## Summary
This is just a small refactor to remove the `FormatFStringPart` as it's
only used in the case when the f-string is not implicitly concatenated
in which case the only part is going to be `FString`. In implicitly
concatenated f-strings, we use `StringLike` instead.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix#14525
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test cases
---------
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
Resolves#14289
The documentation for B028 no_explicit_stacklevel is updated to be more
clear.
---------
Co-authored-by: dylwil3 <dylwil3@gmail.com>
This PR adds a sometimes-available, safe autofix for [unraw-re-pattern
(RUF039)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/unraw-re-pattern/#unraw-re-pattern-ruf039),
which prepends an `r` prefix. It is used only when the string in
question has no backslahses (and also does not have a `u` prefix, since
that causes a syntax error.)
Closes#14527
Notes:
- Test fixture unchanged, but snapshot changed to include fix messages.
- This fix is automatically only available in preview since the rule
itself is in preview
## Summary
This fix addresses panics related to invalid syntax like the following
where a `break` statement is used in a nested definition inside a
loop:
```py
while True:
def b():
x: int
break
```
closes#14342
## Test Plan
* New corpus regression tests.
* New unit test to make sure we handle nested while loops correctly.
This test is passing on `main`, but can easily fail if the
`is_inside_loop` state isn't properly saved/restored.
## Summary
Add support for (non-generic) type aliases. The main motivation behind
this was to get rid of panics involving expressions in (generic) type
aliases. But it turned out the best way to fix it was to implement
(partial) support for type aliases.
```py
type IntOrStr = int | str
reveal_type(IntOrStr) # revealed: typing.TypeAliasType
reveal_type(IntOrStr.__name__) # revealed: Literal["IntOrStr"]
x: IntOrStr = 1
reveal_type(x) # revealed: Literal[1]
def f() -> None:
reveal_type(x) # revealed: int | str
```
## Test Plan
- Updated corpus test allow list to reflect that we don't panic anymore.
- Added Markdown-based test for type aliases (`type_alias.md`)
## Summary
Fixes a panic related to sub-expressions of `typing.Union` where we fail
to store a type for the `int, str` tuple-expression in code like this:
```
x: Union[int, str] = 1
```
relates to [my
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14499#discussion_r1851794467)
on #14499.
## Test Plan
New corpus test
## Summary
Adds meta information to `Type::Todo`, allowing developers to easily
trace back the origin of a particular `@Todo` type they encounter.
Instead of `Type::Todo`, we now write either `type_todo!()` which
creates a `@Todo[path/to/source.rs:123]` type with file and line
information, or using `type_todo!("PEP 604 unions not supported")`,
which creates a variant with a custom message.
`Type::Todo` now contains a `TodoType` field. In release mode, this is
just a zero-sized struct, in order not to create any overhead. In debug
mode, this is an `enum` that contains the meta information.
`Type` implements `Copy`, which means that `TodoType` also needs to be
copyable. This limits the design space. We could intern `TodoType`, but
I discarded this option, as it would require us to have access to the
salsa DB everywhere we want to use `Type::Todo`. And it would have made
the macro invocations less ergonomic (requiring us to pass `db`).
So for now, the meta information is simply a `&'static str` / `u32` for
the file/line variant, or a `&'static str` for the custom message.
Anything involving a chain/backtrace of several `@Todo`s or similar is
therefore currently not implemented. Also because we currently don't see
any direct use cases for this, and because all of this will eventually
go away.
Note that the size of `Type` increases from 16 to 24 bytes, but only in
debug mode.
## Test Plan
- Observed the changes in Markdown tests.
- Added custom messages for all `Type::Todo`s that were revealed in the
tests
- Ran red knot in release and debug mode on the following Python file:
```py
def f(x: int) -> int:
reveal_type(x)
```
Prints `@Todo` in release mode and `@Todo(function parameter type)` in
debug mode.
Fix#14498
## Summary
This PR adds `typing.Union` support
## Test Plan
I created new tests in mdtest.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
- Expand some docs where they're unclear about the motivation, or assume
some knowledge that hasn't been introduced yet
- Add more links to external docs
- Rename PYI063 from `PrePep570PositionalArgument` to
`Pep484StylePositionalOnlyParameter`
- Rename the file `parenthesize_logical_operators.rs` to
`parenthesize_chained_operators.rs`, since the rule is called
`ParenthesizeChainedOperators`, not `ParenthesizeLogicalOperators`
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
These rules were implemented in January, have been very stable, and have
no open issues about them. They were highly requested by the community
prior to being implemented. Let's stabilise them!
## Test Plan
Ecosystem check on this PR.
## Summary
closes#14279
### Limitations of the Current Implementation
#### Incorrect Error Propagation
In the current implementation of lexicographic comparisons, if the
result of an Eq operation is Ambiguous, the comparison stops
immediately, returning a bool instance. While this may yield correct
inferences, it fails to capture unsupported-operation errors that might
occur in subsequent comparisons.
```py
class A: ...
(int_instance(), A()) < (int_instance(), A()) # should error
```
#### Weak Inference in Specific Cases
> Example: `(int_instance(), "foo") == (int_instance(), "bar")`
> Current result: `bool`
> Expected result: `Literal[False]`
`Eq` and `NotEq` have unique behavior in lexicographic comparisons
compared to other operators. Specifically:
- For `Eq`, if any non-equal pair exists within the tuples being
compared, we can immediately conclude that the tuples are not equal.
- For `NotEq`, if any equal pair exists, we can conclude that the tuples
are unequal.
```py
a = (str_instance(), int_instance(), "foo")
reveal_type(a == a) # revealed: bool
reveal_type(a != a) # revealed: bool
b = (str_instance(), int_instance(), "bar")
reveal_type(a == b) # revealed: bool # should be Literal[False]
reveal_type(a != b) # revealed: bool # should be Literal[True]
```
#### Incorrect Support for Non-Boolean Rich Comparisons
In CPython, aside from `==` and `!=`, tuple comparisons return a
non-boolean result as-is. Tuples do not convert the value into `bool`.
Note: If all pairwise `==` comparisons between elements in the tuples
return Truthy, the comparison then considers the tuples' lengths.
Regardless of the return type of the dunder methods, the final result
can still be a boolean.
```py
from __future__ import annotations
class A:
def __eq__(self, o: object) -> str:
return "hello"
def __ne__(self, o: object) -> bytes:
return b"world"
def __lt__(self, o: A) -> float:
return 3.14
a = (A(), A())
reveal_type(a == a) # revealed: bool
reveal_type(a != a) # revealed: bool
reveal_type(a < a) # revealed: bool # should be: `float | Literal[False]`
```
### Key Changes
One of the major changes is that comparisons no longer end with a `bool`
result when a pairwise `Eq` result is `Ambiguous`. Instead, the function
attempts to infer all possible cases and unions the results. This
improvement allows for more robust type inference and better error
detection.
Additionally, as the function is now optimized for tuple comparisons,
the name has been changed from the more general
`infer_lexicographic_comparison` to `infer_tuple_rich_comparison`.
## Test Plan
mdtest included
## Summary
Previously, we panicked on expressions like `f"{v:{f'0.2f'}}"` because
we did not infer types for expressions nested inside format spec
elements.
## Test Plan
```
cargo nextest run -p red_knot_workspace -- --ignored linter_af linter_gz
```
## Summary
Add type narrowing for `type(x) is C` conditions (and `else` clauses of
`type(x) is not C` conditionals):
```py
if type(x) is A:
reveal_type(x) # revealed: A
else:
reveal_type(x) # revealed: A | B
```
closes: #14431, part of: #13694
## Test Plan
New Markdown-based tests.
