ruff/crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/directives
David Peter 2a00eca66b
[ty] Exhaustiveness checking & reachability for match statements (#19508)
## Summary

Implements proper reachability analysis and — in effect — exhaustiveness
checking for `match` statements. This allows us to check the following
code without any errors (leads to *"can implicitly return `None`"* on
`main`):

```py
from enum import Enum, auto

class Color(Enum):
    RED = auto()
    GREEN = auto()
    BLUE = auto()

def hex(color: Color) -> str:
    match color:
        case Color.RED:
            return "#ff0000"
        case Color.GREEN:
            return "#00ff00"
        case Color.BLUE:
            return "#0000ff"
```

Note that code like this already worked fine if there was a
`assert_never(color)` statement in a catch-all case, because we would
then consider that `assert_never` call terminal. But now this also works
without the wildcard case. Adding a member to the enum would still lead
to an error here, if that case would not be handled in `hex`.

What needed to happen to support this is a new way of evaluating match
pattern constraints. Previously, we would simply compare the type of the
subject expression against the patterns. For the last case here, the
subject type would still be `Color` and the value type would be
`Literal[Color.BLUE]`, so we would infer an ambiguous truthiness.

Now, before we compare the subject type against the pattern, we first
generate a union type that corresponds to the set of all values that
would have *definitely been matched* by previous patterns. Then, we
build a "narrowed" subject type by computing `subject_type &
~already_matched_type`, and compare *that* against the pattern type. For
the example here, `already_matched_type = Literal[Color.RED] |
Literal[Color.GREEN]`, and so we have a narrowed subject type of `Color
& ~(Literal[Color.RED] | Literal[Color.GREEN]) = Literal[Color.BLUE]`,
which allows us to infer a reachability of `AlwaysTrue`.

<details>

<summary>A note on negated reachability constraints</summary>

It might seem that we now perform duplicate work, because we also record
*negated* reachability constraints. But that is still important for
cases like the following (and possibly also for more realistic
scenarios):

```py
from typing import Literal

def _(x: int | str):
    match x:
        case None:
            pass # never reachable
        case _:
            y = 1

    y
```

</details>

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/99

## Test Plan

* I verified that this solves all examples from the linked ticket (the
first example needs a PEP 695 type alias, because we don't support
legacy type aliases yet)
* Verified that the ecosystem changes are all because of removed false
positives
* Updated tests
2025-07-23 22:45:45 +02:00
..
assert_never.md [ty] Exhaustiveness checking & reachability for match statements (#19508) 2025-07-23 22:45:45 +02:00
assert_type.md [ty] Improve diagnostics for assert_type and assert_never (#18050) 2025-05-13 13:00:20 +00:00
cast.md [ty] highlight the argument in static_assert error messages (#19426) 2025-07-23 08:24:12 -07:00