Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Waygood
d63b4b0383
[ty] Improve diagnostic range for non-subscriptable diagnostics (#21461)
## Summary

Currently our diagnostic only covers the range of the thing being
subscripted:

<img width="1702" height="312" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e630431-e846-46ca-93c1-139f11aaba11"
/>

But it should probably cover the _whole_ subscript expression (arguably
the more "incorrect" bit is the `["foo"]` part of this expression, not
the `x` part of this expression!)

## Test Plan

Added a snapshot

Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook
<36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-11-14 21:15:14 +00:00
David Peter
04ab9170d6
[ty] Further improve subscript assignment diagnostics (#21411)
## Summary

Further improve subscript assignment diagnostics, especially for
`dict`s:

```py
config: dict[str, int] = {}

config["retries"] = "three"
```

<img width="1276" height="274" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9762c733-8d1c-4a57-8c8a-99825071dc7d"
/>

I have many more ideas, but this looks like a reasonable first step.
Thank you @AlexWaygood for some of the suggestions here.

## Test Plan

Update tests
2025-11-13 13:31:14 +01:00
David Peter
2f6f3e1042
[ty] Faster subscript assignment checks for (unions of) TypedDicts (#21378)
## Summary

We synthesize a (potentially large) set of `__setitem__` overloads for
every item in a `TypedDict`. Previously, validation of subscript
assignments on `TypedDict`s relied on actually calling `__setitem__`
with the provided key and value types, which implied that we needed to
do the full overload call evaluation for this large set of overloads.
This PR improves the performance of subscript assignment checks on
`TypedDict`s by validating the assignment directly instead of calling
`__setitem__`.

This PR also adds better handling for assignments to subscripts on union
and intersection types (but does not attempt to make it perfect). It
achieves this by distributing the check over unions and intersections,
instead of calling `__setitem__` on the union/intersection directly. We
already do something similar when validating *attribute* assignments.

## Ecosystem impact

* A lot of diagnostics change their rule type, and/or split into
multiple diagnostics. The new version is more verbose, but easier to
understand, in my opinion
* Almost all of the invalid-key diagnostics come from pydantic, and they
should all go away (including many more) when we implement
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1479
* Everything else looks correct to me. There may be some new diagnostics
due to the fact that we now check intersections.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests.
2025-11-12 20:16:38 +01:00
Renkai Ge
bf38e69870
[ty] Rename "possibly unbound" diagnostics to "possibly missing" (#20492)
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
2025-09-23 14:26:55 +00:00
Matthew Mckee
b30d97e5e0
[ty] Support __setitem__ and improve __getitem__ related diagnostics (#19578)
## Summary

Adds validation to subscript assignment expressions.

```py
class Foo: ...

class Bar:
    __setattr__ = None

class Baz:
    def __setitem__(self, index: str, value: int) -> None:
        pass

# We now emit a diagnostic on these statements
Foo()[1] = 2
Bar()[1] = 2
Baz()[1] = 2

```

Also improves error messages on invalid `__getitem__` expressions

## Test Plan

Update mdtests and add more to `subscript/instance.md`

---------

Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
2025-08-01 09:23:27 +02:00
Matthew Mckee
4739bc8d14
[ty] Fix incorrect diagnostic when calling __setitem__ (#19645)
## Summary

Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/862 by not emitting a
diagnostic.

## Test Plan

Add test to show we don't emit the diagnostic
2025-07-30 20:34:52 +02:00
Micha Reiser
b51c4f82ea
Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
Renamed from crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/subscript/instance.md (Browse further)