## Summary
This PR updates the formatter and linter to use the `PythonVersion`
struct from the `ruff_python_ast` crate internally. While this doesn't
remove the need for the `linter::PythonVersion` enum, it does remove the
`formatter::PythonVersion` enum and limits the use in the linter to
deserializing from CLI arguments and config files and moves most of the
remaining methods to the `ast::PythonVersion` struct.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, with some inputs and outputs updated to reflect the new
(de)serialization format. I think these are test-specific and shouldn't
affect any external (de)serialization.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR moves the `PythonVersion` struct from the
`red_knot_python_semantic` crate to the `ruff_python_ast` crate so that
it can be used more easily in the syntax error detection work. Compared
to that [prototype](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090/) these
changes reduce us from 2 `PythonVersion` structs to 1.
This does not unify any of the `PythonVersion` *enums*, but I hope to
make some progress on that in a follow-up.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, this should not change any external behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Add support for the `project.requires-python` field in `pyproject.toml`
files.
Fall back to the resolved lower bound of `project.requires-python` if
the `environment.python-version` field is `None` (or more accurately,
initialize `environment.python-version with `requires-python`'s lower
bound if left unspecified).
## UX design
There are two options on how we can handle the fallback to
`requires-python`'s lower bound:
1. Store the resolved lower bound in `environment.python-version` if
that field is `None` (Implemented in this PR)
2. Store the `requires-python` constraint separately.
There's no observed difference unless a user-level configuration (or any
other inherited configuration is used). Let's discuss it on the given
example
**User configuration**
```toml
[environment]
python-version = "3.10"
```
**Project configuration (`pyproject.toml`)**
```toml
[project]
name = "test"
requires-python = ">= 3.12"
[tool.knot]
# No environment table
```
The resolved version for 1. is 3.12 because the `requires-python`
constraint precedence takes precedence over the `python-version` in the
user configuration. 2. resolves to 3.10 because all `python-version`
constraints take precedence before falling back to `requires-python`.
Ruff implements 1. It's also the easier to implement and it does seem
intuitive to me that the more local `requires-python` constraint takes
precedence.
## Test plan
Added CLI and unit tests.
This essentially makes it impossible to construct a `Diagnostic`
that has a `TextRange` but no `File`.
This is meant to be a precursor to multi-span support.
(Note that I consider this more of a prototyping-change and not
necessarily what this is going to look like longer term.)
Reviewers can probably review this PR as one big diff instead of
commit-by-commit.
## Summary
This PR adds support for user-level configurations
(`~/.config/knot/knot.toml`) to Red Knot.
Red Knot will watch the user-level configuration file for changes but
only if it exists
when the process start. It doesn't watch for new configurations,
mainly to simplify things for now (it would require watching the entire
`.config` directory because the `knot` subfolder might not exist
either).
The new `ConfigurationFile` struct seems a bit overkill for now but I
plan to use it for
hierarchical configurations as well.
Red Knot uses the same strategy as uv and Ruff by using the etcetera
crate.
## Test Plan
Added CLI and file watching test
## Summary
This PR adds a new `user_configuration_directory` method to `System`. We
need it to resolve where to lookup a user-level `knot.toml`
configuration file.
The method belongs to `System` because not all platforms have a
convention of where to store such configuration files (e.g. wasm).
I refactored `TestSystem` to be a simple wrapper around an `Arc<dyn
System...>` and use the `System.as_any` method instead to cast it down
to an `InMemory` system. I also removed some `System` specific methods
from `InMemoryFileSystem`, they don't belong there.
This PR removes the `os` feature as a default feature from `ruff_db`.
Most crates depending on `ruff_db` don't need it because they only
depend on `System` or only depend on `os` for testing. This was
necessary to fix a compile error with `red_knot_wasm`
## Test Plan
I'll make use of the method in my next PR. So I guess we won't know if
it works before then but I copied the code from Ruff/uv, so I have high
confidence that it is correct.
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR generalize the idea that we may want to emit diagnostics for
invalid or incompatible configuration values similar to how we already
do it for `rules`.
This PR introduces a new `Settings` struct that is similar to `Options`
but, unlike
`Options`, are fields have their default values filled in and they use a
representation optimized for reads.
The diagnostics created during loading the `Settings` are stored on the
`Project` so that we can emit them when calling `check`.
The motivation for this work is that it simplifies adding new settings.
That's also why I went ahead and added the `terminal.error-on-warning`
setting to demonstrate how new settings are added.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, new CLI test.
## Summary
Adds a JSON schema generation step for Red Knot. This PR doesn't yet add
a publishing step because it's still a bit early for that
## Test plan
I tested the schema in Zed, VS Code and PyCharm:
* PyCharm: You have to manually add a schema mapping (settings JSON
Schema Mappings)
* Zed and VS code support the inline schema specification
```toml
#:schema /Users/micha/astral/ruff/knot.schema.json
[environment]
extra-paths = []
[rules]
call-possibly-unbound-method = "error"
unknown-rule = "error"
# duplicate-base = "error"
```
```json
{
"$schema": "file:///Users/micha/astral/ruff/knot.schema.json",
"environment": {
"python-version": "3.13",
"python-platform": "linux2"
},
"rules": {
"unknown-rule": "error"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a18fcd96-7cbe-4110-985b-9f1935584411
The Schema overall works but all editors have their own quirks:
* PyCharm: Hovering a name always shows the section description instead
of the description of the specific setting. But it's the same for other
settings in `pyproject.toml` files 🤷
* VS Code (JSON): Using the generated schema in a JSON file gives
exactly the experience I want
* VS Code (TOML):
* Properties with multiple possible values are repeated during
auto-completion without giving any hint how they're different. 
* The property description mushes together the description of the
property and the value, which looks sort of ridiculous. 
* Autocompletion and documentation hovering works (except the
limitations mentioned above)
* Zed:
* Very similar to VS Code with the exception that it uses the
description attribute to distinguish settings with multiple possible
values 
I don't think there's much we can do here other than hope (or help)
editors improve their auto completion. The same short comings also apply
to ruff, so this isn't something new. For now, I think this is good
enough
This example from @sharkdp shows how terminal statements can appear in
statically known branches:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15676#issuecomment-2618809716
```py
def _(cond: bool):
x = "a"
if cond:
x = "b"
if True:
return
reveal_type(x) # revealed: "a", "b"; should be "a"
```
We now use visibility constraints to track reachability, which allows us
to model this correctly. There are two related changes as a result:
- New bindings are not assumed to be visible; they inherit the current
"scope start" visibility, which effectively means that new bindings are
visible if/when the current flow is reachable
- When simplifying visibility constraints after branching control flow,
we only simplify if none of the intervening branches included a terminal
statement. That is, earlier unaffected bindings are only _actually_
unaffected if all branches make it to the merge point.
## Summary
- Add feature to specify a custom typeshed from within Markdown-based
tests
- Port "builtins" unit tests from `infer.rs` to Markdown tests, part of
#13696
## Test Plan
- Tests for the custom typeshed feature
- New Markdown tests for deleted Rust unit tests
## Summary
The `Options` struct is intended to capture the user's configuration
options but
`EnvironmentOptions::venv_path` supports both a `SitePackages::Known`
and `SitePackages::Derived`.
Users should only be able to provide `SitePackages::Derived`—they
specify a path to a venv, and Red Knot derives the path to the
site-packages directory. We'll only use the `Known` variant once we
automatically discover the Python installation.
That's why this PR changes `EnvironmentOptions::venv_path` from
`Option<SitePackages>` to `Option<SystemPathBuf>`.
This requires making some changes to the file watcher test, and I
decided to use `extra_paths` over venv path
because our venv validation is annoyingly correct -- making mocking a
venv rather involved.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
