David Peter fa7626160b [red-knot] handle unions on the LHS of is_subtype_of (#13857) ... ## Summary Just a drive-by change that occurred to me while I was looking at `Type::is_subtype_of`: the existing pattern for unions on the *right hand side*: ```rs (ty, Type::Union(union)) => union .elements(db) .iter() .any(|&elem_ty| ty.is_subtype_of(db, elem_ty)), ``` is not (generally) correct if the *left hand side* is a union. ## Test Plan Added new test cases for `is_subtype_of` and `!is_subtype_of`		2024-10-21 20:12:03 +02:00
..
resources	[red-knot] Implement more types in binary and unary expressions (#13803)	2024-10-20 01:57:21 +00:00
src	[red-knot] handle unions on the LHS of is_subtype_of (#13857)	2024-10-21 20:12:03 +02:00
tests	[red-knot] Cleanup generated names of mdtest tests (#13831)	2024-10-20 15:11:53 +00:00
build.rs	Modernize build scripts (#13837)	2024-10-20 22:35:35 +01:00
Cargo.toml	[red-knot] Cleanup generated names of mdtest tests (#13831)	2024-10-20 15:11:53 +00:00