## Summary
The `SequenceIndexVisitor` currently does not recurse into
subexpressions of subscripts when searching for subscript accesses that
would trigger this rule. That means that we don't currently detect
violations of the rule on snippets like this:
```py
data = {"a": 1, "b": 2}
column_names = ["a", "b"]
for index, column_name in enumerate(column_names):
_ = data[column_names[index]]
```
Fixes#13183
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter`
## Summary
Extends deletions for RUF100, deleting trailing text from noqa
directives, while preserving upcoming comments on the same line if any.
In cases where it deletes a comment up to another comment on the same
line, the whitespace between them is now shown to be in the autofix in
the diagnostic as well. Leading whitespace before the removed comment is
not, though.
Fixes#12251
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
As suggested by @MichaReiser in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12886#pullrequestreview-2237679793,
this adds an exemption to `RUF027` for `fastAPI` paths, which require
template strings rather than eagerly evaluated f-strings.
## Test Plan
I added a fixture that causes Ruff to emit a false-positive error on
`main` but no longer does with this PR.
This adds the `fast-api-unused-path-parameter` lint rule, as described
in #12632.
I'm still pretty new to rust, so the code can probably be improved, feel
free to tell me if there's any changes i should make.
Also, i needed to add the `add_parameter` edit function, not sure if it
was in the scope of the PR or if i should've made another one.
List and set comprehensions using `async for` cannot be replaced with
underlying generators; this PR modifies C419 to skip such
comprehensions.
Closes#12891.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug in the semantic model where it would evaluate the
default parameter value in the type parameter scope. For example,
```py
def foo[T1: int](a = T1):
pass
```
Here, the `T1` in `a = T1` is undefined but Ruff doesn't flag it
(https://play.ruff.rs/ba2f7c2f-4da6-417e-aa2a-104aa63e6d5e).
The fix here is to evaluate the default parameter value in the
_enclosing_ scope instead.
## Test Plan
Add a test case which includes the above code under `F821`
(`undefined-name`) and validate the snapshot.
In most cases we should suggest a ternary operator, but there are three
edge cases where a binary operator is more appropriate.
Given an if-else block of the form
```python
if test:
target_var = body_value
else:
target_var = else_value
```
This PR updates the check for SIM108 to the following:
- If `test == body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace with
`target_var = test or else_value`
- If `test == not body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace
with `target_var = body_value and else_value`
- If `not test == body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace
with `target_var = body_value and else_value`
- Otherwise, suggest to replace with `target_var = body_value if test
else else_value`
Closes#12189.
## Summary
Adding parentheses to a tuple in a subscript with elements that include
slice expressions causes a syntax error. For example, `d[(1,2,:)]` is a
syntax error.
So, when `lint.ruff.parenthesize-tuple-in-subscript = true` and the
tuple includes a slice expression, we skip this check and fix.
Closes#12766.
Implements the new fixable lint rule `RUF031` which checks for the use or omission of parentheses around tuples in subscripts, depending on the setting `lint.ruff.parenthesize-tuple-in-getitem`. By default, the use of parentheses is considered a violation.
