Address a few pedantic lints
lints are separated into separate commits so they can be reviewed
individually.
I've not added enforcement for any of these lints, but that could be
added if desirable.
Fixes handling of GitHub PATs in HTTPS URLs, which were otherwise
dropped. We now supporting the following authentication schemes:
```
git+https://<user>:<token>/...
git+https://<token>/...
```
On Windows, the username is required. We can consider adding a
special-case for this in the future, but this just matches libgit2's
behavior.
I tested with fine-grained tokens, OAuth tokens, and "classic" tokens.
There's test coverage for fine-grained tokens in CI where we use a real
private repository and PAT. Yes, the PAT is committed to make this test
usable by anyone. It has read-only permissions to the single repository,
expires Feb 1 2025, and is in an isolated organization and GitHub
account.
Does not yet address SSH authentication.
Related:
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1514
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1452
## Summary
It turns out that storing an absolute URL for every file caused a
significant performance regression. This PR attempts to address the
regression with two changes.
The first is that we now store the raw string if the URL is an absolute
URL. If the URL is relative, we store the base URL alongside the raw
relative string. As such, we avoid serializing and deserializing URLs
until we need them (later on), except for the base URL.
The second is that we now use the internal `Url` crate methods for
serializing and deserializing. If you look inside `Url`, its standard
serializer and deserialization actually convert it to a string, then
parse the string. But the crate exposes some other methods for faster
serialization and deserialization (with fewer guarantees). I think this
is totally fine since the cache is entirely internal.
If we _just_ change the `Url` serialization (and no other code -- so
continue to store URLs for every file), then the regression goes down to
about 5%:
```shell
❯ python -m scripts.bench \
--puffin-path ./target/release/main \
--puffin-path ./target/release/relative --puffin-path ./target/release/puffin \
scripts/requirements/home-assistant.in --benchmark resolve-warm
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/main (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 496.3 ms ± 4.3 ms [User: 452.4 ms, System: 175.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 487.3 ms … 502.4 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/relative (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 284.8 ms ± 2.1 ms [User: 245.8 ms, System: 165.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 280.3 ms … 288.0 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 3: ./target/release/puffin (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 300.4 ms ± 3.2 ms [User: 255.5 ms, System: 178.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 295.4 ms … 305.1 ms 10 runs
Summary
'./target/release/relative (resolve-warm)' ran
1.05 ± 0.01 times faster than './target/release/puffin (resolve-warm)'
1.74 ± 0.02 times faster than './target/release/main (resolve-warm)'
```
So I considered _just_ making that change. But 5% is kind of
borderline...
With both of these changes, the regression is down to 1-2%:
```
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/relative (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 282.6 ms ± 7.4 ms [User: 244.6 ms, System: 181.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 275.1 ms … 318.5 ms 30 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/puffin (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 286.8 ms ± 2.2 ms [User: 247.0 ms, System: 169.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 282.3 ms … 290.7 ms 30 runs
Summary
'./target/release/relative (resolve-warm)' ran
1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than './target/release/puffin (resolve-warm)'
```
It's consistently ~2%-ish, but at this point it's unclear if that's due
to the URL change or something other change between now and then.
Closes#943.
This crate started off as generic caching utilities, but we started
adding a lot of Puffin-specific stuff (like the cache buckets
abstraction that knows about Git vs. direct URL vs. indexes and so on).
This PR moves the generic stuff into a new `cache-key` crate.
