## Summary
The upstream category check here
fd26b29986/crates/ruff_linter/src/upstream_categories.rs (L54-L65)
was not working because the code is actually "E0001" not "PLE0001", I
changed it so it will detect the upstream category correctly.
I also sorted the upstream categories alphabetically, so that the
document generation will be deterministic.
## Test Plan
I compared the diff before and after the change.
Fixes#10426
## Summary
Fix rule B030 giving a false positive with Tuple operations like `+`.
[Playground](https://play.ruff.rs/17b086bc-cc43-40a7-b5bf-76d7d5fce78a)
```python
try:
...
except (ValueError,TypeError) + (EOFError,ArithmeticError):
...
```
## Reviewer notes
This is a little more convoluted than I was expecting -- because we can
have valid nested Tuples with operations done on them, the flattening
logic has become a bit more complex.
Shall I guard this behind --preview?
## Test Plan
Unit tested.
## Summary
Implement `singledispatchmethod-function` from pylint, part of #970.
This is essentially a copy paste of #8934 for `@singledispatchmethod`
decorator.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
## Summary
I would like to add `repos/` to the gitignore since it is given as an
example for the cache directory path in [the ecosystem check's
README](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/tree/main/python/ruff-ecosystem#development):
```console
ruff-ecosystem check ruff "./target/debug/ruff" --cache ./repos
```
## Summary
Short-circuit implementation mentioned in #10403.
I implemented this by extending C400:
- Made `UnnecessaryGeneratorList` have information of whether the the
short-circuiting occurred (to put diagnostic)
- Add additional check for whether in `unnecessary_generator_list`
function.
Please give me suggestions if you think this isn't the best way to
handle this :)
## Test Plan
Extended `C400.py` a little, and written the cases where:
- Code could be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(x for x in range(3))` -> `list(range(3))`
- Code couldn't be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(2 * x for x in range(3))` -> `[2 * x for x in range(3)]`
- `list` function is not built-in, and should not modify the code in any
way.
## Summary
Trailing ellipses in objects defined in `typing.TYPE_CHECKING` might be
meaningful (it might be declaring a stub). Thus, we should skip the
`unnecessary-placeholder` (`PIE970`) rule in such contexts.
Closes#10358.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Given `del X`, we'll typically add a `BindingKind::Deletion` to `X` to
shadow the current binding. However, if the deletion is inside of a
conditional operation, we _won't_, as in:
```python
def f():
global X
if X > 0:
del X
```
We will, however, track it as a reference to the binding. This PR adds
the expression context to those resolved references, so that we can
detect that the `X` in `global X` was "assigned to".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10397.
## Summary
The previous documentation sounded as if typing a mutable default as a
`ClassVar` were optional. However, it is not, as not doing so causes a
`ValueError`. The snippet below was tested in Python's interactive
shell:
```
>>> from dataclasses import dataclass
>>> @dataclass
... class A:
... mutable_default: list[int] = []
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 1230, in dataclass
return wrap(cls)
^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 1220, in wrap
return _process_class(cls, init, repr, eq, order, unsafe_hash,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 958, in _process_class
cls_fields.append(_get_field(cls, name, type, kw_only))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 815, in _get_field
raise ValueError(f'mutable default {type(f.default)} for field '
ValueError: mutable default <class 'list'> for field mutable_default is not allowed: use default_factory
>>>
```
This behavior is also documented in Python's docs, see
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#mutable-default-values):
> [...] the
[dataclass()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.dataclass)
decorator will raise a
[ValueError](https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#ValueError)
if it detects an unhashable default parameter. The assumption is that if
a value is unhashable, it is mutable. This is a partial solution, but it
does protect against many common errors.
And
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#class-variables)
it is documented why it works if it is typed as a `ClassVar`:
> One of the few places where
[dataclass()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.dataclass)
actually inspects the type of a field is to determine if a field is a
class variable as defined in [PEP
526](https://peps.python.org/pep-0526/). It does this by checking if the
type of the field is typing.ClassVar. If a field is a ClassVar, it is
excluded from consideration as a field and is ignored by the dataclass
mechanisms. Such ClassVar pseudo-fields are not returned by the
module-level
[fields()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.fields)
function.
In this PR I have changed the documentation to make it a little bit
clearer that not using `ClassVar` makes the code invalid.
## Summary
Ignoring all lines until the first logical line does not match the
behavior from pycodestyle. This PR therefore removes the `if
state.is_not_first_logical_line` skipping the line check before the
first logical line, and applies it only to `E302`.
For example, in the snippet below a rule violation should be detected on
the second comment and on the import.
```python
# first comment
# second comment
import foo
```
Fixes#10374
## Test Plan
Add test cases, update the snapshots and verify the ecosystem check output
## Summary
This PR updates the `StringLike::FString` variant to use `ExprFString`
instead of `FStringLiteralElement`.
For context, the reason it used `FStringLiteralElement` is that the node
is actually the string part of an f-string ("foo" in `f"foo{x}"`). But,
this is inconsistent with other variants where the captured value is the
_entire_ string.
This is also problematic w.r.t. implicitly concatenated strings. Any
rules which work with `StringLike::FString` doesn't account for the
string part in an implicitly concatenated f-strings. For example, we
don't flag confusable character in the first part of `"𝐁ad" f"𝐁ad
string"`, but only the second part
(https://play.ruff.rs/16071c4c-a1dd-4920-b56f-e2ce2f69c843).
### Update `PYI053`
_This is included in this PR because otherwise it requires a temporary
workaround to be compatible with the old logic._
This PR also updates the `PYI053` (`string-or-bytes-too-long`) rule for
f-string to consider _all_ the visible characters in a f-string,
including the ones which are implicitly concatenated. This is consistent
with implicitly concatenated strings and bytes.
For example,
```python
def foo(
# We count all the characters here
arg1: str = '51 character ' 'stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
# But not here because of the `{x}` replacement field which _breaks_ them up into two chunks
arg2: str = f'51 character {x} stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
) -> None: ...
```
This PR fixes it to consider all _visible_ characters inside an f-string
which includes expressions as well.
fixes: #10310fixes: #10307
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
## Review
To facilitate the review process, the change have been split into two
commits: one which has the code change while the other has the test
cases and updated snapshots.
## Summary
Fixes#10367.
While the server is still in an unstable state, requiring a `--preview`
flag would be a good way to indicate this to end users.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Adds a successful check message after no errors were found
Implements #8553
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Ran a check on a test file with `cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check test.py
--no-cache` and outputted as expected.
Ran the same check with `cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check test.py
--no-cache --silent` and the command was gone as expected.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
See feedback in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4725#issuecomment-1994615409.
In the docs, we use a tabbed interface for express `ruff.toml` vs.
`pyproject.toml`. Here, it might be clearer to default to `ruff.toml`,
since it's more obviously _not_ `pyproject.toml`. But either way, this
PR attempts to clarify that there's a difference.
Re-implementation of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5845 but
instead of deprecating the option I toggle the default. Now users can
_opt-in_ via the setting which will give them an unsafe fix to remove
the import. Otherwise, we raise violations but do not offer a fix. The
setting is a bit of a misnomer in either case, maybe we'll want to
remove it still someday.
As discussed there, I think the safe fix should be to import it as an
alias. I'm not sure. We need support for offering multiple fixes for
ideal behavior though? I think we should remove the fix entirely and
consider it separately.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5697
Supersedes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5845
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR modifies the documentation to use `ruff check` instead of `ruff
check .`, and `ruff format` instead of `ruff format .`, as discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10168#discussion_r1509976904)
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This PR adds methods on `FString` to iterate over the two different kind
of elements it can have - literals and expressions. This is similar to
the methods we have on `ExprFString`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Fix "TRIO115 false positive with with sleep(var) where var starts as 0"
#9935 based on the discussion in the issue.
## Test Plan
Issue code added to fixture
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
## Summary
We had a report of a test failure on a specific architecture, and
looking into it, I think the test assumes that the hash keys are
iterated in a specific order. This PR thus adds a variant to our
settings display macro specifically for maps and sets. Like `CacheKey`,
it sorts the keys when printing.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10359.
## Summary
Fixes#10351
It seems the bug was caused by this section of code
b669306c87/crates/ruff_python_index/src/indexer.rs (L55-L58)
It's true that newline tokens cannot be immediately followed by line
continuations, but only outside parentheses. e.g. the exception
```
(
1
\
+ 2)
```
But why was this check put there in the first place? Is it guarding
against something else?
## Test Plan
New test was added to indexer
## Summary
When negating an expression like `a or b`, we need to wrap it in
parentheses, e.g., `not (a or b)` instead of `not a or b`, due to
operator precedence.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10335.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
This PR fixes the following false positive in a `.pyi` stub file:
```py
x: int
y = x # F821 currently emitted here, but shouldn't be in a stub file
```
In a `.py` file, this is invalid regardless of whether `from __future__ import annotations` is enabled or not. In a `.pyi` stub file, however, it's always valid, as an annotation counts as a binding in a stub file even if no value is assigned to the variable.
I also added more test coverage for `.pyi` stub files in various edge cases where ruff's behaviour is currently correct, but where `.pyi` stub files do slightly different things to `.py` files.
## Summary
Fixes#10295.
`E225` (`Missing whitespace around operator`) and `E275` (`Missing
whitespace after keyword`) try to add a white space even when the next
character is a `)` (which is a syntax error in most cases, the
exceptions already being handled). This causes `E202` (`Whitespace
before close bracket`) to try to remove the added whitespace, resulting
in an infinite loop when `E225`/`E275` re-add it.
This PR adds an exception in `E225` and `E275` to not trigger in case
the next token is a `)`. It is a bit simplistic, but it solves the
example given in the issue without introducing a change in behavior
(according to the fixtures).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and the `ruff-ecosystem` check were used to check that the
PR's changes do not have side-effects.
A new fixture was added to check that running the 3 rules on the example
given in the issue does not cause ruff to fail to converge.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR introduces the `ruff_server` crate and a new `ruff server`
command. `ruff_server` is a re-implementation of
[`ruff-lsp`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp), written entirely in
Rust. It brings significant performance improvements, much tighter
integration with Ruff, a foundation for supporting entirely new language
server features, and more!
This PR is an early version of `ruff_lsp` that we're calling the
**pre-release** version. Anyone is more than welcome to use it and
submit bug reports for any issues they encounter - we'll have some
documentation on how to set it up with a few common editors, and we'll
also provide a pre-release VSCode extension for those interested.
This pre-release version supports:
- **Diagnostics for `.py` files**
- **Quick fixes**
- **Full-file formatting**
- **Range formatting**
- **Multiple workspace folders**
- **Automatic linter/formatter configuration** - taken from any
`pyproject.toml` files in the workspace.
Many thanks to @MichaReiser for his [proof-of-concept
work](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7262), which was important
groundwork for making this PR possible.
## Architectural Decisions
I've made an executive choice to go with `lsp-server` as a base
framework for the LSP, in favor of `tower-lsp`. There were several
reasons for this:
1. I would like to avoid `async` in our implementation. LSPs are mostly
computationally bound rather than I/O bound, and `async` adds a lot of
complexity to the API, while also making harder to reason about
execution order. This leads into the second reason, which is...
2. Any handlers that mutate state should be blocking and run in the
event loop, and the state should be lock-free. This is the approach that
`rust-analyzer` uses (also with the `lsp-server`/`lsp-types` crates as a
framework), and it gives us assurances about data mutation and execution
order. `tower-lsp` doesn't support this, which has caused some
[issues](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284) around data
races and out-of-order handler execution.
3. In general, I think it makes sense to have tight control over
scheduling and the specifics of our implementation, in exchange for a
slightly higher up-front cost of writing it ourselves. We'll be able to
fine-tune it to our needs and support future LSP features without
depending on an upstream maintainer.
## Test Plan
The pre-release of `ruff_server` will have snapshot tests for common
document editing scenarios. An expanded test suite is on the roadmap for
future version of `ruff_server`.
