<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Just to add the section for installing and upgrading uv tool, specifying
the Python version, in the document.
Originally, it was planned to add a markdown block (header) for
representation, but it was felt to be a bit redundant, so it ended up
being like this.
close https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11536
## Test Plan
Run doc server with strict mode in local. (``mkdocs serve -f
mkdocs.public.yml --strict``)
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: FishAlchemist <48265002+FishAlchemist@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
When tests are run downstream, the `COLUMNS` environment variable is
used to force fixed output width and avoid test failures due to
different terminal widths. However, this occasionally causes test
regressions when other tests rely on different output width. Use the
same `COLUMNS` value in CI to ensure consistent output and catch any
regressions.
## Test Plan
It wasn't, it's supposed to be tested by the CI :-).
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Resolves#6913.
Add `tool.uv.build-constraint-dependencies` to pyproject.toml.
The changes are analogous to the constraint-dependencies feature
implemented in #5248.
Add documentation for `build-constraint-dependencies`
## Test Plan
Add tests for `uv lock`, `uv add`, `uv pip install` and `uv pip
compile`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/10017, which might
be viable now that we _don't_ enforce any platforms by default.
The basic idea here is that users can mark certain platforms as required
(empty, by default). When resolving, we ensure that the specified
platforms have wheel coverage, backtracking if not.
For example, to require that we include a version of PyTorch that
supports Intel macOS:
```toml
[project]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = ">=3.11"
dependencies = ["torch>1.13"]
[tool.uv]
required-platforms = [
"sys_platform == 'darwin' and platform_machine == 'x86_64'"
]
```
Other than that, the forking is identical to past iterations of this PR.
This would give users a way to resolve the tail of issues in #9711, but
with manual opt-in to supporting specific platforms.
Initially it seemed like `app.py` might be slightly more desirable but
people seem to overwhelmingly favour `main.py` as a good "generic" name.
Fixes#7782
Closes#11285
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/11437
This changes `-p` from an alias of `--python-version` to `--python`
while retaining backwards compatibility for `--python-version`-like
fallback behavior when the requested version, e.g., `-p 3.12`, cannot be
found.
This was initially implemented with a hidden `--python-legacy` flag
which allows us to special case the short `-p` flag — unlike the
implementation in #11437. However, after further discussion, we decided
the behavior difference between `-p` and `--python` would be confusing
so now `-p` is an alias for `--python` and `--python` is special-cased
when a version is used.
Additionally, we now respect the `UV_PYTHON` environment variable, but
it is ignored when `--python-version` is set. If you want different
`--python-version` and `--python` values, you must do so explicitly. I
considered banning this, but it is valid for e.g. `--python pypy
--python-version 3.12`
Unlike https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/10222, this does not respect
`UV_PYTHON` in `uv python uninstall` (continuing to require an explicit
target there) which I think is simpler and matches our `.python-version`
file behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Choudhry Abdullah <cabdulla@trinity.edu>
Co-authored-by: Choudhry Abdullah <choudhry347@choudhrys-air-2.trinity.local>
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
## Summary
The environment is located at a stable path within the cache, based on
the script's absolute path.
If a lockfile exists for the script, then we use our standard lockfile
semantics (i.e., update the lockfile if necessary, etc.); if not, we
just do a `uv pip sync` (roughly).
Example usage:
```
❯ uv init --script hello.py
Initialized script at `hello.py`
❯ uv add --script hello.py requests
Updated `hello.py`
❯ cargo run sync --script hello.py
Using script environment at: /Users/crmarsh/.cache/uv/environments-v1/hello-84e289fe3f6241a0
Resolved 5 packages in 3ms
Installed 5 packages in 12ms
+ certifi==2025.1.31
+ charset-normalizer==3.4.1
+ idna==3.10
+ requests==2.32.3
+ urllib3==2.3.0
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6637.
## Summary
The [current scripts docs
page](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/scripts/) doesn't include detail
on how to use a custom package index when setting up a script. I believe
this might be because it didn't use to work (see #6688 ) but it now does
(thanks for that, by the way! 😄)
Given it's a useful feature, I suggest adding a quick example to the
scripts page, with the details of authentication, etc. left to the main
`indexes.md` doc.
I'd also suggests that this closes#6688, though it doesn't actually add
that feature - that appears to have already been done :)
## Test Plan
No testing is needed, I think!
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Use `UV_INDEX` instead of the deprecated `UV_EXTRA_INDEX_URL`.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
It is a minor documentation change.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This adds `NO_BINARY` and `NO_BINARY_PACKAGE` environment variables to
the uv CLI, allowing the user to specify packages to build from source
using environment variables. Its not a complete fix for #4291 as it does
not handle the `pip` subcommand.
## Test Plan
This was tested by running `uv sync` with various `UV_NO_BINARY` and
`UV_NO_BINARY_PACKAGE` environment variables set and checking that the
correct set of packages were compiled rather than taken from pre-built
wheels.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I've just fixed some broken anchors after browing ux doc site.
## Test Plan
- `index.md`: based on `mkdocs serve` log
- `readme.md`: manual check
## Aside
Do you manually keep `readme.md` and `index.md` partially sync? I've
tried
checking pre-commit and other scripts but found no way to port my edits
from one
to the other.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
I followed the docs to install flash-attn with uv and got the following
issue
```uv sync
Resolved 27 packages in 12ms
× Failed to build `flash-attn==2.7.4.post1`
├─▶ The build backend returned an error
╰─▶ Call to `setuptools.build_meta:__legacy__.build_wheel` failed (exit status: 1)
[stderr]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 8, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
hint: This usually indicates a problem with the package or the build environment.
```
installing setuptools before running uv sync as done with torch helps
fix it.
## Test Plan
I tested locally before it failed to install, after it worked
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
- PowerShell isn't Windows-only
- Bash/Elvish isn't UNIX-only
- PowerShell profile won't necessarily exist
- Extracted the `echo $SHELL` tip to a tip tooltip
The new PowerShell lines are taken directly from
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.core/about/about_profiles?view=powershell-7.5#how-to-create-a-profile
Note that the "Standalone installer" commands are unaffected. Running
the Linux one through PowerShell worked just fine.
## Test Plan
Look at the page generated from this PR
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I think `UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` is too complicated for use-cases where
the user wants to sync to the active environment. I don't see a
compelling reason not to make opt-in easier. I see a lot of questions
about how to deal with this warning in the issue tracker, but it seems
painful to collect them here for posterity.
A notable behavior here — we'll treat this as equivalent to
`UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` so... if you point us to a valid virtual
environment that needs to be recreated for some reason (e.g., new Python
version request), we'll happily delete it and start over.
Since the resolver internals docs were written, we added a lot more
features to the resolver, which should be documented.
As usual, these docs are not targeted at regular users, but should give
interested readers an insight into the internals of uv and help advanced
users with especially hard resolver problems.
## Summary
It turns out activating the kernel does not change `VIRTUAL_ENV`, so we
still install into the environment the Jupyter environment, rather than
the project environment.
Unfortunately, after this change, we do still show a warning on `uv
add`:
```
warning: `VIRTUAL_ENV=/Users/crmarsh/.cache/uv/archive-v0/3bddKDdYXuX2w57Fu6itL` does not match the project environment path `.venv` and will be ignored
```
`uv pip install` works without warning.
Closes#11154.
We regularly get questions why `uv build` is missing certain files or
using the wrong build tag, when that's done by the build backend and
part of the build backend's docs. I tried to clarify this difference and
to redirect users to look at the tool's docs instead of wondering why
uv's docs don't explain that.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ed Morley <501702+edmorley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
