## Summary
Rename two functions with outdated names (they used to return `Type`s):
* `bindings_ty` => `symbol_from_bindings` (returns `Symbol`)
* `declarations_ty` => `symbol_from_declarations` (returns a
`SymbolAndQualifiers` result)
I chose `symbol_from_*` instead of `*_symbol` as I found the previous
name quite confusing. Especially since `binding_ty` and `declaration_ty`
also exist (singular).
## Test Plan
—
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Add support for `typing.ClassVar`, i.e. emit a diagnostic in this
scenario:
```py
from typing import ClassVar
class C:
x: ClassVar[int] = 1
c = C()
c.x = 3 # error: "Cannot assign to pure class variable `x` from an instance of type `C`"
```
## Test Plan
- New tests for the `typing.ClassVar` qualifier
- Fixed one TODO in `attributes.md`
## Summary
This is a small, tentative step towards the bigger goal of understanding
instance attributes.
- Adds partial support for pure instance variables declared in the class
body, i.e. this case:
```py
class C:
variable1: str = "a"
variable2 = "b"
reveal_type(C().variable1) # str
reveal_type(C().variable2) # Unknown | Literal["b"]
```
- Adds `property` as a known class to query for `@property` decorators
- Splits up various `@Todo(instance attributes)` cases into
sub-categories.
## Test Plan
Modified existing MD tests.
## Summary
This PR adds support for configuring Red Knot in the `tool.knot` section
of the project's
`pyproject.toml` section. Options specified on the CLI precede the
options in the configuration file.
This PR only supports the `environment` and the `src.root` options for
now.
Other options will be added as separate PRs.
There are also a few concerns that I intentionally ignored as part of
this PR:
* Handling of relative paths: We need to anchor paths relative to the
current working directory (CLI), or the project (`pyproject.toml` or
`knot.toml`)
* Tracking the source of a value. Diagnostics would benefit from knowing
from which configuration a value comes so that we can point the user to
the right configuration file (or CLI) if the configuration is invalid.
* Schema generation and there's a lot more; see
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15491
This PR changes the default for first party codes: Our existing default
was to only add the project root. Now, Red Knot adds the project root
and `src` (if such a directory exists).
Theoretically, we'd have to add a file watcher event that changes the
first-party search paths if a user later creates a `src` directory. I
think this is pretty uncommon, which is why I ignored the complexity for
now but I can be persuaded to handle it if it's considered important.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15491
## Test Plan
Existing tests, new file watching test demonstrating that changing the
python version and platform is correctly reflected.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15508
For any two instance types `T` and `S`, we know they are disjoint if
either `T` is final and `T` is not a subclass of `S` or `S` is final and
`S` is not a subclass of `T`.
Correspondingly, for any two types `type[T]` and `S` where `S` is an
instance type, `type[T]` can be said to be disjoint from `S` if `S` is
disjoint from `U`, where `U` is the type that represents all instances
of `T`'s metaclass.
And a heterogeneous tuple type can be said to be disjoint from an
instance type if the instance type is disjoint from `tuple` (a type
representing all instances of the `tuple` class at runtime).
## Test Plan
- A new mdtest added. Most of our `is_disjoint_from()` tests are not
written as mdtests just yet, but it's pretty hard to test some of these
edge cases from a Rust unit test!
- Ran `QUICKCHECK_TESTS=1000000 cargo test --release -p
red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored types::property_tests::stable`
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Ref: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15387#discussion_r1917796907
This PR updates `F722` to show syntax error message instead of the
string content.
I think it's more useful to show the syntax error message than the
string content. In the future, when the diagnostics renderer is more
capable, we could even highlight the exact location of the syntax error
along with the annotation string.
This is also in line with how we show the diagnostic in red knot.
## Test Plan
Update existing test snapshots.
## Summary
Resolves#9467
Parse quoted annotations as if the string content is inside parenthesis.
With this logic `x` and `y` in this example are equal:
```python
y: """
int |
str
"""
z: """(
int |
str
)
"""
```
Also this rule only applies to triple
quotes([link](https://github.com/python/typing-council/issues/9#issuecomment-1890808610)).
This PR is based on the
[comments](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9467#issuecomment-2579180991)
on the issue.
I did one extra change, since we don't want any indentation tokens I am
setting the `State::Other` as the initial state of the Lexer.
Remaining work:
- [x] Add a test case for red-knot.
- [x] Add more tests.
## Test Plan
Added a test which previously failed because quoted annotation contained
indentation.
Added an mdtest for red-knot.
Updated previous test.
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
If `S <: T`, then `~T <: ~S`. This test currently fails with example
like:
```
S = tuple[()]
T = ~Literal[True] & ~Literal[False]
```
`T` is equivalent to `~(Literal[True] | Literal[False])` and therefore
equivalent to `~bool`, but the minimal example for a failure is what is
stated above. We correctly recognize that `S <: T`, but fail to see that
`~T <: ~S`, i.e. `bool <: ~tuple[()]`.
This is why the tests goes into the "flaky" section as well.
## Test Plan
```
export QUICKCHECK_TESTS=100000
while cargo test --release -p red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored types::property_tests::flaky::negation_reverses_subtype_order; do :; done
```
## Summary
Adds some initial tests for class and instance attributes, mostly to
document (and discuss) what we want to support eventually. These
tests are not exhaustive yet. The idea is to specify the coarse-grained
behavior first.
Things that we'll eventually want to test:
- Interplay with inheritance
- Support `Final` in addition to `ClassVar`
- Specific tests for `ClassVar`, like making sure that we support things
like `x: Annotated[ClassVar[int], "metadata"]`
- … or making sure that we raise an error here:
```py
class Foo:
def __init__(self):
self.x: ClassVar[str] = "x"
```
- Add tests for `__new__` in addition to the tests for `__init__`
- Add tests that show that we use the union of types if multiple methods
define the symbol with different types
- Make sure that diagnostics are raised if, e.g., the inferred type of
an assignment within a method does not match the declared type in the
class body.
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15474#discussion_r1916556284
- Method calls are completely left out for now.
- Same for `@property`
- … and the descriptor protocol
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
The next sync of typeshed would have failed without manual changes
anyway, so I'm doing one manual sync + the required changes in our
`sys.platform` tests (which are necessary because of my tiny typeshed PR
here: https://github.com/python/typeshed/pull/13378).
closes#15485 (the next run of the pipeline in two weeks should be fine
as the bug has been fixed upstream)
## Summary
Adds two additional tests for `is_equivalent_to` so that we cover all
properties of an [equivalence relation].
## Test Plan
```
while cargo test --release -p red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored types::property_tests::stable; do :; done
```
[equivalence relation]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_relation
## Summary
This changeset adds new tests for public uses of symbols,
considering all possible declaredness and boundness states.
Note that this is a mere documentation of the current behavior. There is
still an [open ticket] questioning some of these choices (or unintential
behaviors).
## Test plan
Made sure that the respective test fails if I add the questionable case
again in `symbol_by_id`:
```rs
Symbol::Type(inferred_ty, Boundness::Bound) => {
Symbol::Type(inferred_ty, Boundness::Bound)
}
```
[open ticket]: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14297
## Summary
Simplification follow-up to #15413.
There's no need to have a dedicated `CallOutcome` variant for every
known function, it's only necessary if the special-cased behavior of the
known function includes emitting extra diagnostics. For `typing.cast`,
there's no such need; we can use the regular `Callable` outcome variant,
and update the return type according to the cast. (This is the same way
we already handle `len`.)
One reason to avoid proliferating unnecessary `CallOutcome` variants is
that currently we have to explicitly add emitting call-binding
diagnostics, for each outcome variant. So we were previously wrongly
silencing any binding diagnostics on calls to `typing.cast`. Fixing this
revealed a separate bug, that we were emitting a bogus error anytime
more than one keyword argument mapped to a `**kwargs` parameter. So this
PR also adds test and fix for that bug.
## Test Plan
Existing `cast` tests pass unchanged, added new test for `**kwargs` bug.
## Summary
In `SymbolState` merging, use `BitSet::union` instead of inserting
declarations one by one. This used to be the case but was changed in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15019 because we had to iterate
over declarations anyway.
This is an alternative to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15419
by @MichaReiser. It's similar in performance, but a bit more
declarative and less imperative.
## Summary
Follow-up PR from https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15415🥲
The exact same property test already exists:
`intersection_assignable_to_both` and
`all_type_pairs_can_be_assigned_from_their_intersection`
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored
types::property_tests::flaky`
A small PR to reduce some of the code duplication between the various
branches, make it a little more readable and move the API closer to what
we already have for `KnownClass`
## Summary
[**Rendered version of the new test
suite**](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/david/intersection-type-tests/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/intersection_types.md)
Moves most of our existing intersection-types tests to a dedicated
Markdown test suite, extends the test coverage, unifies the notation for
these tests, groups tests into a proper structure, and adds some
explanations for various simplification strategies.
This changeset also:
- Adds a new simplification where `~Never` is removed from
intersections.
- Adds a new simplification where adding `~object` simplifies the whole
intersection to `Never`
- Avoids unnecessary assignment-checks between inferred and declared
type. This was added to this changeset to avoid many false positive
errors in this test suite.
Resolves the task described in this old comment
[here](e01da82a5a..e7e432bca2 (r1819924085)).
## Test Plan
Running the new Markdown tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Prompted by
> One nit: I think we need to consider `Any` and `Unknown` and `Todo` as
all (gradually) equivalent to each other, and thus `type & Any` and
`type & Unknown` and `type & Todo` as also equivalent. The distinction
between `Any` vs `Unknown` vs `Todo` is entirely about
provenance/debugging, there is no type level distinction. (And I've been
wondering if the `Any` vs `Unknown` distinction is really worth it.)
The thought here is that _most_ places want to treat `Any`, `Unknown`,
and `Todo` identically. So this PR simplifies things by having a single
`Type::Any` variant, and moves the provenance part into a new `AnyType`
type. If you need to treat e.g. `Todo` differently, you still can by
pattern-matching into the `AnyType`. But if you don't, you can just use
`Type::Any(_)`.
(This would also allow us to (more easily) distinguish "unknown via an
unannotated value" from "unknown because of a typing error" should we
want to do that in the future)
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This moves almost all of our existing `UnionBuilder` tests to a
Markdown-based test suite.
I see how this could be a more controversial change, since these tests
where written specifically for `UnionBuilder`, and by creating the union
types using Python type expressions, we add an additional layer on top
(parsing and inference of these expressions) that moves these tests away
from clean unit tests more in the direction of integration tests. Also,
there are probably a few implementation details of `UnionBuilder` hidden
in the test assertions (e.g. order of union elements after
simplifications).
That said, I think we would like to see all those properties that are
being tested here from *any* implementation of union types. And the
Markdown tests come with the usual advantages:
- More consice
- Better readability
- No re-compiliation when working on tests
- Easier to add additional explanations and structure to the test suite
This changeset adds a few additional tests, but keeps the logic of the
existing tests except for a few minor modifications for consistency.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: T-256 <132141463+T-256@users.noreply.github.com>
