## Summary
Add a subtly different test case for recursive PEP 695 type aliases,
which does require that we relax our union simplification, so we don't
eagerly unpack aliases from user-provided union annotations.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest.
## Summary
This has been here for awhile (since our initial PEP 695 type alias
support) but isn't really correct. The right-hand-side of a PEP 695 type
alias is a distinct scope, and we don't mark it as an "eager" nested
scope, so it automatically gets "deferred" resolution of names from
outer scopes (just like a nested function). Thus it's
redundant/unnecessary for us to use `DeferredExpressionState::Deferred`
for resolving that RHS expression -- that's for deferring resolution of
individual names within a scope. Using it here causes us to wrongly
ignore applicable outer-scope narrowing.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest that failed before this PR (the second snippet -- the first
snippet always passed.)
## Summary
Implement validation for `TypedDict` constructor calls and dictionary
literal assignments, including support for `total=False` and proper
field management.
Also add support for `Required` and `NotRequired` type qualifiers in
`TypedDict` classes, along with proper inheritance behavior and the
`total=` parameter.
Support both constructor calls and dict literal syntax
part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/154
### Basic Required Field Validation
```py
class Person(TypedDict):
name: str
age: int | None
# Error: Missing required field 'name' in TypedDict `Person` constructor
incomplete = Person(age=25)
# Error: Invalid argument to key "name" with declared type `str` on TypedDict `Person`
wrong_type = Person(name=123, age=25)
# Error: Invalid key access on TypedDict `Person`: Unknown key "extra"
extra_field = Person(name="Bob", age=25, extra=True)
```
<img width="773" height="191" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 17 59 22"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/79076d98-e85f-4495-93d6-a731aa72a5c9"
/>
### Support for `total=False`
```py
class OptionalPerson(TypedDict, total=False):
name: str
age: int | None
# All valid - all fields are optional with total=False
charlie = OptionalPerson()
david = OptionalPerson(name="David")
emily = OptionalPerson(age=30)
frank = OptionalPerson(name="Frank", age=25)
# But type validation and extra fields still apply
invalid_type = OptionalPerson(name=123) # Error: Invalid argument type
invalid_extra = OptionalPerson(extra=True) # Error: Invalid key access
```
### Dictionary Literal Validation
```py
# Type checking works for both constructors and dict literals
person: Person = {"name": "Alice", "age": 30}
reveal_type(person["name"]) # revealed: str
reveal_type(person["age"]) # revealed: int | None
# Error: Invalid key access on TypedDict `Person`: Unknown key "non_existing"
reveal_type(person["non_existing"]) # revealed: Unknown
```
### `Required`, `NotRequired`, `total`
```python
from typing import TypedDict
from typing_extensions import Required, NotRequired
class PartialUser(TypedDict, total=False):
name: Required[str] # Required despite total=False
age: int # Optional due to total=False
email: NotRequired[str] # Explicitly optional (redundant)
class User(TypedDict):
name: Required[str] # Explicitly required (redundant)
age: int # Required due to total=True
bio: NotRequired[str] # Optional despite total=True
# Valid constructions
partial = PartialUser(name="Alice") # name required, age optional
full = User(name="Bob", age=25) # name and age required, bio optional
# Inheritance maintains original field requirements
class Employee(PartialUser):
department: str # Required (new field)
# name: still Required (inherited)
# age: still optional (inherited)
emp = Employee(name="Charlie", department="Engineering") # ✅
Employee(department="Engineering") # ❌
e: Employee = {"age": 1} # ❌
```
<img width="898" height="683" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 22 02 57"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c1b18cd-cb2e-493a-a948-51589d121738"
/>
## Implementation
The implementation reuses existing validation logic done in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19782
### ℹ️ Why I did NOT synthesize an `__init__` for `TypedDict`:
`TypedDict` inherits `dict.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)` that accepts
all arguments.
The type resolution system finds this inherited signature **before**
looking for synthesized members.
So `own_synthesized_member()` is never called because a signature
already exists.
To force synthesis, you'd have to override Python’s inheritance
mechanism, which would break compatibility with the existing ecosystem.
This is why I went with ad-hoc validation. IMO it's the only viable
approach that respects Python’s
inheritance semantics while providing the required validation.
### Refacto of `Field`
**Before:**
```rust
struct Field<'db> {
declared_ty: Type<'db>,
default_ty: Option<Type<'db>>, // NamedTuple and dataclass only
init_only: bool, // dataclass only
init: bool, // dataclass only
is_required: Option<bool>, // TypedDict only
}
```
**After:**
```rust
struct Field<'db> {
declared_ty: Type<'db>,
kind: FieldKind<'db>,
}
enum FieldKind<'db> {
NamedTuple { default_ty: Option<Type<'db>> },
Dataclass { default_ty: Option<Type<'db>>, init_only: bool, init: bool },
TypedDict { is_required: bool },
}
```
## Test Plan
Updated Markdown tests
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
This PR limits the argument type expansion size for an overload call
evaluation to 512.
The limit chosen is arbitrary but I've taken the 256 limit from Pyright
into account and bumped it x2 to start with.
Initially, I actually started out by trying to refactor the entire
argument type expansion to be lazy. Currently, expanding a single
argument at any position eagerly creates the combination (argument
lists) and returns that (`Vec<CallArguments>`) but I thought we could
make it lazier by converting the return type of `expand` from
`Iterator<Item = Vec<CallArguments>>` to `Iterator<Item = Iterator<Item
= CallArguments>>` but that's proving to be difficult to implement
mainly because we **need** to maintain the previous expansion to
generate the next expansion which is the main reason to use
`std::iter::successors` in the first place.
Another approach would be to eagerly expand all the argument types and
then use the `combinations` from `itertools` to generate the
combinations but we would need to find the "boundary" between arguments
lists produced from expanding argument at position 1 and position 2
because that's important for the algorithm.
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/868
## Test Plan
Add test case to demonstrate the limit along with the diagnostic
snapshot stating that the limit has been reached.
Part of astral-sh/ty#994
## Summary
Add new special forms to `ty_extensions`, `Top[T]` and `Bottom[T]`.
Remove `ty_extensions.top_materialization` and
`ty_extensions.bottom_materialization`.
## Test Plan
Converted the existing `materialization.md` mdtest to the new syntax.
Added some tests for invalid use of the new special form.
## Summary
Previously we held off from doing this because we weren't sure that it
was worth the added complexity cost. But our code has changed in the
months since we made that initial decision, and I think the structure of
the code is such that it no longer really leads to much added complexity
to add precise inference when unpacking a string literal or a bytes
literal.
The improved inference we gain from this has real benefits to users (see
the mypy_primer report), and this PR doesn't appear to have a
performance impact.
## Test plan
mdtests
"Why would you do this? This looks like you just replaced `bool` with an
overly complex trait"
Yes that's correct!
This should be a no-op refactoring. It replaces all of the logic in our
assignability, subtyping, equivalence, and disjointness methods to work
over an arbitrary `Constraints` trait instead of only working on `bool`.
The methods that `Constraints` provides looks very much like what we get
from `bool`. But soon we will add a new impl of this trait, and some new
methods, that let us express "fuzzy" constraints that aren't always true
or false. (In particular, a constraint will express the upper and lower
bounds of the allowed specializations of a typevar.)
Even once we have that, most of the operations that we perform on
constraint sets will be the usual boolean operations, just on sets.
(`false` becomes empty/never; `true` becomes universe/always; `or`
becomes union; `and` becomes intersection; `not` becomes negation.) So
it's helpful to have this separate PR to refactor how we invoke those
operations without introducing the new functionality yet.
Note that we also have translations of `Option::is_some_and` and
`is_none_or`, and of `Iterator::any` and `all`, and that the `and`,
`or`, `when_any`, and `when_all` methods are meant to short-circuit,
just like the corresponding boolean operations. For constraint sets,
that depends on being able to implement the `is_always` and `is_never`
trait methods.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Part of: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/868
This PR adds a heuristic to avoid argument type expansion if it's going
to eventually lead to no matching overload.
This is done by checking whether the non-expandable argument types are
assignable to the corresponding annotated parameter type. If one of them
is not assignable to all of the remaining overloads, then argument type
expansion isn't going to help.
## Test Plan
Add mdtest that would otherwise take a long time because of the number
of arguments that it would need to expand (30).
This commit corrects the type checker's behavior when handling
`dataclass_transform` decorators that don't explicitly specify
`field_specifiers`. According to [PEP 681 (Data Class
Transforms)](https://peps.python.org/pep-0681/#dataclass-transform-parameters),
when `field_specifiers` is not provided, it defaults to an empty tuple,
meaning no field specifiers are supported and
`dataclasses.field`/`dataclasses.Field` calls should be ignored.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/980
## Summary
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/669
(This turned out to be simpler that I thought :))
## Test Plan
Update existing test cases.
### Ecosystem report
Most of them are basically because ty has now started inferring more
precise types for the return type to an overloaded call and a lot of the
types are defined using type aliases, here's some examples:
<details><summary>Details</summary>
<p>
> attrs (https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs)
> + tests/test_make.py:146:14: error[unresolved-attribute] Type
`Literal[42]` has no attribute `default`
> - Found 555 diagnostics
> + Found 556 diagnostics
This is accurate now that we infer the type as `Literal[42]` instead of
`Unknown` (Pyright infers it as `int`)
> optuna (https://github.com/optuna/optuna)
> + optuna/_gp/search_space.py:181:53: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to function `_round_one_normalized_param` is incorrect:
Expected `tuple[int | float, int | float]`, found `tuple[Unknown |
ndarray[Unknown, <class 'float'>], Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class
'float'>]]`
> + optuna/_gp/search_space.py:181:83: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to function `_round_one_normalized_param` is incorrect:
Expected `int | float`, found `Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class
'float'>]`
> + tests/gp_tests/test_search_space.py:109:13:
error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function
`_unnormalize_one_param` is incorrect: Expected `tuple[int | float, int
| float]`, found `Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class 'float'>]`
> + tests/gp_tests/test_search_space.py:110:13:
error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function
`_unnormalize_one_param` is incorrect: Expected `int | float`, found
`Unknown | ndarray[Unknown, <class 'float'>]`
> - Found 559 diagnostics
> + Found 563 diagnostics
Same as above where ty is now inferring a more precise type like
`Unknown | ndarray[tuple[int, int], <class 'float'>]` instead of just
`Unknown` as before
> jinja (https://github.com/pallets/jinja)
> + src/jinja2/bccache.py:298:39: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument
to bound method `write_bytecode` is incorrect: Expected `IO[bytes]`,
found `_TemporaryFileWrapper[str]`
> - Found 186 diagnostics
> + Found 187 diagnostics
This requires support for type aliases to match the correct overload.
> hydra-zen (https://github.com/mit-ll-responsible-ai/hydra-zen)
> + src/hydra_zen/wrapper/_implementations.py:945:16:
error[invalid-return-type] Return type does not match returned value:
expected `DataClass_ | type[@Todo(type[T] for protocols)] | ListConfig |
DictConfig`, found `@Todo(unsupported type[X] special form) | (((...) ->
Any) & dict[Unknown, Unknown]) | (DataClass_ & dict[Unknown, Unknown]) |
dict[Any, Any] | (ListConfig & dict[Unknown, Unknown]) | (DictConfig &
dict[Unknown, Unknown]) | (((...) -> Any) & list[Unknown]) | (DataClass_
& list[Unknown]) | list[Any] | (ListConfig & list[Unknown]) |
(DictConfig & list[Unknown])`
> + tests/annotations/behaviors.py:60:28: error[call-non-callable]
Object of type `Path` is not callable
> + tests/annotations/behaviors.py:64:21: error[call-non-callable]
Object of type `Path` is not callable
> + tests/annotations/declarations.py:167:17: error[call-non-callable]
Object of type `Path` is not callable
> + tests/annotations/declarations.py:524:17:
error[unresolved-attribute] Type `<class 'int'>` has no attribute
`_target_`
> - Found 561 diagnostics
> + Found 566 diagnostics
Same as above, this requires support for type aliases to match the
correct overload.
> paasta (https://github.com/yelp/paasta)
> + paasta_tools/utils.py:4188:19: warning[redundant-cast] Value is
already of type `list[str]`
> - Found 888 diagnostics
> + Found 889 diagnostics
This is correct.
> colour (https://github.com/colour-science/colour)
> + colour/plotting/diagrams.py:448:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/diagrams.py:462:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/models.py:419:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:230:9: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:474:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:495:17: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected
`Sequence[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)]`, found
`ndarray[tuple[int, int, int], dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:513:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `text` is incorrect: Expected `int | float`,
found `ndarray[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`), dtype[Unknown]]`
> + colour/plotting/temperature.py:514:13: error[invalid-argument-type]
Argument to bound method `text` is incorrect: Expected `int | float`,
found `ndarray[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`), dtype[Unknown]]`
> - Found 480 diagnostics
> + Found 488 diagnostics
Most of them are correct except for the last two diagnostics which I'm
not sure
what's happening, it's trying to index into an `np.ndarray` type (which
is
inferred correctly) but I think it might be picking up an incorrect
overload
for the `__getitem__` method.
Scipy's diagnostics also requires support for type alises to pick the
correct overload.
</p>
</details>
In implementing partial stubs I had observed that this continue in the
namespace package code seemed erroneous since the same continue for
partial stubs didn't work. Unfortunately I wasn't confident enough to
push on that hunch. Fortunately I remembered that hunch to make this an
easy fix.
The issue with the continue is that it bails out of the current
search-path without testing any .py files. This breaks when for example
`google` and `google-stubs`/`types-google` are both in the same
site-packages dir -- failing to find a module in `types-google` has us
completely skip over `google`!
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/520
fix https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1047
## Summary
This PR fixes how `KW_ONLY` is applied in dataclasses. Previously, the
sentinel leaked into subclasses and incorrectly marked their fields as
keyword-only; now it only affects fields declared in the same class.
```py
from dataclasses import dataclass, KW_ONLY
@dataclass
class D:
x: int
_: KW_ONLY
y: str
@dataclass
class E(D):
z: bytes
# This should work: x=1 (positional), z=b"foo" (positional), y="foo" (keyword-only)
E(1, b"foo", y="foo")
reveal_type(E.__init__) # revealed: (self: E, x: int, z: bytes, *, y: str) -> None
```
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
mdtests
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1046
We special-case iteration of certain types because they may have a more
detailed tuple-spec. Now that type aliases are a distinct type variant,
we need to handle them as well.
I don't love that `Type::TypeAlias` means we have to remember to add a
case for it basically anywhere we are special-casing a certain kind of
type, but at the moment I don't have a better plan. It's another
argument for avoiding fallback cases in `Type` matches, which we usually
prefer; I've updated this match statement to be comprehensive.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest.
`Type::TypeVar` now distinguishes whether the typevar in question is
inferable or not.
A typevar is _not inferable_ inside the body of the generic class or
function that binds it:
```py
def f[T](t: T) -> T:
return t
```
The infered type of `t` in the function body is `TypeVar(T,
NotInferable)`. This represents how e.g. assignability checks need to be
valid for all possible specializations of the typevar. Most of the
existing assignability/etc logic only applies to non-inferable typevars.
Outside of the function body, the typevar is _inferable_:
```py
f(4)
```
Here, the parameter type of `f` is `TypeVar(T, Inferable)`. This
represents how e.g. assignability doesn't need to hold for _all_
specializations; instead, we need to find the constraints under which
this specific assignability check holds.
This is in support of starting to perform specialization inference _as
part of_ performing the assignability check at the call site.
In the [[POPL2015][]] paper, this concept is called _monomorphic_ /
_polymorphic_, but I thought _non-inferable_ / _inferable_ would be
clearer for us.
Depends on #19784
[POPL2015]: https://doi.org/10.1145/2676726.2676991
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This PR adds a new lint, `invalid-await`, for all sorts of reasons why
an object may not be `await`able, as discussed in astral-sh/ty#919.
Precisely, `__await__` is guarded against being missing, possibly
unbound, or improperly defined (expects additional arguments or doesn't
return an iterator).
Of course, diagnostics need to be fine-tuned. If `__await__` cannot be
called with no extra arguments, it indicates an error (or a quirk?) in
the method signature, not at the call site. Without any doubt, such an
object is not `Awaitable`, but I feel like talking about arguments for
an *implicit* call is a bit leaky.
I didn't reference any actual diagnostic messages in the lint
definition, because I want to hear feedback first.
Also, there's no mention of the actual required method signature for
`__await__` anywhere in the docs. The only reference I had is the
`typing` stub. I basically ended up linking `[Awaitable]` to ["must
implement
`__await__`"](https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html#collections.abc.Awaitable),
which is insufficient on its own.
## Test Plan
The following code was tested:
```python
import asyncio
import typing
class Awaitable:
def __await__(self) -> typing.Generator[typing.Any, None, int]:
yield None
return 5
class NoDunderMethod:
pass
class InvalidAwaitArgs:
def __await__(self, value: int) -> int:
return value
class InvalidAwaitReturn:
def __await__(self) -> int:
return 5
class InvalidAwaitReturnImplicit:
def __await__(self):
pass
async def main() -> None:
result = await Awaitable() # valid
result = await NoDunderMethod() # `__await__` is missing
result = await InvalidAwaitReturn() # `__await__` returns `int`, which is not a valid iterator
result = await InvalidAwaitArgs() # `__await__` expects additional arguments and cannot be called implicitly
result = await InvalidAwaitReturnImplicit() # `__await__` returns `Unknown`, which is not a valid iterator
asyncio.run(main())
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
For PEP 695 generic functions and classes, there is an extra "type
params scope" (a child of the outer scope, and wrapping the body scope)
in which the type parameters are defined; class bases and function
parameter/return annotations are resolved in that type-params scope.
This PR fixes some longstanding bugs in how we resolve name loads from
inside these PEP 695 type parameter scopes, and also defers type
inference of PEP 695 typevar bounds/constraints/default, so we can
handle cycles without panicking.
We were previously treating these type-param scopes as lazy nested
scopes, which is wrong. In fact they are eager nested scopes; the class
`C` here inherits `int`, not `str`, and previously we got that wrong:
```py
Base = int
class C[T](Base): ...
Base = str
```
But certain syntactic positions within type param scopes (typevar
bounds/constraints/defaults) are lazy at runtime, and we should use
deferred name resolution for them. This also means they can have cycles;
in order to handle that without panicking in type inference, we need to
actually defer their type inference until after we have constructed the
`TypeVarInstance`.
PEP 695 does specify that typevar bounds and constraints cannot be
generic, and that typevar defaults can only reference prior typevars,
not later ones. This reduces the scope of (valid from the type-system
perspective) cycles somewhat, although cycles are still possible (e.g.
`class C[T: list[C]]`). And this is a type-system-only restriction; from
the runtime perspective an "invalid" case like `class C[T: T]` actually
works fine.
I debated whether to implement the PEP 695 restrictions as a way to
avoid some cycles up-front, but I ended up deciding against that; I'd
rather model the runtime name-resolution semantics accurately, and
implement the PEP 695 restrictions as a separate diagnostic on top.
(This PR doesn't yet implement those diagnostics, thus some `# TODO:
error` in the added tests.)
Introducing the possibility of cyclic typevars made typevar display
potentially stack overflow. For now I've handled this by simply removing
typevar details (bounds/constraints/default) from typevar display. This
impacts display of two kinds of types. If you `reveal_type(T)` on an
unbound `T` you now get just `typing.TypeVar` instead of
`typing.TypeVar("T", ...)` where `...` is the bound/constraints/default.
This matches pyright and mypy; pyrefly uses `type[TypeVar[T]]` which
seems a bit confusing, but does include the name. (We could easily
include the name without cycle issues, if there's a syntax we like for
that.)
It also means that displaying a generic function type like `def f[T:
int](x: T) -> T: ...` now displays as `f[T](x: T) -> T` instead of `f[T:
int](x: T) -> T`. This matches pyright and pyrefly; mypy does include
bound/constraints/defaults of typevars in function/callable type
display. If we wanted to add this, we would either need to thread a
visitor through all the type display code, or add a `decycle` type
transformation that replaced recursive reoccurrence of a type with a
marker.
## Test Plan
Added mdtests and modified existing tests to improve their correctness.
After this PR, there's only a single remaining py-fuzzer seed in the
0-500 range that panics! (Before this PR, there were 10; the fuzzer
likes to generate cyclic PEP 695 syntax.)
## Ecosystem report
It's all just the changes to `TypeVar` display.
## Summary
A [passing
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19711#issuecomment-3169312014)
led me to explore why we didn't report a class attribute as possibly
unbound if it was a method and defined in two different conditional
branches.
I found that the reason was because of our handling of "conflicting
declarations" in `place_from_declarations`. It returned a `Result` which
would be `Err` in case of conflicting declarations.
But we only actually care about conflicting declarations when we are
actually doing type inference on that scope and might emit a diagnostic
about it. And in all cases (including that one), we want to otherwise
proceed with the union of the declared types, as if there was no
conflict.
In several cases we were failing to handle the union of declared types
in the same way as a normal declared type if there was a declared-types
conflict. The `Result` return type made this mistake really easy to
make, as we'd match on e.g. `Ok(Place::Type(...))` and do one thing,
then match on `Err(...)` and do another, even though really both of
those cases should be handled the same.
This PR refactors `place_from_declarations` to instead return a struct
which always represents the declared type we should use in the same way,
as well as carrying the conflicting declared types, if any. This struct
has a method to allow us to explicitly ignore the declared-types
conflict (which is what we want in most cases), as well as a method to
get the declared type and the conflict information, in the case where we
want to emit a diagnostic on the conflict.
## Test Plan
Existing CI; added a test showing that we now understand a
multiply-conditionally-defined method as possibly-unbound.
This does trigger issues on a couple new fuzzer seeds, but the issues
are just new instances of an already-known (and rarely occurring)
problem which I already plan to address in a future PR, so I think it's
OK to land as-is.
I happened to build this initially on top of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19711, which adds invalid-await
diagnostics, so I also updated some invalid-syntax tests to not await on
an invalid type, since the purpose of those tests is to check the
syntactic location of the `await`, not the validity of the awaited type.
## Summary
Support recursive type aliases by adding a `Type::TypeAlias` type
variant, which allows referring to a type alias directly as a type
without eagerly unpacking it to its value.
We still unpack type aliases when they are added to intersections and
unions, so that we can simplify the intersection/union appropriately
based on the unpacked value of the type alias.
This introduces new possible recursive types, and so also requires
expanding our usage of recursion-detecting visitors in Type methods. The
use of these visitors is still not fully comprehensive in this PR, and
will require further expansion to support recursion in more kinds of
types (I already have further work on this locally), but I think it may
be better to do this incrementally in multiple PRs.
## Test Plan
Added some recursive type-alias tests and made them pass.
