Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Douglas Creager
ea812d0813
[ty] Homogeneous and mixed tuples (#18600)
Some checks are pending
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / Fuzz for new ty panics (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks-instrumented (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks-walltime (push) Blocked by required conditions
[ty Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
We already had support for homogeneous tuples (`tuple[int, ...]`). This
PR extends this to also support mixed tuples (`tuple[str, str,
*tuple[int, ...], str str]`).

A mixed tuple consists of a fixed-length (possibly empty) prefix and
suffix, and a variable-length portion in the middle. Every element of
the variable-length portion must be of the same type. A homogeneous
tuple is then just a mixed tuple with an empty prefix and suffix.

The new data representation uses different Rust types for a fixed-length
(aka heterogeneous) tuple. Another option would have been to use the
`VariableLengthTuple` representation for all tuples, and to wrap the
"variable + suffix" portion in an `Option`. I don't think that would
simplify the method implementations much, though, since we would still
have a 2×2 case analysis for most of them.

One wrinkle is that the definition of the `tuple` class in the typeshed
has a single typevar, and canonically represents a homogeneous tuple.
When getting the class of a tuple instance, that means that we have to
summarize our detailed mixed tuple type information into its
"homogeneous supertype". (We were already doing this for heterogeneous
types.)

A similar thing happens when concatenating two mixed tuples: the
variable-length portion and suffix of the LHS, and the prefix and
variable-length portion of the RHS, all get unioned into the
variable-length portion of the result. The LHS prefix and RHS suffix
carry through unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-06-20 18:23:54 -04:00
David Peter
0ede831a3f
[ty] Add hint that PEP 604 union syntax is only available in 3.10+ (#18192)
## Summary

Add a new diagnostic hint if you try to use PEP 604 `X | Y` union syntax
in a non-type-expression before 3.10.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/437

## Test Plan

New snapshot test
2025-05-19 19:47:31 +02:00
Alex Waygood
55df9271ba
[ty] Understand homogeneous tuple annotations (#17998) 2025-05-12 22:02:25 -04:00
Alex Waygood
d1bb10a66b
[ty] Understand classes that inherit from subscripted Protocol[] as generic (#17832) 2025-05-09 17:39:15 +01:00
Micha Reiser
b51c4f82ea
Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00