mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-08-04 10:48:32 +00:00
9910ec700c
## Summary
With this PR we now detect that x is always defined in `use`:
```py
if flag and (x := number):
use(x)
```
When outside if, it's still detected as possibly not defined
```py
flag and (x := number)
# error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
use(x)
```
In order to achieve that, I had to find a way to get access to the
flow-snapshots of the boolean expression when analyzing the flow of the
if statement. I did it by special casing the visitor of boolean
expression to return flow control information, exporting two snapshots -
`maybe_short_circuit` and `no_short_circuit`. When indexing
boolean expression itself we must assume all possible flows, but when
it's inside if statement, we can be smarter than that.
## Test Plan
Fixed existing and added new mdtests.
I went through some of mypy primer results and they look fine
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ruff | ||
| ruff_annotate_snippets | ||
| ruff_benchmark | ||
| ruff_cache | ||
| ruff_db | ||
| ruff_dev | ||
| ruff_diagnostics | ||
| ruff_formatter | ||
| ruff_graph | ||
| ruff_index | ||
| ruff_linter | ||
| ruff_macros | ||
| ruff_notebook | ||
| ruff_options_metadata | ||
| ruff_python_ast | ||
| ruff_python_ast_integration_tests | ||
| ruff_python_codegen | ||
| ruff_python_formatter | ||
| ruff_python_index | ||
| ruff_python_literal | ||
| ruff_python_parser | ||
| ruff_python_resolver | ||
| ruff_python_semantic | ||
| ruff_python_stdlib | ||
| ruff_python_trivia | ||
| ruff_python_trivia_integration_tests | ||
| ruff_server | ||
| ruff_source_file | ||
| ruff_text_size | ||
| ruff_wasm | ||
| ruff_workspace | ||
| ty | ||
| ty_ide | ||
| ty_project | ||
| ty_python_semantic | ||
| ty_server | ||
| ty_test | ||
| ty_vendored | ||
| ty_wasm | ||