Brent Westbrook e9b0c33703 Move RDJSON rendering to ruff_db (#19293) ... ## Summary Another output format like #19133. This is the [reviewdog](https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog) output format, which is somewhat similar to regular JSON. Like #19270, in the first commit I converted from using `json!` to `Serialize` structs, then in the second commit I moved the module to `ruff_db`. The reviewdog [schema](320a8e73a9/proto/rdf/jsonschema/DiagnosticResult.json) seems a bit more flexible than our JSON schema, so I'm not sure if we need any preview checks here. I'll flag the places I wasn't sure about as review comments. ## Test Plan New tests in `rdjson.rs`, ported from the old `rjdson.rs` module, as well as the new CLI output tests. --------- Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>		2025-07-15 12:39:21 +00:00
..
resources/test/fixtures	Rename ruff_cli crate to ruff (#9557)	2024-01-16 17:47:01 -05:00
src	Move RDJSON rendering to ruff_db (#19293)	2025-07-15 12:39:21 +00:00
tests	Move RDJSON rendering to ruff_db (#19293)	2025-07-15 12:39:21 +00:00
build.rs	Use #[expect(lint)] over #[allow(lint)] where possible (#17822)	2025-05-03 21:20:31 +02:00
Cargo.toml	Bump 0.12.3 (#19279)	2025-07-11 09:07:50 -04:00