Commit graph

10398 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Waygood
296d67a496
Special-case value-expression inference of special form subscriptions (#16877)
## Summary

Currently for something like `X = typing.Tuple[str, str]`, we infer the
value of `X` as `object`. That's because `Tuple` (like many of the
symbols in the typing module) is annotated as a `_SpecialForm` instance
in typeshed's stubs:


23382f5f8c/crates/red_knot_vendored/vendor/typeshed/stdlib/typing.pyi (L215)

and we don't understand implicit type aliases yet, and the stub for
`_SpecialForm.__getitem__` says it always returns `object`:


23382f5f8c/crates/red_knot_vendored/vendor/typeshed/stdlib/typing.pyi (L198-L200)

We have existing false positives in our test suite due to this:


23382f5f8c/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/annotations/annotated.md (L76-L78)

and it's causing _many_ new false positives in #16872, which tries to
make our annotation-expression parsing stricter in some ways.

This PR therefore adds some small special casing for `KnownInstanceType`
variants that fallback to `_SpecialForm`, so that these false positives
can be avoided.

## Test Plan

Existing mdtest altered.

Cc. @MatthewMckee4
2025-03-20 21:46:02 +00:00
Brent Westbrook
42cbce538b
[syntax-errors] Fix star annotation before Python 3.11 (#16878)
Summary
--

Fixes #16874. I previously emitted a syntax error when starred
annotations were _allowed_ rather than when they were actually used.
This caused false positives for any starred parameter name because these
are allowed to have starred annotations but not required to. The fix is
to check if the annotation is actually starred after parsing it.

Test Plan
--

New inline parser tests derived from the initial report and more
examples from the comments, although I think the first case should cover
them all.
2025-03-20 17:44:52 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
67602512b6
Recognize SyntaxError: as an error code for ecosystem checks (#16879)
Summary
--

This updates the regex in `ruff-ecosystem` to catch syntax errors in an
effort to prevent bugs like #16874. This should catch `ParseError`s,
`UnsupportedSyntaxError`s, and the upcoming `SemanticSyntaxError`s.

Test Plan
--

I ran the ecosystem check locally comparing v0.11.0 and v0.11.1 and saw
a large number (2757!) of new syntax errors. I also manually tested the
regex on a few lines before that.

If we merge this before #16878, I'd expect to see that number decrease
substantially in that PR too, as another test.
2025-03-20 17:25:40 -04:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
23382f5f8c
[red-knot] add test cases result in false positive errors (#16856)
Some checks are pending
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
[Knot Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
## Summary

From #16641

The previous PR attempted to fix the errors presented in this PR, but as
discussed in the conversation, it was concluded that the approach was
undesirable and that further work would be needed to fix the errors with
a correct general solution.

In this PR, I instead add the test cases from the previous PR as TODOs,
as a starting point for future work.

## Test Plan

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@oddbird.net>
2025-03-20 17:17:54 +00:00
Dylan
c1971fdde2
Bump 0.11.1 (#16871) 2025-03-20 09:50:46 -05:00
Matthew Mckee
cdafd8e32b
Allow discovery of venv in VIRTUAL_ENV env variable (#16853)
## Summary

Fixes #16744 

Allows the cli to find a virtual environment from the VIRTUAL_ENV
environment variable if no `--python` is set

## Test Plan

Manual testing, of:
- Virtual environments explicitly activated using `source .venv/bin/activate`
- Virtual environments implicilty activated via `uv run`
- Broken virtual environments with no `pyvenv.cfg` file
2025-03-20 13:55:35 +00:00
Zanie Blue
12725943cd
Split git pathspecs in change determination onto separate lines (#16869) 2025-03-20 14:54:56 +01:00
Zanie Blue
9d72685f8d
Use the correct base commit for change determination (#16857)
`base.sha` appears to be the commit of the base branch when the pull
request was opened, not the base commit that's used to construct the
test merge commit — which can lead to incorrect "determine changes"
results where commits made to the base ref since the pull request are
opened are included in the results.

We use `git merge-base` to find the correct sha, as I don't think that
GitHub provides this. They provide `merge_commit_sha` but my
understanding is that is equivalent to the actual merge commit we're
testing in CI.

I tested this locally on an example pull request. I don't think it's
worth trying to reproduce a specific situation here.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
2025-03-20 08:03:03 -05:00
Junhson Jean-Baptiste
47c4ccff5d
Separate BitXorOr into BitXor and BitOr precedence (#16844)
## Summary

This change follows up on the bug-fix requested in #16747 --
`ruff_python_ast::OperatorPrecedence` had an enum variant, `BitXorOr`,
which which gave the same precedence to the `|` and `^` operators. This
goes against [Python's documentation for operator
precedence](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#operator-precedence),
so this PR changes the code so that it's correct.

This is part of the overall effort to unify redundant definitions of
`OperatorPrecedence` throughout the codebase (#16071)

## Test Plan

Because this is an internal change, I only ran existing tests to ensure
nothing was broken.
2025-03-20 16:13:47 +05:30
Dylan
74f64d3f96
Server: Allow FixAll action in presence of version-specific syntax errors (#16848)
The single flag `has_syntax_error` on `LinterResult` is replaced with
two (private) flags: `has_valid_syntax` and
`has_no_unsupported_syntax_errors`, which record whether there are
`ParseError`s or `UnsupportedSyntaxError`s, respectively. Only the
former is used to prevent a `FixAll` action.

An attempt has been made to make consistent the usage of the phrases
"valid syntax" (which seems to be used to refer only to _parser_ errors)
and "syntax error" (which refers to both _parser_ errors and
version-specific syntax errors).

Closes #16841
2025-03-20 05:09:14 -05:00
Vasco Schiavo
999fd4f885
[refurb] Fix starred expressions fix (FURB161) (#16550)
Some checks are pending
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
The PR partially solves issue #16457

Specifically, it solves the following problem:

```text
$ cat >furb161_1.py <<'# EOF'
print(bin(*[123]).count("1"))
# EOF

$ python furb161_1.py
6

$ ruff --isolated check --target-version py310 --preview --select FURB161 furb161_1.py --diff 2>&1 | grep error:
error: Fix introduced a syntax error. Reverting all changes.
```

Now starred expressions are corrected handled.
2025-03-19 17:43:58 -04:00
Dylan
433a342656
[flake8-executable] Add pytest and uv run to help message for shebang-missing-python (EXE003) (#16855)
Followup to #16849 per
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16849#issuecomment-2737316564
2025-03-19 13:12:32 -05:00
Matthew Mckee
4ed93b4311
Show more precise messages in invalid type expressions (#16850)
Some checks are pending
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
[Knot Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
## Summary

Some error messages were not very specific; this PR improves them

## Test Plan

New mdtests added; existing mdtests tweaked
2025-03-19 17:00:30 +00:00
Dylan
98fdc0ebae
[flake8-executables] Allow uv run in shebang line for shebang-missing-python (EXE003) (#16849)
Skip the lint for [shebang-missing-python
(EXE003)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/shebang-missing-python/#shebang-missing-python-exe003)
if we find `uv run` on the shebang line.

Closes #13021
2025-03-19 10:35:07 -05:00
Josh Cannon
861931795c
Add --exit-non-zero-on-format (#16009)
## Summary

Fixes #8191 by introducing `--exit-non-zero-on-format` to `ruff format`
which pretty much does what it says on the tin.

## Test Plan

Added a new test!

---------

Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
2025-03-19 10:55:05 -04:00
Alex Waygood
a3f3d734a1
[red-knot] Ban list literals in most contexts in type expressions (#16847)
## Summary

This PR reworks `TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_type_expression()` so that
we emit diagnostics when encountering a list literal in a type
expression. The only place where a list literal is allowed in a type
expression is if it appears as the first argument to `Callable[]`, and
`Callable` is already heavily special-cased in our type-expression
parsing.

In order to ensure that list literals are _always_ allowed as the
_first_ argument to `Callabler` (but never allowed as the second, third,
etc. argument), I had to do some refactoring of our type-expression
parsing for `Callable` annotations.

## Test Plan

New mdtests added, and existing ones updated
2025-03-19 14:42:42 +00:00
Matthew Mckee
3a5f1d46c0
[red-knot] Make' Type::in_type_expression()' exhaustive for Type::KnownInstance (#16836)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

fixes #15048 
We want to handle more types from Type::KnownInstance 

## Test Plan

Add tests for each type added explicitly in the match

---------

Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
2025-03-19 07:36:28 -07:00
Alex Waygood
f3f3e55d97
[red-knot] Minor cleanup to infer_parameterized_known_instance_type_expression (#16846)
## Summary

These are just cosmetic changes, but I'm separating them out into a
standalone PR to make a branch I have stacked on top of this easier to
review

## Test Plan

Existing tests all pass
2025-03-19 14:19:13 +00:00
Brent Westbrook
22de00de16 [internal] Return Messages from check_path (#16837)
Summary
--

This PR updates `check_path` in the `ruff_linter` crate to return a
`Vec<Message>` instead of a `Vec<Diagnostic>`. The main motivation for
this is to make it easier to convert semantic syntax errors directly
into `Message`s rather than `Diagnostic`s in #16106. However, this also
has the benefit of keeping the preview check on unsupported syntax
errors in `check_path`, as suggested in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16429#discussion_r1974748024.

All of the interesting changes are in the first commit. The second
commit just renames variables like `diagnostics` to `messages`, and the
third commit is a tiny import fix.

I also updated the `ExpandedMessage::location` field name, which caused
a few extra commits tidying up the playground code. I thought it was
nicely symmetric with `end_location`, but I'm happy to revert that too.

Test Plan
--

Existing tests. I also tested the playground and server manually.
2025-03-19 10:08:07 -04:00
Dhruv Manilawala
f2a9960fb3
Use the Depot Ubuntu runners instead of GitHub for release workflows (#16843)
## Summary

This is same as https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/11948 and is to
prep for the upcoming Ruff release.
2025-03-19 12:42:13 +00:00
Dhruv Manilawala
fd341bb1b2
Allow dirty files in cargo-dist for action pins (#16842)
## Summary

This is same as https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12252 and is to
prepare for the upcoming Ruff release.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/axodotdev/cargo-dist/issues/1800
2025-03-19 18:06:53 +05:30
InSync
15a6aeb998
[red-knot] Add missing space between error message and lint code in playground (#16840) 2025-03-19 11:10:59 +01:00
Micha Reiser
81759be14b
[playground] Avoid concurrent deployments (#16834)
Some checks are pending
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
[Knot Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
## Summary

Cancel in-flight deployments when queuing a new deployment.
2025-03-18 17:24:16 +00:00
Dhruv Manilawala
a69f6240cc
[red-knot] Infer lambda return type as Unknown (#16695)
## Summary

Part of #15382

This PR infers the return type `lambda` expression as `Unknown`. In the
future, it would be more useful to infer the expression type considering
the surrounding context (#16696).

## Test Plan

Update existing test cases from `@todo` to the (verified) return type.
2025-03-18 22:48:10 +05:30
Dhruv Manilawala
c3d429ddd8
[red-knot] Move name field on parameter kind (#16830)
## Summary

Previously, the `name` field was on `Parameter` which required it to be
always optional regardless of the parameter kind because a
`typing.Callable` signature does not have name for the parameters. This
is the case for positional-only parameters. This wasn't enforced at the
type level which meant that downstream usages would have to unwrap on
`name` even though it's guaranteed to be present.

This commit moves the `name` field from `Parameter` to the
`ParameterKind` variants and makes it optional only for
`ParameterKind::PositionalOnly` variant while required for all other
variants.

One change that's now required is that a `Callable` form using a gradual
form for parameter types (`...`) would have a default `args` and
`kwargs` name used for variadic and keyword-variadic parameter kind
respectively. This is also the case for invalid `Callable` type forms. I
think this is fine as names are not relevant in this context but happy
to make it optional even in variadic variants.

## Test Plan

No new tests; make sure existing tests are passing.
2025-03-18 22:47:44 +05:30
Matthew Mckee
ab3ec4de6a
[red-knot] Emit errors for more AST nodes that are invalid (or only valid in specific contexts) in type expressions (#16822)
## Summary

Add error messages for invalid nodes in type expressions

Fixes #16816 

## Test Plan

Extend annotations/invalid.md to handle these invalid AST nodes error
messages
2025-03-18 17:16:50 +00:00
Micha Reiser
a9f5dddbaa
[playground] Use cursor for clickable elements (#16833)
Some checks are pending
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
[Knot Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
2025-03-18 18:06:00 +01:00
Micha Reiser
cc3ddaf070
[red-knot] Deploy playground on main (#16832)
## Summary

Automatically deploy the Red Knot playground for every commit to main
(because we're moving fast ;)).

## Test Plan
2025-03-18 17:40:30 +01:00
Micha Reiser
c027979851
Red Knot Playground (#12681)
## Summary

This PR adds a playground for Red Knot

[Screencast from 2024-08-14
10-33-54.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae81d85f-74a3-4ba6-bb61-4a871b622f05)

Sharing does work 😆 I just forgot to start wrangler. 


It supports:

* Multiple files
* Showing the AST
* Showing the tokens
* Sharing
* Persistence to local storage

Future extensions:

* Configuration support: The `pyproject.toml` would *just* be another
file.
* Showing type information on hover

## Blockers

~~Salsa uses `catch_unwind` to break cycles, which Red Knot uses
extensively when inferring types in the standard library.
However, WASM (at least `wasm32-unknown-unknown`) doesn't support
`catch_unwind` today, so the playground always crashes when the type
inference encounters a cycle.~~

~~I created a discussion in the [salsa
zulip](https://salsa.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/333573-salsa-3.2E0/topic/WASM.20support)
to see if it would be possible to **not** use catch unwind to break
cycles.~~

~~[Rust tracking issue for WASM catch unwind
support](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118168)~~

~~I tried to build the WASM with the nightly compiler option but ran
into problems because wasm-bindgen doesn't support WASM-exceptions. We
could try to write the binding code by hand.~~

~~Another alternative is to use `wasm32-unknown-emscripten` but it's
rather painful to build~~
2025-03-18 17:17:11 +01:00
Brent Westbrook
dcf31c9348
[syntax-errors] PEP 701 f-strings before Python 3.12 (#16543)
## Summary

This PR detects the use of PEP 701 f-strings before 3.12. This one
sounded difficult and ended up being pretty easy, so I think there's a
good chance I've over-simplified things. However, from experimenting in
the Python REPL and checking with [pyright], I think this is correct.
pyright actually doesn't even flag the comment case, but Python does.

I also checked pyright's implementation for
[quotes](98dc4469cc/packages/pyright-internal/src/analyzer/checker.ts (L1379-L1398))
and
[escapes](98dc4469cc/packages/pyright-internal/src/analyzer/checker.ts (L1365-L1377))
and think I've approximated how they do it.

Python's error messages also point to the simple approach of these
characters simply not being allowed:

```pycon
Python 3.11.11 (main, Feb 12 2025, 14:51:05) [Clang 19.1.6 ] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> f'''multiline {
... expression # comment
... }'''
  File "<stdin>", line 3
    }'''
        ^
SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include '#'
>>> f'''{not a line \
... continuation}'''
  File "<stdin>", line 2
    continuation}'''
                    ^
SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash
>>> f'hello {'world'}'
  File "<stdin>", line 1
    f'hello {'world'}'
              ^^^^^
SyntaxError: f-string: expecting '}'
```

And since escapes aren't allowed, I don't think there are any tricky
cases where nested quotes or comments can sneak in.

It's also slightly annoying that the error is repeated for every nested
quote character, but that also mirrors pyright, although they highlight
the whole nested string, which is a little nicer. However, their check
is in the analysis phase, so I don't think we have such easy access to
the quoted range, at least without adding another mini visitor.

## Test Plan

New inline tests

[pyright]:
https://pyright-play.net/?pythonVersion=3.11&strict=true&code=EYQw5gBAvBAmCWBjALgCgO4gHaygRgEoAoEaCAIgBpyiiBiCLAUwGdknYIBHAVwHt2LIgDMA5AFlwSCJhwAuCAG8IoMAG1Rs2KIC6EAL6iIxosbPmLlq5foRWiEAAcmERAAsQAJxAomnltY2wuSKogA6WKIAdABWfPBYqCAE%2BuSBVqbpWVm2iHwAtvlMWMgB2ekiolUAgq4FjgA2TAAeEMieSADWCsoV5qoaqrrGDJ5MiDz%2B8ABuLqosAIREhlXlaybrmyYMXsDw7V4AnoysyAmQ5SIhwYo3d9cheADUeKlv5O%2BpQA
2025-03-18 11:12:15 -04:00
cake-monotone
4ab529803f
[red-knot] Refactor property_tests.rs into property_tests module structure (#16827)
## Summary

For now, `property_tests.rs` has grown larger and larger, making the
file difficult to read and maintain.

Although the code has been split, the test paths and full names remain
unchanged. There are no changes affecting test execution.
2025-03-18 12:59:14 +00:00
Alex Waygood
23b7df9b29
[red-knot] Simplify IterationError and ContextManagerError (#16820)
## Summary

This PR simplifies `IterationError` and `ContextManagerError` so that
they no longer "remember" what type it was that was (respectively) not
iterable or not valid as a context manager. Instead, the type that was
iterated over (or was used as a context manager) is passed back in when
calling the error struct's `report_diagnostic` method.

The motivations for this are:
- It significantly simplifies the code
- It reduces the size of these types on the stack

## Test Plan

`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic`
2025-03-18 11:30:41 +00:00
cake-monotone
3e2cf5d7c4
[red-knot] Improve property test performance by cloning db instead of holding MutexGuard (#16823)
Some checks are pending
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
## Summary

This PR brings an optimization.

- `get_cached_db` no longer returns a `MutexGuard`; instead, it returns
a cloned database.

### `get_cached_db`

Previously, the `MutexGuard` was held inside the property test function
(defined in the macro), which prevented multiple property tests from
running in parallel. More specifically, the program could only test one
random test case at a time, which likely caused a significant
bottleneck.

On my local machine, running:

```
QUICKCHECK_TESTS=100000 cargo test --release -p red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored stable
```

showed about **a 75% speedup** (from \~60s to \~15s).
2025-03-18 09:09:57 +01:00
Micha Reiser
c9cd0acaeb
[playground] Upgrade dependencies (#16825) 2025-03-18 09:07:34 +01:00
Micha Reiser
ded9c69888
[playground] Extract shared components (#16819)
## Summary
Extract components that can be shared with the Red Knot playground.

## Test Plan

`npm start`
2025-03-18 08:43:47 +01:00
Peter Hill
433879d852
[ruff] Fix --statistics reporting for unsafe fixes (#16756)
Fixes #16751

## Summary

Previously, unsafe fixes were counted as "fixable" in
`Printer::write_statistics`, in contrast to the behaviour in
`Printer::write_once`. This changes the behaviour to align with
`write_once`, including them only if `--unsafe-fixes` is set.

We now also reuse `Printer::write_summary` to avoid duplicating the
logic for whether or not to report if there are hidden fixes.

## Test Plan

Existing tests modified to use an unsafe-fixable rule, and new ones
added to cover the case with `--unsafe-fixes`
2025-03-18 08:03:14 +01:00
Kaxil Naik
b7d232cf89
[airflow] Add chain, chain_linear and cross_downstream for AIR302 (#16647)
## Summary

Similar to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16014. PR on Airflow
side: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47639

## Test Plan

A test fixture has been updated
2025-03-18 11:08:45 +05:30
Charlie Marsh
4d3a5afea5
Update Ruff tutorial to avoid non-existent fix in __init__.py (#16818)
## Summary

There were some other stale references too.

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16805.
2025-03-17 23:45:12 -04:00
Micha Reiser
90a8d92b2f
[refactor] Convert playground to an NPM workspace (#16806)
Some checks are pending
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
## Summary

This is prep-work for the Red Knot playground. We'll have two
playgrounds, one for Red Knot and Ruff.
I want to share some components between the two, a "shared" NPM package
in a local workspace is a great fit for that.
I also want to share the dev dependencies and dev scripts. Again, NPM
workspaces are great for that.

This PR also sets up a CI workflow for the playground to prevent
surprises during the release.

## Test Plan

CI, local `npm install`, `npm start`, ...

I verified that the new CI step fails if there's a typescript or
formatting error.

* [Deployment test
run](3890552435)
2025-03-17 17:56:45 +01:00
Micha Reiser
c8bd5eeb56
[ci] Remove MichaReiser as red_knot_python_semantic code owner (#16817) 2025-03-17 17:56:33 +01:00
Andrew Gallant
bd9eab059f red_knot: update diagnostic output snapshots
These should all be minor cosmetic changes. To summarize:

* In many cases, `-` was replaced with `^` for primary annotations.
This is because, previously, whether `-` or `^` was used depended
on the severity. But in the new data model, it's based on whether
the annotation is "primary" or not. We could of course change this
in whatever way we want, but I think we should roll with this for now.

* The "secondary messages" in the old API are rendered as
sub-diagnostics. This in turn results in a small change in the output
format, since previously, the secondary messages were represented as
just another snippet. We use sub-diagnostics because that's the intended
way to enforce relative ordering between messages within a diagnostic.

* The "info:" prefix used in some annotation messages has been dropped.
We could re-add this, but I think I like it better without this prefix.

I believe those 3 cover all of the snapshot changes here.
2025-03-17 12:46:49 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
6883c1dde7 ruff_db: delete old diagnostic renderer
... and switch to the new one.

We do this switch by converting the old diagnostics to a
`Diagnostic`, and then rendering that.

This does not quite emit identical output. There are some
changes. They *could* be fixed to remain the same, but the
changes aren't obviously worse to me and I think the right
way to *improve* them is to move Red Knot to the new `Diagnostic`
API.

The next commit will have the snapshot changes.
2025-03-17 12:46:49 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
9291074ba6 ruff_db: tweak main diagnostic message
In our existing diagnostics, our message is just the diagnostic
ID, and the message goes to the annotation. In reality, the
diagnostic can have its own message distinct from the optional
messages associated with an annotation.

In order to make the outputs match, we do a small tweak here:
when the main diagnostic message is empty, we drop the colon
after the diagnostic ID.

I expect that we'll want to rejigger this output format more
in the future, but for now this was a very simple change to
preserve the status quo.
2025-03-17 12:46:49 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
602a27c4e3 ruff_db: tweak number of line terminators emitted in new diagnostic renderer
When moving over to the new renderer, I noticed that it
was emitting an extra line terminator compared to the status
quo. This removes it by turning the line terminator into a
line delimiter between diagnostics.
2025-03-17 12:46:49 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
ff548b1272 ruff_db: clarify the error conditions of Diagnostic::print 2025-03-17 12:46:49 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
7512a71bbb github: include /.github/ in ripgrep searches by default
Some checks are pending
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
Previously, unless you had some other configuration that impacts
ripgrep, `rg -tyaml uses:` would return zero results. After this
changes, it returns more of what you might expect.

This is because ripgrep ignores hidden files and directories by default.
But arguably, searching `.github` by default is probably what we want.

I do the same thing in ripgrep's repository:
de4baa1002/.ignore (L1)
2025-03-17 12:37:57 -04:00
renovate[bot]
7ca5f132ca
Update pre-commit dependencies (#16813) 2025-03-17 15:37:14 +00:00
Douglas Creager
743f85f1a4
Add dcreager as red-knot CODEOWNER (#16807)
So that I can keep track of (and start help reviewing) red-knot PRs more
easily
2025-03-17 10:48:20 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
b2e0ae6416
[flake8-gettext] Swap format- and printf-in-get-text-func-call examples (INT002, INT003) (#16769)
Summary
--
Fixes #16735. I also checked `INT001`, and it correctly has an f-string
example.

Test Plan
--
None
2025-03-17 14:37:38 +00:00
Douglas Creager
23ccb52fa6
[red-knot] Handle unions of callables better (#16716)
This cleans up how we handle calling unions of types. #16568 adding a
three-level structure for callable signatures (`Signatures`,
`CallableSignature`, and `Signature`) to handle unions and overloads.

This PR updates the bindings side to mimic that structure. What used to
be called `CallOutcome` is now `Bindings`, and represents the result of
binding actual arguments against a possible union of callables.
`CallableBinding` is the result of binding a single, possibly
overloaded, callable type. `Binding` is the result of binding a single
overload.

While we're here, this also cleans up `CallError` greatly. It was
previously extracting error information from the bindings and storing it
in the error result. It is now a simple enum, carrying no data, that's
used as a status code to talk about whether the overall binding was
successful or not. We are now more consistent about walking the binding
itself to get detailed information about _how_ the binding was
unsucessful.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-17 10:35:52 -04:00