mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-08-09 21:28:04 +00:00
d78d10dd94
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following: - Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.) - Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix with `[ty]` for ty pull requests.) - Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues? --> ## Summary <!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? --> Part of #18972 This PR makes [indentation-with-invalid-multiple-comment (E114)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/indentation-with-invalid-multiple-comment/#indentation-with-invalid-multiple-comment-e114)'s example not raise a syntax error by adding a 4 space indented `...`. The example still gave `E114` without this, but adding the `...` both makes the change in indentation of the comment clearer, and makes it not give a `SyntaxError`. ## Test Plan <!-- How was it tested? --> N/A, no functionality/tests affected |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ruff | ||
| ruff_annotate_snippets | ||
| ruff_benchmark | ||
| ruff_cache | ||
| ruff_db | ||
| ruff_dev | ||
| ruff_diagnostics | ||
| ruff_formatter | ||
| ruff_graph | ||
| ruff_index | ||
| ruff_linter | ||
| ruff_macros | ||
| ruff_notebook | ||
| ruff_options_metadata | ||
| ruff_python_ast | ||
| ruff_python_ast_integration_tests | ||
| ruff_python_codegen | ||
| ruff_python_formatter | ||
| ruff_python_index | ||
| ruff_python_literal | ||
| ruff_python_parser | ||
| ruff_python_semantic | ||
| ruff_python_stdlib | ||
| ruff_python_trivia | ||
| ruff_python_trivia_integration_tests | ||
| ruff_server | ||
| ruff_source_file | ||
| ruff_text_size | ||
| ruff_wasm | ||
| ruff_workspace | ||
| ty | ||
| ty_ide | ||
| ty_project | ||
| ty_python_semantic | ||
| ty_server | ||
| ty_test | ||
| ty_vendored | ||
| ty_wasm | ||