## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5781
## Test Plan
Added cases to
`crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/named_expr.py`
one-by-one and adjusted the condition as needed.
## Summary
Right now, if we have two fixes that have an overlapping edit, but not
an _identical_ set of edits, they'll conflict, causing us to do another
linter traversal. Here, I've enabled the fixer to support partially
overlapping edits, which (as an example) let's us greatly reduce the
number of iterations required in the test suite.
The most common case here is that in which a bunch of edits need to
import some symbol, and then use that symbol, but in different ways. In
that case, all edits will have a common fix (to import the symbol), but
deviate in some way. With this change, we can do all of those edits in
one pass.
Note that the simplest way to enable this was to store sorted edits on
`Fix`. We don't allow modifying the edits on `Fix` once it's
constructed, so this is an easy change, and allows us to avoid a bunch
of clones and traversals later on.
Closes#5800.
## Summary
If a file has a BOM, the import sorter _always_ reports the imports as
unsorted. The acute issue is that we detect that the line has leading
content (before the imports), which we always consider a violation.
Rather than fixing that one site, this PR instead makes `.line_start`
BOM-aware.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6155.
## Summary
This PR adds a new config option for `pep8-naming` plugin called
`extend-ignore-names` which is used to extend the default values in
`ignore-names` option.
resolves: #6050
## Summary
This PR protects against code like:
```python
from typing import Optional
import bar # ruff: noqa
import baz
class Foo:
x: Optional[str] = None
```
In which the user wrote `# ruff: noqa` to ignore a specific error, not
realizing that it was a file-level exemption that thus turned off all
lint rules.
Specifically, if a `# ruff: noqa` directive is not at the start of a
line, we now ignore it and warn, since this is almost certainly a
mistake.
Requires https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/42
Related https://github.com/PyCQA/pyflakes/pull/778
[PEP-695](https://peps.python.org/pep-0695)
Part of #5062
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Adds a scope for type parameters, a type parameter binding kind, and
checker visitation of type parameters in type alias statements, function
definitions, and class definitions.
A few changes were necessary to ensure correctness following the
insertion of a new scope between function and class scopes and their
parent.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Undefined name snapshots.
Unused type parameter rule will be added as follow-up.
## Summary
Right now, `RUF015` will try to rewrite `x[:1]` as `[next(x)]`. This
isn't equivalent if `x`, for example, is empty, where slicing like
`x[:1]` is forgiving, but `next` raises `StopIteration`. For me this is
a little too much of a deviation to be comfortable with, and most of the
value in this rule is the `x[0]` to `next(x)` conversion anyway.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6148.
## Summary
In #6134 and #6136, we see some false positives for "shadowed" class
definitions. For example, here, the first definition is flagged as
unused, since from the perspective of the semantic model (which doesn't
understand branching), it appears to be immediately shadowed in the
`else`, and thus never used:
```python
if sys.version_info >= (3, 11):
class _RootLoggerConfiguration(TypedDict, total=False):
level: _Level
filters: Sequence[str | _FilterType]
handlers: Sequence[str]
else:
class _RootLoggerConfiguration(TypedDict, total=False):
level: _Level
filters: Sequence[str]
handlers: Sequence[str]
```
Instead of looking at _all_ bindings, we should instead look at the
"live" bindings, which is similar to how other rules (like unused
variables detection) is structured. We thus move the rule from
`bindings.rs` (which iterates over _all_ bindings, regardless of whether
they're shadowed) to `deferred_scopes.rs`, which iterates over all
"live" bindings once a scope has been fully analyzed.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR implements pycodestyle's E241 (tab after comma) and E242
(multiple whitespace after comma) lints.
These are marked as nursery rules like many other pycodestyle rules.
Refs #2402
## Test Plan
E24.py copied from pycodestyle.
## Summary
Completes the documentation for the ruleset, apart from four rules which
have contradictions, so need to be thought about more regarding how to
document that. Related to #2646.
## Test Plan
`python scripts/test_docs_formatted.py`
**Summary**
Updated doc comments for `missing_whitespace_around_operator.rs`. Online
docs also benefit from this update.
**Test Plan**
Checked docs via
[mkdocs](389fe13c93/CONTRIBUTING.md (L267-L296))
## Summary
Completes the documentation for the one and only (current) rule in the
`flynt` ruleset. Related to #2646.
## Test Plan
`python scripts/test_docs_formatted.py`
## Summary
This PR stores the mapping from `ExprName` node to resolved `BindingId`,
which lets us skip scope lookups in `resolve_call_path`. It's enabled by
#6045, since that PR ensures that when we analyze a node (and thus call
`resolve_call_path`), we'll have already visited its `ExprName`
elements.
In more detail: imagine that we're traversing over `foo.bar()`. When we
read `foo`, it will be an `ExprName`, which we'll then resolve to a
binding via `handle_node_load`. With this change, we then store that
binding in a map. Later, if we call `collect_call_path` on `foo.bar`,
we'll identify `foo` (the "head" of the attribute) and grab the resolved
binding in that map. _Almost_ all names are now resolved in advance,
though it's not a strict requirement, and some rules break that pattern
(e.g., if we're analyzing arguments, and they need to inspect their
annotations, which are visited in a deferred manner).
This improves performance by 4-6% on the all-rules benchmark. It looks
like it hurts performance (1-2% drop) in the default-rules benchmark,
presumedly because those rules don't call `resolve_call_path` nearly as
much, and so we're paying for these extra writes.
Here's the benchmark data:
```
linter/default-rules/numpy/globals.py
time: [67.270 µs 67.380 µs 67.489 µs]
thrpt: [43.720 MiB/s 43.792 MiB/s 43.863 MiB/s]
change:
time: [+0.4747% +0.7752% +1.0626%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [-1.0514% -0.7693% -0.4724%]
Change within noise threshold.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
linter/default-rules/pydantic/types.py
time: [1.4067 ms 1.4105 ms 1.4146 ms]
thrpt: [18.028 MiB/s 18.081 MiB/s 18.129 MiB/s]
change:
time: [+1.3152% +1.6953% +2.0414%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [-2.0006% -1.6671% -1.2981%]
Performance has regressed.
linter/default-rules/numpy/ctypeslib.py
time: [637.67 µs 638.96 µs 640.28 µs]
thrpt: [26.006 MiB/s 26.060 MiB/s 26.113 MiB/s]
change:
time: [+1.5859% +1.8109% +2.0353%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [-1.9947% -1.7787% -1.5611%]
Performance has regressed.
linter/default-rules/large/dataset.py
time: [3.2289 ms 3.2336 ms 3.2383 ms]
thrpt: [12.563 MiB/s 12.581 MiB/s 12.599 MiB/s]
change:
time: [+0.8029% +0.9898% +1.1740%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [-1.1604% -0.9801% -0.7965%]
Change within noise threshold.
linter/all-rules/numpy/globals.py
time: [134.05 µs 134.15 µs 134.26 µs]
thrpt: [21.977 MiB/s 21.995 MiB/s 22.012 MiB/s]
change:
time: [-4.4571% -4.1175% -3.8268%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [+3.9791% +4.2943% +4.6651%]
Performance has improved.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe
linter/all-rules/pydantic/types.py
time: [2.5627 ms 2.5669 ms 2.5720 ms]
thrpt: [9.9158 MiB/s 9.9354 MiB/s 9.9516 MiB/s]
change:
time: [-5.8304% -5.6374% -5.4452%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [+5.7587% +5.9742% +6.1914%]
Performance has improved.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
6 (6.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
linter/all-rules/numpy/ctypeslib.py
time: [1.3949 ms 1.3956 ms 1.3964 ms]
thrpt: [11.925 MiB/s 11.931 MiB/s 11.937 MiB/s]
change:
time: [-6.2496% -6.0856% -5.9293%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [+6.3030% +6.4799% +6.6662%]
Performance has improved.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
linter/all-rules/large/dataset.py
time: [5.5951 ms 5.6019 ms 5.6093 ms]
thrpt: [7.2527 MiB/s 7.2623 MiB/s 7.2711 MiB/s]
change:
time: [-5.1781% -4.9783% -4.8070%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt: [+5.0497% +5.2391% +5.4608%]
Performance has improved.
```
Still playing with this (the concepts need better names, documentation,
etc.), but opening up for feedback.
## Summary
This is an error message only change to lead an implementor of a new
rule that has an unformatted or invalid bad example to the
right code.
## Test Plan
n/a
## Summary
Noticed in #5954: we walk _past_ the root rather than stopping _at_ the
root when attempting to traverse along the parent path. It's effectively
an off-by-one bug.
## Summary
Updated doc comment for `call_datetime_without_tzinfo.rs`. Online docs
also benefit from this update.
## Test Plan
Checked docs via
[mkdocs](389fe13c93/CONTRIBUTING.md (L267-L296))
## Summary
Check for unused private `TypeVar`. See [original
implementation](2a86db8271/pyi.py (L1958)).
```
$ flake8 --select Y018 crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:4:1: Y018 TypeVar "_T" is not used
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:5:1: Y018 TypeVar "_P" is not used
```
```
$ ./target/debug/ruff --select PYI018 crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi --no-cache
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:4:1: PYI018 TypeVar `_T` is never used
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:5:1: PYI018 TypeVar `_P` is never used
Found 2 errors.
```
In the file `unused_private_type_declaration.rs`, I'm planning to add
other rules that are similar to `PYI018` like the `PYI046`, `PYI047` and
`PYI049`.
ref #848
## Test Plan
Snapshots and manual runs of flake8.
## Summary
In Ruff only a subset of rules are enabled by default. This change
change aims to clarify that when adding a new rule, you must explicitly
use the `--select name_of_rule` command to ensure the rule gets
executed.
This was talked about on Discord a while back.
## Test Plan
Checked docs via mkdocs
## Summary
This is a rewrite of the main comment placement logic. `place_comment`
now has three parts:
- place own line comments
- between branches
- after a branch
- place end-of-line comments
- after colon
- after a branch
- place comments for specific nodes (that include module level comments)
The rewrite fixed three bugs: `class A: # trailing comment` comments now
stay end-of-line, `try: # comment` remains end-of-line and deeply
indented try-else-finally comments remain with the right nested
statement.
It will be much easier to give more alternative branches nodes since
this is abstracted away by `is_node_with_body` and the first/last child
helpers. Adding new node types can now be done by adding an entry to the
`place_comment` match. The code went from 1526 lines before #6033 to
1213 lines now.
It thinks it easier to just read the new `placement.rs` rather than
reviewing the diff.
## Test Plan
The existing fixtures staying the same or improving plus new ones for
the bug fixes.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The `SIM102` auto-fix fails if `elif` is indented like this:
## Example
```python
def f():
# SIM102
if a:
pass
elif b:
if c:
d
```
```
> cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check --select SIM102 --fix a.py
...
error: Failed to fix nested if: Failed to extract statement from source
a.py:5:5: SIM102 Use a single `if` statement instead of nested `if` statements
Found 1 error.
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test
## Summary
This PR adds the implementation for the new Jupyter AST nodes i.e.,
`ExprLineMagic` and `StmtLineMagic`.
## Test Plan
Add test cases for `unparse` containing magic commands
resolves: #6087
