## Summary
This adds a fix for the `duplicate-bases` rule that removes the
duplicate base from the class definition.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run duplicate_bases`, `cargo insta review`.
## Summary
These are now `post-announce-jobs`. So if they fail, the release itself
will still succeed, which seems ok. (If we make them `publish-jobs`,
then we might end up publishing to PyPI but failing the release itself
if one of these fails.)
The intent is that these are still runnable via `workflow_dispatch` too.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12074.
## Summary
This PR updates the playground to show syntax errors.
(I forgot to update this and noticed it this morning.)
## Test Plan
Build the playground locally and preview it:
<img width="764" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-28 at 11 03 35"
src="1fd48d6c-ae41-4672-bf3c-32a61d9946ef">
## Summary
This PR removes the need to check for `E999` code to find the diagnostic
severity in the server.
**Note:** This is just removing a redundant check because all
`ParseErrors` are converted to `Diagnostic` with default `Error`
severity by
63c92586a1/crates/ruff_server/src/lint.rs (L309-L346)
## Test Plan
Verify that syntax errors are still shown with error severity as it did
before:
<img width="1313" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-28 at 09 30 20"
src="75e389a7-01ea-461c-86a2-0dfc244e515d">
## Summary
`ruff server` has reached a point of stabilization, and `--preview` is
no longer required as a flag.
`--preview` is still supported as a flag, since future features may be
need to gated behind it initially.
## Test Plan
A simple way to test this is to run `ruff server` from the command line.
No error about a missing `--preview` argument should be reported.
## Summary
Follow-up from #11901
This PR adds a new server setting to show / hide syntax errors.
## Test Plan
### VS Code
Using https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/504 with the
following config:
```json
{
"ruff.nativeServer": true,
"ruff.path": ["/Users/dhruv/work/astral/ruff/target/debug/ruff"],
"ruff.showSyntaxErrors": true
}
```
First, set `ruff.showSyntaxErrors` to `true`:
<img width="1177" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 08 34 58"
src="5d77547a-a908-4a00-8714-7c00784e8679">
And then set it to `false`:
<img width="1185" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 08 35 19"
src="9720f089-f10c-420b-a2c1-2bbb2245be35">
### Neovim
Using the following Ruff server config:
```lua
require('lspconfig').ruff.setup {
init_options = {
settings = {
showSyntaxErrors = false,
},
},
}
```
First, set `showSyntaxErrors` to `true`:
<img width="1279" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 08 28 03"
src="e694e231-91ba-47f8-8e8a-ad2e82b85a45">
And then set it to `false`:
<img width="1284" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 08 28 20"
src="25b86a57-02b1-44f7-9f65-cf5fdde93b0c">
## Summary
Follow-up to #11902
This PR simplifies the `LinterResult` struct by avoiding the generic and
not store the `ParseError`.
This is possible because the callers already have access to the
`ParseError` via the `Parsed` output. This also means that we can
simplify the return type of `check_path` and avoid the generic `T` on
`LinterResult`.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
Follow-up to #11901
This PR avoids displaying the syntax errors as log message now that the
`E999` diagnostic cannot be disabled.
For context on why this was added, refer to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/2505. Basically, we would allow
ignoring the syntax error diagnostic because certain syntax feature
weren't supported back then like `match` statement. And, if a user
ignored `E999`, Ruff would give no feedback if the source code contained
any syntax error. So, this log message was a way to indicate to the user
even if `E999` was disabled.
The current state of the parser is such that (a) it matches with the
latest grammar and (b) it's easy to add support for any new syntax.
**Note:** This PR doesn't remove the `DisplayParseError` struct because
it's still being used by the formatter.
## Test Plan
Update existing snapshots from the integration tests.
## Summary
This PR updates the way syntax errors are handled throughout the linter.
The main change is that it's now not considered as a rule which involves
the following changes:
* Update `Message` to be an enum with two variants - one for diagnostic
message and the other for syntax error message
* Provide methods on the new message enum to query information required
by downstream usages
This means that the syntax errors cannot be hidden / disabled via any
disablement methods. These are:
1. Configuration via `select`, `ignore`, `per-file-ignores`, and their
`extend-*` variants
```console
$ cargo run -- check ~/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py --extend-select=E999
--no-preview --no-cache
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.10s
Running `target/debug/ruff check /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py
--extend-select=E999 --no-preview --no-cache`
warning: Rule `E999` is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release. Syntax errors will always be shown regardless of whether this
rule is selected or not.
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py:1:8: F401 [*] `abc` imported but
unused
|
1 | import abc
| ^^^ F401
2 | from pathlib import Path
3 | import os
|
= help: Remove unused import: `abc`
```
3. Command-line flags via `--select`, `--ignore`, `--per-file-ignores`,
and their `--extend-*` variants
```console
$ cargo run -- check ~/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py --no-cache
--config=~/playground/ruff/pyproject.toml
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.11s
Running `target/debug/ruff check /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py
--no-cache --config=/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/pyproject.toml`
warning: Rule `E999` is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release. Syntax errors will always be shown regardless of whether this
rule is selected or not.
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py:1:8: F401 [*] `abc` imported but
unused
|
1 | import abc
| ^^^ F401
2 | from pathlib import Path
3 | import os
|
= help: Remove unused import: `abc`
```
This also means that the **output format** needs to be updated:
1. The `code`, `noqa_row`, `url` fields in the JSON output is optional
(`null` for syntax errors)
2. Other formats are changed accordingly
For each format, a new test case specific to syntax errors have been
added. Please refer to the snapshot output for the exact format for
syntax error message.
The output of the `--statistics` flag will have a blank entry for syntax
errors:
```
315 F821 [ ] undefined-name
119 [ ] syntax-error
103 F811 [ ] redefined-while-unused
```
The **language server** is updated to consider the syntax errors by
convert them into LSP diagnostic format separately.
### Preview
There are no quick fixes provided to disable syntax errors. This will
automatically work for `ruff-lsp` because the `noqa_row` field will be
`null` in that case.
<img width="772" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 14 57 08"
src="aaac827e-4777-4ac8-8c68-eaf9f2c36774">
Even with `noqa` comment, the syntax error is displayed:
<img width="763" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 14 59 51"
src="ba1afb68-7eaf-4b44-91af-6d93246475e2">
Rule documentation page:
<img width="1371" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 16 48 07"
src="524f01df-d91f-4ac0-86cc-40e76b318b24">
## Test Plan
- [x] Disablement methods via config shows a warning
- [x] `select`, `extend-select`
- [ ] ~`ignore`~ _doesn't show any message_
- [ ] ~`per-file-ignores`, `extend-per-file-ignores`~ _doesn't show any
message_
- [x] Disablement methods via command-line flag shows a warning
- [x] `--select`, `--extend-select`
- [ ] ~`--ignore`~ _doesn't show any message_
- [ ] ~`--per-file-ignores`, `--extend-per-file-ignores`~ _doesn't show
any message_
- [x] File with syntax errors should exit with code 1
- [x] Language server
- [x] Should show diagnostics for syntax errors
- [x] Should not recommend a quick fix edit for adding `noqa` comment
- [x] Same for `ruff-lsp`
resolves: #8447
The motivation for this rule is solid; it's been in preview for a long
time; the implementation and tests seem sound; there are no open issues
regarding it, and as far as I can tell there never have been any.
The only issue I see is that the docs don't really describe the rule
accurately right now; I fix that in this PR.
## Summary
This PR migrates our release workflow to
[`cargo-dist`](https://github.com/axodotdev/cargo-dist). The primary
motivation here is that we want to ship dedicated installers for Ruff
that work across platforms, and `cargo-dist` gives us those installers
out-of-the-box. The secondary motivation is that `cargo-dist` formalizes
some of the patterns that we've built up over time in our own release
process.
At a high level:
- The `release.yml` file is generated by `cargo-dist` with `cargo dist
generate`. It doesn't contain any modifications vis-a-vis the generated
file. (If it's edited out of band from generation, the release fails.)
- Our customizations are inserted as custom steps within the
`cargo-dist` workflow. Specifically, `build-binaries` builds the wheels
and packages them into binaries (as on `main`), while `build-docker.yml`
builds the Docker image. `publish-pypi.yml` publishes the wheels to
PyPI. This is effectively our `release.yaml` (on `main`), broken down
into individual workflows rather than steps within a single workflow.
### Changes from `main`
The workflow is _nearly_ unchanged. We kick off a release manually via
the GitHub Action by providing a tag. If the tag doesn't match the
`Cargo.toml`, the release fails. If the tag matches an already-existing
release, the release fails.
The release proceeds by (in order):
0. Doing some upfront validation via `cargo-dist`.
1. Creating the wheels and archives.
2. Building and pushing the Docker image.
3. Publishing to PyPI (if it's not a "dry run").
4. Creating the GitHub Release (if it's not a "dry run").
5. Notifying `ruff-pre-commit` (if it's not a "dry run").
There are a few changes in the workflow as compared to `main`:
- **We no longer validate the SHA** (just the tag). It's not an input to
the job. The Axo team is considering whether / how to support this.
- **Releases are now published directly** (rather than as draft). Again,
the Axo team is considering whether / how to support this. The downside
of drafts is that the URLs aren't stable, so the installers don't work
_as long as the release is in draft_. This is fine for our workflow. It
seems like the Axo team will add it.
- Releases already contain the latest entry from the changelog (we don't
need to copy it over). This "Just Works", which is nice, though we'll
still want to edit them to add contributors.
There are also a few **breaking changes** for consumers of the binaries:
- **We no longer include the version tag in the file name**. This
enables users to install via `/latest` URLs on GitHub, and is part of
the cargo-dist paradigm.
- **Archives now include an extra level of nesting,** which you can
remove with `--strip-components=1` when untarring.
Here's an example release that I created -- I omitted all the artifacts
since I was just testing a workflow, so none of the installers or links
work, but it gives you a sense for what the release looks like:
https://github.com/charliermarsh/cargodisttest/releases/tag/0.1.13.
### Test Plan
I ran a successful release to completion last night, and installed Ruff
via the installer:
The piece I'm least confident about is the Docker push. We build the
image, but the push fails in my test repo since I haven't wired up the
credentials.
## Summary
This rule removes `PLR1701` and redirects it to `SIM101`.
In addition to that, the `SIM101` autofix has been fixed to add padding
if required.
### `PLR1701` has bugs
It also seems that the implementation of `PLR1701` is incorrect in
multiple scenarios. For example, the following code snippet:
```py
# There are two _different_ variables `a` and `b`
if isinstance(a, int) or isinstance(b, bool) or isinstance(a, float):
pass
# There's another condition `or 1`
if isinstance(self.k, int) or isinstance(self.k, float) or 1:
pass
```
is fixed to:
```py
# Fixed to only considering variable `a`
if isinstance(a, (float, int)):
pass
# The additional condition is not present in the fix
if isinstance(self.k, (float, int)):
pass
```
Playground: https://play.ruff.rs/6cfbdfb7-f183-43b0-b59e-31e728b34190
## Documentation Preview
### `PLR1701`
<img width="1397" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 11 14 40"
src="779ee84d-7c4d-4bb8-a3a4-c2b23a313eba">
## Test Plan
Remove the test cases for `PLR1701`, port the padding test case to
`SIM101` and update the snapshot.
