## Summary
This PR is a follow-up to #16852.
Instance variables bound in comprehensions are recorded, allowing type
inference to work correctly.
This required adding support for unpacking in comprehension which
resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15369.
## Test Plan
One TODO in `mdtest/attributes.md` is now resolved, and some new test
cases are added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR refactors the common logic for unpacking in assignment, for loops, and with items.
## Test Plan
Make sure existing tests pass.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Another salsa upgrade.
The main motivation is to stay on a recent salsa version because there
are still a lot of breaking changes happening.
The most significant changes in this update:
* Salsa no longer derives `Debug` by default. It now requires
`interned(debug)` (or similar)
* This version ships the foundation for garbage collecting interned
values. However, this comes at the cost that queries now track which
interned values they created (or read). The micro benchmarks in the
salsa repo showed a significant perf regression. Will see if this also
visible in our benchmarks.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Resolves#16365
Add support for unpacking `with` statement targets.
## Test Plan
Added some test cases, alike the ones added by #15058.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This is a follow up to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15763#discussion_r1949681336
It reverts the change to using ptr equality for `AstNodeRef`s, which in
turn removes the `Eq`, `PartialEq`, and `Hash` implementations for
`AstNodeRef`s parametrized with AST nodes.
Cheap comparisons shouldn't be needed because the node field is
generally marked as `[#tracked]` and `#[no_eq]` and removing the
implementations even enforces that those
attributes are set on all `AstNodeRef` fields (which is good).
The only downside this has is that we technically wouldn't have to mark
the `Unpack::target` as `#[tracked]` because
the `target` field is accessed in every query accepting `Unpack` as an
argument.
Overall, enforcing the use of `#[tracked]` seems like a good trade off,
espacially considering that it's very likely that
we'd probably forget to mark the `Unpack::target` field as tracked if we
add a new `Unpack` query that doesn't access the target.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Transition to using coarse-grained tracked structs (depends on
https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/657). For now, this PR doesn't
add any `#[tracked]` fields, meaning that any changes cause the entire
struct to be invalidated. It also changes `AstNodeRef` to be
compared/hashed by pointer address, instead of performing a deep AST
comparison.
## Test Plan
This yields a 10-15% improvement on my machine (though weirdly some runs
were 5-10% without being flagged as inconsistent by criterion, is there
some non-determinism involved?). It's possible that some of this is
unrelated, I'll try applying the patch to the current salsa version to
make sure.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Resolves#14840
## Summary
Usage of ellipsis literal as default argument is allowed in stub files.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest for both python files and stub files.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@oddbird.net>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Related to #13773
This PR adds support for unpacking `for` statement targets.
This involves updating the `value` field in the `Unpack` target to use
an enum which specifies the "where did the value expression came from?".
This is because for an iterable expression, we need to unpack the
iterator type while for assignment statement we need to unpack the value
type itself. And, this needs to be done in the unpack query.
### Question
One of the ways unpacking works in `for` statement is by looking at the
union of the types because if the iterable expression is a tuple then
the iterator type will be union of all the types in the tuple. This
means that the test cases that will test the unpacking in `for`
statement will also implicitly test the unpacking union logic. I was
wondering if it makes sense to merge these cases and only add the ones
that are specific to the union unpacking or for statement unpacking
logic.
## Test Plan
Add test cases involving iterating over a tuple type. I've intentionally
left out certain cases for now and I'm curious to know any thoughts on
the above query.
## Summary
This PR adds a new salsa query and an ingredient to resolve all the
variables involved in an unpacking assignment like `(a, b) = (1, 2)` at
once. Previously, we'd recursively try to match the correct type for
each definition individually which will result in creating duplicate
diagnostics.
This PR still doesn't solve the duplicate diagnostics issue because that
requires a different solution like using salsa accumulator or
de-duplicating the diagnostics manually.
Related: #13773
## Test Plan
Make sure that all unpack assignment test cases pass, there are no
panics in the corpus tests.
## Todo
- [x] Look at the performance regression
