknown>' has overflowed its stack"
N = 7000: ty(this branch) infers Literal[7000] instantly
N = 8000+: ty(this branch) crashes
left
N = 300: pyright emits "Maximum parse depth exceeded; break expression into smaller sub-expressions"
total is inferred as Unknown
N = 5500: mypy crashes with "INTERNAL ERROR"
N = 2500: ty(main) infers Literal[2500] instantly
N = 3000: ty(main) crashes with "thread '<unknown>' has overflowed its stack"
N = 22000: ty(this branch) infers Literal[22000] instantly
N = 23000+: ty(this branch) crashes
```
## Test Plan
New regression test.
