mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-10-27 10:26:20 +00:00
75e01420fa
## Summary When `relative-imports-order = "closest-to-furthest"` is set, we should _still_ put non-relative imports after relative imports. It's rare for them to be in the same section, but _possible_ if you use `known-local-folder`. Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10655. ## Test Plan New tests. Also sorted this file: ```python from ..models import ABC from .models import Question from .utils import create_question from django_polls.apps.polls.models import Choice ``` With both: - `isort view.py` - `ruff check view.py --select I --fix` And the following `pyproject.toml`: ```toml [tool.ruff.lint.isort] order-by-type = false relative-imports-order = "closest-to-furthest" known-local-folder = ["django_polls"] [tool.isort] profile = "black" reverse_relative = true known_local_folder = ["django_polls"] ``` I verified that Ruff and isort gave the same result, and that they _still_ gave the same result when removing the relevant setting: ```toml [tool.ruff.lint.isort] order-by-type = false known-local-folder = ["django_polls"] [tool.isort] profile = "black" known_local_folder = ["django_polls"] ``` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ruff | ||
| ruff_benchmark | ||
| ruff_cache | ||
| ruff_dev | ||
| ruff_diagnostics | ||
| ruff_formatter | ||
| ruff_index | ||
| ruff_linter | ||
| ruff_macros | ||
| ruff_notebook | ||
| ruff_python_ast | ||
| ruff_python_codegen | ||
| ruff_python_formatter | ||
| ruff_python_index | ||
| ruff_python_literal | ||
| ruff_python_parser | ||
| ruff_python_resolver | ||
| ruff_python_semantic | ||
| ruff_python_stdlib | ||
| ruff_python_trivia | ||
| ruff_server | ||
| ruff_shrinking | ||
| ruff_source_file | ||
| ruff_text_size | ||
| ruff_wasm | ||
| ruff_workspace | ||