## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13944
## Test Plan
Standard snapshot testing
flake8-simplify surprisingly only has a single test case
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
In most cases we should suggest a ternary operator, but there are three
edge cases where a binary operator is more appropriate.
Given an if-else block of the form
```python
if test:
target_var = body_value
else:
target_var = else_value
```
This PR updates the check for SIM108 to the following:
- If `test == body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace with
`target_var = test or else_value`
- If `test == not body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace
with `target_var = body_value and else_value`
- If `not test == body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace
with `target_var = body_value and else_value`
- Otherwise, suggest to replace with `target_var = body_value if test
else else_value`
Closes#12189.
## Summary
This rule removes `PLR1701` and redirects it to `SIM101`.
In addition to that, the `SIM101` autofix has been fixed to add padding
if required.
### `PLR1701` has bugs
It also seems that the implementation of `PLR1701` is incorrect in
multiple scenarios. For example, the following code snippet:
```py
# There are two _different_ variables `a` and `b`
if isinstance(a, int) or isinstance(b, bool) or isinstance(a, float):
pass
# There's another condition `or 1`
if isinstance(self.k, int) or isinstance(self.k, float) or 1:
pass
```
is fixed to:
```py
# Fixed to only considering variable `a`
if isinstance(a, (float, int)):
pass
# The additional condition is not present in the fix
if isinstance(self.k, (float, int)):
pass
```
Playground: https://play.ruff.rs/6cfbdfb7-f183-43b0-b59e-31e728b34190
## Documentation Preview
### `PLR1701`
<img width="1397" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 11 14 40"
src="779ee84d-7c4d-4bb8-a3a4-c2b23a313eba">
## Test Plan
Remove the test cases for `PLR1701`, port the padding test case to
`SIM101` and update the snapshot.
## Summary
Ignore `async for` loops when checking the SIM113 rule.
Closes#9995
## Test Plan
A new test case was added to SIM113.py with an async for loop.
Implements SIM113 from #998
Added tests
Limitations
- No fix yet
- Only flag cases where index variable immediately precede `for` loop
@charliermarsh please review and let me know any improvements
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Closes#9319, implements the [`SIM911` rule from
`flake8-simplify`](https://github.com/MartinThoma/flake8-simplify/pull/183).
#### Note
I wasn't sure whether or not to include
```rs
if checker.settings.preview.is_disabled() {
return;
}
```
at the beginning of the function with violation logic if the rule's
already declared as part of `RuleGroup::Preview`.
I've seen both variants, so I'd appreciate some feedback on that :)
## Summary
fixes#6956
details in issue
Following an advice in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6956#issuecomment-1817672585,
this change separates expressions to 3 levels of "constant likelihood":
* literals, empty dict and tuples... (definitely constant, level 2)
* CONSTANT_CASE vars (probably constant, 1)
* all other expressions (0)
a comparison is marked yoda if the level is strictly higher on its left
hand side
following
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6956#issuecomment-1697107822
marking compound expressions of literals (e.g. `60 * 60` ) as constants
this change current behaviour on
`SomeClass().settings.SOME_CONSTANT_VALUE > (60 * 60)` in the fixture
from error to ok
Semantically it makes sense to put certain contextmanagers into separate
with statements. Currently asyncio.timeout and its relatives in anyio
and trio are exempt from SIM117.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8606
## Summary
Exempt asyncio.timeout and related functions from SIM117 (Collapse with
statements where possible).
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8606 for more.
## Test Plan
Extended the insta tests.
## Summary
Ensures that we can catch cases like:
```python
ages = {"Tom": 23, "Maria": 23, "Dog": 11}
age = ages.get("Cat", None)
```
Previously, the rule was somewhat useless, as it only checked for
literal accesses.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8760.
## Summary
Given `key in obj.keys()`, `obj` _could_ be a dictionary, or it could be
another type that defines
a `.keys()` method. In the latter case, removing the `.keys()` attribute
could lead to a runtime error.
Previously, we marked all `SIM118` fixes as unsafe for this reason;
however, in preview, we now mark them as safe if we can
infer that the expression is a dictionary.
## Test Plan
Added a preview fixture.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Close#8123
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test cases
---------
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
- Only trigger for immediately adjacent isinstance() calls with the same
target
- Preserve order of or conditions
Two existing tests changed:
- One was incorrectly reordering the or conditions, and is now correct.
- Another was combining two non-adjacent isinstance() calls. It's safe
enough in that example,
but this isn't safe to do in general, and it feels low-value to come up
with a heuristic for
when it is safe, so it seems better to not combine the calls in that
case.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7797
## Summary
We'll revert back to the crates.io release once it's up-to-date, but
better to get this out now that Python 3.12 is released.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
