## Summary
Change `ClassLiteral.into_callable` to also look for `__init__` functions
of type `Type::Callable` (such as synthesized `__init__` functions of
dataclasses).
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/760
## Test Plan
Add subtype test
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
Emit a diagnostic when a `Final`-qualified symbol is modified. This
first iteration only works for name targets. Tests with TODO comments
were added for attribute assignments as well.
related ticket: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/158
## Ecosystem impact
Correctly identified [modification of a `Final`
symbol](7b4164a5f2/sphinx/__init__.py (L44))
(behind a `# type: ignore`):
```diff
- warning[unused-ignore-comment] sphinx/__init__.py:44:56: Unused blanket `type: ignore` directive
```
And the same
[here](5471a37e82/src/trio/_core/_run.py (L128)):
```diff
- warning[unused-ignore-comment] src/trio/_core/_run.py:128:45: Unused blanket `type: ignore` directive
```
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Fixes a bug where conditionally defined dataclass fields were previously
ignored.
Thanks to @lipefree for reporting this.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Related:
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/111
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17974#discussion_r2108527106
Previously, when validating an attribute assignment, a `__setattr__`
call check was only done if the attribute wasn't found as either a class
member or instance member
This PR changes the `__setattr__` call check to be attempted first,
prior to the "[normal
mechanism](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__setattr__)",
as a defined `__setattr__` should take precedence over setting an
attribute on the instance dictionary directly.
if the return type of `__setattr__` is `Never`, an `invalid-assignment`
diagnostic is emitted
Once this is merged, a subsequent PR will synthesize a `__setattr__`
method with a `Never` return type for frozen dataclasses.
## Test Plan
Existing tests + mypy_primer
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
It was recently clarified in the [typing
spec](https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/class-compat.html#classvar)
that bare `ClassVar` annotations are allowed. For annotated assignments
with a right hand side value, the spec requires type checkers to infer
the type as something "to which [the] value is assignable". For a value
of `2`, the spec suggests `int`, `Literal[2]`, or `Any` as examples.
Here, we choose `Unknown | Literal[2]` instead, conforming with out
usual treatment of attribute types.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/211
## Summary
This PR implements the following pieces of `Protocol` semantics:
1. A protocol with a method member that does not have a fully static
signature should not be considered fully static. I.e., this protocol is
not fully static because `Foo.x` has no return type; we previously
incorrectly considered that it was:
```py
class Foo(Protocol):
def f(self): ...
```
2. Two protocols `P1` and `P2`, both with method members `x`, should be
considered equivalent if the signature of `P1.x` is equivalent to the
signature of `P2.x`. Currently we do not recognize this.
Implementing these semantics requires distinguishing between method
members and non-method members. The stored type of a method member must
be eagerly upcast to a `Callable` type when collecting the protocol's
interface: doing otherwise would mean that it would be hard to implement
equivalence of protocols even in the face of differently ordered unions,
since the two equivalent protocols would have different Salsa IDs even
when normalized.
The semantics implemented by this PR are that we consider something a
method member if:
1. It is accessible on the class itself; and
2. It is a function-like callable: a callable type that also has a
`__get__` method, meaning it can be used as a method when accessed on
instances.
Note that the spec has complicated things to say about classmethod
members and staticmethod members. These semantics are not implemented by
this PR; they are all deferred for now.
The infrastructure added in this PR fixes bugs in its own right, but
also lays the groundwork for implementing subtyping and assignability
rules for method members of protocols. A (currently failing) test is
added to verify this.
## Test Plan
mdtests
## Summary
Infer the type of symbols with a `Final` qualifier as their
right-hand-side inferred type:
```py
x: Final = 1
y: Final[int] = 1
def _():
reveal_type(x) # previously: Unknown, now: Literal[1]
reveal_type(y) # int, same as before
```
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/158
## Ecosystem analysis
### aiohttp
```diff
aiohttp (https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp)
+ error[invalid-argument-type] aiohttp/compression_utils.py:131:54: Argument to bound method `__init__` is incorrect: Expected `ZLibBackendProtocol`, found `<module 'zlib'>`
```
This code [creates a
protocol](a83597fa88/aiohttp/compression_utils.py (L52-L77))
that looks like
```pyi
class ZLibBackendProtocol(Protocol):
Z_FULL_FLUSH: int
Z_SYNC_FLUSH: int
# more fields…
```
It then [tries to
assign](a83597fa88/aiohttp/compression_utils.py (L131))
the module literal `zlib` to that protocol. Howefer, in typeshed, these
`zlib` members are annotated like this:
```pyi
Z_FULL_FLUSH: Final = 3
Z_SYNC_FLUSH: Final = 2
```
With the proposed change here, we now infer these as `Literal[3]` /
`Literal[2]`. Since protocol members have to be assignable both ways
(invariance), we do not consider `zlib` assignable to this protocol
anymore.
That seems rather unfortunate. Not sure who is to blame here? That
`ZLibBackendProtocol` protocol should probably not annotate the members
with `int`, given that `typeshed` doesn't use an explicit annotation
here either? But what should they do instead? Annotate those fields with
`Any`?
Or is it another case where we should consider literal-widening?
FYI @AlexWaygood
### cloud-init
```diff
cloud-init (https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init)
+ error[invalid-argument-type] tests/unittests/sources/test_smartos.py:575:32: Argument to function `oct` is incorrect: Expected `SupportsIndex`, found `int | float`
+ error[invalid-argument-type] tests/unittests/sources/test_smartos.py:593:32: Argument to function `oct` is incorrect: Expected `SupportsIndex`, found `int | float`
+ error[invalid-argument-type] tests/unittests/sources/test_smartos.py:647:35: Argument to function `oct` is incorrect: Expected `SupportsIndex`, found `int | float`
```
New false positives on expressions like
`oct(os.stat(legacy_script_f)[stat.ST_MODE])`. We now correctly infer
`stat.ST_MODE` as `Literal[1]`, because in typeshed, it is annotated as
`ST_MODE: Final = 0`. `os.stat` returns a `stat_result` which is a tuple
subclass. Accessing it at index 0 should return an `int`, but we
currently return `int | float`, presumably due to missing support for
tuple subclasses (FYI @AlexWaygood):
```pyi
class stat_result(structseq[float], tuple[int, int, int, int, int, int, int, float, float, float]):
```
In terms of `typing.Final`, things are working as expected here.
### pywin-32
Many new false positives similar to:
```diff
pywin32 (https://github.com/mhammond/pywin32)
+ error[invalid-argument-type] Pythonwin/pywin/docking/DockingBar.py:288:55: Argument to function `LoadCursor` is incorrect: Expected `PyResourceId`, found `Literal[32645]`
```
The line in question calls `win32api.LoadCursor(0, win32con.IDC_ARROW)`.
The `win32con.IDC_ARROW` symbol is annotated as [`IDC_ARROW: Final =
32512` in
typeshed](2408c028f4/stubs/pywin32/win32/lib/win32con.pyi (L594)),
but
[`LoadCursor`](2408c028f4/stubs/pywin32/win32/win32api.pyi (L197))
expects a
[`PyResourceId`](2408c028f4/stubs/pywin32/_win32typing.pyi (L1252)),
which is an empty class. So.. this seems like a true positive to me,
unless that typeshed annotation of `IDC_ARROW` is meant to imply that
the type should be `Unknown`/`Any`?
### streamlit
```diff
streamlit (https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit)
+ error[invalid-argument-type] lib/streamlit/string_util.py:163:37: Argument to bound method `translate` is incorrect: Expected `bytes`, found `bytearray`
```
This looks like a true positive? The code calls `inp.translate(None,
TEXTCHARS)`. `inp` is `bytes`, and `TEXTCHARS` is:
```py
TEXTCHARS: Final = bytearray(
{7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 27} | set(range(0x20, 0x100)) - {0x7F}
)
```
~~We now infer this as `bytearray`, but `bytes.translate` [expects
`bytes` for its `delete`
parameter](2408c028f4/stdlib/builtins.pyi (L710)).
This seems to work at runtime, so maybe the typeshed annotation is
wrong?~~ (Edit: this is now fixed in typeshed)
```pycon
>>> b"abc".translate(None, bytearray(b"b"))
b'ac'
```
## rotki
```diff
+ error[invalid-return-type] rotkehlchen/chain/ethereum/modules/yearn/decoder.py:412:13: Return type does not match returned value: expected `dict[Unknown, str]`, found `dict[Unknown, Literal["yearn-v1", "yearn-v2"]]`
```
The code in question looks like
```py
def addresses_to_counterparties(self) -> dict[ChecksumEvmAddress, str]:
return dict.fromkeys(self.vaults, CPT_BEEFY_FINANCE)
```
where `CPT_BEEFY_FINANCE: Final = 'beefy_finance'. We previously
inferred the value type of the returned `dict` as `Unknown`, and now we
infer it as `Literal["beefy_finance"]`, which does not match the
annotated return type because `dict` is invariant in the value type.
```diff
+ error[invalid-argument-type] rotkehlchen/tests/unit/decoders/test_curve.py:249:9: Argument is incorrect: Expected `int`, found `FVal`
```
There are true positives that were previously silenced through the
`Unknown`.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Following ty issue [#698](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/698)
this PR adds support for declarations.
closes#698
## Test Plan
Tested against mdtest (specifically attributes).
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
`ty` does not understand that calls to functions which have been
annotated as having a return type of `Never` / `NoReturn` are terminal.
This PR fixes that, by adding new reachability constraints when call
expressions are seen. If the call expression evaluates to `Never`, the
code following it will be considered to be unreachable. Note that, for
adding these constraints, we only consider call expressions at the
statement level, and that too only inside function scopes. This is
because otherwise, the number of such constraints becomes too high, and
evaluating them later on during type inference results in a major
performance degradation.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/180
## Test Plan
New mdtests.
## Ecosystem changes
This PR removes the following false-positives:
- "Function can implicitly return `None`, which is not assignable to
...".
- "Name `foo` used when possibly not defind" - because the branch in
which it is not defined has a `NoReturn` call, or when `foo` was
imported in a `try`, and the except had a `NoReturn` call.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/129
There were previously some false positives here.
## Test Plan
Updated `is_subtype_of.md` and `is_assignable_to.md`
## Summary
Allow declared-only class-level attributes to be accessed on the class:
```py
class C:
attr: int
C.attr # this is now allowed
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/384
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/553
## Ecosystem analysis
* We see many removed `unresolved-attribute` false-positives for code
that makes use of sqlalchemy, as expected (see changes for `prefect`)
* We see many removed `call-non-callable` false-positives for uses of
`pytest.skip` and similar, as expected
* Most new diagnostics seem to be related to cases like the following,
where we previously inferred `int` for `Derived().x`, but now we infer
`int | None`. I think this should be a
conflicting-declarations/bad-override error anyway? The new behavior may
even be preferred here?
```py
class Base:
x: int | None
class Derived(Base):
def __init__(self):
self.x: int = 1
```
## Summary
Remove a hack in control flow modeling that was treating `return`
statements at the end of function bodies in a special way (basically
considering the state *just before* the `return` statement as the
end-of-scope state). This is not needed anymore now that #18750 has been
merged.
In order to make this work, we now use *all reachable bindings* for
purposes of finding implicit instance attribute assignments as well as
for deferred lookups of symbols. Both would otherwise be affected by
this change:
```py
def C:
def f(self):
self.x = 1 # a reachable binding that is not visible at the end of the scope
return
```
```py
def f():
class X: ... # a reachable binding that is not visible at the end of the scope
x: "X" = X() # deferred use of `X`
return
```
Implicit instance attributes also required another change. We previously
kept track of possibly-unbound instance attributes in some cases, but we
now give up on that completely and always consider *implicit* instance
attributes to be bound if we see a reachable binding in a reachable
method. The previous behavior was somewhat inconsistent anyway because
we also do not consider attributes possibly-unbound in other scenarios:
we do not (and can not) keep track of whether or not methods are called
that define these attributes.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/711
## Ecosystem analysis
I think this looks very positive!
* We see an unsurprising drop in `possibly-unbound-attribute`
diagnostics (599), mostly for classes that define attributes in `try …
except` blocks, `for` loops, or `if … else: raise …` constructs. There
might obviously also be true positives that got removed, but the vast
majority should be false positives.
* There is also a drop in `possibly-unresolved-reference` /
`unresolved-reference` diagnostics (279+13) from the change to deferred
lookups.
* Some `invalid-type-form` false positives got resolved (13), because we
can now properly look up the names in the annotations.
* There are some new *true* positives in `attrs`, since we understand
the `Attribute` annotation that was previously inferred as `Unknown`
because of a re-assignment after the class definition.
## Test Plan
The existing attributes.md test suite has sufficient coverage here.
## Summary
Temporarily modify `UseDefMapBuilder::reachability` for star imports in
order for new definitions to pick up the right reachability. This was
already working for `UseDefMapBuilder::place_states`, but not for
`UseDefMapBuilder::reachable_definitions`.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/728
## Test Plan
Regression test
## Summary
This just replaces one temporary solution to recursive protocols (the
`SelfReference` mechanism) with another one (track seen types when
recursively descending in `normalize` and replace recursive references
with `Any`). But this temporary solution can handle mutually-recursive
types, not just self-referential ones, and it's sufficient for the
primer ecosystem and some other projects we are testing on to no longer
stack overflow.
The follow-up here will be to properly handle these self-references
instead of replacing them with `Any`.
We will also eventually need cycle detection on more recursive-descent
type transformations and tests.
## Test Plan
Existing tests (including recursive-protocol tests) and primer.
Added mdtest for mutually-recursive protocols that stack-overflowed
before this PR.
## Summary
Simplifies literal `True` and `False` conditions to `ALWAYS_TRUE` /
`ALWAYS_FALSE` during semantic index building. This allows us to eagerly
evaluate more constraints, which should help with performance (looks
like there is a tiny 1% improvement in instrumented benchmarks), but
also allows us to eliminate definitely-unreachable branches in
control-flow merging. This can lead to better type inference in some
cases because it allows us to retain narrowing constraints without
solving https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/690 first:
```py
def _(c: int | None):
if c is None:
assert False
reveal_type(c) # int, previously: int | None
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/713
## Test Plan
* Regression test for https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/713
* Made sure that all ecosystem diffs trace back to removed false
positives
## Summary
This PR adds diagnostic for invalid binary operators in type
expressions. It should close https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/706
if merged.
Please feel free to suggest better wordings for the diagnostic message.
## Test Plan
I modified `mdtest/annotations/invalid.md` and added a test for each
binary operator, and fixed tests that was broken by the new diagnostic.
This PR updates our unpacking assignment logic to use the new tuple
machinery. As a result, we can now unpack variable-length tuples
correctly.
As part of this, the `TupleSpec` classes have been renamed to `Tuple`,
and can now contain any element (Rust) type, not just `Type<'db>`. The
unpacker uses a tuple of `UnionBuilder`s to maintain the types that will
be assigned to each target, as we iterate through potentially many union
elements on the rhs. We also add a new consuming iterator for tuples,
and update the `all_elements` methods to wrap the result in an enum
(similar to `itertools::Position`) letting you know which part of the
tuple each element appears in. I also added a new
`UnionBuilder::try_build`, which lets you specify a different fallback
type if the union contains no elements.
## Summary
Ensure that we correctly infer calls such as `tuple((1, 2))`,
`tuple(range(42))`, etc. Ensure that we emit errors on invalid calls
such as `tuple[int, str]()`.
## Test Plan
Mdtests
## Summary
Format conflicting declared types as
```
`str`, `int` and `bytes`
```
Thanks to @AlexWaygood for the initial draft.
@dcreager, looking forward to your one-character follow-up PR.
## Summary
This PR includes a behavioral change to how we infer types for public
uses of symbols within a module. Where we would previously use the type
that a use at the end of the scope would see, we now consider all
reachable bindings and union the results:
```py
x = None
def f():
reveal_type(x) # previously `Unknown | Literal[1]`, now `Unknown | None | Literal[1]`
f()
x = 1
f()
```
This helps especially in cases where the the end of the scope is not
reachable:
```py
def outer(x: int):
def inner():
reveal_type(x) # previously `Unknown`, now `int`
raise ValueError
```
This PR also proposes to skip the boundness analysis of public uses.
This is consistent with the "all reachable bindings" strategy, because
the implicit `x = <unbound>` binding is also always reachable, and we
would have to emit "possibly-unresolved" diagnostics for every public
use otherwise. Changing this behavior allows common use-cases like the
following to type check without any errors:
```py
def outer(flag: bool):
if flag:
x = 1
def inner():
print(x) # previously: possibly-unresolved-reference, now: no error
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/210
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/607
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/699
## Follow up
It is now possible to resolve the following TODO, but I would like to do
that as a follow-up, because it requires some changes to how we treat
implicit attribute assignments, which could result in ecosystem changes
that I'd like to see separately.
315fb0f3da/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/semantic_index/builder.rs (L1095-L1117)
## Ecosystem analysis
[**Full report**](https://shark.fish/diff-public-types.html)
* This change obviously removes a lot of `possibly-unresolved-reference`
diagnostics (7818) because we do not analyze boundness for public uses
of symbols inside modules anymore.
* As the primary goal here, this change also removes a lot of
false-positive `unresolved-reference` diagnostics (231) in scenarios
like this:
```py
def _(flag: bool):
if flag:
x = 1
def inner():
x
raise
```
* This change also introduces some new false positives for cases like:
```py
def _():
x = None
x = "test"
def inner():
x.upper() # Attribute `upper` on type `Unknown | None | Literal["test"]`
is possibly unbound
```
We have test cases for these situations and it's plausible that we can
improve this in a follow-up.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Add type narrowing inside comprehensions:
```py
def _(xs: list[int | None]):
[reveal_type(x) for x in xs if x is not None] # revealed: int
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/680
## Test Plan
* New Markdown tests
* Made sure the example from https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/680
now checks without errors
* Made sure that all removed ecosystem diagnostics were actually false
positives
## Summary
Having a recursive type method to check whether a type is fully static
is inefficient, unnecessary, and makes us overly strict about subtyping
relations.
It's inefficient because we end up re-walking the same types many times
to check for fully-static-ness.
It's unnecessary because we can check relations involving the dynamic
type appropriately, depending whether the relation is subtyping or
assignability.
We use the subtyping relation to simplify unions and intersections. We
can usefully consider that `S <: T` for gradual types also, as long as
it remains true that `S | T` is equivalent to `T` and `S & T` is
equivalent to `S`.
One conservative definition (implemented here) that satisfies this
requirement is that we consider `S <: T` if, for every possible pair of
materializations `S'` and `T'`, `S' <: T'`. Or put differently the top
materialization of `S` (`S+` -- the union of all possible
materializations of `S`) is a subtype of the bottom materialization of
`T` (`T-` -- the intersection of all possible materializations of `T`).
In the most basic cases we can usefully say that `Any <: object` and
that `Never <: Any`, and we can handle more complex cases inductively
from there.
This definition of subtyping for gradual subtypes is not reflexive
(`Any` is not a subtype of `Any`).
As a corollary, we also remove `is_gradual_equivalent_to` --
`is_equivalent_to` now has the meaning that `is_gradual_equivalent_to`
used to have. If necessary, we could restore an
`is_fully_static_equivalent_to` or similar (which would not do an
`is_fully_static` pre-check of the types, but would instead pass a
relation-kind enum down through a recursive equivalence check, similar
to `has_relation_to`), but so far this doesn't appear to be necessary.
Credit to @JelleZijlstra for the observation that `is_fully_static` is
unnecessary and overly restrictive on subtyping.
There is another possible definition of gradual subtyping: instead of
requiring that `S+ <: T-`, we could instead require that `S+ <: T+` and
`S- <: T-`. In other words, instead of requiring all materializations of
`S` to be a subtype of every materialization of `T`, we just require
that every materialization of `S` be a subtype of _some_ materialization
of `T`, and that every materialization of `T` be a supertype of some
materialization of `S`. This definition also preserves the core
invariant that `S <: T` implies that `S | T = T` and `S & T = S`, and it
restores reflexivity: under this definition, `Any` is a subtype of
`Any`, and for any equivalent types `S` and `T`, `S <: T` and `T <: S`.
But unfortunately, this definition breaks transitivity of subtyping,
because nominal subclasses in Python use assignability ("consistent
subtyping") to define acceptable overrides. This means that we may have
a class `A` with `def method(self) -> Any` and a subtype `B(A)` with
`def method(self) -> int`, since `int` is assignable to `Any`. This
means that if we have a protocol `P` with `def method(self) -> Any`, we
would have `B <: A` (from nominal subtyping) and `A <: P` (`Any` is a
subtype of `Any`), but not `B <: P` (`int` is not a subtype of `Any`).
Breaking transitivity of subtyping is not tenable, so we don't use this
definition of subtyping.
## Test Plan
Existing tests (modified in some cases to account for updated
semantics.)
Stable property tests pass at a million iterations:
`QUICKCHECK_TESTS=1000000 cargo test -p ty_python_semantic -- --ignored
types::property_tests::stable`
### Changes to property test type generation
Since we no longer have a method of categorizing built types as
fully-static or not-fully-static, I had to add a previously-discussed
feature to the property tests so that some tests can build types that
are known by construction to be fully static, because there are still
properties that only apply to fully-static types (for example,
reflexiveness of subtyping.)
## Changes to handling of `*args, **kwargs` signatures
This PR "discovered" that, once we allow non-fully-static types to
participate in subtyping under the above definitions, `(*args: Any,
**kwargs: Any) -> Any` is now a subtype of `() -> object`. This is true,
if we take a literal interpretation of the former signature: all
materializations of the parameters `*args: Any, **kwargs: Any` can
accept zero arguments, making the former signature a subtype of the
latter. But the spec actually says that `*args: Any, **kwargs: Any`
should be interpreted as equivalent to `...`, and that makes a
difference here: `(...) -> Any` is not a subtype of `() -> object`,
because (unlike a literal reading of `(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any)`),
`...` can materialize to _any_ signature, including a signature with
required positional arguments.
This matters for this PR because it makes the "any two types are both
assignable to their union" property test fail if we don't implement the
equivalence to `...`. Because `FunctionType.__call__` has the signature
`(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any`, and if we take that at face value
it's a subtype of `() -> object`, making `FunctionType` a subtype of `()
-> object)` -- but then a function with a required argument is also a
subtype of `FunctionType`, but not a subtype of `() -> object`. So I
went ahead and implemented the equivalence to `...` in this PR.
## Ecosystem analysis
* Most of the ecosystem report are cases of improved union/intersection
simplification. For example, we can now simplify a union like `bool |
(bool & Unknown) | Unknown` to simply `bool | Unknown`, because we can
now observe that every possible materialization of `bool & Unknown` is
still a subtype of `bool` (whereas before we would set aside `bool &
Unknown` as a not-fully-static type.) This is clearly an improvement.
* The `possibly-unresolved-reference` errors in sockeye, pymongo,
ignite, scrapy and others are true positives for conditional imports
that were formerly silenced by bogus conflicting-declarations (which we
currently don't issue a diagnostic for), because we considered two
different declarations of `Unknown` to be conflicting (we used
`is_equivalent_to` not `is_gradual_equivalent_to`). In this PR that
distinction disappears and all equivalence is gradual, so a declaration
of `Unknown` no longer conflicts with a declaration of `Unknown`, which
then results in us surfacing the possibly-unbound error.
* We will now issue "redundant cast" for casting from a typevar with a
gradual bound to the same typevar (the hydra-zen diagnostic). This seems
like an improvement.
* The new diagnostics in bandersnatch are interesting. For some reason
primer in CI seems to be checking bandersnatch on Python 3.10 (not yet
sure why; this doesn't happen when I run it locally). But bandersnatch
uses `enum.StrEnum`, which doesn't exist on 3.10. That makes the `class
SimpleDigest(StrEnum)` a class that inherits from `Unknown` (and
bypasses our current TODO handling for accessing attributes on enum
classes, since we don't recognize it as an enum class at all). This PR
improves our understanding of assignability to classes that inherit from
`Any` / `Unknown`, and we now recognize that a string literal is not
assignable to a class inheriting `Any` or `Unknown`.
Add property test generators for the new variable-length tuples. This
covers homogeneous tuples as well.
The property tests did their job! This identified several fixes we
needed to make to various type property methods.
cf https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18600#issuecomment-2993764471
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Previously, the checks for implicit attribute assignments didn't
properly account for method decorators. This PR fixes that by:
- Adding a decorator check in `implicit_instance_attribute`. This allows
it to filter out methods with mismatching decorators when analyzing
attribute assignments.
- Adding attribute search for implicit class attributes: if an attribute
can't be found directly in the class body, the
`ClassLiteral::own_class_member` function will now search in
classmethods.
- Adding `staticmethod`: it has been added into `KnownClass` and
together with the new decorator check, it will no longer expose
attributes when the assignment target name is the same as the first
method name.
If accepted, it should fix https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/205
and https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/207.
## Test Plan
This is tested with existing mdtest suites and is able to get most of
the TODO marks for implicit assignments in classmethods and
staticmethods removed.
However, there's one specific test case I failed to figure out how to
correctly resolve:
b279508bdc/crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/attributes.md (L754-L755)
I tried to add `instance_member().is_unbound()` check in this [else
branch](b279508bdc/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs (L3299-L3301))
but it causes tests with class attributes defined in class body to fail.
While it's possible to implicitly add `ClassVar` to qualifiers to make
this assignment fail and keep everything else passing, it doesn't feel
like the right solution.
## Summary
This PR fixesastral-sh/ty#185 by avoiding to infer the value expression
for an unpacking.
This is done simply by only inferring the value expression in a
non-unpacking branch for assignment statement, for statement, with
statement and comprehensions.
This is a simpler alternative to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18890 which I only realized in
hindsight! Ideally, the solution would to consider the "unpack" as it's
own region and do all of the inference of every expressions involved in
an unpacking inside the unpack query and then merge the results in the
outer query. This would require access to the `Unpack` ingredient which
is stored on the `Definition`. And, this would require create the said
`Definition`s for all attributes and subscript expressions. It does
simplify the target inference logic by streamlining it into a single
`infer_target` method instead of the `infer_target`/`infer_target_impl`
split.
Additionally, #18890 also solves a couple of TODOs around raising errors
around attribute / subscript assignment.
## Test Plan
Update the existing test, go through a couple of ecosystem diagnostic.
## Summary
Note this modifies the diagnostics a bit. Previously performing
subscript access on something like `NotSubscriptable1 |
NotSubscriptable2` would report the full type as not being
subscriptable:
```
[non-subscriptable] "Cannot subscript object of type `NotSubscriptable1 | NotSubscriptable2` with no `__getitem__` method"
```
Now each erroneous constituent has a separate error:
```
[non-subscriptable] "Cannot subscript object of type `NotSubscriptable2` with no `__getitem__` method"
[non-subscriptable] "Cannot subscript object of type `NotSubscriptable1` with no `__getitem__` method"
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/625
## Test Plan
mdtest
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
As far as I can tell, the two existing tests did the exact same thing.
Remove the redundant test, and add tests for all combinations of
declared/not-declared and local/"public" use of the name.
Proposing this as a separate PR before the behavior might change via
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18750
## Summary
The code in the `Variable` branch of
`VariableLengthTupleSpec::has_relation_to` made the incorrect assumption
that if you zip two possibly-different-length iterators together and
iterate over the resulting zip iterator, the original two iterators will
only have their common elements consumed. But in fact, the zip iterator
detects that it is done when it receives a `None` from one iterator and
`Some()` element from the other iterator, which means that it consumes
one additional element from the longer iterator. This meant that we
failed to detect mismatched types on this extra consumed element,
because we never compared it to the variable type of the other tuple.
Use `zip_longest` from itertools as an alternative, which allows us to
combine all the handling into just two `zip_longest`, one for prefixes
and one for suffixes.
Marking this PR internal since it fixes a bug in a commit that wasn't
released yet.
## Test Plan
Added mdtests that failed before this fix and pass after it.
We already had support for homogeneous tuples (`tuple[int, ...]`). This
PR extends this to also support mixed tuples (`tuple[str, str,
*tuple[int, ...], str str]`).
A mixed tuple consists of a fixed-length (possibly empty) prefix and
suffix, and a variable-length portion in the middle. Every element of
the variable-length portion must be of the same type. A homogeneous
tuple is then just a mixed tuple with an empty prefix and suffix.
The new data representation uses different Rust types for a fixed-length
(aka heterogeneous) tuple. Another option would have been to use the
`VariableLengthTuple` representation for all tuples, and to wrap the
"variable + suffix" portion in an `Option`. I don't think that would
simplify the method implementations much, though, since we would still
have a 2×2 case analysis for most of them.
One wrinkle is that the definition of the `tuple` class in the typeshed
has a single typevar, and canonically represents a homogeneous tuple.
When getting the class of a tuple instance, that means that we have to
summarize our detailed mixed tuple type information into its
"homogeneous supertype". (We were already doing this for heterogeneous
types.)
A similar thing happens when concatenating two mixed tuples: the
variable-length portion and suffix of the LHS, and the prefix and
variable-length portion of the RHS, all get unioned into the
variable-length portion of the result. The LHS prefix and RHS suffix
carry through unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Add support for `@staticmethod`s. Overall, the changes are very similar
to #16305.
#18587 will be dependent on this PR for a potential fix of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/207.
mypy_primer will look bad since the new code allows ty to check more
code.
## Test Plan
Added new markdown tests. Please comment if there's any missing tests
that I should add in, thank you.
